Democratic Message on Foreign Policy 2008--A Contest
Posted by Jerry Mayer
So I have been part of an informal group of people working in Washington on Democratic and progressive messaging on foreign policy since 2005. Once, the suggestion of using the metaphor of a toolbox to describe the Democratic foreign policy came up, that Bush was trying to build a house with only a hammer, he had only one tool, while the Democrats would use every tool, like diplomacy, trade, persuasion, etc. I actually didn't think much of the idea, it was too complicated for the American public, but someone who had worked on the Kerry campaign chimed in and said "Yeah, we liked that in May, for Kerry, and we kept trying to get it into speeches. I think we finally got it up on the website in October."
Yes, that's right. It took the Kerry campaign months to agree on a METAPHOR for its foreign policy. Sigh.
Well, for 2008, we pretty much know what the Dem foreign policy is going to be, substantively, right? Get out of Iraq, reengage with our allies, smart multilateralism in our foreign policy, tough on the real terror threat, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil...but what the heck do we call it?
I think Kerry's was Stronger at Home, Respected Abroad. But it's tough to tell. It was no "New Frontier." Probably more successful than McGovern's "Come Home America" from 1972. My suggestion in '06 for Congressional Dems was "Change the Course."
So, a contest here at Democracy Arsenal. Propose a catch phrase or label for the Democratic nominee's foreign policy in '08. No more than 10 words. Winner will receive a George Mason University t-shirt via mail.
Bonus humor points: come up with a slogan for the Republican foreign policy. Like "Hey, A Few Countries Don't Hate Us!" or "Same Failed Policies, Now With Competence!" "Republicans: We Put the U in Quagmire!"


As much as current Democratic foreign policy chatter dissatisfies me personally, the Democrats are in effect presnting the administration to come as a sort of US Restoration Era following the disastrous radical interregnum of the Bush administration, an era in which we rebuild friendships, repair tattered alliances and promote cooperation under American leadership - and set the US ship of state back on the more traditional liberal internationalist course it followed during Bush I and Clinton. So I would propose:
Restoring Leadership
I played around with various adjectives to insert between "restoring" and "leadership". But I couldn't think of anything that didn't detract from the overriding simplicity and clarity of the two-word motto.
Posted by: Dan Kervick | May 30, 2007 at 02:39 PM
Tough, Dynamic, Thoughtful leadership for an ever changing complex world.
Intelligent, bold, thoughtful engagement for the complexities of National Leadership.
Posted by: Davinci | May 30, 2007 at 03:01 PM
I don't necessarily have a phrase. But two words or concepts that need to be in there realistic and hopeful. Realistic as a foil to the ideological Bush Administration. Hope as a foil to fear. The Bushies' favorite and most effective tool.
Posted by: Ilan Goldenberg | May 30, 2007 at 03:09 PM
Oh, and here are some Republican slogans:
Supersize Your Freedom Fries!
Lying to Keep You Safe
It's Mourning in America!
Stamping Out Stability
The Right Team for The End Times
Achieving Tomorrow's Imperial Decline Today!
GOP ... OPE ... POE
Strength through Fear
Faith, Fatherland, Fanaticism
Posted by: Dan Kervick | May 30, 2007 at 03:37 PM
Why not just cut to the chase:
SAVE AMERICA
Posted by: Moira Whelan | May 30, 2007 at 03:38 PM
Democrats need a candidate, not a slogan. As far as foreign affairs is concerned, they need a candidate who is not trying to become the third novice in a row to assume the Presidency. And no, having mastered the slogans and talking points needed to live in the world of the permanent campaign does not make one any less of a novice where foreign and national security affairs are concerned.
Posted by: Zathras | May 30, 2007 at 04:08 PM
Wow, some great early stuff. I love "Achieving Tomorrow's Imperial Decline Today!" and Lying to Keep You Safe" I do also like the gerund "Restoring" but "Restoring Leadership"
"Save America" has great appeal, too...
Zathras is of course right, we need a candidate, but slogans and talking points are part of the necessities today as well. I remember a meeting with one of the grand old members of the Democratic foreign policy establishment where he pointed to a list of 24 foreign policy issues and said we didn't need slogans or talking points, we just needed to get the right positions on these issues and we'd win the elections (of 2006). I had to point out to him that most Congressional elections have no foreign policy component at all, and when they do they are dreadfully simplistic, and at best two of the 24 issues would appear in half the campaigns as issues. Messaging on foreign policy in presidential elections is a little more sophisticated but not much. Ike's message in '52 was pretty much "I will go to Korea". No one knew what that meant, but it sounded good.
Keep 'em coming.
Posted by: Jerry Mayer | May 30, 2007 at 04:33 PM
"I will go to Korea" sounded good because Americans had confidence in Eisenhower, the great war hero. That's the Democrats' problem today; their leading candidates include one man known best for suing people, another for writing books about himself, and the last Democratic President's wife. In an election year when support for the Republican candidate collapses -- there is a good chance that 2008 will be such a year -- this could be enough to bring a Democrat to the White House. A successful foreign policy? That would happen only by accident, even if Democrats stack catchy slogans to the ceiling.
Posted by: Zathras | May 30, 2007 at 10:33 PM
"By accident"? I doubt that. To shorten John Edwards' career to "best known for suing people" is really ridiculous. How about best known for running for VP in 2004, at least? And I think Bill Richardson still has a good chance, particularly if the convention knots up. I think the convention may well be knotted. We are in terra incognito with the primaries moving all around. I don't know that Hillary or Obama can get enough momentum to wipe out the other, Edwards will get his votes, and so will some of the others. Add that up, and you could go into the convention without a clear winner. Conventional wisdom says that level of disunity that late in the election will be a disaster for the Dems. I'm not convinced. It will make people care about the conventions again. Could suck up all the media attention.
Also, Obama, Edwards, Richardson, Hillary, and Dodd are all really bright people with a sense of America's role in the world. I think each of them could be a fine leader of our foreign policy. The key is to get them, any of them, elected. Slogans will help.
Posted by: Jerry Mayer | May 30, 2007 at 10:54 PM
How about "Let's be First Again" or just "First Again"
Now, I didn't come up with that, I'm PC-disabled in my creativity. A friend of mine from the countryside out West did. Too jingoistic? I would say yes for everyone outside the USA, but I suspect might work well here at home....
Posted by: Lorelei Kelly | May 31, 2007 at 12:18 AM
Make the World Safe Again- Vote for a Democrat.
Make the World Safe Again- Vote Obama.
Make the World Safe Again- or vote Republican.
I find them all hollow without the candidate and I'm not sure most could pull it off. Maybe Obama, Richardson, or Biden.
Posted by: Lane Brody | May 31, 2007 at 02:27 AM
Hi Lorelei--I agree that jingoism isn't a big problem for Democrats, since it goes against their image and there are, in fact, no votes to be had in Belgium. So I like the concept of a slogan that touches on ambient nationalism. First Again...that's not quite there, though. Restoring the Best? The Best Again? Hmm...can't get it to work, but it's early!
Posted by: Jerry Mayer | May 31, 2007 at 06:41 AM
I think American foreign policy post-W will mirror Sarkozy's nostalgia of neo-Gaulism. Strong, independent foreign policy that brings together multilateral institutions only when it makes sense. I also think we will be eating up the new rhetoric of "smart power" that think tanks are pushing in Washington. With that, here are my slogans:
Posted by: Allen | May 31, 2007 at 09:54 AM
Personally, I think "Democrats: We're not f**king idiots" sums up my feelings, but it probably wouldn't go over so well as a campaign slogan.
"Democrats: In Favor of American Values" or "Remember the Constitution? So do we!" would also sum up my feelings.
As for Republicans, we could do: "Republicans: Because things aren't bad enough---yet". Or maybe, "Consti-what?"
Posted by: Ben Bartlett | May 31, 2007 at 07:45 PM
Or, the Jon Stewart suggestion for the Repubs--Constitution...Schmonstitution!
Posted by: Jerry Mayer | May 31, 2007 at 09:20 PM
条码检测仪
条码打印机
条码扫描器
数据采集器
标签打印软件
碳带
标签
司法考试
司法考试
韩国留学
录音电话
翻译公司
防静电地板
传奇私服
康明斯
气枪
仿真枪
防窜货
职务犯罪
无负压
猎头
猎头公司
猎头顾问
广州猎头
上海猎头
北京猎头
猎头公司
发电机
发电机组
发电机出租
发电设备
发电机租赁
租赁发电机
出租发电机
空气过滤器
北京婚庆
北京婚庆公司
进销存软件
进销存
erp软件
生产管理软件
牛皮癣
精神病
结肠炎
瑜伽
北京瑜伽
瑜伽教练培训
肚皮舞
肚皮舞培训
云台
监控器材
分配器
301云台
公共广播
中央空调
家用中央空调
格力中央空调
中央吸尘|商用中央吸尘|家用中央吸尘|工业中央吸尘|别墅中央
吸尘
家用中央清扫系统|宾馆吸尘|中央吸尘系统|别墅吸尘
拆除
拆除公司
建筑物拆除
鱼鳞病
不锈钢水箱
防雷
防雷器
职业装
大屏幕
快速熔断器
高压熔断器
低压熔断器
熔断器
按钮
塔钟
法语
西服
西装
按钮开关
船型开关
微动开关
钥匙开关
旋转开关
法语培训
婚纱摄影
润滑油
连接器
新开传奇私服
日光温室
节水
rohs认证
传奇私服
最新传奇私服
新开传奇私服
新开传奇
新开私服
3C代理
强制认证
汽车进口
最新传奇私服
山东助听器信息网
上海助听器总汇
北京助听器网
助听器
贵州助听器信息港
名品助听器(南京)直销店
广西助听器验配网
杭州 助听器验配中心
广东 助听器总汇
海参
紫外线消毒器|搪瓷水箱
进口轴承
轴承
进口轴承
玻璃钢水箱|无负压
进口轴承
网站优化|google优化|google推广|google排名
网站建设 北京|北京网页设计|北京网站制作|北京网站推广
北京网站建设|双线空间
虚拟主机|双线空间|asp空间|
非油品
中石化
冬虫夏草
生态餐厅
Posted by: sdfsd | June 05, 2007 at 10:14 PM
The Reagan commercial which began with a deep voiced announcer saying "It's morning again in America" really resonated with people. The simple phrase painted a picture of the country people want to believe... and it did not say "It will be morning if you vote for Reagan." It simply painted a picture and then associated that view of America with Reagan.
We need something like that. Show people what is still right about America, and they will respond.
I also like the idea of using this slogan to call attention to the Constitution. (Some smart campaign should right now be buying thousands of pocket copies of the Constitution for their candidate to hand out like candy at every campaign stop... make it a signature move so if anyone else does it they look like a copy cat.)
Therefore:
"Provide for the Common Defense, Secure the Blessings of Liberty"
"We the People..."
"Forming a More Perfect Union, Every Day"
Or a little more bite:
"When in the course of human events..."
(yeah, yeah, it comes from the Declaration of Independence not the Consitution... but we may need the attitude of the Declaration this time.)
or perhaps:
"Government Power: Only From the Consent of the Governed"
Posted by: Keith Porter | June 25, 2007 at 07:58 AM
A New Direction?
" ... Forever Twisting and Turning Towards Freedom!"
Posted by: JRBehrman | June 25, 2007 at 11:26 AM
"TIRED OF THEIR BULLS**T? TRY OURS!"
Posted by: Ellen1910 | June 25, 2007 at 08:57 PM
I read this elsewhere, but I think re-terming "strategic redeployment" as a "pull (out of Iraq) and strike (at AQ)" would be a great start in Dem sloganeering.
Posted by: Jac Burden | June 26, 2007 at 09:49 PM
Participation, not accommodation.
Posted by: Patrick Roath | June 27, 2007 at 10:16 AM
Democratic Slogan:
"We all succeed together."
Works for international audience as olive branch and fresh start. Works for domestic audience by exposing GOP partisanship and offering collaborative alternative. Especially appeals to female vote.
Republican Slogan:
"We may have MBAs, but we can't manage shit."
Enough said. You know where I stood on the war, but hopefully you understand how I feel about how it was carried out. It still kills me.
Posted by: Jeff Hotchkiss | June 28, 2007 at 03:36 AM
It occurs to me, to be honest, that there is very little indication that a troop withdrawal in name will actually mean a disengagement from Iraq or if that would even be a good thing to begin with. Hillary has recently extended her phased withdrawal plan, Barack seems bent on staying in the region despite his aversion to the conflict in general. Dems might force “withdrawal” but their foreign policy platforms give us no indication of a change in approach. Check out what this Berlin website is saying http://www.atlantic-community.org/index.php/articles/view/The_Next_American_President%3A_Democratic_Foreign_Policy
Looks like the international community might finally understand that American foreign policy is pretty consistent and that this Iraq thing was not an aberration, just a more visible failure.
Posted by: Charlie | July 13, 2007 at 05:20 AM
国际机票 国际机票 婚庆公司 婚庆 货架 机柜 管理咨询 管理咨询
机票 管理咨询公司 钢结构 星辰科技 起名 取名 风水 货架 月嫂
条码打印机 大屏幕 拓展训练 滑雪 北京滑雪 滑雪场 北京滑雪场 标签纸 进口轴承 加固 保洁 保洁公司 北京保洁 北京保洁公司
Posted by: sd | September 09, 2007 at 01:41 AM
货架
南京货架
货架厂
仓储货架
货架公司
轻型货架
中型货架
重型货架
阁楼货架
悬臂货架
模具货架
托盘
钢托盘
塑料托盘
料箱
仓储笼
上海货架
苏州货架
无锡货架
常州货架
扬州货架
南通货架
镇江货架
昆山货架
张家港货架
吴江货架
浙江货架
杭州货架
绍兴货架
上虞货架
诸暨货架
宁波货架
余姚货架
慈溪货架
温州货架
台州货架
嘉兴货架
嘉善货架
海宁货架
湖州货架
衢州货架
模温机
压铸模温机
工业冷水机
冷水机
冷冻机
注塑机
模温机
冷水机
安徽货架
合肥货架
芜湖货架
马鞍山货架
蚌埠货架
铜陵货架
滁洲货架
巢湖货架
哈尔滨货架
长春货架
沈阳货架
大连货架
北京货架
天津货架
山东货架
济南货架
青岛货架
烟台货架
日照货架
淄博货架
威海货架
潍坊货架
昆明货架
成都货架
西安货架
武汉货架
长沙货架
南昌货架
厦门货架
福州货架
手推车
登高车
手动液压托盘搬运车
轻型货架
中型货架
重型货架
悬臂货架
阁楼货架
托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
仓储笼
南京货架
货架厂
上海货架
苏州货架
无锡货架
常州货架
南通货架
江苏货架
浙江货架
杭州货架
宁波货架
温州货架
绍兴货架
台州货架
嘉兴货架
安徽货架
合肥货架
芜湖货架
马鞍山货架
铜陵货架
蚌埠货架
滁洲货架
黄山货架
山东货架
济南货架
青岛货架
烟台货架
轻型货架
中型货架
重型货架
托盘
钢托盘
塑料托盘
仓储笼
南京货架
货架厂
货架公司
上海货架
苏州货架
无锡货架
常州货架
浙江货架
杭州货架
宁波货架
温州货架
台州货架
嘉兴货架
金华货架
绍兴货架
不锈钢工作台
不锈钢手推车
安徽货架
江苏货架
南通货架
扬州货架
镇江货架
模温机
压铸模温机
工业冷水机
冷水机
冷冻机
注塑机
模温机
冷水机
模温机
冷水机
南京北春货架制造有限公司
南京货架
货架厂
仓储货架
货架公司
轻型货架
中型货架
中型货架
重型货架
阁楼货架
悬臂货架
贯通货架
辊轮货架
压入货架
移动货架
抽屉货架
汽配库货架
自动化立体库
密集架
钢制托盘
塑料托盘
木托盘
仓储笼
堆垛架
手推车
登高车
整理架
置物架
钢制料箱
物流台车
液压托盘搬运车
堆高车
输送辊道
货架
货架
轻型货架
轻型货架
中型货架
中型货架
重型货架
滑动式货架
贯通货架
悬臂货架
阁楼货架
模具货架
工具柜
工具车
工作台
仓储笼
折叠式仓储笼
仓库笼
蝴蝶笼
塑料托盘
钢托盘
钢制托盘
钢制托盘制造
手推车
静音手推车
铁板手推车
钢制推车
托盘搬运车
堆垛架
巧固架
物流台车
载物台车
网片
隔离网
金属网片
Posted by: njracks | September 17, 2007 at 05:08 AM