Weekly Top 10 List - Top 10 Reasons Why John Bolton Should Not Be Confirmed As U.S. Ambassador to the UN
Posted by Suzanne Nossel
Bolton’s confirmation hearings start Thursday, and its not too late to weigh in, particularly with Senator Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island. While the chances of flipping any conservatives on the SFRC to vote against Bolton are slim, Chafee is thought to be the best prospect. For more on Bolton check out the Arsenal archive, the CAP website, and especially the washingtonnote.com which is on the forefront of this battle.
Top 10 Reasons:
10. He hates the UN. He’s said that the U.S. should be the only country on the UNSC, that the UN building could be shaved of 10 stories without it making a difference, etc. Check here for direct quotes.
9. He doesn’t believe in paying U.S. dues to the UN. And has said so. A big part of the job of UN envoy is working with the Hill to get U.S. contributions paid. Withholding dues in the ‘80s and ‘90s led to a diplomatic debacle that took years to put right. We don’t have the time, energy or goodwill to waste on such battles.
8. He won’t enjoy the support of U.S. diplomats around the world. 60+ ex-diplomats have signed a letter opposing Bolton. Current envoys feel the same way. But Bolton will need the embassies to back him in capitals to succeed in pushing through U.S. proposals (see Retail Diplomacy). Personal views about Bolton will undercut this support.
7. He and the Secretary of State are not on the same page. Insiders seem unanimous that Bolton was foisted on Rice. This is a recipe for tension between USUN and the Seventh Floor, a fissure that other countries will try to exploit.
6. His statements on China are reckless. He clearly enjoys the role of provocateur vis-à-vis China and Taiwan. At a sensitive point in relations, we cannot afford to have a flamethrower in the mix.
5. The damage will not be confined to the UN. Bolton is not a team player. He has a track record of breaking rules and exceeding his mandate (including by setting an unauthorized deadline for Russian acceptance of US conditions for remaining in the ABM treaty). The UN post touches on a wide range of issues, and is notoriously difficult for the State Department to control.
4. Denying confirmation would signal the world that the foreign policy opposition is alive and kicking. If they see an active progressive opposition, the world will continue to distinguish between their view of this Administration and their view of America at large. With Bush’s reelection and supposed mandate, the separation gets harder -- and more important -- to sustain.
3. He will not change his spots. Some, including progressives, have argued that Bolton may change his ways once at the UN. But this is the man with whom Jesse Helms wants to stand at Armageddon. Can you imagine, if the roles were reversed, conservatives giving the “benefit of the doubt” for a nominee they saw as weak on security (“well, once he gets to the Pentagon, that may toughen him up”).
2. He is a proven opponent of arms control. Bolton has blocked a slew of arms control agreements, from the CTBT to a small arms accord and a biological weapons agreement. With proliferation, terrorism and the combination thereof topping of the list of threats against the U.S., arms control belongs at the forefront of U.S. national security strategy. Bolton will stand in the way of that.
1. He will be ineffective in representing U.S. interests. And this is most important of all. Promoting U.S. interests at the UN is an art and a science. A hammer is an essential part of UN diplomacy. But Bolton is missing the rest of the toolbox. See my article on Retail Diplomacy (PDF) for more on how the US can get its way at the UN through crafty diplomacy.


Suzanne -
Thanks for your excellent list of reasons to oppose Bolton's nomination. I think it's also important that you look closely to the question of what Bolton's record of *effectiveness* has been in the past four years. Many of your arguments end up falling deaf ears when they compete with the idea that Bolton has been an "effective diplomat." His record as Undersecretary of State disproves this notion decisively. For more information, see my article at:
http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/index.php?id=477
Posted by: Michael Roston | April 03, 2005 at 09:30 PM
"He will be ineffective in representing US interests"
I believe this is by far the strongest argument to be made with Sen. Chafee and other Republicans. And I wrote to Sen. Chafee last week saying so.
We have soldiers struggling with peace-keeping and nation-building in Iraq and Afghanistan, and UN cooperation on Iran, Syria and North Korea is needed. Each of these issues trump Bolton's personal agenda.
Posted by: owen | April 04, 2005 at 06:05 AM
These top ten lists are a great idea. Thanks for all your hard work.
Posted by: praktike | April 04, 2005 at 02:34 PM
Good top 10. Here are the predictable wingnut responses:
10. Good for him!
9. Good for him! I don't want my hard-earned money going to those tinpot tyrants at the UN!
8. Guess we better get us some new diplomats who won't undermine him, then.
7. Sounds like we need him to keep that wimp Condi in line.
6. Aww...did he hurt poor widdle communist China's feelings?
5. Great! He can have a positive influence beyond the UN!
4. A victory by the anti-American faction would be an open invitation to the world to take advantage of us, because our homegrown subversives won't let us act in our own interest.
3. Good for him! We need someone who stands for something, unlike those pussies in the Democrat party.
2. He won't let our hands be tied by...y'know...treaties.
1. Oh yeah...because maybe if we had just talked to al Qaeda they wouldn't have been so mean to us.
Posted by: Tom Hilton | April 04, 2005 at 03:20 PM
Which is greater--Bolton's anticipated performance at the UN, or the UN's known performance?
Posted by: Old Dad | April 04, 2005 at 04:03 PM
The argument I've heard most often used by Bolton's supporters is the Nixon-China argument that because he was such an critic in the past he'll be most able to reform the UN. If by reform they mean undermine, they might be right on. But #s 8 and 9 of your list especially show why he's unlikely to provide any good reform, much less be a good diplomat.
Posted by: Lauren | April 04, 2005 at 04:28 PM
in the spirit in which you appear to have written this, and to safeguard our vital but abjectly corrupt & failing multi-national forums such as the UN, we eagerly await your "top 10 reasons why kofi annan should be replaced immediately."
Posted by: cali white bear | April 04, 2005 at 04:58 PM
in the spirit in which you appear to have written this, and to safeguard our vital but abjectly corrupt & failing multi-national forums such as the UN, we eagerly await your "top 10 reasons why kofi annan should be replaced immediately."
Tell you what: once Bush has been impeached for the same sort of cronyism Annan has been accused of, then let's work on replacing Annan. One thing at a time.
Posted by: Tom Hilton | April 04, 2005 at 05:24 PM
If you think Bush's cronyism amounts to a drop in the bucket compared to what's going on at the UN... Wow.
Not to mention that we're in a position of relative power right now with the U.N.: Getting reform to happen within the U.N. is more likely than shifting the course of the Bush administration while it's riding high in international-affairs terms.
Posted by: Joe | April 04, 2005 at 06:21 PM
good ole tom representin for the moonbat wing. of course we arent talking about W, now were we? were were talking about the UN, and the relative usefulness of this ambassador-designate or that secretary general.
it must be tuff to wear those "Chimpy McHilterBurton and the rovian death toads are guilty of everycrime" glasses day in and day out.
ill tell you what, tom: you can have bolton's head on a plate if thats what boils your rabbit, if you give up Annan cooked with the same recipe in exchange...that would be like sending greg ostertag out to punch kevin garnett in the nads and start a fight: they both leave the game but which one is more valuable to his team.????
Posted by: cali white bear | April 04, 2005 at 06:29 PM
One potential avenue for Democrats to oppose Bolton's nomination is to highlight his stance on weapons non-proliferation, including his fight against the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Ottawa Landmines Treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention, and others. At a time when one of the main dangers that the United States faces is that of a small nuclear bomb being smuggled and exploded in NY or DC, how does advancing a man whose whole career has been spent fighting nonproliferation advance our cause? How does it make us safer?
It's almost impossible to understand how Bush considers Bolton to be an effective choice unless, of course, one believes that his ultimate goal is to undermine the UN. In terms of advancing American interests, however, it's a disaster.
The Democratic opposition to Bolton, therefore, should be based on the national security grounds that Bolton is weak on terrorism and weak on non-proliferation. Tactically, it's tough to do this because of Bolton's reputation as a hawk and his reflexive support from the nationalist wing of the Republicans, but it's vital that the case be made. Perhaps something along the lines of "Why does John Bolton want to allow Al Qaeda to get its hands on nuclear weapons?" The issue has to be framed simply and clearly so that it's understandable to the average citizen.
Posted by: Stefan | April 04, 2005 at 06:45 PM
Cali White Bear and Joe, shocking as it may seem, there are indeed some areas where the United States really does outpace the United Nations in terms of cronyism and incompetence. Take Iraq, for instance. Did you know that a special federal auditing agency found that the Coalition Provisional Authority had misplaced almost $9 billion in oil reconstruction funds? Probably not, because the missing oil funds story got hardly any attention from the media and from Congress. (Here's another story about allegations of corruption going in the CPA -http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7306162/site/newsweek/ As far as I know, no CPA Officials have been disciplined.
Personally, I do not believe that Kofi Annan should resign. The fact is that after an exhaustive, $60 million investation, the Volcker Commitee has been unable to produce any evidence of Kofi's knowledge of Coltecena's bid in Iraq in 1998, and, more importantly, any influence over the procurement selection.
Moreover, I don't see what good it would do either the UN or the United States. As Suzanne made clear in an earlier post, Annan has been the most pro-American, reform-minded Secretary General in UN history. Of course, if your goal is to weaken the United Stations, then it makes sense to see Annan resign.
Posted by: Peter | April 04, 2005 at 09:07 PM
For anyone who's interested, there's a copy of the report on the missing Oil Reconstruction Funds available at:
http://www.cpa-ig.com/pdf/dfi_ministry_report.pdf
Posted by: Peter | April 04, 2005 at 09:10 PM
Joe: "Not to mention that we're in a position of relative power right now with the U.N."
Aren't we about to go ask them for help on Iran and North Korea?
What relative power do we have? Is Kofi's son going to get some sweetheart contracts in Iraq or Alaska?
Posted by: owen | April 05, 2005 at 04:19 AM
For a group of foreign policy pundits, the national security case against Bolton should be better made.
Consider Bolton's achievements on arms control. Bolton helped slay the ICC and the Optional Protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention, thus protecting U.S. troops from the "threat" of the Dutch (re: American Servicemember's Protection Act, authorizing force against the Netherlands) while ensuring that troops would have to go into countries to verify their weapons, rather than inspectors.
Why? "Legal enforcement" through arms inspectors - as exists for chemical or nuclear weapons - might threaten U.S. pharmaceuticals.
End result? Bolton national security means protecting Pfizer is more important than protecting troops.
Posted by: donzelion | April 11, 2005 at 08:13 PM
I like to earn the World of Warcraft Gold very much, I want to have a lot of warcraft gold in the game, i do not satisfy the old equipment and so i have to buy wow gold to buy the new equipment to make me strong. If i am very strong in the game i can get some cheap wow gold as the rewards in the game. So i like the game very much.
Posted by: wow gold | December 24, 2008 at 10:31 PM
I hope i can get Atlantica Gold in low price.
Posted by: Atlantica online Gold | January 06, 2009 at 10:25 PM
If you have hero gold, you can get more. If you gave hero online gold to me, I still have my idea to achieve.
Posted by: hero online gold | January 20, 2009 at 12:28 AM
I appriciate him. I prefer the
rs gold in the game. In fact, the
runescape money is expensive.
Posted by: runescape money | March 03, 2009 at 11:04 PM
hzoc good site! odaback.1d cialis <a href=http://odaback.1d>cialis</a> vr762
Posted by: glammamix | March 24, 2009 at 05:04 AM
I appriciate him. I prefer the
rs gold in the game. In fact, the
runescape money is expensive.
Posted by: Hermes Handbags | April 22, 2009 at 02:02 AM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | June 05, 2009 at 10:52 AM
Labels printed by China printing is very good quality and good prices.
Plastic products made by plastic injection molding services with low costs and supeior quality
Shoring scaffolding for construction is a very useful tool.
Posted by: injection moulding | June 16, 2009 at 07:51 AM
Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat seslisohbet
Posted by: yargıc | January 06, 2010 at 07:28 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 27, 2010 at 01:17 AM
0314
The Nike air max Shoe lives up to its name with plush cushioning and a sleek silhouette. It brings you just what you need to style it up wherever you go. you can look at the Air max 2009,air max 90,Air max 95,Air Max 2010
Features:
* Minimalistic construction of leathers and synthetics in the upper
* Nike Shox technology for optimal cushioning
* Rubber outsole for excellent grip
Posted by: nike air max | February 23, 2010 at 02:43 AM
Dear friend ,we are a trading conpany deal with men’s clothes for many years .we mianly export NFL jersey|NFL jerseys,you can visit our website for more information. Our jerseys were high quality replic.
Posted by: NFLjerseys | March 16, 2010 at 10:08 PM
Your point of view is right, thank you for sharing, if you have the time, also came to see my site:
Air Jordan Ugg Boots NFL/MLB/NHL
I hope you enjoy them, thank you!
Posted by: Warm | April 07, 2010 at 05:04 AM
ghd IV salon styler,ghd purple roll bag.
product features:
Auto sleep mode(A built in safety feature that gives you peace of mind by turning off if the ghd IV styler is left unallended for 30 minutes.)
Universal voltage(So that you can use your styler in any country without an adaptor.)
Advanced ceramic heaters(The ultimate heating technology for the ultimate shine and style creation.)
All our products are cheap,if you want to find cheap ghd,come here and that is right.
If you want to find GHD hair products,you can write GHD straightener,GHD hair straighteners,GHD straightners,GHD hair,straighteners GHD in google browse.
Posted by: ghd | April 15, 2010 at 02:53 AM
Chanel Handbags are woman’s dream come true.
Chanel, a fashion name that has become synonymous with femininity since 100 years, is on the must-have list of every fashion-conscious woman.? And we bring these must-have Chanel Handbags at never before discounts, just for you.
It is only when you come across an Chanel New Arrivals, do you realize the power of her words.? Chanel handbags are crafted not just to be trendy, but trend-setting.? Hardly has lived a celebrity who has not been seen carrying a Chanel handbag under her arm; such has the influence of Chanel handbags as a fashion statement.
Chanel handbags have been so popular in the elite classes of the society, that their pricing is usually prohibitive for everyone else.? Discount Chanel handbags are really difficult to come across, but today should be your lucky day.? We bring you a superb unbeatable range of Chanel Flap bags, all at fantastic discounts.? With us, you have an incredible chance to buy your favorite Chanel handbags at rock bottom prices!
Chanel Handbags have always been at the forefront of luxury and style.? The Chanel classic quilted leather handbags and its reinventions have ruled fashion since forever.? Chanel handbags have remained extremely popular as they continue to merge evolving modern trends with the class and simplicity of its original avatar.
An Chanel 2008 Collection and Chanel 2009 Collection single handedly enhances the look you are carrying.? The reason you would buy a Chanel handbag is own a bag that mingles with your charm and intensifies it with its inherent simplicity.? If you have owned an authentic Chanel handbag before, you know what we are talking about.? If you are one of the unlucky people who haven’t yet gotten a chance to own an Chanel Cambon, now is your chance to shop for an authentic Chanel handbag and discover its ability to transform your look completely.
Buy Chanel handbags with us, and get fabulous discounts which you will never get at your favorite store.? We offer cheap authentic Chanel handbags and they are all up for grabs!
Posted by: chanel handbags | April 15, 2010 at 09:14 PM
Both sides of the symmetrical lines, wantonly flaunt a perfect Louis Vuitton handbagsline, in the right case, the border, from 9 o'clock to 12 o'clock position to develop a unique design to show the whole concept of asymmetry, resulting in visual surprise, crown, located in the the right to beautiful, 4 o'clock position of the bright red jujube board. Black dial with white silkLouis Vuitton handbags screen printing, second hand with red paint, resulting in the formation of brand image is more out of color.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton handbags | May 14, 2010 at 03:36 AM
Last year, I know the game mixmaster by chance; I try to play it to pass the time. To my surprise, I get some Sword of the New World Vis , later, my friend told me that how to get more Sword of the New World Gold is very important. He taught me how to play the game well, and through buy Snw Gold
Posted by: Sword of the New World money | May 22, 2010 at 01:13 AM
I was actually looking for this resource a few weeks back. Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.This will absolutely going to help me in my projects .
Posted by: China Tent | October 09, 2010 at 04:36 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much
Posted by: seslino | January 02, 2011 at 08:49 AM
En güncel ve kaliteli pornoları izleyebileceğiniz ve sexfilmiseyretebileceğiniz youjizz kalitesindeki porn sitemize hepinizi bekleriz. porn izle , porn , rokettube ve escort sitesini de unutmayın lütfen : ) Hea bi de sex izle var..
thanks google.
Posted by: trpornizle | January 12, 2011 at 06:16 PM
thanks for sharing Sohbet many people are pay more attention to one's swearing than before, especially a watch.Chat.
Perhaps when you went to some place far away Sohbet you must borrow it from friends you can get everything you want in this game Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at Chat the surface of the watches Exsohbet from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there Egitim Fourth, there were various signs of political conflict among shia. Sohbet If they split 3 ways or 4 ways, the sunnis and the kurds could often be the swing votes in the politics. If they felt they had political clout out of proportion to their numbers, they could settle in Sohbet and do politics and not feel oppressed.
Posted by: Egitim | January 13, 2011 at 04:23 AM
thank you very much
Posted by: seslimacera | January 22, 2011 at 05:10 PM
Top 1 reason is the main one , I guess.
Posted by: China Inflatable | June 02, 2011 at 02:01 AM
fenerbahçe
Posted by: seks hikayeleri | June 07, 2011 at 09:52 AM
Thanks for division this attractive post. There are some points here that I have not hear of earlier than. Once again, thanks for this useful post. This will be very helpful for me.
Posted by: flexible circuits | June 08, 2011 at 11:48 AM
yar diyen sevgili gel beraber komik video izleyek biraz gülek sonra
porn izleyerek
sikişek o da bitince bi porsiyon da
sex izleyerek boşalak
Posted by: porno | June 19, 2011 at 07:24 PM
It is time to buy a homecoming dress for youself.Do you want to be the homecoming queen?If your answer is 'YES'.You'd better search for your homecoming dress as soon as possible.Bright colors are so in this year.Remember, this isn't a prom or graduation ceremony. Homecoming is about fun! Dresses can still look formal, but this year you should be jazzing up your look with bright or even neon colors. Hot pink, electric blue; show your wild side and don't forget to color-match your makeup and accessories.Short skirts are a must. . If you're going to be dancing away the night then you don't want a long skirt tripping you up at every turn! Homecoming is a great chance to be a bit less formal, so ditch the long gown and go short!A-Line or ball gown style is ideal. Every year girls are wondering what the best style is for some serious partying at homecoming! Well in 2011 we're saying that you need to choose A-Line or ball gown style gowns as these are going to be really comfortable for dancing as well as being flattering for almost ANY body shape!Choose iridescent taffeta. 2011 is the year of iridescent taffeta. Here comes the best part though, following 2011's trends and still getting the dresses cheaply!
And now let me tell you where can buy these dressses:
Dress store/This is one site which belong to our company..we are provide a lot of new style homecoming dresses. And we will update the products every month.
Gsdresses/It is belong to our company,too.we will update the products every month and send you conpon non-periodical.
Mldress/We not only provide customize homcoming dresses but also send the new product list to you. If you are lucky,you may get the conpon non-periodical.
Don't be shillyshally,To get your new homecoming dresses as soon as possible.
Posted by: xixihaha | September 26, 2011 at 03:15 AM
The local steering committees have not had as strong an impact as I would have predicted (at least so far), but again there is a correlation between steering committees that take a true leadership role in their units and community effectiveness.
Posted by: Cheap Tera Gold | October 21, 2011 at 01:52 AM