Democracy Arsenal

« Should Liberals be Giving Obama A Break? Part III | Main | Re: Should Liberals be Giving Obama a Break? Part III »

July 22, 2010

Afghanistan Exit Strategy Watch
Posted by Michael Cohen

So I'm about to do something decidedly unwise; I'm going to go a bit out on a limb in predicting where things are headed with the US mission in Afghanistan. As you can see from the title above; I have a sneaking suspicion that something has dramatically changed about the national discourse regarding our policy in Afghanistan.

The first and most obvious sign - and perhaps the catalyst for change - was the replacement of Stanley McChrsytal with David Petraeus. As I wrote at the time, President Obama was getting rid of a general who seemed to be operating under the premise that the US could win in Afghanistan (and was in it for the long haul) versus one who has shown a history of more pragmatic behavior and a better understanding of political realities. 

But really since then it feels like the whole narrative on Afghanistan has changed. Once upon a time US options in Afghanistan were reduced, in popular debates, to staying the course or cutting and running. But in recent weeks you've had Robert Blackwill call for de jure partition of Afghanistan; Richard Haass is now arguing that Afghanistan is not worth it and we need to drawdown; Fareed Zakaria is expressing incredulity at the level of US commitment to Afghanistan to combat a minimal threat. Hell even Newt Gingrich said things "won't end well" there. 

And today in the New York Times, David Sanger makes the following observation, "Mr. Obama has begun losing critical political figures and strategists who are increasingly vocal in arguing that the benefits of continuing on the current course for at least another year, and probably longer, are greatly outweighed by the escalating price."

Aside from John Nagl, it's getting harder and harder to find anyone who thinks things are going well, we're going to "win" in Afghanistan or that a course correction is unneeded. (Well of course, the Obama Administration would be the other exception).

So with that backdrop, on Monday I went to hear David Kilcullen at an event hosted by the World Policy Institute here in New York. As you can likely imagine I was loaded for bear, ready to take on Kilcullen's pro-COIN arguments. 

Well he started off by going through all the reasons why you don't want to do counter-insurgency. And this wasn't an Accidental Guerrilla argument; it was a litany of the challenges in trying to capture "hearts and minds" or fighting your way out of a COIN fight or trying to marshall political will or relying on a host country government for support or trying to "out-service provide" your enemy etc. In short, Kilcullen was basically making the basic anti-COIN argument.

So I then asked what seemed like an obvious follow-up observation: knowing all the inherent challenges in fighting a counter-insurgency - and considering the US-imposed timeline for beginning withdrawals from Afghanistan - isn't it pretty much a terrible idea to try and wage a COIN campaign in Afghanistan today. 

And Kilcullen basically said yes, arguing instead that the US should move away from COIN and focus more on stability operations. He talked about the need for a bottom-up rather than top-down strategy and the importance of devoting more resources to stable areas of Afghanistan, rather than the red zones in the south and east.

By the time he was done, I leaned over to a friend and noted that Kilcullen answered my question pretty much the exact same way I would have. 

Now the fact that David Kilcullen and I agree on the hopelessness of doing COIN in Afghanistan is, in of itself, not terribly interesting. After all, if you go back to the fall Kilcullen was sounding some discordant notes about the Obama Administration trying to find some middle way to find a counter-insurgency. He seemed to be arguing that it was an all or nothing. I don't really agree with that, because it sort of assumed COIN or nothing; but to Kilcullen's credit he was willing to push back on the conventional wisdom.

But what is interesting, I think, is that now (in July 2010) Kilcullen seems to have basically concluded that the current mission can't work - and that the hopes for a successful counter-insurgency campaign in Afghanistan have come and gone. And this is someone who just got done writing a book on counter-insurgency.

Now I'm not arguing that as Kilcullen goes . . . so goes the US military or even the Obama Administration. But it seems increasingly clear that elite opinion on Afghanistan is beginning to shift against the current mission and toward a more limited set of goals. Unless Barack Obama is LBJ re-incarnated I think that has to, at some point, make a difference.

It will be interesting to see how things play out on the ground over the next few months, but I think we've hit a genuine inflection point on Afghan policy - and it leans toward de-escalation, not escalation.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20133f2757afc970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Afghanistan Exit Strategy Watch:

Comments

Last week, I sat and listened to Dr. Kilcullen in Seattle. I have a feeling his talk in New York was mostly the same, but in any case I can tell you what he said here, and what I think you probably misheard there. Counterinsurgencies such as in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Malayan Peninsula, etc., are best avoided. However, once a country starts down that path, it has to defeat the insurgency for a number of reasons that are of obvious vital national interest. Failure in Afghanistan, in particular, poses not just a risk to the native population who will suffer a bloody power struggle post Nato defeat. The larger threat is the possibility of a nuclear armed Taliban/ Al Qaeda. So in sum, I don't think he would agree with the characterization--at least not last week. You are probably right about the American political angle, though.

Whether it is COIN or stability operations, is not Kilcullen still arguing in favor of keeping 100,000 US troops deployed in Afghanistan?

It's also worth pointing out that liberals' preference for the "public option" wasn't about standing for "principle" at the expense of people. I think a public option is probably a good thing in part because it would help "actual Americans suffering from lack of health insurance" gain access to more affordable care.

It's also worth pointing out that liberals' preference for the "public option" wasn't about standing for "principle" at the expense of people. I think a public option is probably a good thing in part because it would help "actual Americans suffering from lack of health insurance" gain access to more affordable care.

Justin, we definitely heard two different talks. He specifically said it was time to stop doing COIN; stop focusing resources on red areas in the south and east and move toward a more stability ops focused mission.

Fair enough, there is no doubting your integrity and a good piece. I would hesitate to put Kilcullen in the same tent as those who would like to get out yesterday like some of the figures you cited such as Haas and his Council on Foreign Relations. Whether the fight takes on a different face in different locales in Afghanistan seems to be a tweak in tactics rather than a shift in strategy. This comports with the Kilcullen's idea that a counterinsurgency, and indeed America's adventure in Afghanistan, should take a little under 15 years.

Ne yaparız bende bilmiyorum doğrusu bu günlerde geçeçktir bunu biliyorum fakat hayat da hep böyle şeyler insanların karşısına geliyor bunun önünde durabilmenin yoluda sanırım birbirimize destek olmaktan geçiyor şeklinde abartıktan ve anlamsız yazılar yazdıktans onra şimdilik aranızdan ayrılıyorum.

Daha sonraki yazılarımızda görüşmek dileğiyle hoşcakalın arkadaşlar

I wonder if General Petraeus is a base of over a possible U.S. goal in Afghanistan. Current U.S. strategy is to increase the relationship between Afghan security forces, rebels and a civilian government to build adequate capacity to maintain this increase and improve governance. May not be possible now to make this an acceptable period of time.

Çok güzel bir dizi başlıyor arkadaşlar kılıç günü son bölüm izle diye manyak bir şey bence kaçırmamalısınız.Çüünlü süper bir hikayesi var ve inannılmaz bir kadrosu var dizisis.

I wonder if General Petraeus is a base of over a possible U.S. goal in Afghanistan. Current U.S. strategy is to increase the relationship between Afghan security forces, rebels and a civilian government to build adequate capacity to maintain this increase and improve governance. May not be possible now to make this an acceptable period of time.

Now I'm not arguing that as Kilcullen goes . . . so goes the US military or even the Obama Administration. But it seems increasingly clear that elite opinion on Afghanistan is beginning to shift against the current mission and toward a more limited set of goals. Unless Barack Obama is LBJ re-incarnated I think that has to, at some point, make a difference.

sesli sohbet seslichat seslisohbet seslichat



The reports released recently iphone case by U. Manage on , Enjoy the bestE66 Dual SIM S. Internet digital camera traffic monitoring agency comScore shows that Microsoft`s share on American intellectual mobile phone market fell again. It has already fallen by 4 percentage points since last December, the newest data is only 15%. Though the ipad case share of google is not inferior to microsoft, according to comScore, data shows that google Android market share increases 5.2% in the same period, furtherly lessen the gap with microsoft. According blackberry keyboard to the trend, google soon will overpass software and become the third smartphone plate after iPhone and RIM.Adornment of TV80

Maybe, it is the reason that why microsoft concerns iphone deals mobile phone industry in 2010 so much. It has already released the new mobile operation system Windows Phone 7 Seires. In any case, microsoft will compete with iPhone and try to win back the lost market share due to the Windows Mobile 6.The Top 5 Best touch screen tft lcd google android 1.6 tablet pc




Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
Buy aika gold
Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service!

Cheap aika gold
In the 2 years we are in this field , AIKA Goldbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(GM MMO)

Christian Louboutin children of their parents' friends, next-door neighbors. Any playmate is better than no playmate Christian Louboutin Boots That's what Homewood, AL, mom Wendy Price Murch learned when her Christian Louboutin Pumps but you've always loved going to the play place Christian Louboutin Sandals Simple Strategies to Help Your Child Make FriendsChristian Louboutin Shoes Sale

In this world, we gradually forgotten, and the lonely, and in love with the new world, like all new, rapid growth in solitude, links of london and in loneliness and solitude. alone in strength, our desire for knowledge, we will enhance confidence. links of london bangles sale let your life more perfect and in the process, we have a strange world with great curiosity ;links of london sale therefore, in a few short years, We learn to speak, and unfamiliar world means of communication and to social development trend and the most likely to make the world around him. links of london necklaces sale let your life more perfect, not only across space and time dimension or leap the changes of substance and spirit. links of london silver 's the time when a man, links of london jewellery with the wind and rain, lightning in adversity, and in loneliness and solitude of the struggle.

In the great journey through life on a cold for me, and contrasts finely with each other as moon and stars are looking good! to have met you and friends, links of london support and on. he can read your love, you can see the quandary, links of london sweetie necklace was able to read your eagerness and comfort your heart! one's life, a confidant, links london a bosom friend is more difficult. we have met once the mouth, had possession. at first sight it is more beautiful and is a thousand times. Your ordinary, talented, but can read my heart. the silent and genuine encouragement and comfort words, a cold soul. links of london charm let me take each time they meet each other, and still to listen, and silently for sharing. links of london silver i never dare to expect too much, as long as i can have a heart and let each other feel happy, with a warm. i understand there are two sides to love and comfort and regret.

The day he wore a suit, left chest, links of london wearing a pink flower, next to the bride wore a white dress, Lisa brings flowers, face smile, still able to see the links of london ring, and Daniel Wu look satisfied, for her to wear the ring, links of london bracelet it is true marriage, Daniel tribes blew, he became a married man, and then set foot on Hong Kong Film Awards red carpet, it immediately became the focus. This should be sweet load it! The same red carpet, two generous people have gone through, links of london rings really married, but they choose a low profile.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use