Democracy Arsenal

« The Contradictions of Marjah - pt.2 | Main | The state of Israel »

February 11, 2010

The Protecting Civilians Myth
Posted by Michael Cohen

First things first. I have broken down and finally gone on Twitter surrendering to the forces of digital overload. My handle is speechboy71 (surprisingly most variations of Michael Cohen were taken). Please follow me because right now I have 21 followers and that is kind of pathetic - that and I'm intensely curious to know who all the DA readers are out there. Ok, on to the news.

Fascinating read in today's Wall Street Journal about how US troops feel about the counter-insurgency mission they are being asked to perform in Southern Afghanistan. 

Among front-line troops, many of them used to more liberal rules of engagement in Iraq, frustration is boiling over. "It's like fighting with two hands behind your back," says Sgt. First Class Samuel Frantz, a platoon sergeant in Capt. Reim's unit, the Charlie Company of the 1st Battalion of the 12th Infantry Regiment. "We're so worried about not hurting the population's feelings that we're not doing our jobs."

"It doesn't matter if we get killed—we're here to die," says Lt. Mark Morrison, 24 years old, the leader of the second platoon. "Our lives are not valuable enough to protect."

As Lt. Morrison's platoon gathered for a patrol, his soldiers traded gallows humor about losing limbs in coming hours. "Look at it this way—if you get prosthetic legs, you get to be taller," one told a shorter comrade-in-arms.

To be sure, this is not the first or last time that soldiers on the frontlines have complained about a mission or engaged in gallows humor, but it does speak to the frustration one has to imagine exists among soldiers who've been taught to be fighters - and are now asked to be armed social workers.

But here's the part of the story that is really concerning:

Capt. Duke Reim, commander of the American unit responsible for Pashmul, estimates that about 95% of the locals are Taliban or aid the militants. District Gov. Niyaz Mohammad Serhadi agrees. "People here are on the side of the insurgency and have no trust in the government," he says. "Insurgents are in their villages 24 hours." 

Now Pashmul isn't in Helmand, it's in Kandahar province, but this gets to an issue I raised yesterday - if our overarching goal in Afghanistan is to protect civilians then why are we waging offensives in places where a strong segment of the population doesn't want us to be there? 

Allow me to answer my own question; because our goal is NOT to protect civilians it's to defeat the Taliban . . . and further US interests. This is hardly a surprise; after all isn't this why most countries go to war - to further their interests. But this fiction that we are in Afghanistan to help the Afghan people is just that: fiction. If tomorrow, the residents of Helmand and Kandahar said "we'd rather live under Taliban rule, US troops get out" do you think we'd actually leave? I don't and the reason is simple; we think it's in our interests to stay.  Long ago we decided that defeating the Taliban - and protecting the lives of US citizens - was more important than protecting the lives of Afghan citizens. Otherwise we wouldn't be sending more troops to Afghanistan because no matter how well we play it, as long as 100,000 US troops are on the ground, Afghan civilians are gong to die.

If our goal was to "win the people's trust," the perhaps easiest course would be to leave places like Pasmul or Marjah, but instead we're going to spend blood and treasure to convince them to trust a government and occupying force that they appear to be quite wary of. And that wariness is only likely to grow if Marjah ends up like Fallujah. 

I'm sorry but this is no way to fight a war. Either we're in places like Helmand and Kandahar to defeat the insurgency or we're there to protect the civilians. I'm not sure that it's possible to do both. In fact, right now it doesn't seem like we're doing a very good job at either.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20128778fcece970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Protecting Civilians Myth:

Comments

Hi,
The subject-matter dealt with should serve to draw attention in every country to the tragic fate of victims, and to the action taken by our Movement to help them. It is therefore felt important to discuss specific problems relating to the protection of the civilian population during armed conflicts, abuses committed against women, the suffering endured by thousands of children, the crucial problem of water shortages and starvation, closely linked to population movements, and the scandalous proliferation of antipersonnel mines. The Conference also offers an opportunity to bear witness, to explain, to arouse compassion, and to encourage rejection of the unacceptable.

You are taking an off-hand comment by a soldier as a statistic. It is his impression that 95% of the people support the insurgency. They do not. In this area the majority stay quite, while many village leaders who want to see change are threatened into inaction.

The strategy you propose was tried in Musa Qala in Helmand with the result being not an increase in peace, but an increase in violence and grievances against the government for not protecting the population.

Don't tell him I said this, but dude you are much smarter than Attackerman. God, he's gone so rah-rah lately. And while all but dismissing Al Qaeda current ability to hurt us. Hello? WTF are doing over there then? Seriously, what business is it of ours -- why are we killing them? I'll absolutely follow your ass on Twitter, bro.

Either we're in places like Helmand and Kandahar to defeat the insurgency or we're there to protect the civilians. I'm not sure that it's possible to do both. In fact, right now it doesn't seem like we're doing a very good job at either.

Why are pounding this false distinction so hard? It's pretty obvious that the main method we are pursuing as per COMISAF is to separate the insurgency from the civilian population, while not doing anything to bring the two closer together.

In order to separate the two, we have to bring the fight to the enemy in territory it controls. Not sure why you are so confused about that ---the whole point of the strategy is to expand government control over the population while shrinking Taliban control.

Strategy = expand Afghan government control.
Tactic = population control/persuasion through ejecting Taliban forces from the midst of the population and establishing ANSF and NATO forces there instead.

You know: clear, hold, build. We're still in the process of clearing in some places, which sometimes entails civilian casualties. In other places, we are trying to hold and build, which will probably mean a lot less of that if we have the right mix of forces and governance.

I mean, is it really so hard to understand? It's not all population protection, and it's not all killing the enemy.

@Yozhik: you're challenging the estimate of the senior Western soldier for a district about how strong an insurgency he's really facing? Do you have anything to base that on other than ideology?

Hi Guy's,
he's gone so rah-rah lately. And while all but dismissing Al Qaeda current ability to hurt us. Hello? WTF are doing over there then? Seriously, what business is it of ours -- why are we killing them?

If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.

You know: clear, hold, build. We're still in the process of clearing in some places, which sometimes entails civilian casualties. In other places, we are trying to hold and build, which will probably mean a lot less of that if we have the right mix of forces and governance.
sesli chat sesli sohbet

We all know these years china pallet racking in china develop very fast, now the design capacity of racking is very strong in china.
You can see every kind of china racking in china, includingDrive in racking,
cantilever racking, shelving,Longspan shelving, dexion racking,. We also have very experienced engineer to do the design and instlaation job.

as a whole contractor for refrigeration equipment, design, manufacturing, installation of cold store

Yellow lens of Ray ban wayfarer can 100% filter UV, allowing infrared and 83% visible light through the lens.

Its greatest feature is that you can filter the sun's most dazzling blue.

Sunlight through the atmosphere, the most performance is the blue light, which is why you see the sky is blue. Yellow lens filters blue light, the natural scenery can be seen more clearly. So driving with a yellow lens Ray ban 2010 sunglasses, you can more clearly see from the vehicle.

Ray ban sunglasses sale


ray ban 2010 sunglasses sale


ray ban sunglasses sale


ray ban wayfarer message from http://www.eyewear-rayban.com

We don't take the luxury route, just playing crazy exaggeration and assertive personality. In addition we break the traditional and innovative stainless steel bracelet, stainless steel rings and so on. Our stainless steel jewelry has great stage effects. The color, texture and design are very fashion. The breakthrough in molding achieves the strong sense of art stainless steel jewelry. It experiences a foreign land and customs, tracking the trend of the international fashion accessories. Our company welcomes the large stainless steel jewelry wholesalers to e-mail consultation.
E-mail: sus360@hotmail.com
website: http://www.sus360.com

In a woman’s dress, the jewelry is unique; there is only one role— let a woman be more elegant, attractive and beautiful. But, one thing I can make a sure: An elegant woman, even if links of londonshe loved jewelry, but also must not be too obsessed with this, so that confused his whole body from top links of london sale to bottom are hanging ornaments, like a Christmas tree.

Doctor told me the foot cramps and frequent colds are due to chemo. Still hurts where I sit.

Normal activities are not enough. I can run 1/2 of a short block, slowly. I am 55 now and bike everywhere.

seslisohbet siteleri arasında ekol bir adres sestonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin sestonum 'tıklayınız..! seslisohbet ve seslichat adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak seslisohbet yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!

sestonum
seslichat
seslisohbet


Türkiyenin ilk Hiphop Sitesi Hiphop, Gekko G Fan Sitesi Gekko G, Mask animasyon thank you very good site

Oh God you are a genius person and a good photographer i like your pics thanks.

You are taking an off-hand comment by a soldier as a statistic. It is his impression that 95% of the people support the insurgency. They do not. In this area the majority stay quite, while many vi

Back in July of 2009, President Obama spoke before he knew all the facts when he said that Officer James Crowley acted “stupidly” when he arrested Henry Gates at his home. Jon Bruning may have spoke before he was aware of all the information when he said that Sokol did nothing criminal. Of course since our country’s judicial system is predicated with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty, Bruning’s comment is not that far off base.

These are wonderful! Thank you for sharing

Jon Bruning may have spoke before he was aware of all the information when he said that Sokol did nothing criminal. Of course since our country’s liseli porno judicial system is predicated with the idea that you are innocent until proven guilty, Bruning’s comment is not that far off base.


Great Site, your plugins are very useful and save me a tonne of time.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use