Democracy Arsenal

« Pruning the Pentagon | Main | Will Pressuring Iran Backfire? »

January 06, 2012

This Wacky Iraq Withdrawal Debate
Posted by David Shorr

Someone please explain to me like I'm a four-year-old this idea that President Obama "owns" the situtation in Iraq. As I work on catching up with some of the Iraq pull-out commentary from over the holidays, I won't try to match the depth of Steve Clemons' counterpoint to Fred and Kimberly Kagan's recent Weekly Standard piece. Instead, I'll direct some of the views I share with Steve toward engaging Peter Feaver over at Shadow Government and ploughing the ground Feaver stakes out: setting fair terms to judge the president's Iraq policy. His questoin is "Can Obama take credit for ending the Iraq War without taking blame for what happens next?" To which my answer is: "why the hell not?" 

Feaver cries foul on the attempt he sees by Obama supporters to give him full credit for anything positive in Iraq and saddle President Bush with everything negative. Well, what is the Obama Administration claiming to have done? President Obama claims credit for extricating American forces from nearly nine years of military involvement there.  By the way, can I pause for a moment to say how absurd it is to talk about a hasty exit after nine years?!?

But returning to Feaver's argument, he'd have a stronger point about taking responsibility for the bad along with the good if Obama was claiming credit having locked in a stable future for Iraq. Except that's not the claim. Like President Bush before him, the president has tried to use the US military presence to the best stabilizing effect for Iraqis and express gratitude and pride in the efforts of the those who served that mission. But how did all of this come about, and by what notion of fairness and responsibility do we treat the original act of invasion as water under the bridge?

As Feaver points out, there is also the issue of the administration's negotiations to keep a residual force in Iraq past 2011:

Besides, it is Bush's fault, the bitter-ender Obamaphiles say, because he saddled Obama with the 2008 framework agreement that  set the 2012 troop exit deadline.  Of course, to cling to this view requires ignoring that both sides, U.S. and Iraqi, viewed the 2008 agreement as an interim step, one that would be renegotiated after the Iraqi elections to allow for a longer-term U.S. presence.  More problematically, it requires ignoring the lengthy but ultimately failed negotiations by Obama-appointed representatives to accomplish just such an extension.

But surely he can see the problems this poses for the conservative side of the argument--even the glaring contradiction right within that passage. I can count three ways in which this debate-within-a-debate only reinforces Obama's rightful credit for the Iraq withdrawal. First, if the 2008 SOFA agreement was merely a temporary placeholder that masked an actual plan to remain, then that only heightens the contrast with the administration's pull-out. Second, the loud cries from critics reinforce the idea that conservatives favor preserving more of a presence. (And oh by the way, the sabre-rattling over Iran perpetuates the image Republican appetite for military conflict and overextension.) More problematically, Feaver's argument requires ignoring the issue over which the SOFA re-negotiations faltered: immunity form prosecution for US personnel. After all the debate over the ICC, I can't imagine this would've been something conservatives could abide.

The divide in this debate is not over who's concerned about the situation in Iraq, or who feels an American sense of responsibility. Most of us do. This is a debate about the need to set limits and make choices about the right investments and engagements of American power -- and not imagine that those choices make themselves. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20162ff206f42970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference This Wacky Iraq Withdrawal Debate:

Comments

mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I'm more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful.

I found that to be more helpful.


Have you ever felt that Microsoft Office a game needed or lacked a certain element to it?

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

Though the Bills gave New England Andy Dalton Authentic Jerseys all it could handle and more back in September, don't expect a Cam Newton Authentic Jerseys duplication of that outcome this week. A rash of injuries have rendered Buffalo a shell of its early-season self, and the Patriots don't lose at home against non-contenders in situations that mean Shannon Sharpe Authentic Jerseys something. And with a chance to stay in their Champ Bailey Authentic Jerseys own backyard throughout the playoffs, this game does carry Matt Ryan Authentic Jerseys a great deal of importance for the Patriots. Buffalo's defense will be hard pressed to prevent Roddy White Authentic Jerseys Brady and his cast of weapons from doing considerable damage, and it's hard to imagine the Bills' erratic offense matching New England on the Tim Tebow Authentic Jerseys scoreboard. Since there's the threat of Belichick pulling some regulars in the event the Pats build a comfortable lead, Buffalo Brian Dawkins Authentic Jerseys may have the opportunity to make the outcome respectable. But a team that's managed just one win since October going on the road Michael Turner Authentic Jerseys against one of the league's elite and coming away with a victory just doesn't seem very plausible.

Stop war in the Iraq!

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

There is also a long way and then end the night there and then the black end.

Welcome to our Belstaff Leather Online Store Belstaff Outlets Store provides Belstaff leather and Belstaff Bags at low price,buy 2012 Belstaff Sale more 65%-75% off,enjoy shopping now!

In some workshops with much dust, filter for purification dust can not only effectively intercept dust particles, but also not to resist the air flow. But when the more dust on the filtration material, the greater resistance. When resistance to the extent of the unreasonable, the filter scraps.
Diesel Filters for diesel generator sets have very good filtration role. At present, domestic diesel engine mostly use the paper diesel oil filter because of its simple structure, small volume, small weight, filtration and good effect of low cost. May be we can click in this china filters supplier. http://www.waxfilter.com/

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use