Metrics, I Don't Need Your Stinking Metrics Posted by Michael Cohen

Over at the New York Times we have a good example of how the new American Way of War (COIN) mantra has infected public discourse on Afghanistan:

But as the Bush administration learned the hard way in Iraq, poorly designed measurements can become misleading indicators — and can create a false sense of progress. That is especially difficult in a war like the one in Afghanistan, in which eliminating corruption, promoting a working democracy and providing effective aid is as critical as scoring military success against insurgents and terrorists.

To the first point, the Bush administration created measurements for judging success in Iraq (18 in all) and then made lowering civilian casualties the most important one - even though it wasn't one of the original 18. So to be clear the individuals who created a false sense of progress were the ones who were pushing different benchmarks then those generally agreed upon. And it's still happening today: the surge in Iraq is constantly portrayed as a success even though its founding element - political reconciliation -- has not been achieved.

In a sense this is a big problem with using metrics to define progress in war time - they can either represent false indicators of success (see Vietnam War and body counts) or they can be changed to fit a particular political and military narrative (see Iraq War and surge success). Or they can cloud over the fact that the underlying mission is fundamentally flawed, not in the national interest or due to resource and political constraints not achievable.

The problem I generally have with these conversations about metrics is that you can't judge success if you don't know what the goal is - and frankly I don't know what the Obama Administration's goal is in Afghanistan. I've been told by the President that it is to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat" Al Qaeda. Great. I'm all for that. But how you achieve that goal matters a great deal. For example, counter-insurgency advocates would argue that the way to prevent Afghanistan from again becoming a safe haven for Al Qaeda is to prevent a Taliban take-over of the country. And the best way to achieve that goal is to conduct population centric counter-insurgency that strengthens the legitimacy of the Afghan government and convinces Taliban members to effectively switch sides.

Well I don't agree and I'm not alone.

In fact, look at what the NYT article says about metrics:

"eliminating corruption, promoting a working democracy and providing effective aid is as critical as scoring military success against insurgents and terrorists."

Well that's one view of success (although I'd hate to know how the US government scores these days on being a working democracy).  But there are others that think the latter (military success) is more important or that these goals are not achievable in the near term or aren't necessary for achieving success in Afghanistan.

In other words, if we're going to measure success in Afghanistan by the successful realization of counter-insurgency goals, then we've restricted a whole level of the conversation we need to be having. Or even worse, we're having a conversation that is based on measuring the success of an operation that it at is at its core may be fundamentally flawed.

Let's stop talking about metrics for success in Afghanistan. Let's start talking about goals and end games.  For example, is the goal to stabilize Afghanistan via nation building or is it to prevent a Taliban takeover? (These are two different things). How will we know what success in Afghanistan looks like: an effective Afghan government or a government in Kabul that is able to prevent a Taliban takeover of the country (of those could be one in the same, but the latter would likely be easier than the former).  If the goal of the US mission is, as the President suggested, to defeat, dismantle and disrupt Al Qaeda should the mission be focused more on the Pakistan part of the fight rather than the Afghan side? I know these two are connected, but in the most narrow definition of US interests . . . they're not. Al Qaeda is in Pakistan, not Afghanistan. And while I know they can always come back and receive safe haven under a Taliban government is that a realistic enough possibility that it requires a long-term US military intervention.  Finally, can we live with the Taliban playing an active political role in Afghanistan as long as they are not giving Al Qaeda shelter?

Quite simply, there are a lot of questions to be answered about the US mission in Afghanistan. Figuring out the metrics for success is, right now, not one of them.

Comments

[Speechboy's doppelganger]

Michael, the goal was NOT to create political reconciliation. It was to create the "space" necessary in which that reconciliation could occur by pacifying much the urban violence in Baghdad, and then radiating out the gains.

It seems like a small distinction, but it's not trifling. "Chance" is a real element in any contest for power, and so the wager went in Baghdad from 2007 - 2009.

Is that pause in the fighting or lull that returns some remnant of civil society enough of a strategic anchor to hold fast the utility of our force?

I don't know. But the distinction should be made.

[Michael Cohen]

Yup, very fair point doppelganger! But of course for all the political space created by the surge it still hasn't resulted in the type of political reconciliation discussed back in January 2007. And both us would agree, I'm sure, that there is a space now for that reconciliation to occur.

[Steve Hynd]

Michael, did you notice that we're back to color coded assessments, just like the old post-9/11 threat code that so quickly became a running joke? And some of the metrics themselves will be classified...*secret* color coded benchmarks! I can hardly wait.

Regards, Steve

[michael jordan shoes]

Cheap Jordan shoes and Gucci shoes are on sale

[cheap coach handbags]

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

[cheap coach purses]

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

[r4 gold karte]

Hi,
I heard that indirect fires, in fact, are the American way of delivering killing power while the infantry closes on the objective.

[SesliChat]

Im a peaceable fellow, but Ive been saying for YEARS- its well past time to go to War with Mexico & make them take Texas back.
Thank You. For sesli sohbet seslisohbet Sesli Chat

[sesli sohbet]

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..

[picked]

That's what Boston needs. Get the crowd crazy early, and get the inside game going. Free up Ray Allen and Paul Pierce on the wings. And if Garnett gets it rolling, look out. Boston 6-2, 2 minutes gone by.It's Game 7 of the NBA finals. Not really, china wholesale nike shoes of course, but Game 3 is surely going to be pivotal.
When a best-of-seven puma store is tied at a game apiece, like these finals between the Celtics and Lakers are, the Game 3 winner prevails about 90 percent of the time. jordan 4 Don't think Phil Jackson and Doc Rivers aren't aware of that.
So you might see tighter rotations tonight. supra shoes Quicker substitutions, especially early if something's not working. You might see guys playing a bit longer in foul trouble. Tonight, one team takes a colossal step toward hoisting the trophy. It starts in ugg snow boots a few minutes.

[TıkLa-SohbeT]

SesLiSohbeT siteleri arasında ekol bir adres SesTonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin SesTonum 'tıklayınız..! SesLiSohbeT Ve SesLichaT adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak SesLiSohbeT yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!

SesTonum
SesLichaT
SesLiSohbeT

[FFXIV Gil]

Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
Buy aika gold
Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service!

Cheap aika gold
In the 2 years we are in this field , AIKA Goldbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(GM MMO)

[explosion proof light]

We are committed to developing environmentally friendly and energy-saving explosion-proof light, led flashlight, led mining light,spotlight and light towers use of new technologies and materials.

[knockoff handbags]

i am glad to study your opinion. m41414 Keepall 55, m41416 Keepall 50, m41522 Speedy 40, m41528 Speedy 25, 219704, m40249 artsy mm, m40259 artsy gm, M45257 Messenger Bag, M40156 Neverfull MM, m40144 Tivoli GM