The National Security Implications of Park51 Posted by Shadi Hamid

Over the course of the week, I'll be offering some thoughts and reflections on the Park51 “mosque” controversy here at Democracy Arsenal. I’ll also continue tweeting my less formed observations here, which I did, for example, when I had the rare privilege of seeing Imam Rauf speak in the flesh the other day. The “missing Imam” had finally appeared. In this post, I’d like to delve deeper into the national security implications of the debate.

As I’ve mentioned previously, many of my liberal colleagues are making the case that failing to build the mosque will empower extremists. When I first started hearing this argument, I found it a bit odd. After all, we do a lot of things that, either indirectly or directly, empower extremists in the Muslim world, but rarely do we let that stop us.

The things we do that really undermine “moderates” – sadly becoming one of the most misused words in the American political lexicon – rarely garner headlines. No one in the U.S., for example, really seems to care about the upcoming, critical Jordanian elections, although the result of that, if it goes as expected, will almost certainly have a more pronounced effect on radicalization (at least in Jordan) than the anti-mosque movement could ever hope to have.

That said, I was perhaps too quick to dismiss arguments such this one from Jonathan Chait:

The key fact is that we are fighting a war for the hearts and minds of non-radical Muslims, and the Park 51 uproar is helping drive potential allies into the arms of the enemy.

Yes, a narrative is being built. And while the narrative - that America is at war with Muslims - was already there, there’s something particularly disconcerting about this episode. One of the few remaining arguments I still have left in my rapidly depleted defend-the-U.S-arsenal is that Muslims arguably have more freedom to practice their religion in America than perhaps anywhere else in the world. I guess that one’s not gonna work anymore.

Marc Lynch, in this post, gets us closer to understanding of how the whole thing is playing in the Arab media. It’s certainly something to keep an eye on. Just because our image in the Middle East is perilously negative – the U.S. has lower favorability ratings under Obama than it did during Bush’s final year – does not mean we should let it become even more so. 

But I think the greater worry should be directed a bit closer to home. The anti-mosque hysteria may, in fact, undermine moderates and moderation abroad, but it is more likely to do so at home, where American Muslims, at least up until now, have been uniquely well-integrated. What’s so troubling about the developments of this summer is that they are casting doubt, in a rather striking way, on the argument – and the reality – that American Muslims have, for the most part, escaped the problems of their European counterparts.

Comments

[littlebadwolf]

among other things which muslims and all americans should be concerned with, there is the disturbing news that fox news and its parent, news corp, are in good part owned by the saudi royal family. why are they subsidising this destructive and insane islamophobic mess? just because they are wahabi and imam rauf is sufi?

what's really going on here? is it a diversion from worse mischief?

anyone rational knows that muslims and jews, hatians and mexicans, russians and chinese, all want a decent and quiet life, not wars, weather and insanity. the interpretations vary just a bit, but we are decent people with a common humanity.

why are the crackpots loose, and who is paying for the havoc?

[Steven]

America is at war with Muslims were already in place, there is something particularly disturbing about this episode. One of the reasons I just left my exhausted quickly to defend the arsenal of the United States, is that Muslims may have more freedom to practice their religion in America than perhaps anywhere else in the world.

translation services

[wulijun]

making sailed aroundlouis vuittonrecycled sails. Every bag we top quality .
the world before make haslve to buy e to buy

[nhljersey]

It's so enjoyable to watch these kinds of posts
cheap NFL jerseys

[TAG Heuer Watches]

Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful to me. I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.

[MicrosoftOffice 2007]

Thank you.I hope I can improve through learning this respect. But overall, it's very nice. Thank you for your share!

[GHD sale]

buy GHD Hair Straighteners seems older than the actual GHD sale. No matter what kind of texture of your hair is, the straight hair always makes folks young and full of vigor. If you don't like your curled hair, it is fairly easy to make.

[Nintendo DS]

While you are in circumstances of great delicacy, have you ever thought of asking others for help? People hold different attitudes toward this R4 DS
kind of situation; some people keep it all to themselves and avoid mentioning this to their friends, figuring it will bother others, R4DS
however others have different opinion about this. You Know What? I Bought a Popular EZ flash vi dsi for My Mother at a Very Low PriceSpring’s Trendiest Nintendo DSi Console Hot Styler4 ds

[ouyang]

In 1988, Christian Louboutin shoes is moving from a friend, join the Dior shoes under the specialized production company of legend Roger Vivier, after the master's point, his shoe-making skills and fly on a highly popular soon. Wings of Christian Louboutin shoes gradually succeeded in 1992 and created their own brands, He has produced high heels colorful, exotic, by the media as "independent of the mainstream of Need," available on a greatly concern.

[ouyang]

in 1984 in American Oregon Bei Fudu the nike Headquarters, after a scale huge debate deliberated, Jordan's signature athletic shoes air jordan shoes series finally was pushed up the historical arena.