Analyzing the Case for Afghanistan
Posted by Michael Cohen
Over at registan.net, Josh Foust has taken on the admirable and difficult job of making the case for staying the course in Afghanistan. He argues there are two strategic goals for the US mission:
- A basic minimal stability in Afghanistan, such that neither the Taliban nor al Qaeda is likely to develop a staging ground for international attacks, whether against neighboring countries or the United States and Europe;
- The permanent delegitimization of Pakistan’s insurgents, such that they can no longer push Pakistan and India toward nuclear conflict;
Number one is a compelling rationale for a US mission in Afghanistan - whether completing that mission needs to be done via robust counter-insurgency is something else altogether. In my view, it doesn't and I will try to tackle that point in a future post.
But to the second point, I'm not sure I completely understand Josh's argument. He explains it more here:
Now I certainly share the view that preventing nuclear conflict in South Asia is a vital American interest, less clear to me is why we need to fix Afghanistan to achieve that goal. Is the fear that if we leave, Afghanistan will become a proxy war for India and Pakistan that could turn into a full-fledged nuclear conflict? I suppose I have to ask where is the evidence for that. I know India is playing a more open role in Afghanistan, but does really rise to the level of proxy war? I do wonder how much of the "Indian influence" is being hyped by the Pakistani government. I'm just not seeing the direct and vital connection that Josh is making.
Josh goes on:
Again, it's important to prevent such a conflict from emerging, but why is it worth US blood and treasure? I'm actually quite serious here - I don't want to get all Chris Preble on Josh, but I really don't see why American troops have to be put in harm's way because a blow-up in Afghanistan might turn into a full-fledged India-Pakistan war. Why would the United States willingly hold itself and its soldiers hostage to an unresolved regional conflict? And are there really no other options - for example, diplomatic - for preventing such a war than "fixing" Afghanistan?
But there is something else about this argument that troubles me. Josh alleges that the big danger is if insurgents bored from the Afghanistan fight will try to spark a confrontation between India and Pakistan. I'm not clear as to why Afghan Taliban would in the wake of a US withdrawal want to get involved with the fight for Kashmir (did that happen from 1996-2001?) but the bigger question is that didn't jihadist terror groups already try to spark that conflict last November in the Mumbai attacks that killed 173 people? Not to minimize those horrific attacks, but even though the jihadists behind the Mumbai attacks were based in Pakistan - and probably backed by the ISI - it didn't spark a military escalation between the two countries. What would be different if we left Afghanistan?
But I will say one thing, if THIS is the rationale for staying I can understand "why even the war supporters cannot articulate them." I seriously doubt most Americans believe that we should be fighting a war in Afghanistan so that India and Pakistan don't fight one in the future.
I ask these questions not to tweak Josh, but I'm actually curious to hear his answers. So I look forward to the debate.


Classic exposition, I have also mentioned it in my blog article. But it is a pity that almost no friend discussed it with me. I am very happy to see your article.
Posted by: maplestory mesos | August 28, 2009 at 04:15 AM
#1 A basic minimal stability in Afghanistan, such that neither the Taliban nor al Qaeda is likely to develop a staging ground for international attacks, whether against neighboring countries or the United States and Europe;
Staging ground??? And you agree this is a "compelling rationale"? You and Foust have lost me.
What kinds of Al Qaeda or Taliban attacks are you imagining could be staged in Afghanistan, and in what would the staging consist? What kinds of staging could possibly take place in Afghanistan that could not just easily take place in any number of other countries which are closer to the likely locations of the attacks? And what level of "minimal stability" could we possibly achieve in Afghanistan that would put any serious dent in the ability of jihadists to store up dynamite, C4, triggers, wires, bullets or bomb vests in a single room in some safe house? What you and Foust are imagining is maximum security, not minimal stability, and obviously there is nothing we can do to turn the very large, wild and geographically challenging country of Afghanistan into an American maximum security facility.
Why in the world would anyone "stage" a suicide bombing, car bombing or assault rifle attack intended for a city in Iraq, Africa, Europe or North America in Afghanistan?
People seem to be easily dazzled in this debate by various pieces of poorly understood and dubiously applicable language: "safe havens", "training bases", "staging grounds". Terrorists don't need expansive training bases to do the minimal training they need to do. They don't need to go to terrorist "boot camp". They don't need to learn to drill, march and salute. They don't need to maintain a network of headquarters to manage logistically and tactically involved operations. They don't need to hide and protect tanks or battle cruisers or field artillery. They don't even need Evil Masterminds in mountain lairs. Militant jihadism is mostly a do-it-yourself job. To the extent it relies on pre-existing expertise and weapons running networks, that expertise and networking is scattered all over the world and isn't permanently "staged" anyhere.
I'm appalled that eight years after the 9/11 attacks, people still don't understand what terrorism is, what can be done to prevent it, and what can't be done. We're still getting these anachronistically conventional and inapplicable military concepts.
Staging ground??? What world are you guys living in?
Posted by: Dan Kervick | August 28, 2009 at 08:18 AM
"I'm not clear as to why Afghan Taliban would in the wake of a US withdrawal want to get involved with the fight for Kashmir (did that happen from 1996-2001?)"
Yes it did. The so-called "Al-Qaeda" camp that Billy The Clinton bombed in 1998 was actually a training camp for the Kashmiri terrorist group "Harkat-al-Mujahideen". The Taliban were "involved" to the same extent that they were involved with bin-Laden.
Of course, to me that suggests more of a reason for India to be involved in Afghanistan, than the US.
Posted by: ErrActually | September 01, 2009 at 02:03 AM
Hey Michael, sorry it's taken me so long to respond here.
If I may, I'd like to summarize your argument for the sake of simplicity:
1) There is not much evidence for tying the conflict in Afghanistan to the conflict in Kashmir (or the general India-Pakistan conflict);
2) Even if there is, it's not clear it's worth American effort to mitigate.
I can respond pretty strongly to #1. I'm not sure I could convince you about #2, but that's because it's rare people—anyone, smart, principled, or otherwise—does. Not a knock on you, just admitting up front it's a harder nut to crack.
So, for #1. One of your commenters already noted that when we bombed the training camps in Afghanistan in 1998 (i.e. the policy of remaining standoffish and relying on air strikes to mitigate any terrorist threat in the country), we were bombing a camp Osama bin Laden used to support Harkat-al-Mujahideen—which he operated with consent and some support from the Taliban. Harakat later hijacked Indian Airlines Flight 814 flying from Kathmandu to New Delhi; they ultimately landed the plane in Kandahar where the Taliban formed a defensive shield around the plane to prevent Indian forces from storming it. There is a lot of evidence the operation revealed extensive links between al Qaeda, Pakistani jihadist groups, and the Taliban (and, worryingly, the ISI). The hijacking took place after Pakistan's disastrous Kargil War, and a lot of analysts suspected if the ISI granted at least tacit approval for the operation since Pakistan decisively lose Kargil.
But there are other examples where militancy ultimately succored in Afghanistan brought India and Pakistan to the brink. Both the Mumbai attacks and the 2001 Parliament attack—both of which seriously worsened relations between India and Pakistan, with the 2001 attacks causing very serious, and legitimate, concern of open warfare—were launched by Lashkar-e Toiba, a group that got its start in Kunar province of Afghanistan in 1990. Since 1993, they have focused most of their activity on Jammu and Kashmir, while using Northeastern Afghanistan as a staging ground during the occasional sweeps by the Pakistani Army and Police. LeT even did us the courtesy of drafting a pamphlet called "Why are we waging jihad," in which they state their goals of not only creating Islamic rule all over India, but the rest of Central Asia as well.
LeT has moved its headquarters to the suburbs of Lahore, but they remain active in recruiting militants from Southeastern Afghanistan, and multiple depositions of captured militants in Afghanistan have indicated that LeT plays a significant role in funding and training Taliban fighters still active inside Afghanistan. Additionally, several rounds of combat brigades have indicated that a growing amount of militancy along the border can be traced back to LeT, though usually the evidence for that is classified so I don't know if it's legit or not.
There are other examples as well. The point is, there is a documented history of Afghan-based and supported terror groups fomenting armed conflict between India and Pakistan, even after the start of Operation Enduring Freedom. That is the biggest reason why I don't think we can decouple the India-Pakistan conflict from the war in Afghanistan.
That is also why I think it is worth U.S. blood and treasure. You wondered, "what would be different if we left Afghanistan?" It's pretty clear, at least I thought, that American diplomatic pressure, backed up by a credibly violent response in eastern Afghanistan and western Pakistan, helped to defuse the tensions after Mumbai. Similarly, given how frequently Indian consulates, the embassy, and even construction crews are singled out for attacks, it is obvious that India would escalate things should violence against their civilians continue. Don't forget the massive Taliban bombing of the Indian Embassy last year, which had ties going right back into the Pakistani security establishment—again, if the U.S. wasn't there, I sincerely doubt India would have backed down.
Now, I can't argue whether you really think things would be so precipitous if we left; what I do know is that American efforts in Afghanistan have staved off a far larger and much deadlier conflict between the two countries several times since we invaded. It is not clear at all that they would have avoided war had the U.S. been absent.
I hope that addresses at least some of your concerns.
Posted by: Joshua Foust | September 02, 2009 at 11:21 AM
Thanks for this post. Its very nice on this niche
Posted by: netlog | September 03, 2009 at 10:27 AM
asdalfaf
Posted by: chat | September 06, 2009 at 11:20 PM
We have a Debatepedia article on this topic that is definitely worth reading:
http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Debate:_Escalation_of_the_War_in_Afghanistan_under_the_Obama_administration#Pro
But, generally, I think that the problem with the War in Afghanistan is that it's not clear that stabilizing Afghanistan is key to preventing attacks on US soil. I think that heavy, heavy border and airport security, as well as beefed up intelligence and monitoring are the best means of protecting against attacks. Poor airport security was the main reason the 9/11 attacks were able to succeed. Greater security and measures have been the factor preventing subsequent attempts. But, these attempts have come from many different territories, including "homegrown" terrorists in Britain. With a decentralized Al Qaeda, a targeted war in Afghanistan cannot bring full domestic security. Only robust border and airport security measures can do that.
http://wiki.idebate.org/index.php/Welcome_to_Debatepedia!
Posted by: Brooks | September 28, 2009 at 10:30 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 26, 2010 at 01:06 AM
Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!
Posted by: cheap coach bags | January 26, 2010 at 09:53 PM
Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!
Posted by: cheap coach purses | January 27, 2010 at 08:20 PM
Hi,
There can be no doubt now that chemical weapons, including the
newly discovered mycotoxins, are being used in Afghanistan by the
Soviets.....
Posted by: nintendo r4 | February 15, 2010 at 12:06 AM
If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Im a peaceable fellow, but Ive been saying for YEARS- its well past time to go to War with Mexico & make them take Texas back
Thank You. For sesli sohbet seslisohbet Sesli Chat
Posted by: SesliChat | March 21, 2010 at 10:44 PM
ery informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading
Posted by: sesli sohbet | May 11, 2010 at 06:08 AM
Thank you, I got it. o(∩_∩)o
Posted by: NFL jerseys | May 12, 2010 at 02:51 AM
every interesting to read.I enjoyed well while reading.I will recommend my friends to read this one for sure.
Posted by: wholesale wigs | May 13, 2010 at 09:18 AM
There is no black and white colors, such as gray and red like a timeless classic, and eventually replica handbagsbecome worse, Homme Dior, black A06 wake up call, the foreigners rouge, further improve the design of the initial sales to noble pure deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) Homme Dior, Dior men will bring clean ao in front of us the overall structure, surrounded by a black dial, simplereplica handbags and stylish design style spirit of Dior Homme.
Posted by: replica handbags | May 14, 2010 at 12:59 AM
It only takes on passing score on 70-680 Exam before you too will agree that Testking truly has the best and most comprehensive 220-602 Exam. You will train faster and retain you new skills longer, with Testking. Once a satisfied 220-701 Exam, always a satisfied 220-702 Exam client - we make sure of that!
Posted by: william | May 28, 2010 at 02:37 AM
They don't need to hide and protect tanks or battle cruisers or field artillery. They don't even need Evil Masterminds in mountain lairs. Militant jihadism is mostly a do-it-yourself job. To the extent it relies on pre-existing expertise and weapons running networks, that expertise and networking is scattered all over the world and isn't permanently "staged" anyhere. Thank you. porno izle - porno izle
Posted by: porno izle | May 29, 2010 at 11:26 AM
Türkiyenin ilk Hiphop Sitesi Hiphop, Gekko G Fan Sitesi Gekko G, Mask animasyon thank you very good site
Posted by: hiphop | May 31, 2010 at 01:20 PM
They don't need to hide and protect tanks or battle cruisers or field artillery. They don't even need Evil Masterminds in mountain lairs. Militant jihadism is mostly a do-it-yourself job. To the extent it relies on pre-existing expertise and weapons running networks, that expertise and networking is scattered all over the world and isn't permanently "staged" anyhere.
Posted by: mbt | June 02, 2010 at 08:38 PM
SesLiSohbeT siteleri arasında ekol bir adres SesTonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin SesTonum 'tıklayınız..! SesLiSohbeT Ve SesLichaT adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak SesLiSohbeT yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!
SesTonum
SesLichaT
SesLiSohbeT
Posted by: TıkLa-SohbeT | June 25, 2010 at 04:43 AM
Forty years ago, Don ED hardy
blew off a Yale fine-art fellowship to pursue the rogue art of tattoo, a timeless and often taboo tradition that captivated him as a boy in the Orange County beach town of Corona del Mar. By 10 he was drawing cars and eagles on kids' backs and arms with wet colored pencils and Maybelline eyeliner. After that he begun to design the Ed hardy picture
At the San Francisco Art Institute in the early '60s, Hardy mastered the demanding art of intaglio etching under the tutelage of the late Gordon Cook, a no-jive blue-collar guy who instilled in Hardy a love of craft, Asian art and the quiet power of Giorgio Morandi's little still life pictures. Which like love kills slowly
But it worked out well for the plucky Hardy boy, who blurred the supposed boundary between "high" and "low" art and carved a path through the worlds of art and commerce. He has drawn images on torsos
, canvases and giant scrolls with equal conviction and aplomb.
Posted by: cheap ed hardy | July 02, 2010 at 01:53 AM
minelask.com seslichat sitesi
Posted by: seslichat sitesi | July 26, 2010 at 07:10 AM
minelask.com seslichat sesli sohbet görüntülü chat sitesi
Posted by: seslichat sitesi | July 26, 2010 at 07:12 AM
Thank you for sharing greetings of respect for my teacher
Posted by: sesli sohbet | July 26, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Known as replica chanel replica chanel
Los Angeles' "Ambassador of replica gucci replica gucci
Boogie Funk," Dãm-Funk represents the citizens of the Funkmosphere. Headquartered in replica hermes replica hermes
the Leimert Park section of L.A., Dãm (pronounced: dame) has been dedicated over the last few years to cultivating a musical renaissance replica louis vuitton replica louis vuitton
rooted in the early-'80s styles known discount handbags discount handbags
as Boogie, Modern designer handbags designer handbags
Soul and Electro-Funk. www.myspace.com/damfunk
Posted by: k247br | August 01, 2010 at 08:47 PM
Chanel
fashion brands and hollywood film Bollywood has been associated with various fashion brands through their films all these years. many brands goes popular through famous film. the Sonam Kapoor starrer movie Aisha has managed to tie-up with high-end international brands like Arc Teryx Jackets Canada Goose and Canada Goose Parka Louboutin Shoes, which are usually unavailable for Hindi films. Throughout the movie,the actress will be seen wearing a Moncler Jackets skirt and TNF shoes, meanwhile the leading man with The North Face suit and Discount Christian Louboutin watch.the association with big fashion brands was an integral part of the film.
Posted by: christian336 | August 10, 2010 at 05:31 AM
Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
Buy aika gold
Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service!
Cheap aika gold
In the 2 years we are in this field , AIKA Goldbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(GM MMO)
Posted by: FFXIV Gil | August 18, 2010 at 03:21 PM
Thanks for the specific classifications, which are helpful to me!!
Posted by: Yang Noury | September 16, 2010 at 02:26 AM
Analyzing nice post like
Posted by: sohbet arkadaslik | January 05, 2011 at 04:50 PM
Great work deserves the appreciation…Keep it on….
Posted by: Digital Converter Box | March 04, 2011 at 06:42 PM
Thanks your good size sancem
Posted by: Sesli Sohbet | March 12, 2011 at 01:03 PM
Thanks your good size sancem
Posted by: Sesli Sohbet | March 12, 2011 at 01:05 PM
i am glad to study your opinion. m41414 Keepall 55, m41416 Keepall 50, m41522 Speedy 40, m41528 Speedy 25, 219704, m40249 artsy mm, m40259 artsy gm, M45257 Messenger Bag, M40156 Neverfull MM, m40144 Tivoli GM
Posted by: knockoff handbags | April 22, 2011 at 09:22 PM
They don't even need Evil Masterminds in mountain lairs. Militant jihadism is mostly a do-it-yourself job. To the extent it relies on pre-existing expertise and weapons running networks, that expertise and networking is scattered all over the world and isn't permanently "staged" anyhere.
Posted by: instyler | June 22, 2011 at 09:26 AM
But there is something else about this argument that troubles me. Josh alleges that the big danger is if insurgents bored from the Afghanistan fight will try to spark a confrontation between India and Pakistan.
Posted by: magic bullet | July 28, 2011 at 07:39 AM
Thanks admin Yangın dolabı yangınshop yangın sondurme sistemleri yangın ekipmanları itfaye bağlantı elemanları en kaliteli yangın hortumları yangın tüpü dolum satış
Posted by: Yangın dolabı | August 04, 2011 at 09:05 AM
Thanks admin Yangın dolabı yangınshop yangın sondurme sistemleri yangın ekipmanları itfaye bağlantı elemanları en kaliteli yangın hortumları yangın tüpü dolum satış
Yangın dolabı
Yangıntüpü
Yangın
Posted by: Yangın ekipman | August 04, 2011 at 09:08 AM
Thanks admin Yangın dolabı yangınshop yangın sondurme sistemleri yangın ekipmanları itfaye bağlantı elemanları en kaliteli yangın hortumları yangın tüpü dolum satış Yanginci yangın güvenlik
Yangın dolabı
Yangıntüpü
Yangın
Posted by: Yangın | August 04, 2011 at 09:10 AM
Now, I can't argue whether you really think things would be so precipitous if we left; what I do know is that American efforts in Afghanistan have staved off a far larger and much deadlier conflict between the two countries several times since we invaded
Posted by: porno izle | September 05, 2011 at 04:52 AM
This is a wonderful site! I’ve been looking for something like this
for a while now! Thank you!
Posted by: replica jewelry | October 07, 2011 at 05:37 AM
Great work deserves the appreciation…Keep it on….
Posted by: abercrombie and fitch | October 21, 2011 at 03:33 AM
Wow, Great post,Nice work, I would like tütüne son to read your blog every day As long Balderesi as our government yemek tarifi do the best, manzaralar I think we must appreciate them. nanomatik Its not easy to rule a country. moliva You don’t know bout that coz you orjin krem too busy to say some critics. formula 21 You should want and klavis panax see what happen. Zayıflama Thanks
Posted by: Afrika Mangosu | December 10, 2011 at 07:41 AM