Democracy Arsenal

« The Immorality of Deficit Hawks | Main | Afghanistan: Why Do We Stay? »

July 06, 2010

Our Lack of Imagination About What To Do in Afghanistan
Posted by Michael Cohen

Over the weekend, I was catching up on my New Yorker reading and came across George Packer's latest piece on Afghanistan. After about a half dozen paragraphs cogently laying out all the reasons why our current strategy in Afghanistan has not been working - and likely will not work - he makes this flabbergasting statement:

No one, however, has been able to come up with an alternative to the current strategy that doesn’t carry great risks. If there were a low-cost way to contain the interconnected groups of extremists in the Hindu Kush—with drones and Special Forces, as Vice-President Biden, among others, has urged—the President would have pursued it. If a return to power of the Taliban, which may well be the outcome of a U.S. withdrawal, did not pose a threat to international security, Obama would have already abandoned Karzai to his fate. But anyone who believes that a re-Talibanized Afghanistan would be a low priority should read the kidnapping narratives of two American journalists, Jere Van Dyk and David Rohde, who were held by the Taliban, along with the autobiography of the former Taliban official known as Mullah Zaeef. Together, these accounts show that the years since 2001 have radicalized the insurgents and imbued them with Al Qaeda’s global agenda. Tactically and ideologically, it’s more and more difficult to distinguish local insurgents from foreign jihadists.

This is an incredibly frustrating example of the real lack of imagination that seems to define a great deal of commentary about the war in Afghanistan. First of all, the notion that the Taliban would even be able to take over the country - or that would be the country's fate if we didn't maintain the current failing strategy - is just a bizarrely far-fetched notion. As Michael Semple noted in a conference I attended last week there isn't exactly a lot of love for the Taliban in Afghanistan (particularly outside the Pashtun-dominated south and east) and every reason to believe that there are severe limits on the ability of the group to take over wide swaths of the country.

Second, the very idea that the Taliban pose a threat to international security is, for lack of a better word, laughable. Instead of reading David Rodhe and Van Dyk, perhaps George Packer should listen to Leon Panetta say there are only about 50-100 al Qaeda in Afghanistan and then try to figure out why this meager AQ presence requires troops levels of 100,000 troops. As Fareed Zakaria noted recently we lost 100 soldiers alone last month in Afghanistan - more than the entire AQ presence in the country. Simple common sense would suggest that even if the Taliban were able to take over Afghanistan they would be insane to give al Qaeda a safe haven - and what's more the US would clearly have the wherewithal and the inclination to militarily eradicate any significant al Qaeda presence there. The notion that removing our presence from Afghanistan - in its current form - would return the country to pre-9/11 days just seems incredibly simplistic.

Does Packer really believe that our current $100 billion a year commitment is the only means of combating the al Qaeda threat? Does he believe that this is an appropriate and measured response to a terrorist organization that has not launched a major attack against the US in nearly 9 years? 

I continue to be amazed and befuddled that otherwise intelligent people don't see the current mission in Afghanistan as an utterly bizarre over-reaction to whatever limited threat al Qaeda actually poses - and seem congenitally incapable of imagining any other potential US strategy.

For example, Packer argues there are no alternatives to the current policy AND there is no low-cost way to the contain the terrorists who reside in the Hindu Kush.

Here's Sean Kay arguing for a containment strategy

Here's Gilles Dorronsorro making the case for political negotiations

Here's Austin Grant Long making the case for a CT approach

Here's me arguing for an approach that stresses regional prioritization

To be sure these plans each have their flaws and none of them are a silver bullet, but they are clearly alternatives to the current strategy at a far less significant cost.

The fact that folks like Packer - and others in the commentariat - are unable to imagine a world in which we can do something different than a) what we are currently doing or b) getting the hell out of Afghanistan ASAP is just impossible for me to understand. 

There are alternatives to our current, failing strategy in Afghanistan - why is everyone so afraid to talk about them?


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Our Lack of Imagination About What To Do in Afghanistan:


High-heel shoe is the favorite,since stars know a pair of Christian Louboutin will add their charming.In the eyes of Christian Louboutin,it's the same important of a beautiful face and a pair of pretty shoes.Christian Louboutin which is well-known by its scarlet soles takes the fancy of the female stars of Europe and America.Whether in formal or informal social accasion,you can see the Christian Louboutin.Style has a new name in Christian louboutin sale.The accessory is definitely a cult piece to own and flaunt.

They turned to the crowd who were fleeing scattered, and then his wife came to the north with the crowd, her husband went to the south, so the two were separated from the turbulence of links of london war for nearly ten years. It was a chance, his wife came to the South in market saw a very familiar links of the links of london silver bracelet, the owner really see it - is his long-lost husband, the couple links of london bracelet hugged each other and cry, links of london silver bracelet so that they can find the most links of london sweetie bracelet pro-people is indeed to bring luck to the people's jewelry,ts

Afghanistan is notorious for fast changing realities, what was true yesterday is not necessarily true today.

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

I encourage everyone a great website. webmaster
More like the posts and admire your site so I expect we so voice-family as we want from you to take a leaf out sister site....thank you...

sesli sohbet

I encourage everyone a great website. webmaster
More like the posts and admire your site so I expect we so voice-family as we want from you to take a leaf out sister site....thank you...

sesli sohbet

For a pair of sleek gloves that would look great with spyder ski, These gloves are perfect for those who live in metropolitan areas where the spyder in the winter because these gloves are lined with extra warm and spyder jacket for that added layer of warmth and spyder.The slim lines of spyder jackets are convenient enough to slip into spyder ski wear when not needed.For a great pair of gloves that will keep up with you on the slopes even in the Paul smith outlet, The Thermacore insulation on these gloves will keep your fingers warm even when the freezing wind and Paul smith on you. The hidden heater and vent pocket stashes extra warmth on the cold days and dumps excess heat in the spring.

what you post is very funny, I like it very much.Thx

Ne yaparız bende bilmiyorum doğrusu bu günlerde geçeçktir bunu biliyorum fakat hayat da hep böyle şeyler insanların karşısına geliyor bunun önünde durabilmenin yoluda sanırım birbirimize destek olmaktan geçiyor şeklinde abartıktan ve anlamsız yazılar yazdıktans onra şimdilik aranızdan ayrılıyorum.

Daha sonraki yazılarımızda görüşmek dileğiyle hoşcakalın arkadaşlar

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use