Democracy Arsenal

« The Wikileak That Didn't Bark | Main | To Negotiate, Or Not To Negotiate... »

November 30, 2010

National security conservatives coming home?
Posted by Kelsey Hartigan

Throughout the day, key Republican figures have signaled that they will likely join Sen. Lugar (R-IN) in supporting New START, which has the full backing of our military leadership. Countless military and national security leaders have urged the Senate to ratify New START before the end of the year. GOP luminaries like Henry Kissinger, Colin Powell, Brent Scowcroft, George Shultz, Jim Baker and Jim Schlesinger have all fully endorsed the treaty and urged their fellow Republicans to do the same. Numerous conservative commentators have also called upon Republican Senators to ratify New START.  Sen. Lugar lambasted members of his own party, urging them to put aside politics and do what is clearly needed to protect America’s national security interests.  "Every senator has an obligation in the national security interest to take a stand, to do his or her duty. Maybe people would prefer not to do his or her duty right now," he said. "Sometimes when you prefer not to vote, you attempt to find reasons not to vote," Lugar told The Cable. "I'm advising that the treaty should come on the floor so people will have to vote aye or nay," he said. "I think when it finally comes down to it, we have sufficient number or senators who do have a sense of our national security. This is the time, this is the priority. Do it."

Faced with the choice between respecting the advice of our most respected military and national security leaders and playing politics—it seems a few Republican Senators are starting to come around. 

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) told George Stephanopoulos this morning on GMA that there is still time to ratify New START before the end of the year. “I believe we can move forward with the START treaty and satisfy Sen. Kyl’s concerns and mine about missile defense and others,” McCain said, adding that Democrats are addressing Kyl’s concerns in active negotiations.

Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), one of the Foreign Relations Committee members who voted in favor of the treaty in September, said Tuesday that administration officials responded late Monday night to several matters raised by Kyl and himself about modernization of the remaining nuclear arsenal and sufficient funds for safeguarding the stockpile.  "I thought they did a good job. I think it's continuing to evolve in a good way as it relates to modernization," Corker said in an interview. He later added, "Could we finish? I think it's possible that we could."

Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) is now “leaning toward its ratification – and wants a vote this year,” the Wall Street Journal reported today.  “There seems to be a lot of coming together there and a lot more comfort [with the treaty] among our friends and allies in Europe,” Sen. Voinovich said. “I think I’d be supportive.” Earlier this morning, Sen. Voinovich also noted, "I'd like to get it done, but in my conscience I want to feel it's the right thing to do."

Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL), the newly seated senator from Illinois, was asked about Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's warning that a new arms race will erupt if Russian can't agree with the West about a joint European missile defense program.  "I'm open-minded and this is one of the issues I'll raise with the State Department briefing teams coming up to talk to me," he said.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference National security conservatives coming home?:


The Illinois senator was asked Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's warning that a new outbreak of arms if Russia can not agree with the West on a joint European missile defense.

She has lived in love moistening, and this is a how lucky matter, is also the how enviable matter. She has lived in love light shade by sterling pandora silver charms.
As the women is concerned pandora jewellery to make them happy enough to vertigo.
The pandora silver charms are always the most loved stars, and those are obviously the status and the status proof – - proved that own sign status, proves itself in opposite party mind status. This is Pandora’s charm, and I think many people will like them, and they are live in your heart.

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along.
I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading.Nice blog,I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Good post. I am also going to write a blog post about this...I enjoyed reading your post and I like your take on the issue. Thanks.

This is pretty interesting site. I glad to find this site. Every time I got some thing new and interesting information here.

Sorry, it is a secret only the gods on the hill can tell.

tanky you çok güzel bir konuydu admin sağolun

On my Egypt Air flight yesterday to Cairo, I witnessed one of the more intriguing in-flight exchanges that I can remember. A bearded, well-dressed man sitting a few seats behind me began shouting at the flight attendant. He was complaining that the in-flight movie was inappropriate. What are these “offensive images?” he asked. These included a 15-minute stretch of the movie where at least one woman at any given time was wearing a bikini. In a couple of scenes at a club, members of opposite sexes were dancing in close proximity while, it appeared, consuming alcoholic beverages. “Are we really all Westernized now?” the man behind me asked, as if posing a question to those of us in the back of the plane.

The man’s arguments were rather interesting. He pointed out that if you took a poll of the passengers,ugg boots outlet most would agree the film was morally offensive. He asked the attendant, “if we ask the passengers what they think and they agree with me, then what will you do?” The attendant responded, “we don’t take public opinion (ra’i al ‘am) on the airplane.” The man was right: most passengers, and most Egyptians – the vast majority of whom don’t drink, go to clubs, or wear bikinis – would object to the film’s content. But at what point do they have the right to restrict minority expressions of unfaithfulness?

It was an odd, amusing exchange that justified the otherwise unpleasant experience of flying on EgyptAir.ugg boots clearance But it was a reminder of the fundamental lack of consensus in the Arab world over the boundaries and limits of the state. There are two groups – Islamists and secular elites – with worldviews which couldn’t be more different. They live parallel lives in parallel worlds, with parallel institutions. They rarely intersect.ugg boots clearance One group believes it has both history and the Egyptian people on its side. The other side, considerably smaller in number, likely has neither. It does, however, have the power.

This stalemate has paralyzed the Arab world for decades now.ugg boots outlet

Sunday’s elections will be just another version of this.ugg boots clearance The main players are the Muslim Brotherhood – populist, religious, and righteous – and the regime coalition which, with its president soon to pass, finds itself in an uncertain place. Both sides are strong in different ways – and weak in others. Neither seems to have anything resembling a coherent strategy for dealing with the impending transition that is soon to come.

ugg boots clearance

It's funny how we adopt words and adapt our lexicon to the times. This is a very useful slant on things.

That is an awfully astounding column you've posted.Thanks a lot for that a fantastically amazing post!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use