Democracy Arsenal

« Pentagon Strategy Review – Why It Matters | Main | Pruning the Pentagon »

January 05, 2012

When are Two Wars Not Two Wars?
Posted by Heather Hurlburt

As we wait for the Pentagon strategy review announcement this morning, the first attempt to use it for political advantage has broken out over efforts to move officially away from the "two-war strategy" -- the idea that the US military must be prepared to fight and win two regional conflicts -- ie Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea -- at the same time.

It turns out that this is one of those bedrock doctrines that is much more bedrock for politicians than for military planners.  Flag officers will quietly tell you that it hasn't been true, or truly doctrine, for a long time -- and they're out saying publicly that it clearly failed in Iraq/Afghanistan in the last decade.

What do experts say?

Winslow Wheeler, who worked 31 years on defense in the Senate, including as the first and last staffer to work simultaneously for a GOP and Democrat:

If it were a strategy, it doesn't describe any strategy or capability
we've had for decades. The construct was for two "Major Regional Conflicts"
in the 1990s. These meant conflicts like Korea and Desert Storm, which in
turn meant force deployments of half a million or so. Neither Iraq
(2003-2011) nor Afghanistan quality as "major" in that regard; both were
much smaller AND they totally crapped out our forces as regards both
manpower and equipment. In other words, we were not able to even support
two minor conflicts, let alone major ones.

We had an inadequate force for two opponents that lacked an air force, an
air defense, a navy, or any coherent ground forces. People who declare
coming off the two MRC "strategy" as unraveling our defenses (eg. Dov Zakheim) are dilettantes.

Time's Mark Thompson calls the strategy "Mythical Routine Canards" and notes:

The only problem is that the two-war construct has been shot through with enough caveats and loopholes to render it worthless. Formally doing away with it, consequently, is just as vaporous.

Going back to World War II, when the nation had 12 million in uniform, the U.S. and its allies couldn’t beat the Japanese in the Pacific until they had defeated the Germans in Europe. Flash forward 60 years: the U.S. and its allies couldn’t prevail in Afghanistan – assuming they ever will – once President George W. Bush had decided to invade Iraq. “It is simply a matter of resources, of capacity,” Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Congress in late 2007. “In Afghanistan, we do what we can. In Iraq, we do what we must.” That, in a nutshell, is a definition of a nation lacking the ability to wage and win two wars at once. It not only lacked it during World War II, but it also was MIA less than five years ago.

Charles Knight of the Project on Defense Alternatives:

It is misleading to discuss the two war construct as if it were
strategic doctrine. The U.S. did not simultaneously undertake the
intense fighting phases of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Its
military problems in those conflicts are associated with subsequent
commitments to counterinsurgency and nation building. As with World
War II, the long-standing American practice is for sequential focused
action in different theaters. What has been called a strategy of
“win, hold, win” is simply being sensible and not being carried away
with a false sense of power that the U.S. can do everything,
everywhere at once.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference When are Two Wars Not Two Wars?:


These so-called robber when busy season picked up the hoe is a farmer, when slack season shoulder pole is a robber, these do not haveugg boots sale any armed robbers to raid homes and plunder houses, only dare to get some siugg boots clearancemple trap to rob some passing travelers, but never hurt.

I think that while the United States Government will not launch Obama on Iran and North Korea,inflatable Syria, the war. Because Obama to win the next U.S. presidential election world.


mean I just read through the entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I'm more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful.

I’d just like to say thank you for writing this straight forward tutorial. This is the first tutorial that I have came across that makes perfect sense and allowed me to get started!

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

The New York Giants and Dallas Cowboys play Kyle Orton Authentic Jerseys Sunday night in a winner take all game. The Giants are the home Andy Dalton Authentic Jerseys team. The victor wins the NFC West and Cam Newton Authentic Jerseys the #4 seed.
The wildcards are the Detroit Lions and Shannon Sharpe Authentic Jerseys the Atlanta Falcons. They have both clinched. Right now the Lions are the #5 Champ Bailey Authentic Jerseys seed and the Falcons the #6 seed, but if the Lions lose Matt Ryan Authentic Jerseys and the Falcons win, both teams would be 10-6. The Falcons would have the tie-breaker and be the #5 seed Roddy White Authentic Jerseys with Detroit #6. Most people would think that the difference between being 5 and 6 Tim Tebow Authentic Jerseys is irrelevant, but this year it matters. The 6 seed would be at either the Saints or 49ers, and if somehow the 6 won, Brian Dawkins Authentic Jerseys then at #1 Green Bay. Yet the 5 would start at the 4, either Dallas or the Giants. That is a much easier Michael Turner Authentic Jerseys game. Then the 5 would get to avoid Green Bay for as long as possible. The Lions are at Green Bay, which Tony Gonzalez Authentic Jerseys has nothing to play for. Atlanta hosts Tampa Bay, which has lost 9 straight at 4-11.

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody ''Escribe tu comentario"

A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.

There is also a long way and then end the night there and then the black end.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use