Democracy Arsenal

« Pawlenty's Painful Misstatement on CIA Interrogations | Main | Ted Kennedy RIP »

August 26, 2009

A Cornucopia of Strategic Debates on Afghanistan
Posted by Michael Cohen

These days it seems like everyone in the blogosphere wants to debate the strategic rationale for staying in Afghanistan. Andrew Exum kicked things off a few weeks ago; Jari Lindholm and Bernard Finel weighed in recently and now Josh Foust is getting in the game.

Having debated Josh in the past I look forward to reading and responding to his arguments, but a few ground rules are in order. For example, Josh kicks off his case for Afghanistan here:

Many people I know and respect, like Michael Cohen, have written articles and blog posts explaining why there is little or no strategic rationale for the continued war in Afghanistan, and therefore the U.S. should withdraw from the conflict.

. . .  When the nation’s top military officer continues to insist on teevee that al Qaeda is still capable of striking the U.S., that carries tremendous import, and building the case that even another 9/11 is an acceptable risk requires a sophistication of argument—exhaustive, comprehensive, meticulous—that simply is not evident in the “withdraw now” folks. In other words, they need to build an air tight case, which hasn’t happened yet.

Two things here. I hardly see at as being incumbent on those who oppose the current mission in Afghanistan to build an air tight case - shouldn't that be the responsibility of the people who are arguing for a continued military intervention? It's one of my great pet peeves about recent US national security strategy that the default position always seems to be in favor of using military force - and that somehow it's incumbent on the opponents to prove why this is wrong.

But Josh is raising a bit of a strawman argument here.  A top US military officer insisting that al Qaeda is capable of striking the US shouldn't exactly shut down debate. Hell we had a President who spent 5 years telling us that Iraq was the central front in the war on terror - forgive me if I take these types of pronouncements with a grain of salt. 

And just because AQ is capable of striking the US doesn't mean the current mission makes sense. And being opposed to that mission is not the same thing as believing another 9/11 is an acceptable risk. One can certainly believe that US policy in Afghanistan is wrong while also believing that the US needs to aggressively target AQ terrorists.

But my real problem here is the notion that all of those opposed to the current US mission believe we should "withdraw now." I certainly don't although I do believe we should begin looking at ways to pare down our involvement there. The choice need not be full speed ahead or cut and run. That's the same false choice we dealt with in the Iraq debate. I, for one, believe that the US has some strategic interests in Afghanistan, but I do believe those interests are not being furthered by the current mission - and what's worse there is a growing credibility gap between what the Administration says needs to happen in Afghanistan and our capabilities (not to mention resources).

Josh is a smart guy so I'm sure he will engage with this argument. But please don't make this debate a black and white choice between two unpleasant choices.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e20120a5201317970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Cornucopia of Strategic Debates on Afghanistan:

Comments

The fact they keep wheeling out the uniformed military to make their case is a sign of desperation. The notion that because he is a four star general and therefore the statements he makes are genuine (i.e. not politically motivated) is completely absurd and reflects a complete lack of understanding of how civil-military relations in the US work.

I don't care to be drawn into a discussion of who is making what strawman arguments, but a policy alternative to the course now being pursued by the Obama administration in Afghanistan that amounts to "...[looking] at ways to pare down our involvement there" is no alternative at all.

The default position on Afghanistan, a country in which American infantry are in contact with the enemy as I write this, is absolutely in favor of military force. It would be no matter who was President. It's certainly appropriate to ask whether the military or political courses being pursued by NATO and the American government are likely to work, whether the consequences of their not working are worse than the consequences of withdrawing from them, and whether the cost of the effort we're making is out of proportion to what we are likely to get from it. But those questions have to have answers, and the answers can't just be "I don't think this will work, show me something else."

That isn't opposition or even constructive criticism. It is griping, and isn't helpful to anyone.

There are a couple of things here. The first, and most important, is I think you radically downplay the importance of having the military discussing the threat. This is tied up in a larger discussion about why I don't think you're justified in saying history won't repeat itself in Afghanistan, but that deserves its own post to discuss.

But there is also a kind of procedural issue, I think, as well. You're saying that it is the burden of those who support to war to state why they support it. That doesn't make any sense. Supporting the war is the status quo—it is the burden of the advocate demanding change to justify why change is preferable to the status quo. That's why I made the point about the overall weakness of the disengagement set—that case has been asserted, but not proven (or even, I would argue, very strongly argued).

The point about strategic drift is a powerful one, however, and that is where I really agree with you, Michael. If our leaders cannot articulate why we need to be there—beyond Adm. Mullen simply saying it matters—then we really should not be there.

And I don't think those two positions are contradictory.

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

Great comments! You are so nice, man! You never know how much i like'em!

Hi,
As far as I know five years of unsuccessful war in Iraq and Afghanistan and Israel’s recent military defeat in Lebanon have convinced the neocons that America and Israel cannot establish hegemony over the Middle East with conventional forces alone...

If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.

Im a peaceable fellow, but Ive been saying for YEARS- its well past time to go to War with Mexico & make them take Texas back
Thank You. For sesli sohbet seslisohbet Sesli Chat

ery informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading

This is an 70-680 where it is increasingly easier to tap the internet and find free 70-294 to quickly pass your CIW certification exam. Unfortunately for the 70-297
who select this option, the only thing that 70-298
will earn them, is a MCITP Exam and a worthless papered certification.

You're saying that it is the burden of those who support to war to state why they support it. That doesn't make any sense. Supporting the war is the status quo—it is the burden of the advocate demanding change to justify why change is preferable to the status quo. porno izle - porno izle

Türkiyenin ilk Hiphop Sitesi Hiphop, Gekko G Fan Sitesi Gekko G, Mask animasyon thank you very good site

ery informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading



ery informative and trustworthy blog. Please keep updating with great posts like this one. I have booked marked your site and am about to email it to a few friends of mine that I know would enjoy reading

SesLiSohbeT siteleri arasında ekol bir adres SesTonum hemen sohbette başlamak icin SesTonum 'tıklayınız..! SesLiSohbeT Ve SesLichaT adreslerinin gözdesi hemen tıklayarak SesLiSohbeT yapmaya başlaya bilirsiniz..!

SesTonum
SesLichaT
SesLiSohbeT

Are you fighting in Final Fantasy XIV for FFXIV Gil or Final Fantasy XIV Gil?
Can you suffer yourself being called newbie in FFXIV Gil game?
Are you seeking unofficial Buy FFXIV Gil cheats or Final Fantasy XIV guides in order to make Final Fantasy XIV Gil faster?
Can you get millions of Cheap FFXIV Gil in one day?
Even if you know how to farm Buy Final Fantasy XIV Gil you have to prepare enough Final Fantasy XIV Power Leveling first to buy height class Final Fantasy XIV Items, to upgrade your Final Fantasy XIV characters.
Buy aika gold
Then why not Buy FFXIV Gil from us?
In Final Fantasy XIV it's the fastest way FF14 Gil,for you to get rich. We are online 24 hours a day ready and 7 days one week to power up your FFXIV Gil accounts with FFXIV Gil. Here is the best place for the Final Fantasy XIV Online players to buy your Final Fantasy XIV Gil.
We are the professional website in FFXIV GIL sale.FFXIV GIL here,We are professional FFXIV Power Leveling online. We update price every single day to make sure we are the lowest in the market.(we don't compare price with scam sites which uses unbelievable low price to deceive.)
Our slogan:Cheapest price, Fastest delivery, Best service!

Cheap aika gold
In the 2 years we are in this field , AIKA Goldbuilt many business with tens of thousands of customers. They are very satisfied with our service.So if you want to get a log of Cheap FFXIV Gil ,no doubt ,come to our website to buy. Our customer service is ready for you on line now!(GM MMO)

The nuclearized bipolar ideological competition gave a differential rationale and context for stability. We shouldn't be completely dismissive of stability as a consideration (viz Iraq). The stubborn central fact remains, thougare limits to how much you can compel or propel democratization. As every serious practitioner in that area will remind you, they're in the business of democracy support, not democracy promotion. In its nature, this is an opportunistic affair.

the highest-grade sheepskin availableugg outlet , is the age which suitable to restore the old, the every large or small varied assortment the classical design again returned to people's line of sight, from the wind series's return, 3 rewirings went forth to battle recently to Classic Short UGG the Garnett ... Classic Tiffany Jewelry. Publisher: Alina008. As we all know that ...ugg classic tall is packed in cartons and Blue Ribbon is the symbol of Tiffany jewelry..

a nice cornucopia of nice...

Thanks a lot!!!!
For me is always been a challenge to test the website on different browsers with different platforms, but this list of links made it all easy….
NIce post
tr

What I want to know is why you didnt think to include the other side of this issue? There are so many things that youre missing here that I dont see how you could actually form an intelligent opinion on the subject. Its like you didnt even consider that there me be another side here. Im kind of disappointed.

Actually, I like this article very
much.. It's really very well
written, informative and very
useful for everyone, I've
bookmarked it to re-visit in the
future.. Keep up the great
works and thank you very
much for this,..

Atap baja ringan

And I don't think they did show who keyed his car did they?

I am a young, energetic & honest person and love to share knowledge. I did Masters from a prestigious University and have energies and time to spend for worthwhile knowledge

It is always been a challenge to test the website on different browsers with different platforms

The nuclearized bipolar ideological competition gave a differential rationale and context for stability.

thanks you very nice must

Yo. I think to write well, worth looking at, hope to continue to work, I will continue to focus on your blog.

http://www.picksuprashoes.com/

What you wrote good continue to work hard

Since Osama bin laden was killed last week, it seems that maybe America's strategy in Afghanistan will need to change a little bit. Al Qaeada will probably need time to regroup. They're in a state of Insanity.

The empty vessels make the greatest sound .

Activity is the only road to knowledge . (George Bernard Shaw , British dramatist)

Very well written post.I would say o the contrary, it is going to contribute to "too much

The nomination of the winner depends on the capability and spirit of the personality to finish the race.I like the post very much as it contain informative in knowledge.I like pics of Chelsea shares of the beauty of running in Madison, Wisconsin.I want to congratulate the winner for the nomination race.I want to know suggestion from others.


Your article makes me stay in high spirits all the day!

These kind of post are always inspiring and I prefer to check out quality content so I happy to find many good point here in the post, writing is simply great, thank you for the post.

Very well written post.I would say o the contrary, it is going to contribute

and I don't think they did show who keyed his car did they?

Very well written post.I would say o the contrary, it is going to contribute

Wow, Great post,Nice work, I would like tütüne son to read your blog every day As long Balderesi as our government yemek tarifi do the best, manzaralar I think we must appreciate them. nanomatik Its not easy to rule a country. moliva You don’t know bout that coz you orjin krem too busy to say some critics. formula 21 You should want and klavis panax see what happen. Zayıflama Thanks

Interesting article...

Check out the latest and greatest games for the PS3 Move.

The Roku 2 is a great new Media Streaming device... Some would argue the best on the market! To learn more, check out What is a Roku?

Very interesting! Thank you very much for sharing.

Check out P90X vs Insanity.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Emeritus Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use