Democracy Arsenal

« GOP Support for New START: "Counting the Chickens" | Main | "Ratcheting" is not a policy »

December 06, 2010

American Exceptionalism . . . Again
Posted by Michael Cohen

David Rieff is exhausting! I mean that in both a good and bad way. Obviously he's an interesting writer with some compelling ideas about humanitarian intervention and foreign policy in general - and when it comes to writing stem-winding, but thought-provoking blog posts the man should get an award or something. But when it comes to the issue of American exceptionalism (an issue on which he and I have furiously engaged both online and off) his arguments tend to make me want to pound my head against a wall.

In his latest missive he actually takes on me and fellow DAer Heather Hurlburt:

. . . If you believe the United States is fundamentally a force for good in the world then you should be appalled by the emergence of Wikileaks, for it does indeed make the job of American diplomats more difficult. If, on the other hand, you believe that America is an empire (one does not have to believe that this makes the United States a malign force, just not a benign one, any more than any other empire has ever been), and, if you are an American, anyway, you believe that this imperial vocation is destroying the country, and therefore you want to see the empire’s end, then of course you will enthusiastically welcome the advent of Wikileaks.

The first an most obvious rejoinder to this is that even non-exceptional countries require diplomatic secrecy! So if you embrace the notion that confidentiality is a sine qua non for the ability to conduct effective diplomacy then you would certainly believe that Wikileaks' modus operandi is dangerous and counter-productive. (And Josh Foust makes a good point here about how Wikileaks is likely to make the US government even less transparent, not more).

But that leads to the second problem with Rieff's argument. Indeed, one of the things that I've found so striking about the Wikileaks debate is the difficulty that many critics seem to be having (both pro and anti-WL) with holding two separate thoughts in their head.

I basically expect this from Glenn Greenwald, who has a rather exquisite ability to reduce every policy issue to a simplistic black and white narrative where one side is good and one side is irredeemably evil (and then takes sadistic delight in degrading the evil side in the most hurtful manner possible) Although I suppose this makes sense: after all they are evil! 

And Rieff falls victim to the same affliction - as he seems unable to wrap his mind around the notion that one can believe that America's imperial mindset is doing great damage to the country; or that one can embrace Barry Rosen's persuasive case for restraint in American foreign policy and yet STILL think Wikileaks is really, really bad. Apparently this individual doesn't fit into the rubric that Rieff has created. In Rieff's world all Wikileaks opponents seem to hold the same view of American exceptionalism and American hegemony.

So for example, I do believe that America, like every single other country, has the potential to be a legitimate force for good in the world. The problem with Wikileaks is that it makes such a goal that much more difficult - while also making it much harder for the United States to operate on a global stage in the same manner by which every other country operates; namely with diplomatic secrecy. 

But, as the argument goes, that's ok because Wikileaks assumes that all US behavior in the world is a bad thing (a view Rieff implicitly embraces). As I noted the other day, Wikileaks rejects "the notion that US actions on the global stage are legitimate or serve a global public interest. They reflect a view of American power that is nearly uniformly negative and adversarial." So Wikileaks has fulfilled the goal of weakening American empire.

Again, Wikileaks opponents thinks this is a very good thing. But, to be overly blunt and perhaps a bit catty, this is deeply childish. The Wikileaks disclosure may not only do real damage to US national security, but it may also have a detrimental impact on issues that have global import. One would imagine, for example, there are other countries in the world cheering for the US to be successful in securing Pakistan's highly enriched uranium. 

But these good deeds don't seem to interest Rieff; because America's imperial desire has infected the country and it must be destroyed. Even if these disclosures do damage to US efforts to support democratic reformers or even opposition movements in authoritarian states or help regional powers think about ways to deal with potential crises, let it be . . . because after all "this imperial vocation is destroying the country, and therefore you want to see the empire’s end." The fact that you might in some cases actually be discarding the baby along with the bathwater . . . meh.

There's something almost vaguely Bolshevik about this argument. But to be honest it's completely legitimate. You believe American empire is bad; you believe that it must be destroyed and so all hail Wikileaks for bringing that day closer. Throw the good out with the bad etc.

Of course legitimate doesn't equal defensible or even useful. For example Heather, who has devoted yeoman effort to reducing the amount of nuclear weapons in the world, actually has to think about the impact of Wikileaks on the realization of critically important national security objectives. She and others don't have the luxury of living in a black and white world.

Of course, for those who reside on soap boxes - the choices are a bit less complicated.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20147e06b182c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference American Exceptionalism . . . Again:

Comments

Word.

--@MikeDrewWhat

The framing is all wrong here; it is in terms of foreign policy, "force for good in the world" vs. "empire". This is "not even wrong". The US has no foreign policy; hasn't had one for over thirty years. The map on the wall might as well be of a fictional planet. The only uses of Other Places in our political discourse are as allegories for the domestic factional struggle; that struggle is the only thing that is real.

Nothing is about what it pretends to be about. The debate about Wikileaks is about the documents that they haven't released yet: the documents that prove that the Bush Administration's domestic wiretapping began in mid-February 2001 and what its targets were. That's the ball game. Everything else is just hints and euphemisms and didactic fiction.

As far as any American political actor cares, the rest of the world may as well not exist: none of them have a sense of historical time or a sense of place. They all make their own reality. We just have to live in it.

I surprisingly agree with this because I think it makes sense to take a pretty wide and complex view of Wikileaks, it's contribitutions, achievements, demerits and motivations.

But I don't see that Wikileaks is all that special in this regard. Everything we do in the global arena involves trade offs. It's just a matter of whether or not we know what the trade offs are and how well we calculate what we lose for what we gain.

You seem to be taking a pretty absolutist stance on Wikileaks -- that it's a bad thing that harms our ability to conduct foreign policy and that it interferes with the good at least as much as it interferes with the bad and so people shouldn't support it.

But another view, accepting everything you said, would be to say that Wikileaks, like the weather, does some good and does some bad and we should probably just learn to live with it and deal with it. We should let it power our sails when it does and we should keep the ship from tipping over when it storms.

Michael, I'm with destor above: You're just imitating your caricature of Glenn Greenwald (who's dead-on about this topic, I think) and reducing WikiLeaks to a completely negative force on American diplomacy.

For instance, you claim that WikiLeaks impedes our country's ability to be an international force for good. But then, doesn't it also impede our country's ability to be an international force for evil? On balance, I think you just assume that America's actions are more good than evil, so WikiLeaks is preventing more good stuff from happening than it is exposing bad stuff that we've done.

I disagree, and I'm surprised you take that view, considering your writings on Afghanistan in particular. I'm somewhat ashamed of America's role in the world over the last decade, and so I'm glad to see an organization emerging that undermines what I see as spurious, "official" justifications for that ever-expanding, increasingly negative international role - i.e., the need to prevent terrorist safe havens from existing anywhere, the need to increase involvement of our military across our the Middle East (even in Yemen, now, apparently, which we learned thanks to WL), the trumped-up WMDs in Iraq, the embarrassment that is Guantanamo Bay, etc.

I can't believe you don't condone WikiLeaks for helping to undermine these very negative actions by the U.S. I mean, it seems to me you're weighing the increased difficulty that diplomats have doing their jobs against the actual human deaths and suffering that's been caused on a massive scale - it should be a pretty easy decision to support WikiLeaks based on all that past wrongdoing.

thank you for this important issue.

I am sure, too, My Lady. Safe as a coyote among chickens. If ever he'd made a right decision, it had been his escape to Middle California. To think that Paul Naismith and the others had the manor to themselves - it was a wonder the Jonques had not overrun this land long ago. The thought almost kindled his suspicions. But then the prospect of what he could do here overwhelmed all. There was no reason he should have to leave with his loot. Wili Wachendon, weak as he was, could probably be ruler here - if he was clever enough during the next few weeks. At the very least he would be rich forever. If Naismith were the jefe, and if Wili were to be his apprentice, then in essence he was being adopted by the manor lord. That happened occasionally in Los Angeles. Even the richest families were cursed with sterility. Such families often sought an appropriate heir. The adopted one was usually high-born, an orphan of another family, perhaps the survivor of a vendetta. But there were not many children to go around, especially in the old days. Wili knew of at least one case where the oldsters adopted from the Basin - not a black child, of course, but still a boy from a peasant family. Such was the stuff of dreams; Wili could scarcely believe that it was being offered to him. If he played his cards right, he would eventually own all of this-and without having to steal a single thing, or risk torture and execution! It was unnatural ugg boots clearance. But if these people were crazy, he would certainly do what he could to profit by it.

The US has no foreign policy; hasn't had one for over thirty years. The map on the wall might as well be of a fictional planet. The only uses of Other Places in our political discourse are as allegories for the domestic factional struggle; that struggle is the only thing that is real.

ugg boots clearance On my Egypt Air flight yesterday to Cairo, I witnessed one of the more intriguing in-flight exchanges that I can remember. A bearded, well-dressed man sitting a few seats behind me began shouting at the flight attendant. He was complaining that the in-flight movie was inappropriate. What are these “offensive images?” he asked. These included a 15-minute stretch of the movie where at least one woman at any given time was wearing a bikini. In a couple of scenes at a club, members of opposite sexes were dancing in close proximity while, it appeared, consuming alcoholic beverages. “Are we really all Westernized now?” the man behind me asked,ugg boots clearance as if posing a question to those of us in the back of the plane.

The man’s arguments were rather interesting. He pointed out that if you took a poll of the passengers,ugg boots outlet most would agree the film was morally offensive. He asked the attendant, “if we ask the passengers what they think and they agree with me, then what will you do?” The attendant responded, “we don’t take public opinion (ra’i al ‘am) on the airplane.” The man was right: most passengers, and most Egyptians – the vast majority of whom don’t drink, go to clubs, or wear bikinis – would object to the film’s content. But at what point do they have the right to restrict minority expressions of unfaithfulness?ugg boots clearance

It was an odd, amusing exchange that justified the otherwise unpleasant experience of flying on EgyptAir.ugg boots clearance But it was a reminder of the fundamental lack of consensus in the Arab world over the boundaries and limits of the state. There are two groups – Islamists and secular elites – with worldviews which couldn’t be more different. They live parallel lives in parallel worlds, with parallel institutions. They rarely intersect.ugg boots clearance One group believes it has both history and the Egyptian people on its side. The other side, considerably smaller in number, likely has neither. It does, however, have the power.

This stalemate has paralyzed the Arab world for decades now.ugg boots outlet

Sunday’s elections will be just another version of this.ugg boots clearance The main players are the Muslim Brotherhood – populist, religious, and righteous – and the regime coalition which, with its president soon to pass, finds itself in an uncertain place. Both sides are strong in different ways – and weak in others. Neither seems to have anything resembling a coherent strategy for dealing with the impending transition that is soon to come.

ugg boots clearance

Of course we could expect sentiments like this from everyone. This is so because we care for what's happening in our country and we fear that something bad might take place because of our carelessness.

So cool cloth, besides it you can find another dresses, for example JESSICA BIEL dresseskatherine heigl dresses and Carolina Bang Style dress.

There are those of us outside of the United States who have keenly observed the last decade with mounting horror and trepidation. I, certainly, view the work of Wikileaks as being essential: the lies, half-truths and dissembling which has characterised American foreign policy are being laid bare.

As for this statement: "...US actions on the global stage are legitimate or serve a global public interest. They reflect a view of American power that is nearly uniformly negative and adversarial," I couldn't disagree more vehemently. "Global public interest"? What on earth do you mean? There IS no global public interest. There is only the American national interest. They're not the same thing. The truth is that countries like Australia, for example, parrot US strategic aims because the US is the only game in town.

And it's a really crap game.

Like several handheld nintendo ds r4 card consoles, the M3 DS can are afflicted with lots of malfunctions and issues if misused. These types of symptoms may include lines throughout the sport display in the course of play, audio concerns, frequent sport freezes, problems with wi-fi R4 connectivity and multiplayer game play or a faulty touchscreen display. These issues can stem from faulty sport cards resulting from grime buildup, sign interference or perhaps heavy impact that straight damaged your R4 Card system. If the console set for fix, there are many troubleshooting actions you need to take.

Marriage is the essence of virginity, bathed in brilliant shine two people in love. Since the ancient times, crystal was from the pure. The pandora clear and bright brightness is exquisite, a symbol of the good life to this happy moments. With high quality material, and develop business policy and infinite originality, Pandora is strange to this romantic moments, it has opened the door of the imitated crystal.
The pandora bracelets in jewelry world has long been a lonely place, for the bride's accessories, the ring is lonely, actually, a modeling chic the ring can give you create enough colors and make you save other unnecessary pandora jewelry. Pandora colorful rings are filled with nature, insects and fascinating, and it is creating a flower lifelike, magnificent world of crystal for his bride is a bosom to add beauty.

"Americand Exceptionalism". Art, image.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/cainandtoddbenson/3530242190/

As we all know, ;f Hoodies are so famous Links of London Charms It has been the top brand in the world. No matter Cheap Links of London of the fashion design, or the warmth rating,Links of London Friendship, both are quite perfect. Under this hedonism social morality,Links of London Friendship Bracelets, famous persons pay more attention to brand awareness. In many street snaps,, we always find that in winter, famous stars choose ;f Hoodies as their necessary article. Wherever they go,Links of London Pendants, as long as they go out of the door, they will put on a ;f jacket. ;f Hoodies have become silent representative of noble and unique quality for famous stars. Owning one ;f Hoodies in the cold winter, not only represents that you are rich, quite different with other poor people, but also represents that you are Links of London Charms uk in the fashion circle. Only for fashion, many people thought they deserve to keep one ;f jacket. As a moncler Hoodies fan, once I was also discount Links of London Charmslooking forward to owning one jacket. I hope in the cold winter, I will not be afraid of coldness any more and can spend a happy time outside. Fortunately, easy and convenient network age realized my dream.

Then Eöl looked into the eyes of King Turgon, and he was not daunted, but stood long without word or movement while a still silence fell upon the hall; and Aredhel was afraid, knowing that he was perilous. Suddenly, swift as serpent, he seized a javelin that he held hid beneath his cloak and cast it at Maeglin, crying:
'The second choice I take and for my son also! You shall not hold what is mine!'
But Aredhel sprang before the dart, and it smote her in the shoulder; and Eöl was overborne by many and set in bonds, and led away, while others tended Aredhel. But Maeglin looking upon his father was silent.
It was appointed that Eöl should be brought on the next day to the King's judgement; and Aredhel and Idril moved Turgon to mercy. But in the evening Aredhel sickened, though the wound had seemed little, and she fell into the darkness, and in the night she died; for the point of the Javelin was poisoned, though none knew it until too late.
Therefore when Eöl was brought before Turgon he found no mercy; and they led him forth to the ugg boots clearanceCaragdûr, a precipice of black rock upon the north side of the hill of Gondolin, there to cast him down from the sheer walls of the city. And Maeglin stood by and said nothing; but at the last Eöl cried out: 'So you forsake your father and his kin, ill-gotten son! Here shall you fail of all your hopes, and here may you yet die the same death as I.'

ugg boots clearance On my Egypt Air flight yesterday to Cairo, I witnessed one of the more intriguing in-flight exchanges that I can remember. A bearded, well-dressed man sitting a few seats behind me began shouting at the flight attendant.ugg boots clearance He was complaining that the in-flight movie was inappropriate. What are these “offensive images?” he asked. These included a 15-minute stretch of the movie where at least one woman at any given time was wearing a bikini. In a couple of scenes at a club, members of opposite sexes were dancing in close proximity while, it appeared, consuming alcoholic beverages. “Are we really all Westernized now?” the man behind me asked,ugg boots clearance as if posing a question to those of us in the back of the plane.

The man’s arguments were rather interesting. He pointed out that if you took a poll of the passengers,ugg boots outlet most would agree the film was morally offensive. He asked the attendant, “if we ask the passengers what they think and they agree with me, then what will you do?” The attendant responded, “we don’t take public opinion (ra’i al ‘am) on the airplane.” The man was right: most passengers, and most Egyptians – the vast majority of whom don’t drink, go to clubs, or wear bikinis – would object to the film’s content. But at what point do they have the right to restrict minority expressions of unfaithfulness?ugg boots clearance

It was an odd, amusing exchange that justified the otherwise unpleasant experience of flying on EgyptAir.ugg boots clearance But it was a reminder of the fundamental lack of consensus in the Arab world over the boundaries and limits of the state. There are two groups – Islamists and secular elites – with worldviews which couldn’t be more different. They live parallel lives in parallel worlds, with parallel institutions. They rarely intersect.ugg boots clearance One group believes it has both history and the Egyptian people on its side. The other side, considerably smaller in number, likely has neither. It does, however, have the power.

This stalemate has paralyzed the Arab world for decades now.ugg boots outlet

Sunday’s elections will be just another version of this.ugg boots clearance The main players are the Muslim Brotherhood – populist, religious, and righteous – and the regime coalition which, with its president soon to pass, finds itself in an uncertain place. Both sides are strong in different ways – and weak in others. Neither seems to have anything resembling a coherent strategy for dealing with the impending transition that is soon to come.

ugg boots clearance

She had instinctively turned away; but, stopping on his approach, received his compliments with an embarrassment impossible to be overcome. Ugg boots clearanceHad his first appearance, or his resemblance to the picture they had just been examining, been insufficient to assure the other two that they now saw Mr. Darcy, the gardener's expression of surprise on beholding his master must
uggs clearanceimmediately have told it. They stood a little aloof while he was talking to their niece, who, astonished and confused, scarcely dared lift her eyes to his face,
Ugg boots clearance and knew not what answer she returned to his civil enquiries after her family. Amazed at the alteration in his manner since they last parted, every sentence that he uttered was increasing her embarrassment; and every idea of the impropriety of her being found there recurring to her mind, the few minutes in which they continued together were some of the most uncomfortable of her life. Nor did he seem much more at ease;Ugg boots clearance when he spoke, his accent had none of its usual sedateness; and he repeated his enquiries as to the time of her having left Longbourn, and of her stay in Derbyshire, so often, and in so hurried a way, as plainly spoke the distraction of his thoughts.
At length, every idea seemed to fail him; and, after standing a few moments without saying a word, he suddenly recollected himself, and took leave.
The others then joined her, and expressed their Ugg boots outletadmiration of his figure; but Elizabeth heard not a word, and, wholly engrossed by her own feelings, followed them in silence. She was overpowered by shame and vexation. Her coming there was the most unfortunate, the most ill-judged thing in the world! How strange must it appear to him! In what a Uggs clearancedisgraceful light might it not strike so vain a man! It might seem as if she had purposely thrown herself in his way again! Oh! why did she come? or, why did he thus come a day before he was expected? Had they been only ten minutes sooner, they should have been beyond the reach of his discrimination, for it was plain that he UGG Boots Clearance
was that moment arrived, that moment alighted from his horse or his carriage. She blushed again and again over the perverseness of the meeting. And his behaviour, so strikingly altered, -- what could it mean? That he should even speak to her was amazing! -- but to speak with such civility, to enquire after Ugg boots clearanceher family! Never in her life had she seen his manners so little dignified, never had he spoken with such gentleness as on this unexpected meeting. What a contrast did it offer to his last address in Rosings Park, when he put his letter into her hand! She knew not what to think, nor how to account for it.Uggs clearance
They had now entered a beautiful walk by the side of the water, and every step was bringing forward a nobler fall of ground, or a finer reach of the woods to which they were approaching; but it was some time before Elizabeth was sensible of any of it; and, though she answered mechanically to the repeated appeals of her uncle and aunt, and seemed to direct her eyes to such objects as they pointed out, she distinguished no part of the scene. Her thoughts were all fixed on that one spot of Pemberley House, whichever it might be, where Mr. Darcy then was. She longed to know what at that moment was passing in his mind; in what manner he thought of her, and whether, in defiance of every thing, she was still dear to him. Perhaps he had been civil only because he felt himself at ease; yet there had been that in his voice which was not like ease. Whether he had felt more of pain or of pleasure in seeing her, she could not tell, but he certainly had not seen her with composure.
At length, however, the remarks of her companions on her absence of mind roused her, and she felt the necessity of appearing more like herself.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use