Not a Gaffe: A Fundamental Misunderstanding of Iraq
Posted by Ilan Goldenberg
John McCain made a mistake this evening, which as far as I'm concerned disqualifies him from being President. It is so appalling and so factually wrong that I'm actually sitting here wondering who McCain's advisers are. This isn't some gaffe where he talks about the Iraq-Pakistan border. It's a real misunderstanding of what has happened in Iraq over the past year. It is even more disturbing because according to John McCain, Iraq is the central front in the "war on terror." If we are going to have an Iraq-centric policy, he should at least understand what he is talking about. But anyway, what happened.
On Katie Couric tonight McCain says:
Kate Couric: Senator McCain, Senator Obama says, while the increased number of US troops contributed to increased security in Iraq, he also credits the Sunni awakening and the Shiite government going after militias. And says that there might have been improved security even without the surge. What's your response to that?
McCain: I don't know how you respond to something that is as-- such a false depiction of what actually happened. Colonel McFarlane [phonetic] was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, that's just a matter of history. Thanks to General Petraeus, our leadership, and the sacrifice of brave young Americans. I mean, to deny that their sacrifice didn't make possible the success of the surge in Iraq, I think, does a great disservice to young men and women who are serving and have sacrificed.
One problem. The surge wasn't even announced until a few months after the Anbar Awakening. Via Spencer Ackerman, here is Colonel MacFarland explaining the Anbar Awakening to Pam Hess of UPI, on September 29 2006. That would be almost four months before the President even announced the surge. Petraeus wasn't even in Iraq yet.
With respect to the violence between the Sunnis and the al Qaeda -- actually, I would disagree with the assessment that the al Qaeda have the upper hand. That was true earlier this year when some of the sheikhs began to step forward and some of the insurgent groups began to fight against al Qaeda. The insurgent groups, the nationalist groups, were pretty well beaten by al Qaeda.
This is a different phenomena that's going on right now. I think that it's not so much the insurgent groups that are fighting al Qaeda, it's the -- well, it used to be the fence-sitters, the tribal leaders, are stepping forward and cooperating with the Iraqi security forces against al Qaeda, and it's had a very different result. I think al Qaeda has been pushed up against the ropes by this, and now they're finding themselves trapped between the coalition and ISF on the one side, and the people on the other.
And here is the NY Times talking about the Anbar Awakening back in March 2007.
The formation of the group in September shocked many Sunni Arabs. It was the most public stand anyone in Anbar had taken against Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, which was founded by the Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
And here is Colin Kahl in Foreign Affairs
The Awakening began in Anbar Province more than a year before the surge and took off in the summer and fall of 2006 in Ramadi and elsewhere, long before extra U.S. forces started flowing into Iraq in February and March of 2007. Throughout the war, enemy-of-my-enemy logic has driven Sunni decision-making. The Sunnis have seen three "occupiers" as threats: the United States, the Shiites (and their presumed Iranian patrons), and the foreigners and extremists in AQI. Crucial to the Awakening was the reordering of these threats.
This is not controversial history. It is history that anyone trying out for Commander in Chief must understand when there are 150,000 American troops stationed in Iraq. It is an absolutely essential element to the story of the past two years. YOU CANNOT GET THIS WRONG. Moreover, what is most disturbing is that according to McCain's inaccurate version of history, military force came first and solved all of our problems. If that is the lesson he takes from the Anbar Awakening, I am afraid it is the lesson he will apply to every other crisis he faces including, for example, Iran.
This is just incredibly disturbing. I have no choice but to conclude that John McCain has simply no idea what is actually happened and happening in Iraq.


I have no choice but to conclude that John McCain has simply no idea what is actually happened and happening in Iraq.
Ilan, even if Sen. McCain DOES have some sort of accurate understanding of the timeline/history of the Iraq War, isn't it simply more likely that he doesn't care if his public pronouncements on it are accurate?
Virtually the entirety of Sen. McCain's campaign thus far has consisted primarily of repetitiously trumpeting his own "superior" "strategy" for dealing with Iraq, and mostly, said strategy has been to push a simpleminded "win-vs-lose" narrative, parading himself as the "win" candidate, and Sen. Obama as the "lose" one.
It's Rovian campaign strategy at its finest [sic]: message is all, image is vital; and the voting public is hugely unlikely to much care. Things like truth (still less historical accuracy) are optional extras, at best.
Posted by: Jay C | July 22, 2008 at 11:57 PM
Yes, McCain doesn't care if he is right on the facts or wrong on the facts, as long as he projects as a man who will utilize all of our US military resources (everything he can do) to keep us safe.
When Obama supporters see this they say. OMG not McCain. When the rest of the country sees it, they say, he's tough, I like that. When I see it, I wonder if he's talking out of his ass by mistake or doing in intentionally.
Posted by: Neil | July 23, 2008 at 12:50 AM
I thank the authors for this article because it exposes the shocking misrepresentations that Sen Obambi has been making to the national and international press corps.
Sen Obama has asserted abroad and to Couric and Moran that NO ONE could have anticipated that the Sunnis in the Anbar Awakening would turn against Al Queada.
Here are the quotes:
Obama says to Couric: "There is no doubt that the extraordinary work of our U.S. forces has contributed to a lessening of the violence, just as making sure that the Sadr militia stood down or the fact that the Sunni tribes decided to flip and work with us instead of with al-Qaeda - something that we hadn't anticipated
happening."
"SOmething that we hadn't anticipated happening".
Similarly on Nightline,
"Here is what I will say," Obama said, "I think that, I did not anticipate,and I think that this is a fair characterization, the convergence of not only the surge but the Sunni awakening in which a whole host of Sunni tribal leaders decided that they had had enough with Al Qaeda, in the Shii’a community the militias standing
down to some degrees. So what you had is a combination of political factors inside of Iraq that then came right at the same time as terrific work by our troops. Had those political factors not occurred, I think that my assessment would have been correct."
How did Sen Obama fail to anticipate the "Sunni flip" if it had started before his votes on the surge.
Seems to me Sen Obama failed to investigate the facts on the ground before he opposed the surge. Seems to me Sen Obama didn't even bother to check the facts before he made these bald faced lies to the international press corp. And this is the guy that Americans should entrust the lives of our troops? I "hope" not.
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 12:58 AM
I thank the authors for this article because it exposes the shocking misrepresentations that Sen Obambi has been making to the national and international press corps.
Sen Obama has asserted abroad and to Couric and Moran that NO ONE could have anticipated that the Sunnis in the Anbar Awakening would turn against Al Queada.
Here are the quotes:
Obama says to Couric: "There is no doubt that the extraordinary work of our U.S. forces has contributed to a lessening of the violence, just as making sure that the Sadr militia stood down or the fact that the Sunni tribes decided to flip and work with us instead of with al-Qaeda - something that we hadn't anticipated
happening."
"SOmething that we hadn't anticipated happening".
Similarly on Nightline,
"Here is what I will say," Obama said, "I think that, I did not anticipate,and I think that this is a fair characterization, the convergence of not only the surge but the Sunni awakening in which a whole host of Sunni tribal leaders decided that they had had enough with Al Qaeda, in the Shii’a community the militias standing
down to some degrees. So what you had is a combination of political factors inside of Iraq that then came right at the same time as terrific work by our troops. Had those political factors not occurred, I think that my assessment would have been correct."
How did Sen Obama fail to anticipate the "Sunni flip" if it had started before his votes on the surge.
Seems to me Sen Obama failed to investigate the facts on the ground before he opposed the surge. Seems to me Sen Obama didn't even bother to check the facts before he made these bald faced lies to the international press corp. And this is the guy that Americans should entrust the lives of our troops? I "hope" not.
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 12:58 AM
I thank the authors for this article because it exposes the shocking misrepresentations that Sen Obambi has been making to the national and international press corps.
Sen Obama has asserted abroad and to Couric and Moran that NO ONE could have anticipated that the Sunnis in the Anbar Awakening would turn against Al Queada.
Here are the quotes:
Obama says to Couric: "There is no doubt that the extraordinary work of our U.S. forces has contributed to a lessening of the violence, just as making sure that the Sadr militia stood down or the fact that the Sunni tribes decided to flip and work with us instead of with al-Qaeda - something that we hadn't anticipated
happening."
"SOmething that we hadn't anticipated happening".
Similarly on Nightline,
"Here is what I will say," Obama said, "I think that, I did not anticipate,and I think that this is a fair characterization, the convergence of not only the surge but the Sunni awakening in which a whole host of Sunni tribal leaders decided that they had had enough with Al Qaeda, in the Shii’a community the militias standing
down to some degrees. So what you had is a combination of political factors inside of Iraq that then came right at the same time as terrific work by our troops. Had those political factors not occurred, I think that my assessment would have been correct."
How did Sen Obama fail to anticipate the "Sunni flip" if it had started before his votes on the surge.
Seems to me Sen Obama failed to investigate the facts on the ground before he opposed the surge. Seems to me Sen Obama didn't even bother to check the facts before he made these bald faced lies to the international press corp. And this is the guy that Americans should entrust the lives of our troops? I "hope" not.
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 12:58 AM
I thank the authors for this article because it exposes the shocking misrepresentations that Sen Obambi has been making to the national and international press corps.
Sen Obama has asserted abroad and to Couric and Moran that NO ONE could have anticipated that the Sunnis in the Anbar Awakening would turn against Al Queada.
Here are the quotes:
Obama says to Couric: "There is no doubt that the extraordinary work of our U.S. forces has contributed to a lessening of the violence, just as making sure that the Sadr militia stood down or the fact that the Sunni tribes decided to flip and work with us instead of with al-Qaeda - something that we hadn't anticipated
happening."
"SOmething that we hadn't anticipated happening".
Similarly on Nightline,
"Here is what I will say," Obama said, "I think that, I did not anticipate,and I think that this is a fair characterization, the convergence of not only the surge but the Sunni awakening in which a whole host of Sunni tribal leaders decided that they had had enough with Al Qaeda, in the Shii’a community the militias standing
down to some degrees. So what you had is a combination of political factors inside of Iraq that then came right at the same time as terrific work by our troops. Had those political factors not occurred, I think that my assessment would have been correct."
How did Sen Obama fail to anticipate the "Sunni flip" if it had started before his votes on the surge.
Seems to me Sen Obama failed to investigate the facts on the ground before he opposed the surge. Seems to me Sen Obama didn't even bother to check the facts before he made these bald faced lies to the international press corp. And this is the guy that Americans should entrust the lives of our troops? I "hope" not.
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 01:21 AM
McCain's a little confused...again...
Posted by: steve | July 23, 2008 at 01:50 AM
JAZ,
Obama is not claiming that he didn't anticipate the Sunni flip. He's saying that he did not anticipate the Sunni flip AND the Shi'ite militia ceasefire (in August 2007) as being enough - in conjunction with the surge and Petraeus' appointment - to lower the violence. Oh, and the ethnic cleansing of Baghdad in the spring of 2007 helped too. Obama DID predict that would happen. Petraeus's walls helped pacify Baghdad because Sadr stood down and because the walls kept the gangsters out. Then Petraeus applied the Anbar model to the now-homogeneous Baghdad neighborhoods, which helped local neighborhood patrols keep out Al Qaeda.
The surge helped, but it was more supplementary than anything else. McCain is lying about the chronology of events. Obama is telling the truth about what he thought would happen.
Nice try though.
Posted by: Elrod | July 23, 2008 at 02:10 AM
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MGM2YWI4ODI0MDA1ZjczOTFjNDNkMGQzMzM0MGQ4Mjg=
Fred Kagan national review: A few sunnis were taking part in the sunni awakening before the surge and grew to 14,000 after the surge.
Anbar and the Surge
The tribal leaders in Anbar began to turn against al Qaeda in Iraq last year, largely due to unspeakable atrocities committed by the terrorists against their own hosts. Many analysts and observers have seized upon this fact to argue that the movement in Anbar had nothing to do with the surge, began before the surge did, and would continue even without the surge. This argument is invalid. Anbari tribal leaders did begin to turn against AQI in their areas last year before the surge began, but not before Colonel Sean MacFarland began to apply in Ramadi the tactics and techniques that are the basis of the current strategy in Baghdad. His soldiers and Marines fought tenaciously to establish a foothold in Anbar’s capital, which was then a terrorist stronghold, and thereby demonstrated to the local leaders that they could count on American support as they began to fight their erstwhile allies. Even so, the movement proceeded slowly and fitfully for most of 2006 and, indeed, into 2007. But when Colonel John Charlton’s brigade relieved MacFarland’s in Ramadi and was joined by two additional Marine battalions (part of the surge) elsewhere in Anbar, the “awakening” began to accelerate very rapidly. At the start of 2007 there were only a handful of Anbaris in the local security forces. By the summer there were over 14,000. Before the surge, Ramadi was one of the most dangerous cities in Iraq; now it is possible for Americans to walk through its market with limited security details and without body armor. David Kilcullen describes the relationship between the surge and the movement very well in his Small Wars Journal posting, and I have also addressed the issue in detail in a recent Weekly Standard article . The fact is that neither the surge nor the turn of the tribal leaders would in itself have been enough to turn Anbar around — both were necessary, and will remain so for some time.
Posted by: Sean | July 23, 2008 at 02:35 AM
Obama said in January 2007 on MSNBC that the surge would have the opposite effect of reducing violence and in fact adding more troops would create more sectarian violence.
The nutroots are silent on that quote.
Posted by: Sean | July 23, 2008 at 02:36 AM
Ilan,
You are the one that is mistaken.
Here are some important points:
1. The fact is that in December 2006 the argument was between a change of strategy and "surge" of forces, and a defunding of the war and precipitous withdrawal of forces.
2. Until then, the US military did not have enough forces to stop the deterioration in the situation, the Sunnis and the Shiites continued to perpetuate sectarian violence and the early stages of civil war, and communities cooperated with extremists on both sides because those extremists filled the power vacuum and protected their sectarian community.
3. As a result, the Sunnis allied with AQI because through the terrorist group they were able to organize, coordinate, and protect their community from Shiite militias. They had to do this because they sensed that the US was close to beginning a withdrawal and thus was not a long term partner or protector.
4. Although some Sunni tribes began to rebel against AQI before the "surge" it was a piecemeal, uncoordinated, and largely unsuccesful effort which led AQI to assassinate many of these Sunni tribal leaders. The vast majority of Sunni tribes did not turn on AQI because they did not have the capability to defend themselves from AQI and their leaders feared being assassinated by AQI. Also, the security vacuum created by insufficient US forces meant that the tribes had no other choice but to turn to AQI for protection from Shiite militias.
5. The "surge" sent a clear message to Sunni tribes that the US was committed to improving conditions on the ground and was a credible long-term partner against AQI. Thus the Sunni tribes then began to trust the US as a partner and protector against AQI and Shiite militias. This is the important action that catalyzed Sunnis to turn against AQI and join the US on a wide scale.
6. The "surge" enabled the US military to actually defeat AQI by clearing and holding areas and uniting and organizing Sunni tribes to govern their areas. Without the surge the Sunni tribes would not have been organized in a united and coordinated way to defeat AQI, and security gains would not have been sustainable.
In short, before the "surge" very few tribes turned against AQI and allied with the US. The "surge" demonstrated a renewed American commitment to Iraq that gave the Sunni tribes the confidence to turn against AQI and ally with the US on a large scale. The "surge" then enabled the US to definitively defeat AQI and organize the Sunni tribes to govern and protect themselves.
Had the US performed a precipitous withdrawal as the Democrats and Obama insisted at the time, the Awakening Movement would have failed, its leaders would have been assassinated either by AQI or Shiite militias, and AQI today would be a powerful force in Western Iraq. There is just no doubt that the success of the Awakening Movement is due in large part to the "surge" in forces and counterinsurgency tactics.
Posted by: Armando | July 23, 2008 at 02:39 AM
Gaffes Happen has become the official teeshirt of the McCain campaign and they may come to regret 'whining' for more news coverage.
Politicians put their foot in their mouth on a regular basis. Sometimes it may be the result of long hours on the campaign trail, sometimes because they simply can't keep their facts straight and sometimes because they can't keep their lies straight. Sometimes it's simply because they do not understand the facts.
Per President Bush and Col. MacFarland, the Anbar awakening was already well under way through organized efforts by the tribal leaders well before the surge began. These events took place months before the surge was even announced. Per McCain, the surge 'began' the Anbar awakening.
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3738
The Couric interview gets even more interesting as McCain tries to distance himself from the numerous failed Iraq policies under the Bush administration:
“McCain: The fact is we had four years of failed policy. We were losing. We were losing the war in Iraq. The consequences of failure and defeat of the United States of America in the first major conflict since 9/11 would have had devastating impacts throughout the region and the world.”
Why would McCain support a president responsible for four years of failure?
“no one has supported President Bush on Iraq more than I have.” [John McCain, 03/28/08)
“The fact is that I have agreed with President Bush far more than I have disagreed. And on the transcendent issues, the most important issues of our day, I’ve been totally in agreement and support of President Bush.” [John McCain, 06/19/05]
“I am proud of this president’s strategy in Iraq.” [John McCain, upon receiving endorsement from President Bush, 02/13/08]
Gaffes and old quotes are a living history of our thought processes, how well we think, what we think and when we think it. Even Carly can't change that fact:
“To say that John McCain was aligned with President Bush on the prosecution of the war in Iraq is to change history.” [Carly Fiorina, McCain Campaign Advisor, 07/13/08]
The McCain campaign should be thankful the media has let them slide on many major issues, such as his voting record on veteran health issues and successful effort to shut down all investigation into remaining POW/MIA over the protests of their families and veteran groups in order to open up trade with Vietnam (his father-in-law immediately opened up a multi-billion dollar beer industry there).
http://www.aiipowmia.com/sea/schanberg_mccain.html
McCain has been given no media coverage on the very real probability he suffers from PTSD.
“Among U.S. servicemen taken captive during the Korean War, as many as nine out of 10 survivors may suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and other mental disorders more than 35 years after their release, psychologist Patricia B. Sutker of the New Orleans Veterans Administration Medical Center and her colleagues report in the January AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY.”
Perhaps McCain should quit whining about media coverage and not look a gift horse in the mouth.
Posted by: MsSwin | July 23, 2008 at 05:48 AM
The success of the surge is nothing more than a temporary window of opportunity to try and form an united Iraqi government. In that aspect it has failed due to the fact that the Maliki government has not yet included a large number of Sunnis into the police and armed forces. The likely outcome of this policy is that Maliki is probably going to go after the Awakening Councils and Sunni militias much like he used the Iraqi army against the the Sadrists. The American army will soon find itself trapped in an Iraqi civil war if they do not withdraw within sixteen months.
Posted by: Peace | July 23, 2008 at 05:50 AM
Hey ELrod Nice try buddy. The question is did Sen Obambi know about the Anbar Awakening at the time it started? His answer twice has been that NO One could have anticipated it.
Nice try trying to add in the militia stuff. But as Obambi says (this week at least) anyone could have told you that increased troop strength would quell the violence, ie get the militias to back down. Unfortunatelym, for Obambi in 2006, he ignored those fact and would not credit them because they would have gotten in the way of his political aspirations.
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 08:44 AM
You're kidding right? If Mc made a mistake that disqualifies him, what do you call everything Obama made mistakes on, from Chicago till now. Those are just boneheaded mistakes, history gaffes re: war and detente, speaking on something before he even goes to the ME, FISA, financing, the people that aren't 'who he used to know', receiving how much from those due for trial till this day (including the two Ahmed brothers convicted in Canada out of Minn. recently on terror charges), using a 'fact finding mission' to campaign (who's paying for that btw), not to mention his scrubbing of our first amendment rights on the web, deleting of youtube accounts (google is a big supporter), his lobbyists (which for some reason never get mentioned, as if 300 mil came from the oppressed little people), the state of Chicago (with Blago, due for impeachment for scandal, calling for the National Guard due to crime, 10% tax, screwed up schools and of course many condemned and abandoned buildings thanks to his friend, favors for those wanted by Interpol re: Oil for Food, one who walks around his district this minute). Oh, I suggest you go look at open secrets to see where the money comes from. Nukes, defense, lawyers, education (see Chicago), big pharm and oh yes, oil. Yeah, check that ethics bill there and see when it passed.
You guys seem to forget... you don't like a guy who evades, lies, blames others, stubborn/not changing his mind (he revises and nuances, will not admit he's wrong, is a warmonger; Go ahead, put another Bush in, it will be fun when the press and then our net rights are snatched away because he can't take criticism (the press knows it too). Like someone else, he will never be held accountable.
This guy will make Bush look like JFK after he's in.
I also suggest that folks who love to act as if our military's been drafted, to read his Global Poverty Act closely. That National Security Civilian Force he talked about? That he wants just as many, as well trained, just like our military? (This isn't the Americorps or Peace Corps plan, this is a different monster) He wants it mandatory... go dig (After that dig for the history of this). That fluffy you'll get money to go to school, 50 hours a year, etc.... BS, go read about the Canadian and UN programs (via Global Poverty Act), for conscription, he's diverting you with the others, trust me? You guys raise hell on Iraq, say nothing on Afghanistan, or his Pakistan threat from before (that wasn't a mistake either).
What you guys don't understand is, it makes no difference... this is about globalism, the press as well as the left and right elite have chosen this whole election for us. When you have a minute, look back and see how many unreal choices were made... you know the voters didn't make them. It will be interesting to see him buck them with socialism.
I'm still attempting to figure out why he's on a mission if he didn't chair the subcommittee, and where the expenses breakdown is. I'm also thinking there hasn't been a convention yet, he's not from the State Dept., why the heck is he broadcasting what these leaders tell him.
confession: I was kinda hoping though... when that piece-o-'news' re: Malike came out, Bush would've said 'screw you, let's get outta there then' (as if, I can dream), due to the press shilling and big mouth. In case no one noticed, there are two war fronts going, and some need to think before they speak (as evidenced by wrong votes in IL and present votes), an Alinsky disciple and constitutional lawyer should know better.
Oh well, time to dust off the Manifesto and flip through the little red book, who knows, maybe the civilian forces will tell on those who abuse thermostats, drive over 55, grill meat outside and eat what they want... I must plan accordingly.
Via the next first lady,
Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed.
Hmmm, no... i'll die with my cynicism, thanks.
Primer:
Socialism is premised on the assumption that only the government should decide what’s in the best interests of every citizen, even if that involves micro-managing every citizen’s political, economic and personal choices.
If we are a Capitalist society what does this mean for us?
Is there a re-education summer camp in your future? Will we all be sent out in solidarity with the farmers to help with the beet harvest? When will you need to convey your summer home to the “collective” for the good of workers?
Hmmm... I'd like to check back with the BushHitler crowd after the implementation of the five year plan after Obama wins... If possible. I lot of folks are really going to hate themselves after pushing him, I promise you that.
Trojan horse.
Posted by: Carol | July 23, 2008 at 09:35 AM
"This is just incredibly disturbing. I have no choice but to conclude that John McCain has simply no idea what is actually happened and happening in Iraq."
Hi Ilan: I was at your panel with Spencer Ackerman at Netroots Nation and asked that odd question about things being "impossible" militarily and why that would disqualify the US from doing them, just because they're impossible and can't work and will end in disaster. I didn't quite succeed in clarifying what I was asking about, but it bears on your post here, and your statement about having "no choice."
You do have a choice. You can decide that McCain is signaling that he's ready to continue with a peculiar policy move we saw during the Bush years: the defeat of reality-based policy making, the retreat from empiricism in the government as a whole, and the placement of impossible fantasies (like, "Chalabi will take over and we can leave by August...") in the middle of the most deadly and far-reaching strategic decisions.
I wrote about it back in March when McCain was stating that Iran is training Al Qaeda.
I'd be grateful if someone with a strategic head would think through the consequences of continuing with the retreat from empiricism. I believe it is an alternative way of framing these things. Cheers.
Posted by: Jay Rosen | July 23, 2008 at 09:41 AM
Aside from the chronological errors, isn't there another problem with McCain's story? He says "Colonel McFarlane [phonetic] was contacted by one of the major Sunni sheiks. Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others." But didn't the major Sunni sheik in question get killed by AQ some months afterwards? Can't recall his name, but it was a big story at the time, and threw the Anbar awakening into doubt for a while, IIRC.
Posted by: peter riggs | July 23, 2008 at 10:49 AM
JAZ,
Read the whole quote. When he says "nobody anticipated" he was referring to the drop in violence, not the Anbar Awakening.
Posted by: Elrod | July 23, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Armando,
You act as if there were no US forces in Anbar before the surge. The "official" kickoff of the Anbar Awakening (Anbar Salvation Council) was in late September 2006. There were thousands of Marines in Anbar ready to help the Sunni tribesmen working alongside Abu Risha. The tipping point came before the surge was even announced.
As Petraeus himself understands, an insurgent force can only survive if it has the support of the populace. Al Qaeda lost support among the Sunni populace, which had organized to defeat in the late summer and fall of 2006.
What the surge did was not sustain the Anbar Awakening. It helped apply a similar Awakening model in Baghdad and Diyala. That's no small potatoes.
You also discount one of the disastrous effects of the surge: the ethnic cleansing of Baghdad. For all their brutality, the Sunni insurgents did help "protect" Sunni Baghdad neighborhoods from Shi'ite thugs. With the Sunni insurgents on the run in Baghdad, the Sadrists had free reign to evict all the Sunnis from mixed neighborhoods. By August 2007, the map of Baghdad literally changed. The role of the surge troops at that point was mainly to build massive concrete barriers to shield off each neighborhood from outsiders.
Posted by: Elrod | July 23, 2008 at 10:59 AM
I should add, Armando, that any time an argument begins with the statement:
"The fact is that in December 2006 the argument was between a change of strategy and "surge" of forces, and a defunding of the war and precipitous withdrawal of forces."
You are offering a straw man argument.
The most high-profile option in the public domain at the time was the Iraq Survey Group report from James Baker and Lee Hamilton. It called for neither a "precipitous withdrawal and defunding of the war" nor a surge of troops. I'm sure Dennis Kucinich would love to have been able to cut off the purse strings. But Barack Obama never called for that.
There is no way to know what would have happened if the US had adopted the ISG recommendations, which fairly closely aligned with Obama's position.
But to say that the Anbar Awakening would have been crushed without the surge is untrue. Kagan is right that the surge certainly helped by providing some more manpower. But the surge forces did not fully arrive until June 2007, and did not begin to come on board until March. By that point Al Qaeda was already well on the run from Anbar.
Posted by: Elrod | July 23, 2008 at 11:08 AM
I thank the authors for this article because it exposes the shocking misrepresentations that Sen Obambi has been making to the national and international press corps.
Sen Obama has asserted abroad and to Couric and Moran that NO ONE could have anticipated that the Sunnis in the Anbar Awakening would turn against Al Queada.
Here are the quotes:
Obama says to Couric: "There is no doubt that the extraordinary work of our U.S. forces has contributed to a lessening of the violence, just as making sure that the Sadr militia stood down or the fact that the Sunni tribes decided to flip and work with us instead of with al-Qaeda - something that we hadn't anticipated
happening."
"SOmething that we hadn't anticipated happening".
Similarly on Nightline,
"Here is what I will say," Obama said, "I think that, I did not anticipate,and I think that this is a fair characterization, the convergence of not only the surge but the Sunni awakening in which a whole host of Sunni tribal leaders decided that they had had enough with Al Qaeda, in the Shii’a community the militias standing
down to some degrees. So what you had is a combination of political factors inside of Iraq that then came right at the same time as terrific work by our troops. Had those political factors not occurred, I think that my assessment would have been correct."
How did Sen Obama fail to anticipate the "Sunni flip" if it had started before his votes on the surge.
Seems to me Sen Obama failed to investigate the facts on the ground before he opposed the surge. Seems to me Sen Obama didn't even bother to check the facts before he made these bald faced lies to the international press corp. And this is the guy that Americans should entrust the lives of our troops? I "hope" not.
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Jaz you are so stupid it's pukeable. He couldn't have anticiapted as it was happening it, eat s-hit you liar.
Posted by: Jass | July 23, 2008 at 01:30 PM
Jaz you are so stupid it's pukeable. He couldn't have anticiapted as it was happening it, eat s-hit you liar.
Posted by: Jass | July 23, 2008 at 01:30 PM
I am a freaking drunk idiot who nails my sister and blogs w/ his free hand, i lie like a drunk, cause I am
Posted by: JAZ | July 23, 2008 at 01:31 PM
let's not forget that the army saw an oppurtunity early in the "awakening", and began paying terrorists to no longer attack U.S. forces. This was the original motivation....
Posted by: bwildered | July 23, 2008 at 02:35 PM
I'd say, as with most positions Repubs take these days-they understand perfectly what is really happening. Their interests are fundamentally different from those of the vast majority of the citizens of this country that they would rather lie or mislead than reveal how different their interests are from those of the vast majority of us.
Posted by: tc | July 23, 2008 at 03:08 PM
Yes, it's true that the Anbar Awakening occurred before the escalation of troops to Iraq and McCain's calling (along with President Bush) for a "surge". However, to suggest it would have been maintained without an increase in U.S. troops is beyond reason. After all, this Awakening didn't magically happen, it occurred because of a U.S. strategy dedicated to winning over the tribal leaders and fence-sitters, convincing them to safely call out insurgents. The strategy that succeeded in Anbar became the model that was then implemented in other areas, and this of course, required more troops. Soon, it could also be the model for Afghanistan, where ironically Obama supports a "surge" (as does McCain).
Ms. Swin, in her comments, provides the following post to a Dept. of Defense press release as some kind of argument against the "surge" :
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=3738
However, if you read the entire transcript, it becomes obvious that Colonel McFarland is arguing for more troops to continue doing the work that is successful in Anbar. Even that success can only e described as moderate in its early stages, as Colonel McFarland notes the progress that still needs to be made:
"You know, I was talking to somebody the other day, and I said attacks are down 25 percent. That still means we still have 75 percent of the attacks that we used to have, which are still a lot. So you can still go around and find bad news if you want to focus on bad news. It all depends on if you're a glass half empty or a glass half full kind of a person. Right now, you know, the glass is maybe three-quarters empty, a quarter full, but we're pouring more water in it all the time. "
McCain saw the success in Anbar as a reason to double our efforts in the rest of Iraq and win the war. Obama either didn't know about the success in Anbar or considered the glass 75% empty, choosing to focus only on the bad news. In either case, Obama proposed immediate retreat and withdrawal. McCain proposed the "surge." Now Obama and his most ardent supporters try to act like all this progress would have been made regardless of U.S. troops, that the glass could illogically become full without adding any new water. In fact, what they originally proposed is to discount the 25% success, pouring the water out by removing troops and leaving a vacuum of power. Now because we have no way of seeing the repercussions of their proposals, they want credit for the glass being full. Of course, if we had pulled out at their beckoning, and Iraq had deteriorated, they would congratulate themselves for predicting failure and withdrawing just in time.
So we had success in Anbar because of our deliberate strategy of increased security and troops, but increased security and troops would probably "lead to more bloodshed and violence" in Iraq according to Obama. Meanwhile, Obama gives credit to the Anbar Awakening for starting the movement that stabilized the country, even though he ignored its success or considered it a failure in its early days before the "surge", which he opposed. And, of course, this same "surge" which can't be credited for the winning situation in Iraq would help a lot in Afghanistan. This is frightening logic so twisted Hugo Chavez probably wishes he could get away with it.
It's a brilliant political strategy so long as you don't mind what effect it has on the country.
Posted by: Jon O | July 23, 2008 at 04:15 PM
Much Ado About Nothing.
Q. Why should McCain have an intimate knowledge of the details of the history of the Iraqi war?
A: He should not. In fact, the less a civilian leader knows about such details, the better. It indicates he leaves the war in the hands of his generals.
The "Anbar Awakening" was a camel fart heard in the maqhas of Iraq by a liberal journalist.
Posted by: tndal | July 23, 2008 at 05:29 PM
McCain is an "expert" on military and international issues? Can anyone say this with a straight face anymore?
McCain even attacked Obama, after he went to the holocost museum in Isreal, as being "soft" on genicide!
Posted by: George Arndt | July 23, 2008 at 08:30 PM
Lingerie Wholesale
Sexy Lingerie Wholesale
Leather/PVC Lingerie
Christmas Costume
Posted by: charmingirl | October 21, 2008 at 10:24 PM
piratesthetankers
Posted by: aga | December 04, 2008 at 04:40 AM
http://www.recycle-demolish.com/
Posted by: 清拆 | December 12, 2008 at 02:22 AM
They supply silkroad gold in low price. I usually buy
sro gold from them.
silkroad online goldThey have regualar customer service.
I like silk road gold.
Posted by: cheap silkroad gold | December 25, 2008 at 01:02 AM
The lives of most menacheter des kamas are determined by dofus kamastheir enviroment.acheter des kamasThey accept the circumstances dofus kamasamid which but even with good will.
Posted by: cqx | January 19, 2009 at 05:56 AM
You can decide that McCain is signaling that he's ready to continue with a peculiar policy move we saw during the Bush years: the defeat of reality-based policy making, the retreat from empiricism in the government as a whole, and the placement of impossible fantasies (like, "Chalabi will take over and we can leave by August...") in the middle of the most deadly and far-reaching strategic decisions.
Posted by: Soma | March 04, 2009 at 11:10 AM
I hope i can get FFXI Gil in low price,
Yesterday i bought FFXI gold for my friend.
Posted by: dd | March 06, 2009 at 01:39 AM
Is there a re-education summer camp in your future? Will we all be sent out in solidarity with the farmers to help with the beet harvest? When will you need to convey your summer home to the “collective” for the good of workers?
Posted by: Mike | March 17, 2009 at 03:49 AM
Do want to know the magic of online games, and here you can get more ro zeny. Do you want to have a try? Come on and ragnarok zeny can make you happy.
Posted by: ragnarok zeny | March 20, 2009 at 12:25 AM
I am a freaking drunk idiot who nails my sister and blogs w/ his free hand,
Posted by: Christian Dior Handbags | April 20, 2009 at 03:33 AM
I am a freaking drunk idiot who nails my sister and blogs w/ his free hand, i lie like a drunk, cause I am
Posted by: Bvlgari replica Earings | April 29, 2009 at 02:15 AM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | May 25, 2009 at 03:07 AM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | May 25, 2009 at 03:07 AM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | June 01, 2009 at 12:05 PM
The most Soma Drug high-profile option in the public domain at the time was the Iraq Survey Group Soma report from James Baker and Lee Hamilton. It called for neither a "precipitous withdrawal and defunding of the war" nor a surge of troops. I'm sure Soma Online Dennis Kucinich would love to have been able to cut off the purse strings. But Barack Obama never called for that.
Posted by: Soma | July 09, 2009 at 03:59 AM
As Petraeus himself Soma understands, an insurgent force can only survive if it has the support of the populace. Al Qaeda lost support among the Sunni populace, which Soma had organized to defeat in the late summer and fall of 2006.
Posted by: Arik | July 09, 2009 at 04:00 AM
I cant agree with you anymore
Posted by: led vs lcd | November 07, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Watching making at pandora charms is an art blended with tradition and experience so that one admires Pandora for the rest of their life. A pandora beads watch on your hand makes an impression of prosperity and luxury. The craze for Pandora has always defied age and gender. Some of the popular and reputed sites offer these watches along with a 1 month money back guarantee and 2 year warranty. These bracelets are so similar to the original that even some jewelers would not be able to spot the difference.This new version of Pandora Daytona has dials that are large and it also has contrasting color inner track. They will take your money for a real 2008 Swiss made bracelet (their price starts from $700-$800) and will ship cheap Japan or Asian made bracelet (if they ship a watch at all! ).Pandora bracelet, High quality cheap pandora silver. If you ask yourself how many companies is exists in today�s world where customers have to wait more than a year to get a product.The average price of a Pandora bracelet watch , according to the different models is from $150 to $600. There are also instances where dealers have shown photos of authentic Pandora watches to prospective customers and trying to pass the same as bracelets. Always consider a dealer with good reputation.The new generation of Japan-made pandora gold bracelets (called Grade 1 Japan-made bracelets) have a hacking signal as well.
Posted by: Nicole Thompsen | December 23, 2009 at 01:10 AM
Resonera som den är det, den silver earrings kopian, är mer ekonomisk och lika stilfull. Riskerar är vid tiden dig som är färdig denna artikel som du ska är ordnar till för att gå att shoppa för en kopiasilver earrings DateJust klocka. Du kan välja från den standarda vitbakgrunden för mätinstrumenten med en Breitling silver earrings kopiaklocka. Naturligtvis och att gå att få det bättre kvalitets- ut ur det dyrare brännmärka, även om några kan oroa om kvalitets-, det kan antas att du är, men kopiasilver earrings klockor inte är avlägset behind. Det primat inom de skulle silver earrings kopiaklockorna varierar, som huruvida det måste att tas för dagstidning ämnar av för någon sakkunnig orsakar. Du finner den som ganska är ironical, som vi talade precis om kopior av den silver earrings klockan? silver earringskopian ska hjälper dem, när de löser fall. Hundreds kanske tusentals, kan inte och kunde inte berätta det olikt mellan ett original och en kopia, om inte de händde att vara en sakkunnig silver earrings klocka, som något är faktiskt. Att inhandla en silver earrings klocka från ett annat land via internet med avsikten av att ha den sände är också i kränkning av silver earrings varumärke. Unge kopiasilver earrings klockor (497). Resultatet var den nya silver earrings följetongen numrerar med en märka som prefixet och 6 siffror (R000010). De inte endast köp produkten skapar en uttrycka av munnen som annonserar att förhöjningar produktmedvetenheten och, gäller också i kunderna frammanar uppsättningen. Den silver earrings klockafördelen vid kundlivtiden värderar. Det förhöjningar avbilda och vinsten av silver earrings klockor. Klocka för kopia för silver [url=http://www.o2limits.com]sterling silver cubic zirconia earrings[/url] pärla ledar-. Något folk förälskelse att få uppmärksamheten av annat folk. De önskar att se sig som är unika i folkmassan. Klockan för kopian för den silver earrings pärlan den ledar- är speciellt för det folk.
Posted by: Nicole Thompsen | December 23, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Resonera som den är det, den silver earrings kopian, är mer ekonomisk och lika stilfull. Riskerar är vid tiden dig som är färdig denna artikel som du ska är ordnar till för att gå att shoppa för en kopiasilver earrings DateJust klocka. Du kan välja från den standarda vitbakgrunden för mätinstrumenten med en Breitling silver earrings kopiaklocka. Naturligtvis och att gå att få det bättre kvalitets- ut ur det dyrare brännmärka, även om några kan oroa om kvalitets-, det kan antas att du är, men kopiasilver earrings klockor inte är avlägset behind. Det primat inom de skulle silver earrings kopiaklockorna varierar, som huruvida det måste att tas för dagstidning ämnar av för någon sakkunnig orsakar. Du finner den som ganska är ironical, som vi talade precis om kopior av den silver earrings klockan? silver earringskopian ska hjälper dem, när de löser fall. Hundreds kanske tusentals, kan inte och kunde inte berätta det olikt mellan ett original och en kopia, om inte de händde att vara en sakkunnig silver earrings klocka, som något är faktiskt. Att inhandla en silver earrings klocka från ett annat land via internet med avsikten av att ha den sände är också i kränkning av silver earrings varumärke. Unge kopiasilver earrings klockor (497). Resultatet var den nya silver earrings följetongen numrerar med en märka som prefixet och 6 siffror (R000010). De inte endast köp produkten skapar en uttrycka av munnen som annonserar att förhöjningar produktmedvetenheten och, gäller också i kunderna frammanar uppsättningen. Den silver earrings klockafördelen vid kundlivtiden värderar. Det förhöjningar avbilda och vinsten av silver earrings klockor. Klocka för kopia för silver sterling silver cubic zirconia earrings pärla ledar-. Något folk förälskelse att få uppmärksamheten av annat folk. De önskar att se sig som är unika i folkmassan. Klockan för kopian för den silver earrings pärlan den ledar- är speciellt för det folk.
Posted by: Nicole Thompsen | December 23, 2009 at 11:40 PM
Cheap Jordan shoes and Gucci shoes are on sale
Posted by: michael jordan shoes | January 08, 2010 at 10:27 PM
The traditional Chinese wedding always warm in the red, red, let people feel happy, Instead, the traditional western-style wedding dresses
with white wedding dress and black dress, although outdoor wedding dressescolor, but appear plain style, romantic and sacred wedding formed a strong contrast. But now, new Chinese wedding, the young man had put western-style debut as a white wedding dress in front of the important guests.
Posted by: wedding dress | January 23, 2010 at 03:36 AM
Nice article. I liked it a lot. payday loans
Posted by: Payday | January 23, 2010 at 06:33 PM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 27, 2010 at 10:26 PM
Thank you very much for this information.
Good post thanks for sharing.
I like this site ;)
-----------
cam balkon cam balkon
çerçeve çerçeve
fizik tedavi fizik tedavi
tercüme tercüme
Posted by: merhaba | February 08, 2010 at 03:04 AM
good article
Posted by: Beauty Accessories | February 08, 2010 at 07:51 AM
You can decide that McCain is signaling that he's ready to continue with a peculiar policy move we saw during the Bush years: the defeat of reality-based policy making, the retreat from empiricism in the government as a whole, and the placement of impossible fantasies (like, "Chalabi will take over and we can leave by August...") in the middle of the most deadly and far-reaching strategic decisions.
Posted by: tempurpedic | February 21, 2010 at 05:37 AM
hello..., US an its global affairs..., crazy!
Posted by: tech news | February 23, 2010 at 11:11 AM
You want a piece of free government grants, federal grants, housing grants, small business grants, business grants, college grants, foundation grants, minority grants, women grants, state grants, personal grants, government grants.
Wouldn't it be great get a share form the billions of dollars in free grant money?
Posted by: free government grants | February 25, 2010 at 06:14 PM
If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.
Posted by: rado watches | February 26, 2010 at 10:28 PM
Very Useful information , this is both good reading for, have quite a few good key points, and I learn some new stuff from it too, thanks for sharing your information.
regards,
handbags
Posted by: gucci | March 08, 2010 at 02:49 AM
I must say that overall I am really impressed with this blog.It is easy to see that you are passionate about your writing. If only I had your writing ability I look forward to more updates and will be returning. insanity workout
Posted by: beachbody | March 09, 2010 at 09:56 PM
Very Useful information , this is both good reading for, have quite a few good key points, and I learn some new stuff from it too, thanks for sharing your information.
walking shoes
Posted by: brenda | March 12, 2010 at 05:49 PM
people to appreciate, I have to thank you such an article.
Posted by: asics gel kinsei 2 | March 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM
Very rich in contents, I and my friends are like.
Posted by: runescape gold | March 19, 2010 at 01:20 AM
let's not forget that the army saw an oppurtunity early in the "awakening", and began paying terrorists to no longer attack U.S. forces. This was the original motivation....
Posted by: Round Diamond Solitaire Ring | March 22, 2010 at 11:13 AM
what's your name? bmx
Posted by: metin2 yang | March 28, 2010 at 11:50 PM
what's your name? bmx
Posted by: wow gold | March 28, 2010 at 11:51 PM
The numbers of players who own karos gold have risen sharply now. As it is time-consuming to earn karos online gold in game and both expensive and unsafe in other ways. buy karos gold has attracted attention of more and more players who need karos carat. Have you tried karos online carat?
Posted by: karos online gold | April 02, 2010 at 09:40 PM
Thanks for sharing this valuable information. Intuition made a great deal of this information suspect, but now we have some empirical evidence for our beliefs.
Posted by: wholesale bikini | April 06, 2010 at 05:29 AM
Your view coincides with me. Have you ever known that Christian Louboutin pumps can make a woman believe she is the most beautiful woman in the world. If you wanna style your own hair, have a try with ghd iv styler, which is for the people who want a unique hair straightener with an added touch of style, or CHI flat iron. What’s more, MBT M F's Shoe are on sale now. Free Shipping and fast delivery on all Items. Low Price Guaranteed. MBTshoes
Posted by: christian louboutin shoes | April 09, 2010 at 09:48 PM
Thank you for your clarification
Posted by: v pills | April 13, 2010 at 04:21 AM
Great post! Thanks for sharing. Insanity Workout
Posted by: Shaun T | April 14, 2010 at 01:13 PM
Thank you for lighting
Posted by: penis buyutucu | April 22, 2010 at 05:28 AM
Will be interesting to see if he wins reelection in November. Hayworth is definitely making a race out of it.
-Beachbody Coach
Posted by: Beachbody Coach | May 12, 2010 at 08:26 PM
Thank you for lighting
Posted by: Chanel | May 27, 2010 at 04:23 AM
Gucci and Christie for Vintage Appraisal Service
From now on, you can have access to the fashion label, Gucci in a more easier way since it has teamed up with Christie, an auction house Christie.
Posted by: Chanel | May 27, 2010 at 04:24 AM
Christian Louboutin shoes are the shoes stylish women should own. Though the price of Christian Louboutin shoes is a little bit expensive.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin sale | May 29, 2010 at 04:23 AM
the US army should quit from IRAQ ASAP.
Posted by: potty training girls | June 02, 2010 at 11:02 AM
Don’t waste your time on a man/woman, who isn’t willing to waste their time on you.
Posted by: rs money | June 04, 2010 at 07:15 AM
Don’t cry because it is over, smile,because it happened.
Posted by: rs money | June 04, 2010 at 07:15 AM
And forever has no end.
Posted by: cheap wow | June 04, 2010 at 07:17 AM
Life is a pure flame, and we live by an invisible sun within us.
Posted by: eve isk | June 04, 2010 at 07:18 AM
Air Jordans shoes to many countries around the world, including Europe, American and Asia.
Posted by: toetoe | June 08, 2010 at 04:43 AM
Don’t cry because it is over, smile,because it happened.
Posted by: runescape gold | June 08, 2010 at 10:35 PM
I must say that overall I am really impressed with this blog.It is easy to see that you are passionate about your writing. If only I had your writing ability I look forward to more updates and will be returning.
Posted by: jack | June 28, 2010 at 09:56 PM
It is based on traditional MMORPG features polished to a high degree of quality, with some unique features that are adding a lot of fun into the game. karos carat is important in the game. At the core of the game is the concept of Fletta, the magical energy of the world. Players can collect Fletta Points by killing monsters, which are used for many things including developing character attributes, karos gold can make you get tall upgrade. There is also an elaborate crafting system in the game, based on Fletta Gems that can be mined from the ground or obtained as quest rewards or monster drops. These can be used to craft powerful magical Fletta weapons and armour that not only give you bonuses, but also evolve with your character.
Posted by: karos gold | July 02, 2010 at 05:22 AM
Cheap Maple Mesos is important for any character in the game. You can fool around with this too by adding int if you want more money or a hard hitting weapon. You could also use your gold to make a tank so you can debuff people. You can also make potions and sell them for a ton of money. If you're being forced to defend your base you're still going to be going for attack items and buy Cheap MapleStory Mesos.
Posted by: Cheap Maple Mesos | July 03, 2010 at 03:48 AM
great article. i love it
Posted by: wow gold | July 21, 2010 at 02:46 AM
Excellent post, thank you very much for taking the time to share with those who are starting on the subject. Greetings
Posted by: poker online | July 25, 2010 at 06:50 PM
I left a comment but has not yet appeared. how long time is moderate?
Posted by: pariuri sportive | July 25, 2010 at 06:51 PM
If you like analog-digital Chanel Replica Watches, today's review might just make your day. This is the limited-edition A Lange & Sohne Replica, model #9052. Limited to 999 pieces, this seems to be their version of the Omega X-33. Let's start out with the specifications:44mm across, 50mm at the widest point, 15mm thick.PVD-finished stainless steel case and bracelet.Bracelet is three-link, solid, with solid end links, fliplock, and 23mm lugs.Domed sapphire crystal with inner anti-reflective coating.Inner dive bezel, operated by a screw-down crown at ten o'clock.Tritium tubes on hours, bezel, and hands.Reverse LCD display.In an interesting twist: it also has an electronic compass.Like the X-33, the caseback is a soundboard to increase the volume of the alarm.Also like the X-33, the crown is actually a push button; rotating it has no effect.45 month battery.ISA quartz movement.Water resistant to 100m (330ft).Three time zones, countdown timer, alarm, Bvlgari Replica Watches, and my favorite: seconds-only mode.Please read on for the full review.As you can see from the profile, the Blackbird has quite a different appearance than the Luminox Blackout. It's tapered, subtle and considerably more understated. Take a close look at the bezel: it has a tapered profile that I quite like. The Audemars Piguet Replica finish is flat (non-glossy) which combines with the reverse LCD on the dial for a very stealthy look. You can also see in this picture how the lugs curve down around your wrist for a good fit. I did notice that when on bad pavement on a bicycle, the lugs dug in a bit due to the weight of the Rado Replica Watches (175g), so I wouldn't recommend this as an exercise Tissot Replica Watches.The Blackbird has some fascinating design decisions that I don't pretend to understand. For example, the inner bezel is set via the screw-down crown at ten o'clock; well and good. However, on your left wrist, it's quite tricky to operate, requiring removal. It's nice, but you probably won't use it much given that the Tag Heuer Replica Watches has a digital Swiss Rolex ETA Replica and countdown timer, anyway. The bezel does have a tritium marker, though,Baume & Mercier Replica more useful at night.Another oddity is the primary crown: as noted above, it's actually a button only, and unlike the bezel crown, it's not screwdown. I would have expected either a conventional button or a threaded crown. And lastly, there's no analog seconds hand. Seconds are displayed by a dedicated ring of segments on the outer edge of the display. It works, but I do miss the analog hand.Here you can see the sounding board caseback design, very similar to the X-33.
Posted by: watches | July 28, 2010 at 03:42 AM
It's etched and inked with a very nice rendition of the Blancpain Replica Watches which, as an engineer and pilot myself, has always been one of my favorite planes. The alarm is good, though not as loud as the 80dB Omega. Luminox managed this compromise while still maintaining 100m water resistance, though, which is a good tradeoff and a strong point in their favor.The face and dial are, in contrast to the Raptor just reviewed, quite sparse and understated. Stark white hands, minimal text and graphics, and a reverse LCD display; it all adds up to outstanding legibility. The sapphire crystal minimally domed with an inner camber and inner A/R coating also helps quite a bit. And, of course, at night the tritium tubes rock. Note, however, that the digital portion is not backlit, and therefore not useable in the dark. The Swiss Chanel Ceramic Watch has some really unusual features you might enjoy like the compass, and the "week of year" and tachymeter modes. I like that you can select a display mode that suits you: time, full date (day/date/year/month), seconds only (very clean), time, second or third timezone, alarm or countdown timer. It's an extremely functional Japanese Rolex Replica, and as with the Bedat & CO Replica Watches, the large curved segments are easy to read and use. The buttons and pushbutton crown are well-sized and spaced, and work fine even with gloves on; that's one advantage for the crown design. Case and packaging are quite good; it comes in a very nice travel pack with padding and cleaning cloth that you can actually use as opposed to something you store on a shelf or discard. It also has internal pockets to hold the manual and warranty card another thoughtful touch.The bracelet is good and fully PVD coated, including the inside bits of the clasp. It has snap closure, fliplock, four micro-adjustments, solid links with pins, and solid end links a good match for the Zenith Replica Watches, and with standard lugs on the case so you could try your own strap if you want. I suspect it would work well with a dark leather strap, as well.On the wrist, this is a fun Patek Philippe Replica to wear: substantial, but not massive, uniquely styled, and tremendously legible day or night. The sculpted bezel and profile mean that it's more cuff-friendly than you might expect which is one more thing to like about the design. List price on the Blackbird is $1,500, consistent with Luminox's recent push into higher-end Rolex Ladies Replica Watches. For a Tudor Replica Watches that compares well to the X-33, that seems like a reasonable price, especially given the discounts usually available, and how much easier the Luminox will be to find.If you like analog-digital Piaget Replica Watches as much as I do, this one is a clear winner: more waterproof than the X-33, tritium illumination, good alarm, tons of functions, cool inner bezel, cuff-friendly profile, and a clean, understated dial.Our thanks to Luminox USA for the review loan.By Paul Hubbard; For updates on content, follow Franck Muller Replica Report on Twitter.
Posted by: watches | July 28, 2010 at 03:46 AM
chip made to stick.a whole new mind.why right brainers will rule the critical errors to avoid.the visual display of multimedia learnings.
Posted by: EVE ISK | July 28, 2010 at 11:05 PM
This was really interesting, I enjoyed reading it, thanks a lot for bringing this up..
Posted by: pariuri online | July 31, 2010 at 02:14 AM
Known as replica chanel replica chanel
Los Angeles' "Ambassador of replica gucci replica gucci
Boogie Funk," D?m-Funk represents the citizens of the Funkmosphere. Headquartered in replica hermes replica hermes
the Leimert Park section of L.A., D?m (pronounced: dame) has been dedicated over the last few years to cultivating a musical renaissance replica louis vuitton replica louis vuitton
rooted in the early-'80s styles known discount handbags discount handbags
as Boogie, Modern designer handbags designer handbags
Soul and Electro-Funk.
Posted by: k247br | August 02, 2010 at 12:00 AM
This is a great post I am glad I found it.
Posted by: P90X Workout | August 09, 2010 at 10:31 PM
As Americans mark another somber milestone in the war in Iraq, John McCain continues his pattern of parroting the Bush administration's misleading rhetoric on the war.
Posted by: vigilon security | August 19, 2010 at 11:30 AM
wow all those garments are so amazing and fabulous I don't come to your blog as often as I would like, but whenever I do I see some really amazing things keep up the good work! =)
Posted by: louis vuitton | August 27, 2010 at 04:38 AM
Superbe article, vraiment simple et utile. Bravo pour sa mise en ligne. C’est ce genre d’information que le public (et moi en particulier) recherche.
Posted by: liga 1 | August 30, 2010 at 01:49 PM
My friendS told me that this blog is competitive. i will continue to read.
Posted by: discount clothes | August 31, 2010 at 05:54 AM