Democracy Arsenal

« I've Seen This Movie Before - It's Called Kosovo | Main | There's Nothing Easy About War - The Libya Version »

March 19, 2011

Is Intervening in Libya in American Interests?
Posted by Shadi Hamid

Does the US have a vital national security interest in Libya? It depends on how you define interests. But even if there's no clear-cut 'imminent threat' to U.S. security, that may actually be a good thing. The perception has long been that the U.S. only intervenes when it has "vital interests at stake." But, this time, we're presumably doing it to protect civilians, prevent a bloodbath, and assist those valiantly fighting for democracy. So the very fact that less may be directly at stake for the U.S. does not give me pause. If anything, that is another reason why this intervention should be applauded (isn't that why it's called humanitarian intervention?).  

In any case, I happen to define "interests" more broadly than, say, Daniel Larison who has made strong arguments against intervention (including criticizing my recent post). One of the main sources of Arab antipathy toward America is our long, tragic history of supporting repressive dictatorships in the region. This five-decade-long bi-partisan policy gave us the self-destructing Arab world that we have now (and also contributed to the rise of Arab terrorism as Steven Brooke and I argue here). The "stability paradigm," - which is just about as "realist" as you can get - has proven a failure. It is critical, then, that the U.S. begin to align itself with forces of democratic change. Autocracies, after all, don't last forever. Libya is part of this bigger strategic picture. People have warned that applying the "responsibility to protect" in cases where autocracies massacre their own citizens could set a precedent. But that is precisely the point - it should set a precedent.

By contrast, if Libya fails, Qaddafi stays in power, and the rebels are crushed, it will mark the end of what's left of the Arab spring. It will send a dangerous message to autocrats: if you want to stay in power, do what Qaddafi did. We should also note that after a people are brutally and systematically crushed, it takes a long time for them to recover (Syria and Algeria are two instructive examples). This would end Libyans' dream of democracy for quite possibly decades. 

Does Larison think that being remembered for letting Libyans get slaughtered is going to facilitate a promising future of U.S.-Arab relations? No, it will be another blot on America's record. That is why I found it odd that Philip Gourevitch cited our support for autocrats as a reason to be wary of intervention. Wouldn't it be the opposite? Others, like Ezra Klein and Andrew Sullivan, as well as Gourevitch have wondered why we haven't intervened in, say, Ivory Coast or Burma where atrocities were (and are) being committed. This is the argument I find the most difficult to wrap my head around. Doing nothing in two countries does not justify doing nothing in a third. Doing the wrong thing consistently seems no better to me than doing the wrong thing inconsistently. I'd rather us get this one right than none of them. We also have to be realistic: politics, and by extension, foreign policy is about the art of the possible. It would be very difficult to assemble an international coalition to intervene in Ivory Coast or Burma tomorrow. But that internatonal coalition is already in place in the case of Libya, receiving unprecedented Arab support (and U.N authorization). So to the question of why Libya, the answer is relatively straightforward: because we can - where, in other countries, we can't. 

And this is yet another way Libya bears little resemblance to Iraq. As I argue in a recent Foreign Policy piece, where, in Iraq, we stood alone calling for war while most of the world opposed it, the dynamic, this time, was reversed. The United States - along with Russia, China, and Germany among the major powers - stood increasingly alone in opposing the emerging Arab and international consensus favoring intervention.

Let us now consider what is almost certain to happen in the absence of military intervention and then we can decide if that outcome is in the interests of the U.S. or the international community. Qaddafi would overrun Benghazi, an urban center of more than 1 million. Knowing what we know about Qaddafi, we can except brutal reprisals. Already thousands have been killed. But that would be nothing compared to the mass executions that Qaddafi would be likely to inflict on the rebel army and members of interim government. I don't know about you - but I have trouble understanding how people can be okay with sitting back and doing nothing, when, with military intervention, it could fairly easily be prevented. We can stop it. Moving to the strict "interests" rationale, it seems fairly self-evident that Libya, under an isolated Qaddafi, would likely return to attacking Western interests in the region, including through terrorism. He's done it before.  

Some people might take issue with "moral imperatives" or how morality is very much part of how I conceptualize broader U.S. interests. But we aren't France (and even France has taken to talking about the honor of the West in face of dictatorship). We are the United States and the U.S., for both better and worse, has claimed to be a nation that stands for something beyond the nation-state. That's why people look to us for moral leadership, even if they're likely not to find it. We are not Botswana. And the president of the United States is not the premier of China. Moreover, it is declared U.S. policy under both the Bush adn Obama administrations that the U.S. will support the universal, democratic aspirations of the Arab people. In this sense, we have encouraged them to do what we would do in similar circumstances - resist repression and fight for their freedom. 

In contrast, Greg Scoblete argues

And as for America's security interests, it seems to me the over-riding security interest of the United States is to safeguard the lives and resources of its citizens and to put both on the line only when either are gravely threatened. Libya hardly meets such a standard.

I'm not sure Libya meets this "standard" either. But I don't really understand why this is the standard that military action in Libya should meet. The lives of American citizens were not at stake in Rwanda but I think most people now realize that that was a dire mistake. Our failure to act there will remain yet another tragic mark on not only our history but that of the international community. 

Obviously, we need to have a broader conversation about America's role in a new, emerging Middle East? What do we have to say about U.S. leadership in an age of supposed Americna decline? We should think ahead. Doing the right thing not just in Libya, but elsehwere in the region, allows us an opportunity to re-affirm America's moral and political leadership at a time when there seems to be an absence of leadership on the world stage. It is not too late. And, one hopes, it is not too late for the Libyan people who still find themselves at the mercy of Qaddafi's advancing forces. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e2014e5ff80702970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Is Intervening in Libya in American Interests?:

Comments

team america world police!

No, not world policeman, that's been very clear but, in this case working in coordination w/ the intl community to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe. I still mourn for the victims of the rwandan genocide n remember albright not wanting to use the word genocide. Finally, the responibility to protect doctrine that all or most nations signed on to is one that is worth acting on when ppl r in danger from their own government.

Qoute "We are not Botswana" end Qoute, What does this mean or imply??

waow, such weak arguments from such a renowned name!

1- "Others, like Ezra Klein and Andrew Sullivan, as well as Gourevitch have wondered why we haven't intervened in, say, Ivory Coast or Burma where atrocities were (and are) being committed. This is the argument I find the most difficult to wrap my head around. Doing nothing in two countries does not justify doing nothing in a third."
How is this difficult to understand? They're asking about the hypocrisy and the the actual reasons behind the actions (saying it's humanitarian just doesn't cut it). Doing nothing for Ivory Coast should be as unacceptable as doing nothing for Libya, but then again, oil beats cacao. And let's just not start with what's happening in Bahrain or Yemen right now, right in front of our eyes in the very same region, and the US response or shall we say lack of response to them.

2- "It would be very difficult to assemble an international coalition to intervene in Ivory Coast or Burma tomorrow. But that internatonal coalition is already in place in the case of Libya, receiving unprecedented Arab support (and U.N authorization). So to the question of why Libya, the answer is relatively straightforward: because we can - where, in other countries, we can't."
well this doesn't even require any analysis. I just want to say, really, seriously??? The almighty US would not be able to provide international support for Ivory Coast even if it actually tried? US is in much deeper trouble than it actually shows then, or it only weighs in the matters that "matter" to its own interests whether be financial or political or whatever.

I don't want to go on, this is just sad. It's an insult to those who suffer all around the world when you claim to advocate human rights, freedom and peace, and then act according to very obvious double standards. At least, do not try to fool people with such arguments or have the courtesy to say "sorry, but you ain't worth the trouble".

I don't really understand why this is the standard that military action in Libya should meet. The lives of American citizens were not at stake in Rwanda but I think most people now realize that that was a dire mistake..

When one intervenes in countries that don't have any viable institutions one will wind up adopting them while attempting to establish those instutions from scratch .
Also , I am sorry to say , I forecast that the revolutions in the Mideast will run into the sand when considering our interests.
We were a very fortunate country but now it seems that new dynamics are operating in the world.

Thanks for sharing it with us.Informative!

thanks

The blog contains so many real and the informative things and i can also achieve so many things from this blog.It also contains some part of the Moralities.Thank you for sharing.

“I would love to hear how doing nothing in Libya was going to help U.S. security interests.”
A profoundly ignorant statement:
US security interests, like all national security interests, are grounded on the principle of national sovereignty.
As you and others have repeatedly pointed out, Libya is engaged in civil war. The government of Libya presents no threat to anyone beyond its borders. Simple enough to comprehend for anyone who has been paying attention. Intervention places us now squarely in the realm of conjecture and speculation. “The spectre of Iraq and Afghanistan” provides a useful foreshadowing of what we can expect and that is all. It is also enough that only a fool would write it away as a ghost story.
If these arguments surprise Mr Hamid by their weakness, it is because he lacks the capacity to engage them as they are and not as he would have them to be.

Discount pandora charms is pandora usually formed by the Danish expensive jewelry artists Each Enevoldsen for 1979. In a little while this type of business enterprise has been mopping worldwide. He was quoted saying, pandora charms Ive never thought this Pandora has got delicious effect these days. One reason tends to be that we’ve been concerning about the new product pattern in addition to system superior quality, nevertheless the victory got here soundlessly. Via Early in the eightys, the happy pandora australia couple commonly imported out of Thailand pandora jewelry for full price as well as would a very long time inexpensive online business. After encountering several direction pandora.com.au means together with a solid develop sales, the happy couple decide to build their particular expensive jewelry plant around Thailand later. Inside 1989, they put in place a smaller manufacturing plant inside Bangkok and did start to prepare goods which designed by your pet designed for construct inside Thailand. During 2000, this wonderful pandora rings time Pandora bracelets that had been copyrighted plus created by the pup and sold in that Denmark market, which in turn shot to popularity speedily round the whole entire Pound.

d? They're asking about the hypocrisy and the the actual reasons behind the actions (saying it's humanitarian just doesn't cut it). Doing nothing for Ivory Coast should be as unacceptable as doing nothing for Libya, but then again, oil beats cacao. And let's just not start with what's happening in Bahrain or Yemen right now, right in front of our eyes in the very same region, and th

The United States - along with Russia, China, and Germany among the major powers - stood increasingly alone in opposing the emerging Arab and international consensus favoring intervention.

Hi admin very nice and very successful In Turkey there is a portal site as a brother I would thank you too watch with admiration

Thanks for your article.I have learned a lot form you.Thanks very much.

nline business. After encountering several direction pandora.com.au means together with a solid develop sales, the happy couple decide to build their particular expensive jewelry plant around Thailand later. Inside 1989, they put in place a smaller manufacturing plant inside Bangkok and did start to prepare goods which designed by your pet designed for construct inside Thailand. During 2000, this wonderful pandora rings time Pandora bracelets that had been copyrighted plus created by the pup and sold in that Denmark market, which in turn shot to popularity speedily round the whole entire Pound.

Burberry outlet has a good reputation. I think it’s a best product for you to buy, whatever for you or send your family and friends as a gift.

Hi admin very nice and very successful In Turkey there is a portal site as a brother I would thank you too watch with admiration

this wonderful pandora rings time Pandora bracelets that had been copyrighted plus created by the pup and sold in that Denmark market, which in turn shot to popularity speedily round the whole entire Pound..

 Once again great post. You seem to have a good understanding of these themes.When I entering your blog,I felt this . Come on and keep writting your blog will be more attractive. To Your Success!

 The perfect!These articles written too great,they rich contents and data accurately.they are help to me.I expect to see your new share

Today the total is noticeably, Thomas Sabo Australia offers accepted to manifest as a analogue for maximum merchandise. Make it possible for a certain injury including Holiday season, Evening of romance or even Mothering Tuesday, will, no doubt buy your brilliant existing to fit those invoved with accession to the expansion. This specific latest can certainly on top of that Thomas Sabo Jewellery add more relating to the proliferation not to mention beatitude from the most important event Properties the sexes what person accuse in not really taking as well as allow not even happened to be capable to aces an established latest for Thomas Sabo types apron and youngsters. Still Thomas Sabo on sale stuff you will not wherever accept that passionate involved with frustration. Your found conform put in conquer not acknowledge to be anxious choice . almsman will cherish the software or otherwise not.

Sabo recent models are not alone get started with sufficient for lovers from peacefulness. When the request all the diffuse record, you'll apperceive to admission private for those in your ancestors assemblage or simply amphitheater of buddies. The particular runs in power you could see you can which means appealing together with purchase all the aberrant associate about adroitness that may experience an appropriate accurateness together with ancestors or possibly contacts. This has been a arresting behavior all those flexibility which accepts delivered a bonus apropos figures all over.

Gourevitch have wondered why we haven't intervened in, say, Ivory Coast or Burma where atrocities were (and are) being committed. This is the argument I find the most difficult to wrap my head around. Doing nothing in two countries does not justify doing nothing in a third."
How is this difficult to understand? They're asking about the hypocrisy and the the actual reasons behind the actions (saying it's humanitarian just doesn't cut it). Doing nothing for Ivory Coast sh

05


china electronics from
http://www.buybuyseller.com/

60

TY, wonderful job! This was the info I needed to know.

Every time I see blogs as good as this I KNOW I should stop surfing and start working on mine!

Wow, ah well ! Thanks for sharing such good information.I long exposure.

Great sources for fashion news and fashion articles. It's got offered many details about the relevant information. I enjoy this post quite definitely and i'm likely to recommend it to my buddies. Brief and practical methods inside the post not waste time and inside searching process. It can be this awesome source or technique i can't wait to use it. The post is utterly incredible. Many thanks for whatever you posted and all you give us!

I follow your blog for quite a long time and should tell that your articles always prove to be of a high value and quality for readers. Keep up the great work. Thanks.

I really enjoyed this brilliant blog. Please keep them coming. Greets!!!

i agree your opinion, i love your article.

Your article I like it very much

Thanks , I have just been looking for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered till now.

These all things are very informative and knowledgeable and i can get so many ideas form it.I like your sharing too much.You have done such a nice job.

Response to Beats By Dr.Dre Beatbox Review.

Your article is nice.Thanks for your sharing,it helps me know more.

Thank you for this article. That's all I can say. You most definitely have made this blog into something special. You clearly know what you are doing, you've covered so many bases.Thanks!

Perhaps this is one of the most interesting blogs that I have ever seen. Interesting article, Funny comment. Keep it up!

Good ,i have a thought about you post ,thank you .

Thank you for this article. That's all I can say. You organize the article very well and your writing ability is really wonderful. I hope one day I could write such good articles. I hope my English is better and better.

Thank your for sharing your wonderful article. I very agree with your views from here.

thanks for your sharing article, i like that.

very Good ,i have a thought about you post ,thank you .

Gadhafi may last for months or longer as his forces continue to repel the Western-backed rebels.

The main point of wars in Lybia is to stop governments or factions that aim to become governments (such as the transitional council) from committing mass murder. They are not peacekeeping missions, though, like peacekeeping, they are optional wars of choice they are often called.

Good post. I am also going to write a blog post about this...I enjoyed reading your post and I like your take on the issue. Thanks.

Sac longchamp, Rigoureux, exécution exquise est le même, et les types de longchamp sac, de styles et de couleurs sont plus riches. longchamp pliage devient très petit et portable. Longchamp sac pas cher coloré qui donne une atmosphère calme dans l'apparence de sens de la mode, il est facile à transporter. Le sac longchamp soldes série avec le logo est une percée dans le passé à la conception classique, a maintenant atteint un succès mondial. Pour beaucoup d'hommes, dames, il est devenu une nécessité de vie. Nouveau sac Long champ de couleurs de bonbons énumérés, aujourd'hui simple en vogue , comment pouvons-nous pas avoir un sacs longchamps aussi!

Looks great feeling.

Great article.

I'm so tired of war. I hope it will end one day

We have gotten many great comments from our customers and earn a good reputation in foreign makerts, more than 90% customers are satisfied with our products and service, till now our online members are beyond 80,000. As of right now, we Replica Handbags currently serve customers from over 18 countries, and we are still growing. We really hope to expand our business through cooperation with individuals and companies from around the world.

d service, till now our online members

Looks great feeling.

For all the warnings of imminent doom, rarely before in America's history has the United States been in less danger than it is today. And understanding that might be the single most effective tool for keeping America safe and secure in the 21st century.

Need a new heating and air conditioning system, but are unsure where to turn? The article below will walk you through the process.

Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Thank you for sharing. At the same time,i love best pram very much .Welcome to look at my website and blog articles.Hope we can become good friends, and exchange and to help each other! Thanks!!

After read the article.I have just one word to say,you are so brilliant.I like all of your article.Well done.


A real lot of useful info here!These are all great comments here. Very cool article.

Amazing website, especially the illustration. Nice flow and visually appealing. Although, some may say shameless self promotion. Kidding. http://www.spd1120.com

Hamid, no words left to appreciate you to put so much deep thought in this article on Libyan issue. I am not such an expert with political or social issues but what US needs to do the best is guarantee safeguard to it's citizens which must be on high priority.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use