Democracy Arsenal

« A Taxonomy of Republican Foreign Policy Nonsense | Main | What Was Left Unsaid »

November 22, 2011

Tonight's Discussion on American Muslims
Posted by James Lamond

There was a fairly disturbing portion of the debate tonight where most of the GOP contenders for president supported monitoring Muslims closer than other citizens - the obvious dissenter being Ron Paul.  Rick Santorum essentially endorsed treating all Muslims as suspects. This is disappointing as an American who believes in our values, but it is just flat out bad security policy. There are four basic reasons, without getting into the serious first and second order effects, for this: It overloads and already stressed national security apparatus, serves as a distraction to the real problems, hinders cooperation between communities and law enforcement, and can serve terrorists' recruitment process. This is why most homeland security experts endorse policies that focus on actions of individuals, not their religion or race. 

But as Mr. Cain said “ask the professionals”:

The 9/11 Commission Chairmen, on overloading the system: Profiling overloads the "intelligence and law enforcement agencies, already over-stressed and inundated with information and leads." 

Scott Bates, former policy advisor to the House Homeland Security Committee, on distractions from the real probelms: "we have seen with a number of recent cases, there is no single 'profile' of a terrorist or would-be terrorist. Recent cases include individuals as diverse as ‘Jihad Jane,’ a white middle-aged woman who converted to Islam and traveled to Sweden to participate in the murder of Swedish artist Lars Vilks, and James Wenneker von Brunn, the elderly white supremacist who shot up the Holocaust Memorial Museum in 2009."

David Schanzer, the director of the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security at Duke University and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, on hindrance of police cooperation: "Law enforcement officials occasionally receive information about a suspicious person from a fertilizer vendor or some other person in a position to observe potential terrorists. But authorities agree such tips are most likely to come from the community in which the homegrown terrorist lives, which in this day and age is frequently the Muslim-American community." But as he explains, "The rise of such [anti-Islam] intolerance... is particularly dangerous... because it is likely to inhibit intelligence collection from Muslim-Americans and may contribute to the radicalization process." 

Brian Fishman, counterterrorism analyst at the New America Foundation and West Point, on use as a recruitment tactic: “In a March 2010 statement titled "A Call to Jihad," Awlaki argued darkly that ‘yesterday America was a land of slavery, segregation, lynching and Ku Klux Klan, and tomorrow it will be a land of religious discrimination and concentration camps. Don't be deceived by the promises of preserving your rights from a government that is right now killing your own brothers and sisters… The West will eventually turn against its Muslim citizens!’”

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20162fcc20c3a970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tonight's Discussion on American Muslims :

Comments

Recent cases include individuals as diverse as ‘Jihad Jane,’ a white middle-aged woman who converted to Islam and traveled to Sweden to participate in the murder of Swedish artist Lars Vilks, and James Wenneker von Brunn, the elderly white supremacist who shot up the Holocaust Memorial Museum in 2009.

This article has really pointed out the problem of labeling muslims with terrorism as it does hinders cooperation as well as serves terrorist's recruitment but to say it out flatly and bluntly by a presidential candidate is completely bad as it is a policy whether for security reasons or not. This is low for the GOP if they make it like that.

t think supporting actions of individuals, not their religion or race is ringt.

Religion was originally created for people to pursue ideal life, but so many misuse it and have gone too far on the wrong way.

Thanks for making my morning a little bit better with this great article!!

Thank you so much!

Homeland security experts endorse policies that focus on actions of individuals, not their religion or race.

NikeのハイエンドスニーカーのサッカーシューズのシリーズELITEある去年派手な1時、adidasは品質はNIKEに負けませんますが、しかし位置付けの上で風下に降りました。近日、1組のサッカーシadidas スニーカーューズのスパイはによってadidasの重いサッカーシューズの王の席に帰る遠大な抱負を暴露しました。adidasはadiPOWER PREDATORが発表することをきっかけにするを、SLシリーズのトップクラスのサッカーシューズの製品を出して、その中はPREDATOR SLとadiPURE SLを含みニューバランスました。2足の靴はすべてF50を採用しました adiZEROの軽量で大きい底、靴の表面の材質も普通な版と違い、大いに重さを軽減しました。さらに加えて再びサッカーシューズの軽量の王冠のF50を奪います adiZERO PRIME,adidasのトップクラスのサッカーのシリーズはすナイキ シューズ 通販 でに準備し出発を待ちました。NIKEとadidasの双雄間もなく引き離す大きい幕。

A liar is not believed when he speaks the truth.e

【my-lady.jp】のアグ ブーツはキッズも、レディースも、メンズもよくぴったり新作はいよい よ入荷中...UGG ムートンブーツ,UGG ブーツは通販激安ing…phoenixzon.com

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use