Counterterrorism in the State of the Union: A Tale of Two Paragraphs
Posted by Eric Martin
Given that the State of the Union address tilted heavily toward domestic issues, should come as no surprise that US counterterrorism policy was allotted a mere two paragraphs. That said, the two paragraphs are instructive, and offer a stark contrast in approaches and, ultimately, efficacy.
First, the good:
Of course, as we speak, al Qaeda and their affiliates continue to plan attacks against us. Thanks to our intelligence and law enforcement professionals, we're disrupting plots and securing our cities and skies. And as extremists try to inspire acts of violence within our borders, we are responding with the strength of our communities, with respect for the rule of law, and with the conviction that American Muslims are a part of our American family.
Here, Obama hits all the right notes in highlighting what are by far the most effective tools in our counterterrorism kit: intelligence and law enforcement, as buttressed by cooperation from local communities, which can act as a tripwire in terms of detecting and reporting nascent plots.
Obama's direct reference to the American Muslim community is particularly timely considering some of the noxious anti-Muslim bigotry finding favor amongst certain elected Republican officials and pundits - notably, Peter King and his planned hearings focusing on Muslim-American terror activities and support for same.
As mentioned above, local communities can play a vital role in interdicting terror plots before they are carried out, and, contra Peter King, American Muslims have been instrumental in these efforts. According to the Muslim Public Affairs Council database:
7 out of the last 10 Al-Qaeda plots threatening the U.S. since 9/11 have been prevented with the help of Muslims.
Overall, almost 40% of all Al-Qaeda terror plots threatening the U.S since 9/11 were foiled with the assistance of Muslim communities.
However, that support could begin to wane if perceptions of persecution lead to alienation, fear and ambivalence.
While Obama's first paragraph was near-flawless, his second misses the mark in many ways:
We've also taken the fight to al Qaeda and their allies abroad. In Afghanistan, our troops have taken Taliban strongholds and trained Afghan security forces. Our purpose is clear: By preventing the Taliban from reestablishing a stranglehold over the Afghan people, we will deny al Qaeda the safe haven that served as a launching pad for 9/11.
Here, Obama highlights the militarized approach to counterterrorism which can be effective when applied judiciously in limited circumstances, though becomes far less so when such an approach entails a heavy-handed reliance on military force, such as pursuant to a near decade long occupation of a foreign country without any significant terrorist presence.
While Obama is correct to note that taking "the fight to al-Qaeda" with the aid of the US military in the early days of the Afghanistan campaign was key in disrupting al-Qaeda's network, as well as in killing and capturing numerous operatives, it is no longer clear that a war effort that has metastasized over time to a nation-building, Taliban-focused campaign is the best means to address the threats from al-Qaeda. After all, al-Qaeda is now largely absent from Afghan territory, and is instead dispersed around the globe, with a concentration in Pakistan.
Despite Obama's assertion, it is not certain that the Taliban could gain a stranglehold over Afghan territory or that, should some factions of the Taliban regain some form of political power, they would necessarily welcome al-Qaeda back. For example, Mullah Omar's rhetoric and public statements have begun to signal that space exists between the two groups, and it is no secret that many Taliban leaders blame al-Qaeda's brazen attacks on the US for their loss of power and subsequent hardships.
While certain Taliban factions find al-Qaeda's footsoldiers valuable in times of armed conflict, and other Taliban factions (the Haqqanis, ie) may be more ideologically sympathetic, there is room to pursue negotiations with Taliban groups that could, in part, explore ways to separate Taliban factions from al-Qaeda, a task that could be aided by the fundamental rift in the two groups' respective worldviews. Though some ideological cross-pollination has occurred, Taliban groups still mostly focus inward on Afghan matters, while al-Qaeda is more globally oriented. This divergence can lead to actions that, when not lacking in synergy, can actually work at cross purposes.
Further, al-Qaeda might not choose to relocate to Afghanistan should a sympathetic Taliban regime regain power, given the advantages of its current Pakistani locale (harder for the US to conduct military operations in Pakistan), as well as other potential destinations around the globe. In truth, al-Qaeda can operate from within even developed Western democracies - though there is value to such a group in having a central location for training/indoctrination/networking, which can enhance the lethality and effectiveness of attacks.
But such a locus exists now in Pakistan, and our effort in Afghanistan is only tangentially related, at best, and has certainly not prevented that outcome.
Additionally, a pre-9/11 style safe haven in Afghanistan is unlikely regardless of the outcome of the war effort given that the US security establishment is infinitely more focused on al-Qaeda than before, and would undoubtedly have much looser rules of engagement in terms of calling in airstrikes and initiating other military actions than than those that prevailed during more cautious pre-9/11 era.
Some argue that without a massive troop presence in Afghanistan, we would lack the intelligence necessary to effectively target al-Qaeda operatives in the region, to which there are two responses. First, we had pretty good targeting intelligence pre-9/11 without such a presence, and with far, far less resources and brainpower dedicated to the task. Second, as Christine Fair points out, "intelligence is just as likely to improve as Afghans, who dislike al-Qaeda, may be more open to sharing information when the disliked [troop-intensive military] effort is scaled back and abandoned."
Given that our one overriding goal in Afghanistan should be to counter al-Qaeda, and that our current incoherent (and extremely costly) strategy is not necessarily serving that goal in anything approaching an efficient manner, it would have sparked some optimism had the President hinted that he understood the depths of the disconnect between our current policy and what should be our primary objective, and that a new course was being charted.


However, that support could begin to wane if perceptions of persecution lead to alienation, fear and ambivalence.
Doesn't this just mean all the paid informants/instigators?
Posted by: DPirate | January 30, 2011 at 12:17 PM
Very good blog! I love the best. I love what you've done!
Posted by: telephone rose | January 31, 2011 at 06:18 AM
Nice blog, your articles and stories are very interesting thank you again.
Posted by: voyance gratuite | January 31, 2011 at 06:18 AM
Hello, I just visited your blog and found his style very elegant.
Posted by: horoscope | January 31, 2011 at 06:19 AM
In truth, al-Qaeda can operate from within even developed Western democracies - though there is value to such a group in having a central location for training/indoctrination/networking, which can enhance the lethality and effectiveness of attacks.
Posted by: Pet Medication | February 01, 2011 at 01:31 AM
Given that our one overriding goal in Afghanistan should be to counter al-Qaeda, and that our current incoherent (and extremely costly) strategy is not necessarily serving that goal in anything approaching an efficient manner, it would have sparked some optimism had the President hinted that he understood the depths of the disconnect between our current policy and what should be our primary objective, and that a new course was being charted
seslisohbet seslichat
Posted by: sesli sohbet | February 09, 2011 at 12:20 PM
I tried to think so, but i found it was not as the same in the actual process. As you mentioned, I still have doubts, but really thank you for sharing!
Posted by: Mechanical seals | March 03, 2011 at 10:44 PM
Thanks for the great article here at your blog. I know it will help me and many others.
Posted by: Coach Bags | March 03, 2011 at 10:47 PM
assive troop presence in Afghanistan, we would lack the intelligence necessary to effectively target al-Qaeda operatives in the region, to which there are two responses. First, we had pretty good targeting intelligence pre-9/11 without such a presence, and with far, far less resources and brainpower dedicated to the task. Second, as Christine Fair points out, "intelligence is just as likely to improve as Afghans, who dislike al-Qaeda, may be more open to sharing information when the disliked [troop-intensive military] effort is scaled back and abandoned."
Posted by: 冷夜 | March 07, 2011 at 12:10 AM
Nice blog, your articles and stories are very interesting thank you again.
Posted by: bedava porno | March 10, 2011 at 12:17 PM
I tried to think so, but i found it was not as the same in the actual process. As you mentioned, I still have doubts, but really thank you for sharing!
Posted by: bedava porno izle | March 12, 2011 at 10:27 AM
thanks good post
Posted by: Best fashion designers | March 25, 2011 at 02:53 AM
it is good
watch5
whowatch
watchse
uwatch
Uwatch
iwatch
needwatch
watcheslife
livewatch
Posted by: goodwatches | March 31, 2011 at 10:32 PM
it is a good article.
Posted by: knockoff handbags | April 19, 2011 at 04:45 AM
Very good article, I want to learn
Posted by: The best knockoff handbags | April 23, 2011 at 04:04 AM
Caviar Extract, for the human organism contains a variety of valuable natural nutrients. Using a high lecithin content, the consumption of natural collagen by the body and thus prevents the formation of cellulite. Vitamins and minerals in the complexes on the one hand brings life to your skin again. Conclusion: Tight, firm and elastic, skin and subcutaneous soft tissue structures.
Posted by: havyar jeli | April 25, 2011 at 06:14 PM
Thanks , I have just been looking for information about this topic for ages and yours is the best I’ve discovered till now.
Posted by: soccer cleats | April 26, 2011 at 01:58 AM
The carefully crafted image that you want to use this formula to do with the short term is now not far from reach.
Posted by: oakley sunglasses | May 04, 2011 at 05:37 AM
Article rich content, I'll reproduced my blog. Thank you!
Posted by: Ralph Lauren Polo | May 26, 2011 at 04:49 AM
Also should add that Badminton Cross Country day alone had an attendance of over 120,000 people, the biggest attendance of any outdoor event in Europe. Marginalised? Really?
Posted by: lacoste Polo Shirts | June 10, 2011 at 11:00 PM
Thank you for this article. That's all I can say. You organize the article very well and your writing ability is really wonderful.As an English learner, this post is a little too difficult for me to understand. I hope one day I could write such good articles. I hope my English will be better and better.But I have no time for my English study. I have to do all kinds of job.I have to download and upload pictures.
Posted by: Converse slippers blue | June 13, 2011 at 05:22 AM
Good food for thought here. Thank you very much for the extensive explanation.
Posted by: ryska kvinnor | June 25, 2011 at 12:07 PM
The term resource curse has emerged largely from study of the hydrocarbon and mining industries, which differ in many ways to agricultural endeavours.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Sale | June 29, 2011 at 02:24 AM
Thank your for sharing your wonderful article. I very agree with your views from here.
Posted by: replica panerai | June 30, 2011 at 05:26 AM
thanks for sharing your article, i am like that.
Posted by: replica handbags | July 04, 2011 at 10:06 AM
Rich, posh folk prancing about on horses is not a sport, its a social event for owners and trainers
Posted by: Abercrombie et Fitch | July 05, 2011 at 02:30 AM
Not sure how that this works out for blameless peons vs. culpable senior staff still on the roster, but there you go; there'll be glasses clinking in Islington tonight.
Posted by: Bvlgari Watches | July 11, 2011 at 02:35 AM
free shipping,christinlouboutinfamily provides all kinds of items , everyone can get what they want.
christian louboutin wedges
cheap christian louboutin wedges
christian louboutin slingbacks
christian louboutin flatscheapchristian louboutin flats
christian louboutin new arrivelcheap christian louboutin new arrivel
christian louboutin sandalscheap christian louboutin sandals
christian louboutin shoes christian louboutin slingbacks
christian louboutin bootscheap christian louboutin boots,
cheap christian louboutin pumps
christian louboutin 2011 discount christian louboutin 2011
christian louboutin bootie cheap christianlouboutin shoes
christian louboutin platformsI have a lot of good and
very fashionable christian louboutin boots,pls visit website http://www.christianlouboutinfamily.com/
free shipping,nikejordanlink is discount item retailer and wholesale,you can get cheap shoes which can fit you best, it is useful, and also absolutely safe for you to purchase each item.
nike air max 2011 air jordan 2010
air jordan 2010 nike air max 2011 mens shoes
nike air max 2010 air jordan 2011
nike air max 2009 air jordan 2010
nike shox deliver air jordan 2009
nike air max air jordan 2010
air max shoes air jordan 2010
jordan retro shoes air jordan shoes 2010
nike shox torch cheap nike shox torch
new jordan shoes 2010 discount nike shox torch
nike free mens shoes air jordan shoes 2010
nike free womens shoes jordan retro shoes
jordan retro 1 air jordan 2010
jordan retro 1 shoes jordan retro 1 shoes
air jordan 2010 shoes air jordan 2010 shoes
nike air max 2011 mens shoes air jordan 2010
cheap air jordan 2010, I have a lot of good and very fashionable nike jordan shoes,pls visit website http://www.nikejordanlink.com.
Posted by: christian louboutin bootie | July 12, 2011 at 04:00 AM
Surely part of the skill of any bowler is to outwit or out think the batsman.
Posted by: cheap Ralph Lauren | July 15, 2011 at 02:27 AM
They are simply told to move away without proper compensation and means of survival in place
Posted by: ralph lauren tees | July 19, 2011 at 11:29 PM
We always have time enough , if we will but use it aright.
Posted by: chaussures puma | July 29, 2011 at 10:23 PM
I was in low spirits before,but now i read your writting,i feel a little better!
Posted by: Polo Outlet | August 02, 2011 at 09:24 PM
Action is the foundational key to all success.gianmarco lorenzi heels
Posted by: bailey button triplet | August 08, 2011 at 10:45 PM
Keep up the great work, its hard to find good ones. I have added to my favorites. Thank You. This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. This is very nice one and gives in depth information.
Posted by: thomas sabo rings | August 19, 2011 at 03:06 AM
Don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched.
Posted by: Nike Air Yeezy | August 26, 2011 at 03:04 AM
Terrorizing Ourselves explores disciplined approaches to terrorism and dismantles the flawed thinking that dominates today’s national security policy. It exposes how politicians manipulate fear for political purposes and shows how anxiety about terrorism is driving military adventurism, exploding the national debt, militarizing domestic affairs, and shifting expenditures away from other urgent priorities.
Posted by: Graphic Design Courses | September 04, 2011 at 11:11 PM
It is true that America badly needs an alternative to occupying foreign lands. But a worldwide assassination program that motivates countless potential suicide bombers, weakens friendly governments, strengthens U.S. foes and increases the danger of nuclear materials falling into the hands of anti-Americanterrorists, is hardly more “cost-effective counterterrorism.”
Posted by: Bachelor of Health and Movement (sport) | September 04, 2011 at 11:14 PM
Thanks for the insight. You are absolutely right.
Posted by: replica louis vuitton handbags | September 06, 2011 at 03:59 AM
We have gotten many great comments from our customers and earn a good reputation in foreign makerts, more than 90% customers are satisfied with our products and service, till now our online members are beyond 80,000. As of right now, we Replica Handbags currently serve customers from over 18 countries, and we are still growing. We really hope to expand our business through cooperation with individuals and companies from around the world.
Posted by: chaussures femmes | September 08, 2011 at 04:44 AM
thanks for article admin.
Posted by: mynet sohbet | September 15, 2011 at 02:21 PM
You know what charm is : A way of getting the answer "yes" without having asked any clear question. (A. Camus)
Posted by: Air Max Nike | September 16, 2011 at 03:27 AM
When run is for the most part a satisfaction , existence is joy !?! When run is duty , existence is slavery .(Maxim Gorky , Russian writer )
Posted by: Red Bottom Heels | September 16, 2011 at 03:32 AM
Let's grant Shadi's premise for the sake of argument: US support for brutal autocratic regimes in the region has fostered resentment and, at times, a virulent strain of anti-Americanism that has produced violent manifestations.
Posted by: replica wallets | October 20, 2011 at 10:53 AM
Your article looks great!Thanks for you sharing. I love it. Your article looks great! Thanks for you sharing. I love it.
Posted by: knockoff handbags | October 26, 2011 at 04:44 AM
Sensationnel éditorial, merci pour le partage. Également, votre site a-t-il un flux RSS disponible ? Pouvez-vous me l envoyer via email svp ? Merci par avance ;)
loto euromillion euromillions jouer au loto loto en ligne résultat euro millions
--
laurena from euromillion
Posted by: Laura | December 06, 2011 at 12:10 AM