Democracy Arsenal

« Oy, a Debate McCain Really Wants to Have? | Main | Viva Zapata! »

September 18, 2008

Not a Gaffe? McCain Campaign Willing to Destroy Relationship with Spain, Europe to Conceal Confusion
Posted by Max Bergmann

Worse than Bush. There can be no doubt about it now.

In McCain's bizarre interview with Spanish owned Union Radio he refused to say whether he would meet with Spain's Prime Minister, José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Listening to the interview repeatedly, it simply seemed that McCain had no idea who Zapatero actually was. McCain seemed to think he was a Latin American autocrat - despite the reporter repeatedly saying "I am talking about Spain." This gaffe would seem to have very significant implications. Not knowing who the leader of Spain was or thinking Spain was in Latin America would not really be shocking coming from his running mate, but McCain has run on his foreign policy expertise and such confusion completely undercuts his credibility. Furthermore this gaffe would bring up real questions about his age. Is McCain really prepared to deal with a crisis at 3AM, when he can't even remember who the leader of Spain is during a late evening interview?

But was it a gaffe? While it definitely seemed so, now Randy Sheunemann, McCain's foreign policy adviser is shockingly saying that this is not a gaffe but an intentional expression of policy toward Spain. Instead of just admitting that it was small gaffe late in the day, the McCain campaign has decided that they care so little about governing that they are willing to potentially nuke the U.S.-Spain relationship just to get elected. Sheunemann emailed the Washington Post, saying:

The questioner asked several times about Senator McCain's willingness to meet Zapatero (and id'd him in the question so there is no doubt Senator McCain knew exactly to whom the question referred). Senator McCain refused to commit to a White House meeting with President Zapatero in this interview," he said in an e-mail.

This is beyond extreme. This is beyond reckless. This is insane.

McCain won't meet with a NATO ally, that has nearly 1,000 troops in Afghanistan, that has lost more than 20 soldiers there, has been brutally attacked by Al Qaeda, is incredibly influential in Latin America, has the seventh largest economy in the world, is a DEMOCRACY, and is a large and influential country in the EU. Won't meet with them?

The only plausible explanation for McCain not wanting to meet with Zapatero, is that, like Bush, he is still angry about Spain pulling its troops out of Iraq in 2004. If McCain carries that much of a grudge then how in the world will he rebuild our relationship with Europe, as he has said he would do. In a big foreign policy speech to the Los Angeles World Affairs Council in March, McCain expressed a desire to strengthen the transatlantic relationship.

We cannot build an enduring peace based on freedom by ourselves, and we do not want to.  We have to strengthen our global alliances as the core of a new global compact...The bonds we share with Europe in terms of history, values, and interests are unique.  Americans should welcome the rise of a strong, confident European Union as we continue to support a strong NATO.

McCain even told El Pais, Spain's major newspaper, in April that he would bring Prime Minister Zapatero to the White House. (translation via America Blog)

Republican presidential candidate, John McCain, is ready to change the policy of estrangement with the Spanish government that was put in place for four years now by George Bush. He declared that he was ready to fully normalize bilateral relations and that Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero was invited to the White House.

And does McCain not know that his campaign has already met with a representative of Zapatero's office? From the BBC in April:

Recently, Bernardino Leon, who is currently heading the General Secretariat of the Prime Minister's Office to attempt to foster Zapatero's interest in international issues, travelled to Washington to meet the foreign policy advisers to Democratic candidates Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama and to Republican candidate John McCain. [BBC Monitoring 4/22/08]

But Sheunemann's statement now makes it clear that there will be no rebuilding of the transatlantic relationship. Instead, McCain will continue the ruinous approach of the Bush administration and continue to alienate our allies and further isolate America. This should not come as a surprise. McCain has after all shown in the past a reckless eagerness to attack America's allies.

See below for some of his more prominent attacks:

 

McCain attacked our allies as “vacuous and posturing” for opposing war in Iraq. “Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said that "Iraq is the test" of both the U.N. and NATO. He charged that the alliance is failing the test because of the "flawed calculations" and "vacuous posturing" of Germany and France. McCain and Rumsfeld both said that recent French and German foot-dragging over even discussing the possible deployment of NATO assets, such as Patriot anti-missile batteries, to Turkey also threatened to damage the alliance.” [Washington Post, 2/9/03]

John McCain engaged in the anti-French bashing of the far right because they opposed the invasion of the war. "The Lord said the poor will always be with us, and the French will be with us, too," said McCain, a member of the Armed Services Committee. "This is part of a continuing French practice of throwing sand in the gears of the Atlantic alliance. But now they're playing a dangerous game, and coming close to rendering themselves irrelevant." A few days later he even said that, “Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) likened France to an aging '40s starlet "still trying to dine out on her looks but doesn't have the face for it." [NY Times, 2/14/03. NY Daily News, 2/17/03]

McCain attacked Germany for opposing the war – saying they lacked “political courage.” McCain said that former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder “looks little like the ally that anchored our presence in Europe throughout the Cold War…A German Rip Van Winkle from the 1960s would not understand the lack of political courage and cooperation with its allies on the question of Iraq exhibited in Berlin today.” [Washington Times, 2/14/03]

On the war path, McCain said didn’t care if invading Iraq damaged UN, thought Iraq would prove UN to be irrelevant. “If war is necessary, the United States will not ‘be going it alone,’ he said, but will wage war in Iraq with a coalition of allies - with or without the blessing of the United Nations. ‘The problem here is not whether we do damage to the United Nations if we have to take military action,’ he said. ‘The question is, will the United Nations follow the League of Nations and risk irrelevancy.’” [Washington Times, 2/14/03]

McCain dismissed interests of French and Russians over invasion, said they were just based on commercial concerns. McCain said that “The French and Russians are putting their "commercial interests above international law, world peace and the political ideals of Western civilization.” [Washington Times, 2/14/03]

At German security conference in the run up to the war McCain echoed Rumsfeld’s notorious attacks on our European allies. “Rumsfeld has made headlines across Europe in recent weeks for a series of barbs at those who oppose U.S. policy.” McCain clearly echoed Rumsfeld’s statements, “McCain accused the Germans and French of "calculated self-interest" and "vacuous posturing" that left NATO with a "terrible injury." German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer said Germany would support its ally Turkey, but the question was one of timing. Both German and French officials have said that such a vote is tantamount to admitting war's inevitability. The conference's most emotional moment came from Fischer…he told how three times he had led the charge for German troops to be deployed: in Kosovo, Macedonia and Afghanistan…His voice rising, and beginning to speak in English, he addressed Rumsfeld directly: ‘My generation learned you must make a case and, excuse me, I am not convinced.’ Rumsfeld sat against the wall, sipping water and watching without expression. Much was said at the meeting about the strident tone of U.S.-European discussions.” [Philadelphia Inquirer, 2/9/03]

McCain rejected calls to get more international troops on the ground in Iraq. McCain said, “I think that the only military presence required right now would be American and British.” [MSNBC Hardball, 4/23/03]

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e2010534aee4eb970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Not a Gaffe? McCain Campaign Willing to Destroy Relationship with Spain, Europe to Conceal Confusion:

Comments

Since McCain went on to talk about Mexico, it is reasonable to infer that McCain confused Spanish Prime Minister Zapatero, who is alive, with the Mexican revolutionary Emiliano Zapata, who died in 1919.

It is less clear whether McCain was recalling personally meeting the historical figure himself, or viewing the Zapata played by Marlon Brando in the 1952 film, "Viva Zapata!"


Nice one Ken. Thanks for the detailed write-up Max.

I listened to that interview. McCain sounded tired and I think he was just trying to use his boilerplate to get through it. He didn't seem to register the Spain part, and in one answer (the interviewer asked him the Spain questions three times) he mentioned that we have good friends in the hemisphere.

Of course, he could have meant the northern hemisphere.

The US-Spain relationship has been "nuked" ever since Zapatero became Prime Minister. McCain won't be the one doing any "nuking". Zapatero is the most anti-US leader in the EU and our worst US ally in NATO. Zapatero has undermined US policy in Latin America and elsewhere. Zapatero has worked to end EU diplomatic and economic pressure on Cuba on human rights. Zapatero has been Hugo Chavez's best friend in the EU. Zapatero has been stridently anti-Israel.

Spanish troops in Afghanistan under Zapatero sit around in relatively safe areas near Herat, far away from the fighting with al-Qaeda and the Taliban. As reported in the New York Times earlier this year (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/10/world/europe/10zapatero-web.html), Zapatero has steadfastly refused to deploy Spanish troops in combat areas in Afghanistan. When countries like Canada and the Netherlands complain that other NATO counties with large armies aren't pulling their proportional weight in Afghanistan, while US, UK, Canadian, Dutch, Australian, and even French troops die in battle, Spain is one of the countries that they are complaining about. And that is 100% due to Zapatero's policies.

The US has patched things up with Germany, France, Canada, etc. since the days after the Iraq war started. There is a reason that things haven't been patched up with Spain. And that reason is that diplomacy is a two way street. And as long as Zapatero fans the flames of anti-Americanism in Spain for his own domestic political gain and abroad for Spanish commercial gain, there is no good reason to be overly friendly to Zapatero.

Oh and by the way, 17 of the "more than 20" (I believe the total is 23) Spanish soldiers who died in Afghanistan died in a single helicopter crash (mechanical failure not combat related). Only about four Spanish deaths have come from hostile fire and all of those have been from things like roadside bombs against convoys. No Spanish deaths in Afghanistan have come from the Spanish going out and engaging enemy fighters because the Spainish don't engage the enemy. They just sit around because Zapatero doesn't want them to fight. Frankly, McCain was being too nice to Zapatero.

McCain won't meet with a NATO ally . . .

I still haven't seen the English version of the interview, but the issue seems to be whether McCain would give Zapatero the special honor of an invitation to the White House, not whether they would meet at all.

I have a question for Zaptero sucks....Just exactly what did the US patch up with Germany, France and Canada after the occupation of Iraq?

Welcome to our game world, my friend asks me to buy some knight noah . I do not know how to use the knight online gold ; my friend tells me how to use. I will thank for my friends bringing me in this world. I am not regret to buy knight online noah . We all love game, if you want to play it, please buy cheap knight gold and join us. Please do not hesitate to have game.

When you have Anarchy credits, you will become strong. With Anarchy Online credits, you can upgrade and admire by others. You can use Anarchy gold to start the journey of the world. So, do not hesitate, let us move to buy AO credits

Welcome to our requiem gold center. We can provide all what you want if you want. Our requiem lant are specialized, professional and reliable website for selling requiem money and providing cheap requiem lant.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use