Democracy Arsenal

« NSN Daily Update 3/5/09 | Main | Don't Believe the Hype »

March 05, 2009

Britain's making the "special relationship" less relevant
Posted by Max Bergmann

Eu_usa_uk_flag

The special relationship is losing its luster and it relevance. Contrary, to the UK press, this has little to do with the personal relationship between Obama and Brown or his electoral troubles, but is a byproduct of Iraq and the UK’s growing estrangement with Europe.

On the face of it everything now seems fine. As Brown departed for Washington, there was a lot of British commentary about whether Obama and the U.S. even cared about the “special relationship.” Personal relations between Obama and Brown were interpreted to be frosty and much was made over Obama’s statement prior to Brown’s arrival that called the U.S.-UK alliance a “special partnership,” not a relationship. It was even said that Obama hated the British because they tortured his father.

But in their meeting at the White House, Obama made pains to stress the relationship was special and Gordon Brown’s speech yesterday was so rah rah America it could have been given at CPAC. So everything is right in the relationship, right? Well not really, especially if your British. As the FT noted, Obama is not going to turn down an ally: “The Obama administration wants cordial productive relations with Britain, as with other countries.”

But that does not make the UK particularly relevant to the U.S. right now. Yes over the last eight years the Brits have been with us side by side in Iraq and Afghanistan, but that in some ways is sort of the problem. By backing the Bush administration in Iraq the UK hasn’t exactly enhanced their global clout and their military is now under great stress, which prevents greater assistance in Afghanistan. Furthermore, the UK’s relationship with Europe – never cozy – has become increasingly estranged.

Blair claimed that the UK was a “pivotal” country in world affairs,  due to, as the Economist noted, “Britain's possession of efficient armed forces, together with its twin loyalty to America and the European mainland, give it a unique bridging role.” In the run-up to the Iraq war, Blair leveraged these dual loyalties to America and Europe to make the UK an important international player that was essential to the U.S. The Economist had a great cartoon at the time showing Blair with a foot in both an American row boat and a European row boat that were headed in opposite directions. Bush offered the UK a choice, Europe or the U.S. Having chosen the Atlantic relationship, it was natural that there would be growing estrangement with Europe. But this has been compounded by American disinterest under Bush in rebuilding U.S.-European relations, as well as by the arrival of Brown, who is much more disinterested in Europe then Blair was.

The problem for the “special relationship” is that an increasingly eurosceptic Britain is much less relevant to the U.S. than a Britain that is firmly entrenched as an important player in the EU. So British debates over what’s more important the relationship with Europe or America offer a false choice, especially since the American president is no longer George Bush.  For the UK to maintain its traditional relevance to the U.S., it needs its place in Europe. Without that place in Europe, Britain will no doubt be an important and close ally - just like Canada, Australia, and Japan - but they bring a lot less influence to the table. 

With the possibility of David Cameron unseating Brown – ushering in one of the most eurosceptic governments the UK has had since it joined in 1973 – and overall anti-immigrant and anti-Europe sentiment growing in the UK, the Obama administration should make it clear that we want the UK to play a constructive role in Europe. U.S. pressure could at the very least serve as a check on potential British obstructionism on the Lisbon Treaty, as well as on other efforts to de-link the UK from Europe.

It’s high time we used the special relationship to attempt to influence British behavior in Europe, just as they use it to influence our behavior globally.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e2011168c3a65a970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Britain's making the "special relationship" less relevant:

Comments

This is misguided, Max. The special relationship is not only relevant, it is vibrant and required to successfully tackle the major global challenges that the UK, US and world face today. The UK and US have a common analysis of these issues and our open and multilateral approaches to solving them are very similar.

For example, the UK is the second largest contributor - behind the US - of troops and assistance to Afghanistan. Foreign Secretary Miliband said recently that the UK's commitment there is 'long term and comprehensive.' So the UK is fully involved in working with the US and our allies to help Afghans build a stable, secure and prosperous country.

The UK is also playing a central role in confronting the economic crisis. We're coordinating a global response with the US and international partners through direct dialogue and international institutions such as the EU, World Bank, IMF and G20. This cooperation will be most visible in April when the UK hosts the G20 summit in London.

I must also protest your inaccurate and unfair description of the UK as 'anti-immigrant' and 'anti-Europe.' As anyone who has been to London knows, the UK is one of the most diverse countries in the world. This is something that is embraced and celebrated but not feared in the UK.

Neither is Europe feared in the UK. We are a firm and constructive member of the EU. This was affirmed yesterday in Prime Minister Gordon Brown's speech to Congress where he called on US leaders to look towards their 'friends' in Europe. Moreover, during some of the interviews he gave while in the US, the Prime Minister made a plea for economic assistance to new EU members who are particularly affected by the downturn in the global economy.

I'm really surprised by the tonality of this article. I thought sincerely all the americans were eurosceptics but this article give us any hopes for the future of the relationship between US and Europe.
Concerning your comments Brian, anytimes it's really hard to understand british people. Whereas you participate completely in the financing of EU, you [the british people] send in the same time a mixed impression of euroscepticism (if not adversaries of Europe).
Personnaly I always loved all anglo-saxon things and I'd be happy to see UK and US have any constructive approaches toward Europe.

Mr. Bergmann makes sense to me. Whereas Mr. McGuigan sounds like any nebulous politician.

Mr. Bergmann makes sense to me. Whereas Mr. McGuigan sounds like any nebulous politician.

Mr. Bergmann makes sense to me. Whereas Mr. McGuigan sounds like any nebulous politician.

Mr. Bergmann makes sense to me. Whereas Mr. McGuigan sounds like any nebulous politician.

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Thank you, I got it. o(∩_∩)o

I like the post, and I agree somewhat with, To be very truthful.

There is no black and white colors, such as gray and red like a timeless classic, and eventually replica handbagsbecome worse, Homme Dior, black A06 wake up call, the foreigners rouge, further improve the design of the initial sales to noble pure deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) Homme Dior, Dior men will bring clean ao in front of us the overall structure, surrounded by a black dial, simplereplica handbags and stylish design style spirit of Dior Homme.

Forty years ago, Don ED hardy
blew off a Yale fine-art fellowship to pursue the rogue art of tattoo, a timeless and often taboo tradition that captivated him as a boy in the Orange County beach town of Corona del Mar. By 10 he was drawing cars and eagles on kids' backs and arms with wet colored pencils and Maybelline eyeliner. After that he begun to design the Ed hardy picture

At the San Francisco Art Institute in the early '60s, Hardy mastered the demanding art of intaglio etching under the tutelage of the late Gordon Cook, a no-jive blue-collar guy who instilled in Hardy a love of craft, Asian art and the quiet power of Giorgio Morandi's little still life pictures. Which like love kills slowly
But it worked out well for the plucky Hardy boy, who blurred the supposed boundary between "high" and "low" art and carved a path through the worlds of art and commerce. He has drawn images on torsos
, canvases and giant scrolls with equal conviction and aplomb.

Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
FF14 Gil Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service! Final Fantasy XIV GIL
In the 2 years we are in this field , FFXIV GILbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(WWW,GM MMO,COM Sell FFXIV Gil)

Interesting article,but hopefully it The Economist had a great cartoon at the time showing Blair with a foot in both an American row boat and a European row boat that were headed in opposite directions.

Its was for time being,its an interesting post,thanks a lot for sharing...

For the UK to maintain its traditional relevance to the U.S., it needs its place in Europe.Without that place in Europe, Britain will no doubt be an important and close ally - just like Canada, Australia, and Japan - but they bring a lot less influence to the table.

Its Really Good and thanks for this so valuable information….but hopefully it The Economist had a great cartoon at the time showing Blair with a foot in both an American row boat...

Without that place in Europe, Britain will no doubt be an important and close ally - just like Canada, Australia, and Japan - but they bring a lot less influence to the table.

Its good that the Economist had a great cartoon at the time showing Blair with a foot.Thanks for sharing this is nice blog & very knowledgble.

To the UK press, this has little to do with the personal relationship between Obama and Brown or his electoral troubles, but is a byproduct of Iraq and the UK’s growing estrangement with Europe.

U.S. pressure could at the very least serve as a check on potential British obstructionism on the Lisbon Treaty, as well as on other efforts to de-link the UK from Europe.

As anyone who has been to London knows, the UK is one of the most diverse countries in the world. This is something that is embraced and celebrated but not feared in the UK.

As anyone who has been to London knows,the UK is one of the most diverse countries in the world.This is something that is embraced and celebrated but not feared in the UK.

The personal relations between Obama and Brown seems to be frosty..

Bush offered UK a choice, Europe or the U.S, it was natural that there would be growing estrangement with Europe.

It should be clear by the Obama administration that we want the UK to play a constructive role in Europe. U.S. pressure could at the very least serve as a check on potential British obstructionism on the Lisbon Treaty, as well as on other efforts to de-link the UK from Europe.

Obama administration should make it clear that we want the UK to play a constructive role in Europe.

U.S. pressure could at the very least serve as a check on potential British obstructionism on the Lisbon Treaty,as well as on other efforts to de-link the UK from Europe.

The UK and US have a common analysis of these issues and our open and multilateral approaches to solving them are very similar.Thanks, really nice post.

Well This is something that is embraced and celebrated but not feared in the UK..Thanks for the information.

That's was great,The Obama administration wants cordial productive relations with Britain, as with other countries...

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use