Democracy Arsenal

« Gen. Eaton: Obama's VFW Speech Echoed What Every Commander Expects from the Commander in Chief | Main | Further Thoughts on Hillary Clinton's Africa Trip »

August 17, 2009

Afghanistan Mission Creep Watch - The Q Rating Version
Posted by Michael Cohen

I’m doing my best to understand Rajiv Chandrasekaran’s big piece in the Washington Post today about the firing of Gen. David McKiernan and his replacement by Lt. Gen Stanley McChrystal. Part of the problem is that I’ve read the article a few times and I’m still not exactly clear as to why McKiernan was fired:

Gates and Mullen had been having doubts about McKiernan since the beginning of the year. They regarded him as too languid, too old-school and too removed from Washington. He lacked the charisma and political savvy that Gen. David H. Petraeus brought to the Iraq war.

Also there was this:

But back in Washington, McKiernan was increasingly seen as too deferential to NATO. By November, when it became clear that the Europeans would not be sending more troops, senior officials at the Pentagon wanted him to focus on making better use of the existing NATO forces -- getting them off bases and involved in counterinsurgency operations. "He was still doing the NATO-speak at a time when Gates and Mullen were over it," a senior military official at the Pentagon said.

From an operational standpoint it's a bit more difficult to find a huge divide between McKiernan and McChrystal's approach to the war in Afghanistan. McKiernan had recommended troop increases back in the Fall of 2008, he put in place procedures to limit civilian casualties and he had at least begin to shift the focus of the US mission in Afghanistan to counter-insurgency before his replacement arrived on the scene. It does seem as though McChrystal has acted on these measures with more of a vengeance, but operationally there isn't a great divide here.

What does come across in this piece, however, is that the predominate reason that McChrystal was the first wartime theater commander to be fired since General Douglas MacArthur in 1951 was that he didn't do a good job of playing the Washington game:

"Blame General Petraeus," a senior Defense Department official said. "He redefined during his tour in Iraq what it means to be a commanding general. He broke the mold. The traditional responsibilities were not enough anymore. You had to be adroit at international politics. You had to be a skilled diplomat. You had to be savvy with the press, and you had to be a really sophisticated leader of a large organization. When you judge McKiernan by Petraeus's standards, he looked old-school by comparison.

Now we're getting somewhere - and Chandrasekaran provides a nice example of why McChrystal is more Petraeus-like:

Before McChrystal left Washington, Gates asked him to deliver an assessment of the war in 60 days. Instead of summoning a team of military strategists to Kabul, McChrystal invited Washington think-tank experts from across the ideological spectrum.

The experts gave McChrystal a 20-page draft report that calls for expanding the Afghan army, changes in the way troops operate and an intensified military effort to root out corruption. There were few revolutionary ideas in the document, but McChrystal may have received something far more important through the process: allies in the U.S. capital, on the political left and right, to talk about the need for more troops in Afghanistan -- in advance of his assessment to Gates, which will probably be submitted this month. "He understands the need to engage Washington, and he's willing do so in a creative way," said Stephen Biddle of the Council on Foreign Relations, who was part of the team.

Aha! So apparently, the most important tool for a theater commander is not only how you play the Washington game, but how you sell it to a reluctant electorate. Let's call it the Schwarzkopf-ization of American generalship. Certainly, from this narrow perspective the move makes sense. There is little question that to date McChrystal has shown himself to be the much politically savvier general; better at working DC, better at working the press etc.

But does that make the war in Afghanistan any more winnable - or does it just increase the likelihood that US troops will remain there for a longer period of time in pursuit of a dubious mission? For example, McChrystal is continuing the improved training mission that McKiernan initially implemented, but it doesn't mean the ANA and ANP are going to be trained any faster. And, I'm not sure how changing generals is going to help rectify the situation of that pesky Afghan Taliban safe haven across the border in Pakistan.

Apparently I'm alone in my fear, because as we are told McKiernan's firing is "a story of the president's top military leaders, who are betting that this one personnel decision, above all others, will set in motion a process that reverses U.S. fortunes in Afghanistan."

Oy!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20120a5564e17970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Afghanistan Mission Creep Watch - The Q Rating Version:

Comments

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!

Yes, that's cool. The device is amazing! Waiting for your next one!

I bought a replica rolex paypal from online store last month , at the beginning I worried about the quality ,so I tried to buy one for my husband .but when I received it , it’s exact appearance attracted me . there is almost no difference from the original rolex. Now my husband love me much more than before ,he said my Replica Rolex bring him confidence.so I decide to buy one more for myself .

Im a peaceable fellow, but Ive been saying for YEARS- its well past time to go to War with Mexico & make them take Texas back.
Thank You. For sesli sohbet seslisohbet Sesli Chat

Very informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading..

SesLiSohbeT siteleri arasında ekol bir adres SesTonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin SesTonum 'tıklayınız..! SesLiSohbeT Ve SesLichaT adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak SesLiSohbeT yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!

SesTonum
SesLichaT
SesLiSohbeT

Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
Buy aika gold
Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service!

Cheap aika gold
In the 2 years we are in this field , AIKA Goldbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(GM MMO)

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Emeritus Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use