Democracy Arsenal

« That Wacky, Wacky John McCain | Main | NSN Daily Update 2/9/09 »

February 06, 2009

More of the Same on Defense Spending
Posted by Michael Cohen

I'm a bit late to the game on this one, but Tuesday Robert Kagan had an op-ed in the Washington Post calling for . . . surprise, surprise more money for defense spending.

Kagan employs the same tired rationales that DSZs (defense spending zealots) always seem to fall back on; like our enemies won't fear us if we cut spending and our allies won't trust us. (Right, because the fact that we already spend more on our military than every other major military power in the world combined is not intimidating enough.) 

Kagan also makes the "interesting" argument that Republicans will be unlikely to support foreign aid if they don't see increases in defense spending - so in order to get more money for development and democratization assistance we have to waste billions upon billions of dollars elsewhere. Only in Washington would this be considered a logical argument.

But above all, what is really missing from Kagan's argument is any kind of strategic rationale for why we need more defense spending. Instead of asking the all important question of what we want our military to do or how should the military be constructed to deal with 21st century security challenges, Kagan's answer is the same one we've been hearing for more than a generation: spend, spend, spend. .  

This is not to say, of course, that all defense spending is bad. Far from it. But just once I would like to hear Kagan or others who advocate for more defense spending explain how more money on tanks, planes and ships makes Americans more secure. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e201053714cbf9970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More of the Same on Defense Spending:

Comments

There are more powerful people than Kagan calling for increased Pentagon corporate welfare spending -- like Carol Shea-Porter and her usually penurious friends.

WASHINGTON D.C. – Today, the entire Maine and New Hampshire congressional delegations united in a joint effort to create new, good-paying jobs at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNS) in Kittery, Maine. In a letter to the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations, the bipartisan group of lawmakers urged the Department of Navy to increase the permanent workforce at the Maine-based shipyard to help mitigate weakness in the regional labor market and increase overall employee productivity and quality of life.
--posted by Carol Shea-Porter, 1st District, NH

So there are 435 little elves working on Santa's Pentagon presents.

runescape gold

runescape gold

I am glad to talk with you and you give me great help! Thanks for that,I am wonderring if I can contact you via email when I meet problems.

Thank you very much. I am wonderring if I can share your article in the bookmarks of society,Then more friends can talk about this problem.

You can go to buy wonderland Gold to take your tent with you when you are traveling around the WL world.

I tried to think so, but I found it was not as the same in the actual process. As you mentioned, I still have doubts, but really thank you for sharing!

Kagan's argument is any kind of strategic rationale for why we need more defense spending. Instead of asking the all important question of what we want our military to do or how should the military be constructed to deal with 21st century security challenges.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use