Democracy Arsenal

« When are Two Wars Not Two Wars? | Main | This Wacky Iraq Withdrawal Debate »

January 06, 2012

Pruning the Pentagon
Posted by Jacob Stokes

Military strategyI have a new piece in The American Prospect on Obama's military strategy. Here's an illustrative sample:

The document flows from this question, posed by President Obama in his speech: “What kind of military will we need after the long wars of the last decade are over?” The answer, according to Panetta, is a force that’s “smaller and leaner, but will be agile, flexible, ready, and technologically advanced.” That means reductions in the size of the Army and Marines, reportedly almost back down to pre-9/11 levels.

It also signals that the U.S. is in no hurry to engage in another extended occupation like the ones in Iraq and Afghanistan. In other words, this marks a move away from the counterinsurgency operations of the last decade. Instead, America will build a military poised to respond quickly to events around the world. The operation in Libya and even the raid that killed Osama bin Laden serve as models for this strategy. To be sure, we will retain the capability to project force for long-term operations if our vital interest are at stake, but such operations will be the exception, not the rule.

Read the whole thing here.

Also, read Heather on the BBC. Here's the portion on what the strategy says about nuclear weapons:

Stephen Young of the Union of Concerned Scientists describes the future of the nuclear weapons complex as "cautious but suggestive". The strategy review document maintains a nuclear arsenal but hints at reductions, saying "it is possible our deterrence goals can be achieved with a smaller nuclear force".

What might this mean in practice? In the near-term, disappointment for those on the US right who have advocated aggressive investment in new nuclear bombs and even a return to testing. In the longer-term, many Pentagon generals, especially those not in submarine, missile or nuclear bomber commands, are willing to consider shrinking the nuclear "triad". There is also a raft of influential players in the nuclear sphere who have been eager to retire the weapons.

Full piece here.

Photo: Flickr

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20162ff201c32970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pruning the Pentagon:

Comments

U.S. withdrawal from Iraq is a wise move, so make yourself from nine years of war freed. Back to Iraq, but also has a separate owner-occupied countries.

I like your article, writing dot, hey hey!

mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I'm more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful.

Thanks for sharing this realist, objective review of Lenovo IdeaPad Y530 laptop. I found the post very useful and the price is very interesting. I will come back to read some more.

Have you ever felt that Microsoft Office a game needed or lacked a certain element to it?

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.ser.com/ ''Escribe tu comentario"

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

There is also a long way and then end the night there and then the black end.

I tried to think so, but i found it was not as the same in the actual process. As you mentioned, I still have doubts, but really thank you for sharing!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use