Democracy Arsenal

« Who Are Bush's 33%? | Main | Call Your Therapist, Part 3 »

August 28, 2007

Petraeus: Lots of Smoke. No Fire Yet.
Posted by Ilan Goldenberg

I have to agree with Kevin.

I am getting more and more suspicious of General Petraeus and these assertions that violence is actually down in Iraq.  There is no smoking gun and I hope that I am wrong about this, but there are just too many question marks out there.  Individually they don't raise suspicions, but combined they make me very skeptical. 

There is a lot of smoke.  But as of yet no fire.  Reporters and legislators alike need to take a very careful look at him and the numbers that are presented in the White House report. 

Consider:

  • The McClatchy article from a couple of weeks back where the military asserted that violence was down but “declined to provide specific numbers, and statistics gathered by McClatchy Newspapers don’t support the claim.”

  • The AP reported this weekend that by their count sectarian violence has doubled this year. 

  • The fact that the Iraqi ministry of health has stopped sharing its numbers with the UN.  So there is no independent verification of the violence numbers.

  • The fact that Petraeus commented on the NIE and helped "soften" the language on the security situation

  • His Washington Post op-ed in 2004 which touted the success of Iraqi security forces, 6 weeks before the election.  Turns out it wasn’t going as well as he said it was.

  • The fact that the U.S. military in the past has gone out of its way to specifically undercount "sectarian killings" to make it look like there was progress

  • The fact that Petraeus's entire career and legacy is tied to the “surge” and its success

Just some food for thought.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200e54ed2cc5c8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Petraeus: Lots of Smoke. No Fire Yet.:

Comments

Don't forget the Iraq Study Group (ISG) which lambasted the Pentagon for "significant underreporting of the violence in Iraq." For example, official accounts tallied 93 attacks one day in July [2006], yet, according to the ISG, "a careful review of the reports for that single day brought to light 1,100 acts of violence."

Also, Petraeus's report ought to be considered secondary to Crocker's. The purpose of the military escalation was to provide security for accomplishment of the 18 benchmarks. With the ongoing disintegration of the Iraqi "government" that seems unlikely in the next 5 or 10 Friedman units.

So everything's going to plan. The US treasury has been drained, the US is in hock up to its eyebrows in debt to Japan and China and the US will obviously stay the course, with a slight deviation to a total ME holocaust following attacks on Iran. --How about them Sox?

Months ago you had an ongoing debate with Petraeus's spokesman in which you argued that you cannot trust the guy running the show to be the person who judges whether it is working or not. You were right then and nothing has changed to make anyone think differently.

At the risk of being obvious, GAO also was commissioned to write a report for Congress on many of these subjects, and parts of it recently were been leaked to the press.

It's scheduled to be discussed during a September 1 hearing, I believe. Its major points are about benchmarking troop commitments to "political reconciliation" goals achieved by the government of the "nation" of "Iraq."

It's such a top-secret, hush-hush document -- complete with metrics! -- that it's been openly mentioned by the Washington Post, NY Times and the Kalamazoo Daily Bugler.

runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money lotro gold buy lotro gold Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold dofus kamas buy dofus kamas 血管瘤 肝血管瘤 音乐剧 北京富码电视 富码电视 富码电视台 7天酒店 7天连锁酒店 7天连锁 自清洗过滤器 过滤器 压力开关 压力传感器 流量开关 流量计 液位计 液位开关 温湿度记录仪 风速仪 可燃气体检测仪 wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling
runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling 棕榈树
eve isk
eve online isk
eve isk
eve online isk

thanks for your sharing.Good

Hello. That's very nice site but I've seen this before here:
[url]http://bb2.inguaro.com/25e07695f39bc2baea78bb82472b01df[/url]
25e07695f39bc2baea78bb82472b01df

I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

If Petraeus presents a glowing report, and the "successes" in Iraq continue, he might be able to buy himself a little more time for his surge. He might be able to mollify war critics sufficiently to keep us in Iraq a bit longer. There will, however, be no peace in Iraq until there is political reconciliation, and it just seems very unlikely that the Sunnis will be comfortable as a minority in the Iraqi Parliament. They used to run the whole enchillada, lest we forget.In any event, I'm guessing that we start to see a drawdown of troops before the elections next year. Bush will say that the surge worked, that most of the country is peaceful, and that he is drawing down troops and he'll let the Iraqis handle the rest. So, it'll be Vietnam all over again, basically. If he does this, I'm guessing it will take the wind out of Hillary's sails. Her advantage is that she's perceived as being way tougher than her opponents for the nomination, and if the need for that toughness is abated, the Democrats will probably pick a safer candidate.

The sides are beautifully sculpted and the lugs extend from the bottom of the case in a way that compliments almost any strap,or the bracelet.The design is very fluid,and it sits perfectly on my wrist.Replica Kenneth Cole Watches is solid,smooth,and has a very vintage feel to it.The crown is a lovely size and features the Benarus three dolphin logo on its edge.The bezel is a Replica Jacques Lemans F1 120 click dive timer that fits the case perfectly with no play,wiggle or flex.Replica Immersion Watches of any case is in its details which is where the Moray excels.Its retro design seamlessly integrates with the solid end links of the bracelet.The dial is quite unique as well; Replica Jacques Lemans Watches is a very dark grey/black with a slightly tactile metallic tone -- not glossy or smooth.It's very hard to describe,and I have attempted to capture it in the photos.The markers and numbers on the dial are not inlaid but appear to be made of painted on C3 luminous paint.The lume is first rate; it charges quickly and lasted well into the night or through a movie.The hour and second hand have metallic edges while the minute hand has orange edges that cause it to stand out.This is my only issue with the Moray: I'm not a big fan of the continuity of the orange hand.It's not bad,but Replica Orient Watches really stands out.(The Ocean7 LM-2 has a similar orange minute hand,but it matches the orange accents on the reflector,second hand,and logo.)The dial is almost sterile,only indicating the brand,the automatic movement,and the water resistance.The date window is small and unobtrusive with white text on a black wheel located between the 4 and 5 markers.The dial design is very similar to that found on Panerai Replica Hamilton Watches,but the hands,date Replica Leonard Watches,and paint application has little in common with Panerai.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use