Democracy Arsenal

« This Wacky Iraq Withdrawal Debate | Main | The GOP's Iran Obsession »

January 08, 2012

Will Pressuring Iran Backfire?
Posted by David Shorr

Natanz-googThese days we're hearing two sets of concerns about the US and international pressure on Iran over its nuclear program. From one direction, GOP presidential candidates and other ultra-hawks argue for an escalated conflict with Iran. According to them, President Obama isn't doing enough or is actually coddling Tehran. Not that the candidates really know much about the Administration's Iran policy, but that's par for the course and part and parcel of an increasingly bizarro Republican foreign policy aproach.

For some of Obama's critics, their faith in military action gives them utter confidence that attacking Iran would squelch its nuclear ambitions without the kind of backlash we might regret. (Hmm, where have we heard that before?)

Yet another set of commentators, who are less sanguine about a war with Iran, warn that tightening the screws of economic sanctions -- currently being prepared -- already puts things on a dangerous course. Prominent voices in this camp are Trita Parsi and Suzanne Maloney, two of the foreign policy community's top experts on the region and certainly warranting close attention. Indeed, the questions they raise are central: has the Obama administration put higher priority on the sanctions than on the nuclear program itself, and in the process complicated (if not doomed) the effort to reach a peaceful solution? Here's now Trita captures the core policy dilemma:

The challenge with multilateral sanctions, however, is that the diplomatic resources required to create concensus around sanctions are so great that once the sanctions threat gains momentum, the commitment of the sanctioning countries to this path tends to become irreversible.

He's also correct that the moment just prior to sanctions is a time of heightened leverage -- also a moment of opportunity, when the target of this international pressure might offer key concessions. And yes, when you hear people downplay eleventh-hour concessions as merely ploys to alleviate pressure, this misses the entire point that the aim of pressure is ... to extract concessions. 

Here's where I have to offer a counterpoint, though. In short, not all concessions are created equal. When you're doing this statecraft right, the leverage of impending sanctions produces measures that really move the parties toward a solution. But just because it's foolish to choose sanctions over meaningful concessions, doesn't mean it's wise to suspend sanctions in exchange for whatever the targeted government offers. With all the effort that goes into building support for sanctions, they should only be traded in a fair bargain.

That goes doubly when you're bargaining over a deal that had been agreed earlier on. In Trita's piece, he recounts the story of October 2009 - June 2010, the months after Iran agreed and then reneged on a plan to transfer most of their enriched uranium out of the country. As UN Security Council countries were preparing for a new sanctions vote, the leaders of Turkey and Brazil undertook a dramatic initiative to mediate and obtained a last-minute agreement that resurrected the uranium transfer. The Obama administration was not impressed, and immediately called the vote in the Council, which passed.

As Trita sees it, the administration refused to take 'yes' for an answer. But I can argue that the Iranians were trying to sell us the same horse twice. For one thing, the agreement with Brazil and Turkey didn't sufficiently account for the uranium that had been enriched in the intervening months. Contrary to Parsi's analysis, I believe the administration would have welcomed a reasonable compromise. (I look forward to reading Trita's more detailed account in his new book, A Single Roll of the Dice, which focuses on President Obama's Iran diplomacy and will be out this month.)

Suzanne Maloney similarly argues that Obama's sanctions diplomacy is undercutting its intended aim:

[T]he United States cannot hope to bargain with a country whose economy it is trying to disrupt and destroy. As severe sanctions devastate Iran's economy, Tehran will surely be encouraged to double down on its quest for the ultimate deterrent. So, the White House's embrace of open-ended pressure means that it has backed itself into a policy of regime change, something Washington has little ability to influence.

Not only is it far beyond America's control to relpace Iran's government, it is also at odds with the objective of preventing it from developing a nuclear weapon. The only way Iranian leaders would cooperate in proving Iran's non-weapon status is if that would make them less, rather than more, vulnerable. After the overblown "axis of evil" rhetoric of President Bush, it's actually been crucial for President Obama to highlight that nuclear weapons are the real issue, and not the Iranian leadership themselves.

Still, is severe international economic pressure tantamount to a regime-change policy? I don't see the two as equivalent. For me, the main point is that by resisting nuclear transparency, Iran is losing sympathy and becoming isolated. Suzanne emphasizes Iran's long record of enduring hardship and pressure, but standing completely alone in the world community is easier said than done.

A policy of "open-ended pressure" would indeed be counterproductive. It is just as important for the Obama Administration to highlight that Tehran can get out of the penalty box, as it is to build a strong international coalition to keep up the pressure. Unlike Maloney, I still think the policy can keep these two in proper balance. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20162ff34a125970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Will Pressuring Iran Backfire?:

Comments

http://www.shunkycrusher.com
http://www.jawcrusher.hk
http://www.sandmaker.biz
http://www.c-crusher.net
http://www.jaw-breaker.org

Buffalo's running game. The Bills need to keep New England's A.J. Green Authentic Jerseys high-powered offense off the field as much as possible Von Miller Authentic Jerseys by controlling the clock, and the best way of doing so would be by Spiller maintaining his strong recent form. It's also a proven formula for success, as Buffalo is 5-1 this season when rushing for 138 Kyle Orton Authentic Jerseys yards or more.

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

There is also a long way and then end the night there and then the black end.

For this matter, once I discussed with one of my friends, not only about the content you talked about, but also to how to improve and develop, but no results. So I am deeply moved by what you said today.


This articles helps me more.Thanks for your sharing,I will pay more attentions to your blog. Looking forward to your better and better articles.See you next time.

Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!

Your article is nice.Thanks for your sharing,it helps me more.I will look forward to your more wonderful articles.Have a good time.

Your school may have done away with winners and losers, but life has not. In some schools they have abolished failing grades; they'll give you as many times as you want to get the right answer. This doesn't bear the slightest resemblance to anything in real life.

Welcome to our Belstaff Leather Online Store Belstaff Outlets Store provides Belstaff leather and Belstaff Bags at low price,buy 2012 Belstaff Sale more 65%-75% off,enjoy shopping now!

You have a great weblog and I like your style of writing about this stuff. Keep up the good work!

All of us at GEW Global are so proud of all the organizers behind Startup Weekend. As several blog posts on this site have described, GEW 2011 was an excellent year for Startup Weekend’s around the world. Beyond all the great energy and startups coming out of this effort

I am totally agree with your oppinion.this blog post is very encouraging to people who want to know these topics.

と判断されるホーム最初の人、そして彼女はちょうど時間が経って催促に向けた最も重要なステップ、彼女は受け入れることができる方法のこの残酷な事実ではなかった。

good post! Thanks for sharing!!!

Thanks for your sharing,

Thanks you for your support, all the information is just what i need.

Thanks for your sharing.

But has the last word been said ? Is all hope to be lost ? Is the defeat final No !

I hope the Iran issue will cool down soon. "Backfire", I guess so for every action there's an equal reaction.

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

Hello, Thanks for this fine blog. I think it is really a great topic to write about on my blog. Also here is some nice information:

Hi! Thanks for the great information you have provided! You have touched on crucuial points! i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later.

There is a monster hit and Monster Headphones absolute avant-garde design, with the cable seems added durable, a lot of of the headphones. Headphones monster into play to accomplish the a lot of avant-garde audio technology to accommodate the a lot of authentic notes, humans who accept to a circuitous unparalleled experience. In addition,Monster Beats accomplished able complete technology to fight, even in blatant environments, can aswell be actual bright to every note, about like a able recording flat acknowledgment to the absolute aftertaste of the sound, "let music added exciting" cast philosophy.
Beats Dr Dre
Monster Earphones
Beats By Dre
Monster Beats Studio
wholesale monster headphones
Monster Beats Solo HD
Monster Limited Edition
Monster Artist
hdfgdfg123456

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.


It's the Year of the Dragon, considered the luckiest year in the Chinese zodiac, and it should be a great year for entrepreneurs and small business owners,
according to what's predicted to affect you and your small business in the coming year

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use