Democracy Arsenal

« Herzliya Dispatch #1:The two state solution is coming, whether you like it or not. | Main | Herzliya Dispatch #2: American Influences on the Discussions »

February 01, 2010

What's A Little Discrimination . . . We're at War
Posted by Michael Cohen

Last week President Obama announced his intention to end the policy that restricted openly gay service members from serving in the armed forces. I've been very struck since then by the response from both Republicans and some Democrats like Ike Skelton of Missouri. Take for example, John McCain's post-SOTU statement on the policy shift

"This successful policy has been in effect for over 15 years, and it is well understood and predominantly supported by our military at all levels," McCain said. "We have the best-trained, best-equipped, and most professional force in the history of our country, and the men and women in uniform are performing heroically in two wars. At a time when our Armed Forces are fighting and sacrificing on the battlefield, now is not the time to abandon the policy." 

According to Skelton, the policy change would create "disruptions' and other "serious problems" at a time when the country in two major wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Forgive my French, but what a load of crap. Apparently our best-trained and best-equipped fighting force can be ordered into harm's way to be shot at, to be bombed and potentially die at the hands of the enemy, but they can't be ordered to serve alongside homosexuals. I can't decide if this is more insulting to homosexuals or to American soldiers.

Let's cut through the BS; this entire discussion about gays in the military has little to do with whether the military can integrate gay service members or whether it will have a negative impact on morale and unit cohesion. We know from the military's own experience with integrating African-Americans and women in the past as well as the very basic fact that there are few more organizations in America as hierarchical as the United States military . . this issue can be dealt with properly. No, let's be clear; gays in the military like the debate on gay marriage is about bigotry and discrimination. 

It certainly isn't about the ability of gays to serve or the ability of the military to handle the change. Don't let anyone argue otherwise. The opposition to repeal of DADT is about the prejudices, misconceptions and fear that some heterosexuals hold toward gays. Nothing more; nothing less. That such views, based on emotion and prejudice, should dictate national policy - and have the force of law behind it - is nothing short of tragic. 

And if some recent polling is any indication the retrograde views of Skelton and McCain are not shared by service members: three-quarters of queried Iraq and Afghanistan servicemembers felt comfortable about serving with gay soldiers.  And for these old men to say that the policy has been successful . . . tell that to the tens of thousands of gay servicemembers who have been drummed about the armed forces and the likely tens of thousands of others who have been forced to lie about their personal lives. 

It was a disgraceful policy 17 years ago and it's a disgraceful policy today. That's it taken this long to change the law is an embarrassment to America; that there are men in positions of political power who would prefer to push that day even further into the future makes it even worse.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20120a83f68af970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What's A Little Discrimination . . . We're at War:

Comments

The best thing for you to do is to go frolic in the front lines in Afghanistan, along all the homosexuals you can take with you. Go serve and not be a bigot! Go be a soldier and love your fellow troop members! You cut through the BS and show them--in the front lines!

As another commenter said so wisely, they can't wait to see the first American cross-dresser general. What an honor! Maybe it will be you? We can't wait!

Hi,
As far as I know Obama's $192 billion war budget rivals the $245 billion request made in 2007 by President George W. Bush, after announcing that more than 20,000 combat troops would be sent to Baghdad.

Sexy, adventurous, trendsetting apparel and accessories of Seven Jeans and True Religion Jeans.Try these slim fitting and darker Seven for mankind jeans, show yourself like a globale star.

A really good pair of True Religion Jeans to walk around town in a very casual and comfortable way.For the seasons, Seven jeans are slim fitting, darker, and with bold pocket statements.Place the order for the Seven for mankind with free shipping here.Promotion now.

If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.

We all know these years china pallet racking in china develop very fast, now the design capacity of racking is very strong in china.
You can see every kind of china racking in china, includingDrive in racking,
cantilever racking, shelving,Longspan shelving, dexion racking,. We also have very experienced engineer to do the design and instlaation job.

as a whole contractor for refrigeration equipment, design, manufacturing, installation of cold store

Yellow lens of Ray ban wayfarer can 100% filter UV, allowing infrared and 83% visible light through the lens.

Its greatest feature is that you can filter the sun's most dazzling blue.

Sunlight through the atmosphere, the most performance is the blue light, which is why you see the sky is blue. Yellow lens filters blue light, the natural scenery can be seen more clearly. So driving with a yellow lens Ray ban 2010 sunglasses, you can more clearly see from the vehicle.

Ray ban sunglasses sale


ray ban 2010 sunglasses sale


ray ban sunglasses sale


ray ban wayfarer message from http://www.eyewear-rayban.com

What is the purpose of war?
The wars year after year, day by day kill many people. There should be a way we have more peace in Elmundo. People live in a world very nice and we have to care.

What is the purpose of war?
The wars year after year, day by day kill many people. There should be a way we have more peace in Elmundo. People live in a world very nice and we have to care.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use