Democracy Arsenal

« Homeland, anyone? | Main | "Mission Completion!" »

July 19, 2007

What the Baker-Hamilton Commission Could Do Next
Posted by Heather Hurlburt

Trying to use the phenomenal popularity of the Baker-Hamilton Commission (itself very astutely feeding off the phenomenal popularity of the 9-11 Commission) to stand in for strong action on troop withdrawal, Senators Ken Salazar (D-CO) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN) put forward a proposal, now apparently dead, for a "Baker-Hamilton II" to propose a way forward in Iraq.

I'd like to see something a little different:  ask the Baker-Hamilton wise folks to go back to work and give us a dispassionate, bipartisan estimate of how Congress can start now, and the next Administration can continue, to clean up the damage the Iraq war has done to our national interests in the Middle East, our position in world public opinon, our military preparedness, and our core national values.

I doubt they'd come up with a sadder, tighter statement of the problem than this piece by Timothy Garton Ash from the LA Times, "Iraq hasn't even begun."  But having bipartisan agreement on the dimensions of the problem -- and bipartisan recommendations on what to do about it -- might do a lot to move some issues off the dime in a closely-divided Congress and past the veto pen of this White House.  It would also prepare the ground and make things easier for the next President, whomever s/he may be.

Just a thought.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200e008db56898834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What the Baker-Hamilton Commission Could Do Next:

Comments

Heather,

I agree with just about all your post, but not this one. These commissions, while extraordinarily popular, get used more as political football than as a way to change policy or point us forward in a new direction. Even the 9/11 Commission recommendations are still being blocked by Republicans in the Senate who refuse to appoint conferees for the conference committee. And as you point out the Baker Hamilton Commission is being used as political football for Republicans who want to say that they are against the war but don't want to actually do anything about it. Democrats are guilty as well, turning the 9/11 commission recommendation into a campaign talking point without actually evaluating much of it objectively.

Also, the first step to fixing the entire mess we have right now is starting to move troops out of Iraq. There is broad agreement on this issue across the country, but Republicans still aren't there. So, any bipartisan committee that tries to formulate an answer to your question will ultimately have to come to some lukewarm, relatively unclear agreement on what to do with American troops in Iraq. If they don't have a good answer for that question the rest of the report won't be all that useful.

Ilan - We're talking about two different problems. Commissions are less useful for forcing legislative action, for the reasons you cite (although I would argue we might not have even what we have on Iraq or 9-11 fixes without those two commissions) and more for giving a shape to public and media concerns -- setting the terms of the debate that follows. Baker-Hamilton helped break the Iraq debate open; now it has re-hardened into something that is more about politics than anything else. The reality is that we face a broad range of problems that no one can even get oxygen to talk about. It's going to be an ugly surprise for the public when the next President does start talking about them; a bipartisan group could give that president cover and again, set the terms of public debate in a way that useful legislative results could conceivably follow.

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Great sharing I would like to say Baker-Hamilton wasn't about finding solutions to the Iraq problem. It was about finding viable political solutions to the Iraq problem. Since there are none, it punted the problem to the next administration. Maybe the war will be real to those folks and they'll actually do something....

the highest-grade sheepskin availableugg outlet , is the age which suitable to restore the old, the every large or small varied assortment the classical design again returned to people's line of sight, from the wind series's return, 3 rewirings went forth to battle recently to Classic Short UGG the Garnett ... Classic Tiffany Jewelry. Publisher: Alina008. As we all know that ...ugg classic tall is packed in cartons and Blue Ribbon is the symbol of Tiffany jewelry..


The different out-and-out wow gold drawing near to distinguish the gender of your tot monk to genesis is for invasive medical demanding called a chorionic villus specimen objection. These tests are not done now the several aim of important the gender of the son; but rolex replica if the practiced is a medical flirt with over the test, the nurture bequeath also laptop batteries demonstrate its gender if the parents ravenousness to be cognizant. incomparable medical procedures that may predict the gender are ultrasound tests. This defiance is not always uttered which depends on quickbooks 2009 the comprehension of the technician further dimmable led driver the repute of the machine.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Emeritus Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use