Fuzzy Numbers... Again
Posted by Ilan Goldenberg
OK, you would have thought that after all the heat that the Pentagon took for its inconsistent violence numbers they would have been very careful about the latest data that they issued in their September report to Congress. But they weren’t. There are significant inconsistencies between the numbers General Petraeus showed to Congress regarding civilian casualties and the numbers in the Pentagon’s latest reports. Again, Petraeus’s numbers seem to make the period before the surge look worse and the numbers after the surge look much better.
I graphed the Pentgon’s data on civilian casualties from its latest report (Pg 20). The data is for daily casualties, which includes both wounded and killed (I only included Iraqi civilians, which is the green bar). I converted the numbers to monthly casualties and compared it to the civilian death numbers on Page 3 of General Petraeus’s presentation to Congress. I don’t know if the data comes from the same source. Although, to be clear the Pentagon report data comes from the database that Petraeus himself stated was the best source of information and was verified by two U.S. intel agencies. Petraeus’s data comes from “Coalition and Host Nation Reporting.” I graphed everything based on eyeballing the data so the numbers are not exact.
Still, you’d expect the Iraqi civilian death numbers to track the Iraqi dead and wounded numbers and obviously civilian dead should be lower than wounded and dead combined. Unfortunately that is simply not the case. Three observations:
According to the MNC-I data there has been no improvement since either December (The numbers Petraeus and the Administration often cite) or February (when the surge actually began). Why wasn’t Congress shown these numbers in the presentation by General Petraeus? Why only the good news numbers? Why the lack of clarity on Petraeus’s sourcing? Especially since he himself acknowledged that the best numbers come from the MNC-I database.
In terms of actual anomalies
Anomaly A: Somehow in December, the month that is always cited by the Pentagon and the Administration, Petraeus’s Iraqi dead is actually greater than the MNC-I Iraqi Dead + Wounded. That makes absolutely no sense. You can’t have more dead than dead and wounded combined.
Anomaly B: In the months after the surge begins Petraeus’s Iraqi dead numbers are significantly lower than the dead + wounded numbers in the Pentagon report. This is inconsistent with the entire history of the previous year, where the numbers track closely. The only explanation would be a dramatic increase in the wounded to dead ratio. Perhaps there were more car bombings that injured people but didn’t kill them, as opposed to close range executions where victims do not survive. Or maybe there is another explanation. Still it seems inconsistent to see this major split just as the surge begins..
I’ve also graphed what the wounded numbers should look like based on this data (i.e. you can take the total civilian casualty numbers and subtract civilian deaths to find wounded). Notice how in December 2006 and January 2007 the numbers are actually negative, which makes no sense at all. By far the three highest months of wounded are March 2007, April 2007 and August 2007 – after the surge has started.
Overall, the numbers used by Petraeus have the same effect as all the other inconsistencies. They make the numbers right before the surge look extremely bad and the numbers during the surge look much better. Maybe that’s just a coincidence. But it does raise more questions.



Negative Wounded statistics occur when people are healed of a serious injury by being hit by a sniper's bullet.
Or when a car puts more people back together than it tears apart.
Posted by: scotus | September 18, 2007 at 09:43 PM
http://1boringoldman.com/index.php/2007/09/18/graphs-and-graphics-the-petraeus-story/
Great post. I wish I'd seen it before I obsessed over the numbers too. I think it says that the Surge was not something to help us leave Iraq, I think Bush did it so we could STAY. At the rate things were going in 2006, the place was collapsing. From his point of view, the Surge was a success. It kept things from deteriorating to the point where we had to get out [or were thrown out]...
Posted by: Mickey | September 19, 2007 at 12:20 AM
Bush's only fixation is on staying the course and dumping this mess in someone elses lap, so he can make a claim that it wasn't his fault - it all went to hell for the next guy. His fudged numbers show improvement after his surge, and it will be the new guy that lost Iraq for us, you watch.
Posted by: ponhros one | September 19, 2007 at 09:07 AM
very good analysis.
it was obvious that Petraeus had manipulated numbers. but this is simply betrayel.
Posted by: sod | September 19, 2007 at 09:59 AM
I recreated your graph and made a post about it on my blog. In addition, though, I added numbers from all the civilian casualty sources I could find, including the UN, IBC, icasualties, etc.
One thing that rather surprised me is that both the UN and IBC counts for civilians killed are, like Petraeus' numbers, ALSO greater than the total derived from that graph released in the MNF report for December 2006. It would seem that 3 sources conflicting with the MNF data would reduce its credibility, but of course, without knowing the details - and particularly the methodology of the MNF counts - it's impossible to know if we're comparing apples-to-apples, or, if we are, if we're comparing Granny Smiths to Red Delicious.
Posted by: Andy | September 20, 2007 at 10:16 AM
http://nepotomul.2itb.com
all here
Posted by: Mister | November 15, 2007 at 07:25 PM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro goldrunescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit
Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold
Posted by: runescape money | November 25, 2007 at 12:17 AM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money lotro gold buy lotro gold Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold dofus kamas buy dofus kamas 血管瘤 肝血管瘤 音乐剧 北京富码电视 富码电视 富码电视台 7天酒店 7天连锁酒店 7天连锁 自清洗过滤器 过滤器 压力开关 压力传感器 流量开关 流量计 液位计 液位开关 温湿度记录仪 风速仪 可燃气体检测仪 wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling
runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling 棕榈树
eve isk
eve online isk
eve isk
eve online isk
Posted by: runescape money | December 02, 2007 at 07:37 PM
Posted by: Ask | January 06, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Buy Levitra
Buy celebrex
Buy Cialis
My good site
Posted by: Sedop | January 15, 2008 at 01:29 PM
Very useful rapidshare search. It includes over 4 000 000 files. Loadingvault.com is a best search engine designed to search files in various file sharing and uploading sites.
You can find the files shared on uploading sites that the other crawlers miss.
Loadingvault.com provides relevant search results.
Loadingvault.com will definitely make it easy for you to search rapidshare files instead of using complex Google operators.
Try Loadingvault.com in my opinion the best rapidshare search engine ever. \
http://loadingvault.com
Posted by: Sewer | January 16, 2008 at 06:49 AM
good atie atle oat et
Posted by: maplestory mesos | January 17, 2008 at 05:14 AM
buy celebrex online The Best Prices at Pharmacy-for-you
buy arava online
Buy Arava, Arava, Online Arava
Buy celebrex . The best place to find drugs online. Compare prices from top online pharmacies, make order and get your medicine delivered to your door!
Posted by: ol | March 06, 2008 at 03:59 AM
I completely agree with all that here is told
"So you can find the information on it on my search resource
http://fileshunt.com"
Posted by: Search | March 30, 2008 at 09:38 AM
I completely agree with all that here is told
So you can find the information on it on my search resource
Fileshunt.com contains extensive search base on video and audio to materials
Posted by: tatianahunt download | April 01, 2008 at 10:10 AM
流動的思想 靈魂的翅膀
梅菜扣肉
自得其樂,善於娛樂,知足常樂,助人為樂
Posted by: huizhu | April 14, 2008 at 06:12 AM
Agreed but wouldnt that Rapidshare premium account be nice to have ?
Regards,
Roy
Posted by: Roy T | May 04, 2008 at 08:00 AM
I have found two interesting sources ( Fileshunt.com and Filesfinds.com ) and would like to give the benefit of my experience to you.
Posted by: tatianahunt download | May 05, 2008 at 08:11 AM
リネージュ2のアデナをカンタンに購入するならこちら。PlusOneのリネージュ2 RMTページ。余ってしまったアデナの買取も。
高級レギンス専門店のイビザストア。お買い上げ金額5000円以上で送料無料!レギンスとカラータイツの専門店です。
送料・代引き手数料無料ハナビラタケGはフェニックス健康オンラインショップ。
Posted by: agshin | May 05, 2008 at 10:43 PM
東京電力のショールームは、IH無料体験やオール電化住宅の相談をはじめ、家電の選び方・使い方もご提案!
ウェディングドレスレンタルから、ヴェールなどのドレス小物、ブーケ、ヘアメイク、写真撮影などもお任せください。
レンタルのウエディングドレスから、デザイナーズ・ウエディングドレスまで、低価格で全国へお届けします!ドレス 通販>
Posted by: irmuun | May 06, 2008 at 09:21 PM
インターンシップで使える英語が身につく。iiPは語学留学(アメリカ 留学)やワーホリとは違う効果があります。
Posted by: hi | May 06, 2008 at 10:50 PM
Download now without waiting : Rapidshare Premium Account
Posted by: Nick G. | May 24, 2008 at 06:19 AM
June 2007 M T W T F S S« May Jul» 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Favorite Sites A Million Monkeys Typing Ace of Spades Acute Politics Alarming News Anwyn’ s Notes in the Margin Badgers Forward Beldar Blog Best of the Web Betsy’ s Page Big Lizards BizzyBlog Blackfive Blogging. la BuzzMachine Captain’ s Quarters Carol Platt Liebau Commonwealth Conservative Confirm Them Constitutional Conservative Cop the Truth Countercolumn Dan Weintraub DANEgerus Dave Barry...
Posted by: business income opportunity xango | June 23, 2008 at 08:10 PM
Tech companies that have gone into“ Online Music” alone include Imeem, SomaFM, Pandora and countless others who use music as a primary driver of traffic, while completely ignoring any idea of a business model that fairly compensates artists for their work, something that’ s primarily because of their lack of industry experience or advice. The results? GREAT MUSIC SERVICES are on the chopping block as soon as they’ re mature enough to start making a“ profit” (e. g. Imeem has paid MILLIONS in advances to the...
Posted by: making money online | June 24, 2008 at 12:42 AM
great work!
Store
Posted by: drugstore | June 28, 2008 at 10:48 PM