Democracy Arsenal

« What Can the G-20 Do In Cannes? | Main | Your Daily Dose of Defense Drawdown Doomsday-ism »

November 02, 2011

Shadowboxing with Wolves
Posted by Heather Hurlburt

If you're too transfixed by the prospect of the US losing its seat on the IAEA board of governors, losing Japanese funding through UNESCO for police training in Afghanistan, and potentially losing global patent protection, all over the Palestinians' effort to join the UN and an outdated 1994 law, you'll miss the fun of a new Iran bill coming through the House that apparently attempts to catch what international cooperation the 1994 law may have missed.

The bill bars US diplomats from even talking to their Iranian counterparts without prior certification by the President and notification to Congress 15 days in advance.  Imagine if JFK had had to tell Cognress before he called the Soviets during the Cuban missile crisis.  More to the point, US and Iranian diplomats have been sharing a conference room discussing the political future of Iran's neighbor Afghanistan this week.  The New York Times reported that the Administration had quietly reached out to Iran to attempt to bring it into a political discussion around Afghanistan's future stability.  No more of that.

And the number three official at the State Department, Bill Burns, had a meeting with an Iranian counterpart that, among other topics, proved important in releasing the first of the three American hikers from Iranian custody.  Does that not matter?  Also, are the CIA and DoD still allowed to talk to Iranians?  Just asking.

In fact, the substantive problem with this bill doesn't lie so much in that ridiculous provision but in its efforts to sanction Iran's Central Bank.  NIAC points out that this has been tried before, with Iraq, and failed; that sanctions on the Bank will further increase the hardships faced by ordinary Iranians, and create some measure of unity among Iranian factions -- the same impact it had on Iraq.

We have effective ways to "get tough," show our displeasure with Iran and make things more difficult for its rulers.  When a Special Rapporteur criticized Iran's human rights record at the UN last month, the country got less support than Burma or North Korea -- a significant global embarrassment.  Where is Cognress's support for the rapporteur's next steps?  The IAEA is days away from presenting its latest report on Iran's nuclear activities, and it would seem that Washington's real priority ought to be garnering global support for a unified response.  Other nations have made it clear that they won't follow us against the Central Bank, much less imposign a gag order on our own diplomats.   

Of course, Washington has to be represented at the IAEA's executive council for such a strategy to work.  Which makes you wonder whether Iran's hard-liners aren't secretly cheering every shadowboxing move we make.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Shadowboxing with Wolves:


We live in a world where zealots like Netanyahu threaten war against Iran,as if that breach of international law should be implemented without haste, in view of the crisis of imminent threat, that cannot be demonstrated. And the American Likudniks parrot the party line as if it were received truth. Who sets American Policy? AIPAC? Likud? Netanyahu? Neoconservatives? Or nominal 'Liberals' like President Obama? Those questions remain active concerns, while a campaign of hysteria mongering continues unabated, with the active collaboration of Americas blood thirsty press. What we need is another war!

Because of that criticism they totally became embarrassed ... significant global embarrassment... that's enough for them!

Kind Regards,

Maturity is a bright but not dazzling glory, a mellow sound but not greasy ears, a need for others detect facial expressions of calm, one finally stopped the prayer of the complaint to the surrounding atmosphere, a disregard Hongnao smile, a wash of extreme indifference, a not quiet thick, one is not steep height.

The bill bars US diplomats from even talking to their Iranian counterparts without prior certification by the President and notification to Congress 15 days in advance. Imagine if JFK had had to tell Congress before he called the Soviets during the Cuban missile crisis.

I saved your web log from lycos and it is superb. Thanks for offering much an informative journal position! hotels in Philadelphia.

wow !!! that sound really interesting and superb

This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

Why are traditional aizoe wedding dress so long? Is it a modesty thing to show that the bride is going to commit only to the groom?Floor length gowns are considered more appropriate for formal occasionsQuinceanera Dresses. Also in the past women ONLY wore floor length gowns because legs were considered too "sexy" and revealing. Which also happens to be the reason table skirts were invented (those table cloths that go to the floor). Because people thought men would see the "legs" of a table and be filled with desire for a woman.No, it's not a"modesty" issue. Weddings are considered to be formal events, and long dresses simply seem to fit the occasion. It's often the only time in her life that a woman actually has reason to wear a very fancy long dress such as wealthier, higher-status (or royal) women get to wear often at various events. It's a sort of "fairy tale" look. making the bride look like a fantasy princess for a day. In other words, it's merely a tradition, a custom. At relatively informal aizoe wedding , the bride often chooses to wear a tea-length or even much shorter size prom dress White does not represent "purity" or "virginity". That, too, is merely a custom dating back to a trend that got started when Queen Victoria chose to wear white in the early 19th-century. It became a aizoe wedding fashion fad and then a custom. Prior to that, white was considered far too impractical a color for most brides, since weddng dresses were usually worn again. I think it is still a modesty issue. Even if I were having an informal ceremony, I would still wear a floor length gown. I am not a virgin, nor is my fiance the only person I have been with, but when I give my vows to him on or aizoe wedding day, I would prefer to do so as a beautiful young woman,prom dress with a pure and clean mind and not as a sex symbol. I think showing too much skin in a aizoe wedding outfit gives the wrong impression about your reason for being there. It has a very vegas look to it.

It's seem that US catch a tartar ...but the warm isn't the only way to solv the crisis .hope Washington solve the crisis by other friendly ways

Ladies classic pirate costumes can be used in several places. The main parts of costumes are for birthdays, anniversaries and special events. Why not tell it fun or scary, with Pirate Party Costumes and laugh at all or on the edge of the seat is the choice is yours.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use