Democracy Arsenal

« Neocons Attack Geneva Negotiations | Main | U.S Cyber Command Goes Online »

September 30, 2009

Conservative Plan for Iran: Dissemble about Obama Plan for Iran
Posted by Patrick Barry

An unfortunate side effect of attending a bloggers' conference is that it leaves you with very little time to blog, especially when the conference is as enriching as the one I just attended, hosted by the fine people over at the Middle East Institute.  One thing that has apparently continued, even if my blogging hasn't, is the dissembling perpetuated by opponents of the Obama administration's policy of engaging Iran.  Michael Rubin's piece flagged by James is the latest example.  Looking at the revelation of Iran's secret nuclear facility, as well as their recent missile test, Rubin concludes that its enough to put "a nail in the coffin of the Obama doctrine" of engagement. 

Given the tendency of former Bush administration officials to mistake means with ends, Rubin's take is understandable.  It also has the advantage of being totally wrong.  For the billionth time - ENGAGEMENT IS NOT THE GOAL. It never was. The Obama administration has been perfectly consistent on this point, stating it again and again. At a briefing at the State Department put together by MEI, a senior administration official working on Iran emphasized repeatedly that engagement was NOT the goal of U.S. policy toward Iran.  What he did emphasize is that engagement is an instrument for clarifying Iranian intentions, including on the issue of their nuclear program.  From that perspective it doesn't seem to have failed at all.  To the contrary.  When was the last time the IC was so unified in its position toward Iran?  Even the Russians seem to have moved closer toward the view that Iran's recent behavior has been pretty concerning.

Not only do the Michael Rubins of the world tend to ignore this, when you consider that engagement-as-a-means has become a near-constant refrain by the administration, it appears as though they're doing it willingly.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Conservative Plan for Iran: Dissemble about Obama Plan for Iran:


I am not on irans side but the u s has been screwing them since 1953. is it any wonder they want nukes. if a guy came by every day and threatened to set your house on fire would not you try defend your property? never mind the question ,you've already let your own govt burn your house down. so vote republican again,you've got nothing to loose...

Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

I am so with you FRANCK MULLER Watch

A business is successful to the extent that it provides a product or service that contributes to happiness in all of its forms.

If you hold the 70-680 Exam, then you can take two exams to upgrade to MCSE 2003. These special fast-track exams are 220-602. By the way, on the MCSE 2000 track, exam 70-216 was a 'killer'. I thought that 70-620 was twice as hard as the other exams; my point is that there is no such viscous exam on the MCSE 2003 track. In my opinion, the 70-680 is no harder than the other exams.

Türkiyenin ilk Hiphop Sitesi Hiphop, Gekko G Fan Sitesi Gekko G, Mask animasyon thank you very good site

like the post, and I agree somewhat with, To be very truthful.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use