Democracy Arsenal

« Previewing Romney’s Foreign Policy Speech | Main | No Ideas: Evaluating Romney's Speech »

October 06, 2011

Mitt Romney: Nationally Insecure?
Posted by Heather Hurlburt

Which Mitt Romney will show up at the Citadel to give a ‘major foreign policy address’ tomorrow? Will we see Tea Party-pleasing Mitt who’s proposed getting out of Afghanistan and staying out of the international effort on Libya? War Party Mitt who supports unending war in Afghanistan, a new war in Iran and U.S. troops to Pakistan -- and who just named the Bush old guard to his national security team? Free-trader Mitt who opposes tariffs on China or Mitt who supports sanctions for Chinese currency manipulation? Or maybe crowd-pleasing Mitt who refused ‘to scold the audience’ for booing an active-duty servicemember deployed in Iraq? Best guess is he’ll go for all of the above—no apologies!—but you never know.

President Obama:  Keeping Promises Across The Globe

It will take some doing to challenge a president who has taken Bin Laden and more than two dozen wanted terrorist leaders off the battlefield, kept a pledge to begin winding down wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, shown firmness toward China, driven Moammar Qaddafi from power and rallied our allies together around sanctions for Iran and support to prevent global economic collapse.

Mitt Romney:  All Over The Map

From hand-to-hand combat in presidential debates over Afghanistan, to intra-party Congressional food fights on defense spending, the conservative movement is torn between its War Party and Tea Party factions. Meanwhile, on a litany of foreign policy issues --Afghanistan, China, Libya, terrorism, American allies and military-- Romney’s attempts to define himself as all things to all people have placed him on the wrong side of the experts – and often, his own previous statements.

Romney was against a drawdown of troops in Afghanistan before he was for it; he said he would not send troops to Pakistan, but then said he could imagine a scenario where it would be necessary; he said the President was wrong to join a coalition intervening in Libya, but then celebrated when Qaddafi was forced out; he said we shouldn't criticize our allies, then made disparaging remarks about Mexico and France; he said Presidents Bush and Obama were too tough on China’s steel and tire exporters, but then said the President wasn’t tough enough on China trade.

Be Prepared?

Romney says he was not prepared “to scold the audience” at a recent debate for booing an active-duty servicemember deployed in Iraq.  Last year he was unprepared to support our military leaders’ call for a treaty that would reduce Russia’s nuclear weapons.  Instead, he followed Congressional Republicans and opposed it, in what an independent journalist called a “shabby, misleading and thoroughly ignorant” attack. 

Team of Rivals?

The Bush national security hands that he’s named to his national security team are the same people who brought us the bungled aftermath of the Iraq invasion, the elections that brought Hamas to power in Gaza, and the decision to pull troops away from the hunt for Bin Laden and send them to Iraq instead.

The “shadow National Security Council” rolled out by the Romney campaign today includes advisers who think the Obama Administration’s planned transition away from combat operations in Afghanistan would be “a disaster,” and others who say that skepticism about any continued mission there simply “accounts for reality.”  He has advisers who think the U.S. tried to “run away from” Libya, and others who think we did too much.  What does Romney think?  

In domestic politics, flip-flops make your donors insecure. In foreign policy, they make us all less secure.

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e2015435f33bad970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mitt Romney: Nationally Insecure?:

Comments

Good day, This particular internet web page is certainly exciting and enjoyment to study. I’m an enormous fan from the subject matter mentioned. I also get pleasure from learning the opinions, but find out that alot of people ought to remain on composition to attempt and add value in the direction of the unique blog distribute. I’d also motivate every single human being to take note of this web page for any preferred help to assist situated the appearance zhongchengmaoyi110post

d. I also get pleasure from learning the opini

Thank you for sharing. Very happy to see your article, I very much to like and agree with your point of view. Have a good time.

ナイキエアマックスアップテンポ2 1995ナイキのバスケッナイキ エアジョーダントボールシューズは、特にデュークAdidas サッカーシューズ大学排他的なバスケットボールシューズの発売のため、今それが刻まれた。 時代の典型的な特徴、ユニークな舌、クイックレースシステム、機能のアッパー、ソールボックスのパタミズノ サッカースパイク特価ーン、 ヒールマックスエア270度の可視性を持つアップテンポ1995年に設計されたナイキエアマックス2は、年間で画期的な構成です。一見サッカーユニフォーム したナイキエアマックスアップテンポな2つの非常にバークリーCB34味で。

Hi, I found this blog once, then lost it. Took me forever to come back and find it. I wanted to see what comments you got. Nice blog by the way.

nail glitter
bleaching teeth

hmm interesting info mate, i think its insecure myself but who knows eh

very happy to read your blog.Thank you for sharing this article.It is great!
Thanks for sharing this nice post.I will keep your article in my idea.

This is a good,common sense article.Very helpful to one who is just finding the resouces about this part.It will certainly help educate me.

This is a good,common sense article.Very helpful to one who is just finding the resouces about this part.It will certainly help educate me.

The love of beauty is an essential part of all healthy human nature.(John Ruskin, American writer and critic)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use