Democracy Arsenal

« Wanna Tighten the Screws on China? Focus on Coalition Building | Main | "China as Behemoth" Has a Military Edge »

January 19, 2011

Tactics vs. Strategy in Afghanistan
Posted by Michael Cohen

Over at abumuqawama and registan.net, Josh Foust and Andrew Exum have posted a rather interesting exchange that examines the tactical efforts of the US military in Afghanistan. It's a fascinating debate between two smart people and one that I highly recommend.

But, and I mean this not to be insulting to either, it's a digression even diversion from the real issues regarding the current US mission in Afghanistan. To explain check out this quote from Andrew:

U.S. counterinsurgency operations at the tactical level were some of the best I had ever seen. Caveat lector, I do not know whether or not these improved tactics will yield a strategic effect. There are too many phenomena that we cannot even observe much less measure. And we still have a lot of known pains in our asses (like Afghan governance and sanctuaries in Pakistan) that could render tactical gains ephemeral.

It's good that Andrew makes this connection (because there seem to be a lot of folks who don't) but he's dramatically downplaying it's importance. In the end, it doesn't really matter how good the US military gets at counter-insurgency and it doesn't really matter if the Arghandab Valley is more secure than it was a year ago; particularly if the larger strategic impediments to success in Afghanistan remain in place. Indeed, our fetishization of tactical "successes" has become a distraction from our abundant strategic failures in Afghanistan.

Over the 18 months we've seen no evidence that the Afghan government is seriously interested in clamping down on corruption or is able to provide more effective governance for its citizens. We've seen no evidence that Pakistan has any interest in turning against the Afghan Taliban (in fact quite the opposite). We've seen little evidence that the ANSF will be able to take over from ISAF in providing security any time soon and the same goes for the police. And on the latter point, the lack of an effective judiciary system in the country tends to demonstrate how uselss a police force we are likely creating. All of this is happening while the clock is ticking on US engagement and NATO allies are becoming increasingly wary of their commitment to the fight in Afghanistan.

In short, from a strategic perspective we've seen very little progress on our larger objectives that are (and this is rather crucial) supposed to support the tactical gains that folks in the US military love to brag about. (And if I sound like a broken record on this point . . . it's because I am).

This is elemental to the success or failure of our mission and speak to the sustainability of our current operations. Indeed, if there are no guarantees that the ANSF can take over security in the Arghandab valley any time soon or that the government can provide vital services or that the spigot of fighters from Pakistan can be turned off . . . then all we doing here is "mowing the lawn."

The worst part of this is that by believing enhanced security in the Arghandab valley or elsewhere in southern and eastern Afghanistan is a metric of success not only distracts us from our real challenges, but it allows military commanders and in turn political leaders to resist needed shifts in strategy.

So for example, the recent "success" in killing Taliban insurgents is used, in part, as a justification for not embracing a more robust political strategy of reconciliation. Why should we if the enemy is on the run? We're winning, or so the story goes, and thus it's not a good time to open up a political channel or embrace confidence-building measures that might bring the Taliban to the table.  From this perspective, believing that we are winning tactically in Afghanistan is our greatest curse; in fact, it's the root of all our problems. You see, if we recognized we weren't winning, we might shift course a la surge 2007 in Iraq, but instead we see progress where there isn't and ignore the many signs of failure.

This brings me to the final point: Andrew's evoking of the Wire (aka the best TV show in history):

I use The Wire a lot to explain everything from Lebanese politics to counterinsurgency, and I would liken the U.S. Army to the character Ellis Carver: when we meet him in Season One, all he wants to do is kick ass and take names. By Season Five, though, he’s become a much smarter police officer. He’s taken the time to get to know the people he’s trying to protect and can thus better separate the bad guys from all the people just trying to get on with their lives.

We could spend a whole week making a connection between international affairs and the Wire, but I think this misses the crucial takeaway from the Wire. Carver is not a smart police officer . . . he is a tragic figure. He doesn't realize that knowing the neighborhood better and separating the bad guys from ordinary folk does not change the fundamental nature of the Drug War, which overwhelms all efforts at effective policing. 

You bust one corner boy, another one sprouts up; you take down a package, another comes in; you arrest a drug lord, guess what another one takes his place. Unless you try to change the very strategy a la Bunny Colvin and Hamsterdam, you're just spitting against the wind.

So if there is a lesson from the Wire it is that the tactical efforts of the cops is a waste of time and resources. It doesn't matter how good they get at their jobs because ultimately the game is the game . . and the game is rigged.

Sounds like Afghanistan, doesn't it?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20148c7c1c224970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tactics vs. Strategy in Afghanistan:

Comments

Great post. Not to get too bogged down in analogies to The Wire, but Carver's maturation over the course of the series does include self-awareness of the permanence of The Game, beginning at the end of Season 4 after his failure to save Randy, and manifesting during Season 5, as evidenced by his bar conversation with Herc (ep. 7). What makes Carver a smart police officer AND a tragic figure is that he continues to work and mature despite knowing the permanence of The Game. His reprimand of Colicchio demonstrates Carver's philosophy that even though The Game will continue (and is rigged), policework still matters, and should be done well. Bringing this (overly?)extended analogy full-circle to Afghanistan, can't we acknowledge and praise tactical gains(good policework) while also acknowledging that the larger situation won't truly change without dealing with the larger strategic issues(The Game)?

I really like your metaphor of "mowing the lawn" for tactical successes (doing something worthwhile even though it won't last) but really don't like your metaphor of "spitting in the wind". Good tactics matter, even if they are impermanent.

the real issues regarding the current US mission in Afghanistan...

Good response by Chris above to a characteristically incisive post from Michael. I agree that American soldiering should still be done well, where it is done, but what if the effect is to prolong a misguided strategic engagement because of the appearance of success?

In metaphorical words, if successfully "mowing the lawn" keeps tricking generals/officials/media/the public into thinking that the rest of the yard work is finally going to get done once and for all, is it still worthwhile? I think Michael might agree with me that the answer is no.

It would actually be better to see more tactical failure, because that would lead to a quicker exit from a war that we've established is NOT in our national interest.

Thank you for another great article. Where else could anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect way of writing?

Chinese probably need to cut back the number of active duty soldiers, but in order to do this the army would have to relinquish its role as a interna

spend time developing custom software solutions where you could use something off-the-shelf or open-source to get the job done. And perhaps most importantly, you would recognize the value of time.

extended analogy full-circle to Afghanistan, can't we acknowledge and praise tactical gains(good policework) while also acknowledging that the larger situation won't truly change without dealing with the larger strategic issues(The Game)?

form an Indian-American partnership will be lost. Once again it seems that the obsessive attention to Iran's nuclear program is detrimental to American goals in Asia.

You bust one corner boy, another one sprouts up; you take down a package, another comes in; you arrest a drug lord, guess what another one takes his place. Unless you try to change the very strategy a la Bunny Colvin and Hamsterdam, you're just spitting against the wind.
seslisohbet seslichat

The lack of emotional security of our American young people is due, I believe, to their isolation from the larger family unit. No two people - no mere father and mother - as I have often said, are enough to provide emotional security for a child. He needs to feel himself one in a world of kinfolk, persons of variety in age and temperament, and yet allied to himself by an indissoluble bond which he cannot break if he could, for nature has welded him into it before he was born. ~Pearl S. Buck

in age and temperament, and yet allied to himself by an indissoluble bond which he cannot break if he could, for nature has welded him into it before he was born

aktadır. Bir tarım ve hayvancılık ülkesi olan Türkiye’de önemli bir açığı kapatmak için yayına başlayan hayvancilik1.com, bu sektörlerde halkı aydınlatma ve bu konulardan haberdar etme amacıyla kurulmuştur. İlgili bakanlığın ve devlet politikalarının titizlikle takip edildiği sitemizde hayvancılığa dair en güncel gelişmeleri ve yararlı bilgileri edinebilirsiniz. Alanında uzman editör kadrosuyla köylümüzü, çiftçimizi ve hayvancılık sektöründe hizmet veren kurum ve kuruluşları bilinçlendirme ve bilgilendirmeyi temel felsefesi edinen hayvancilik1.com, alanında en iyi hayvancılık internet portalıdır.

Excellently written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a much better place. Please keep it up!

Thanks for writing this blog post, it was informative, enjoyable, and most importantly - a good length!

ss of the permanence of The Game, beginning at the end of Season 4 after his failure to save Randy, and manifesting during Season 5, as evidenced by his bar conversation with Herc (ep. 7). What makes Carver a smart police officer AND a tragic figure is that he continues to work and mature despite knowing the permanence of The Game. His reprimand of Colicchio demonstrates Carver's philosophy that even though The Game will continue (and is rigged), policework still matters, and should be done well. Bringing this (overly?)extended analogy full-circle to Afghanistan, can't we acknowledge and praise tactical gains(good policework) while also a

What makes Carver a smart police officer AND a tragic figure is that he continues to work and mature despit

But, and I mean this not to be insulting to either, it's a digression even diversion from the real issues regarding the current US mission in Afghanistan. To explain check out this quote from Andrew

Thank you for another great article.

temperature control suggests they are able to lower all of the heat sufficiently for that reason that most they can type of their hair with out burning the house along with causing permanent harm coupled with on

of the permanence of The Game, beginning at the end of Season 4 after his failure to save Randy, and manifesting during Season 5, as evidenced by his bar conversation with Herc

obsessive attention to Iran's nuclear program is detrimental to American goal

to Afghanistan, can't we acknowledge and praise tactical gains(good policework) while also acknowledging that the larger situation won't truly change without dealing w

it is a good article.

Very good article, I want to learn

Caviar Extract, for the human organism contains a variety of valuable natural nutrients. Using a high lecithin content, the consumption of natural collagen by the body and thus prevents the formation of cellulite. Vitamins and minerals in the complexes on the one hand brings life to your skin again. Conclusion: Tight, firm and elastic, skin and subcutaneous soft tissue structures.

Thanks , I have just been looking for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered till now.

e been inexperienced then. He may not have been confident enough in his position to say no. However, his involvement with that story does not give me confidence in his judgment.

Happy Monday everyone. Food shopping on the docket for today, strength training, bread baking...

Mizuno Corporation is a Japanese sports equipment manufacturer, which was established in 1906. Nowadays, Mizuno
develops so fast that it gets large numbers of loyal consumers, especially those sports lovers. For example, the players who love tennis, football, baseball, skiing, hiking and cycling can get satisfaction from Mizuno products. The company also has expanded its operation centres opening new factories in Germany, France, China PR, Scotland and Hong Kong. What's more, Mizuno products are selling very well in the overseas market. If necessary, please seek for much more related information. (xu)

Vitamins and minerals in the complexes on the one hand brings life to your skin again. Conclusion: Tight, firm and elastic, skin and

The carefully crafted image that you want to use this formula to do with the short term is now not far from reach.

can't we acknowledge and praise tactical gains(good policework) while also acknowledging that the larger situation won't truly change without

Hey bad accessoires, if vitamins and minerals bring life to your skin, then I tell you, fertilizers do bring life to your plants.

but really don't like your metaphor of "spitting in the wind". Good tactics matter, even if they are impermanent.

but really don't like your metaphor of "spitting in the wind". Good

I think there are some who use tactics that are deceptive

for that reason that most they can type of their hair with out burning the house along with causing permanent harm coupled with on dozens of

I like your style so much, I am your honest reader.

thank you so much ,i get something from you article.

American partnership will be lost. Once again it seems that the obsessive attention to Iran's nuclear program is detrimental to

their hair with out burning the house along with causing permanent harm coupled with on dozens of in addition to thick

you have been going for well over ten years now. Good for you and hope

you have been going for well over ten years now. Good for you and hope

thanks for your sharing, i like your opinion.

shares in this blog is really nice, actually,
I no longer have to follow the internet world

counterinsurgency for cheap counter-terroris konteynercounterproductivity result, isn't this a tacit admission that al-Qaeda really is bleeding America outkonut projeleri

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use