Democracy Arsenal

« Barrasso Embarrassing on Climate Change and the CIA | Main | Chain of Command -- The Hollywood Version »

October 08, 2009

Mission Creep Explained
Posted by Michael Cohen

Today's article by Rajiv Chandrasekaran on how US Afghan policy went so far astray over the past 6 months is an absolute must read. What seems pretty clear from Rajiv's reporting is that the military and the civilians were simply not on the same page . . . but the extent to which they weren't on the same page is very difficult to comprehend:

Preventing al-Qaeda's return to Afghanistan, the document stated, would require "executing and resourcing an integrated civilian-military counterinsurgency strategy." To senior military commanders, the sentence was unambiguous: U.S. and NATO forces would have to change the way they operated in Afghanistan. Instead of focusing on hunting and killing insurgents, the troops would have to concentrate on protecting the good Afghans from the bad ones.

And to carry out such a counterinsurgency effort the way its doctrine prescribes, the military would almost certainly need more boots on the ground.

To some civilians who participated in the strategic review, that conclusion was much less clear. Some took it as inevitable that more troops would be needed, but others thought the thrust of the new approach was to send over scores more diplomats and reconstruction experts. They figured a counterinsurgency mission could be accomplished with the forces already in the country, plus the 17,000 new troops Obama had authorized in February.

"It was easy to say, 'Hey, I support COIN,' because nobody had done the assessment of what it would really take, and nobody had thought through whether we want to do what it takes," said one senior civilian administration official who participated in the review, using the shorthand for counterinsurgency.

On the surface, this is embarrassing. How could civilian officials be recommending a counter-insurgency strategy for Afghanistan and not fully understand what it would take to accomplish this goal? How could they not understand that a counter-insurgency operation would almost certainly necessitate more troops being sent to Afghanistan? Quite simply, how do you endorse a plan for counter-insurgency and then not think it through?

But before we start saying civilian policymakers screwed the pooch it sure doesn't appear that the military had determined in March that it needed more troops either:

"Typically, you defer to the field for the resource needs," said one senior official involved in the review. "In March . . . we thought we had a handle on what McKiernan thought he needed."

The military was not ready at that point to come to the president and say, 'Here's the number we think it's going to take,' " the person familiar with the conversation said. "They were satisfied that what they had put on the table at the beginning of the administration met their requirement for the moment."

Aha! That changes things a bit and suggests that the disconnect between the civilian side and the military wasn't simply that the civilians were clueless - it's that the military commanders were content with the troop levels. That was until General McKiernan was fired and replaced by General McChrystal who adopted population centric counter-insurgency with a vengeance.

At the first meeting of a team of outside experts he convened to help him with the assessment, he told them, according to two attendees, that he wanted "a COIN campaign focused on the people."

Here's where the trouble seemed to begin:

Back in Washington, some civilians involved in the review grew concerned that McChrystal's counterinsurgency plan went beyond what they believed was stated in the white paper. "Secure the population" was always a "military phrase," one senior civilian participant said. "That was the way they extrapolated from Riedel's plan," but "it's not in Riedel's plan."

To the military, however, the only way to do counterinsurgency is by protecting the population.

"We were operating under the assumption that when they said COIN, that's what they meant," said a senior U.S. military official in Afghanistan, "and they were serious about committing the necessary resources."

To some extent this is a pox on both houses. McChrystal made the determination that protecting the population was the goal in Afghanistan even though that strategy went much further than not just the white paper but the President's own words in March. Then to make matters worse he began politicking for more troops with selective leaks to the news media (and as loyal readers of the AMCW are well aware, this didn't start with a speech in London).

But the performance of civilian policymakers is almost as bad; if not worse.  There just seems to be a complete lack of planning, forethought and direct communication between civilian policymakers and the military about what a robust counter-insurgency mission would entail. What's more, if Rajiv's reporting is correct it sure seems as though core assumptions about US national interests and capabilities in Afghanistan -- with the notable exception of Tony Blinken - went basically unchallenged. I'm glad to see that the President and his advisors are having this discussion now, but it would have been nice if they had as robust a conversation in March before we got into this mess.

UPDATE: As usual, Bernard Finel takes no prisoners, but it's hard to disagree with him here:

This story is extremely depressing.  It suggests a shockingly low level of debate.  No one brought up the force-sizing requirements in 3-24?  And it makes me wonder whether they even considered what “diplomats and reconstruction experts” could actually accomplish in one of the poorest countries in the world.

This was the product of “weeks” of discussion?  A strategy signed off on with no sense of the forces required?  A strategy bolstered by a hand-wave about “reconstruction experts”?

I am just speechless.

But I have to admit, if this story is correct, my initial assessment of the process was wrong.  The policy process was not captured by a cabal of COINdinistas shutting out all skeptics…. the policy process was instead mismanaged and the participants failed to do sufficient due diligence.  Incompetence rather than conspiracy explained the outcome.

It was early on.  The process was half-staffed and all of the people were presumably new to their jobs.  And that may explain part of the problem.  But wow… this story is really, really rough.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20120a6236621970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mission Creep Explained:

Comments

Well, who's got the courage to tell the US electorate that the resources required to generate any reasonable chance of success (nothing's guaranteed in this life) will consist of 300K troops and $25 billion in civil aid for 10 years. The Republicans have been lying to the public for the last eight years about how this could be done on the cheap. Now, the bills have finally come in the mail and everybody is afraid to look at them. Everyone's trying to kick that can down the road one more time.

Everyone's trying to kick that can down the road one more time.

Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat seslisohbet

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

Hi,
Thank you very much for the whole information.Before your post I was little bit aware but your post gave me clear idea and solved my confusions about issue.

Chanel Handbags are woman’s dream come true.

Chanel, a fashion name that has become synonymous with femininity since 100 years, is on the must-have list of every fashion-conscious woman.? And we bring these must-have Chanel Handbags at never before discounts, just for you.

It is only when you come across an Chanel New Arrivals, do you realize the power of her words.? Chanel handbags are crafted not just to be trendy, but trend-setting.? Hardly has lived a celebrity who has not been seen carrying a Chanel handbag under her arm; such has the influence of Chanel handbags as a fashion statement.

Chanel handbags have been so popular in the elite classes of the society, that their pricing is usually prohibitive for everyone else.? Discount Chanel handbags are really difficult to come across, but today should be your lucky day.? We bring you a superb unbeatable range of Chanel Flap bags, all at fantastic discounts.? With us, you have an incredible chance to buy your favorite Chanel handbags at rock bottom prices!

Chanel Handbags have always been at the forefront of luxury and style.? The Chanel classic quilted leather handbags and its reinventions have ruled fashion since forever.? Chanel handbags have remained extremely popular as they continue to merge evolving modern trends with the class and simplicity of its original avatar.

An Chanel 2008 Collection and Chanel 2009 Collection single handedly enhances the look you are carrying.? The reason you would buy a Chanel handbag is own a bag that mingles with your charm and intensifies it with its inherent simplicity.? If you have owned an authentic Chanel handbag before, you know what we are talking about.? If you are one of the unlucky people who haven’t yet gotten a chance to own an Chanel Cambon, now is your chance to shop for an authentic Chanel handbag and discover its ability to transform your look completely.

Buy Chanel handbags with us, and get fabulous discounts which you will never get at your favorite store.? We offer cheap authentic Chanel handbags and they are all up for grabs!

Türkiyenin ilk Hiphop Sitesi Hiphop, Gekko G Fan Sitesi Gekko G, Mask animasyon thank you very good site

Known as replica chanel replica chanel
Los Angeles' "Ambassador of replica gucci replica gucci
Boogie Funk," Dãm-Funk represents the citizens of the Funkmosphere. Headquartered in replica hermes replica hermes
the Leimert Park section of L.A., Dãm (pronounced: dame) has been dedicated over the last few years to cultivating a musical renaissance replica louis vuitton replica louis vuitton
rooted in the early-'80s styles known discount handbags discount handbags
as Boogie, Modern designer handbags designer handbags
Soul and Electro-Funk. www.myspace.com/damfunk

Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
Buy aika gold
Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service!

Cheap aika gold
In the 2 years we are in this field , AIKA Goldbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(GM MMO)

There was a sweetish smell vaguely reminiscent of coffee.

Nice ideas has been explained here. I like this information. These are the good ideas.

很难有发展前途做人体艺术美,看的眼光不同,人也不同
务的受人体艺术是确是很难
人体艺术这项工作了女so you him
其实有空还不如去看看人体艺术有意思,再不然也可以去浏览下有不错的人体艺术指导,难道看到的古惑仔全集系列要去
short haircutssms jokesshort hairstylessdog groomerswhy

Good article! Thank you so much for sharing this post.Your views truly open my mind.

Always good to see, this was a brilliant post. In theory I would like to write like this too.

People requirement is world without end.

This is surely a subject thats close to me so I am very pleased that you wrote about it. The aricle is quite interesting. You seem to be a very skilled writer. short hair

Thank you very much for the whole information.Before your post I was little bit aware but your post gave me clear idea and solved my confusions about issue.

Amazing article. Seems that you have experience in this sphere and your writing quality is on high-level. I am pleased to continue reading your blog posts. Keep up the good work.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use