Would McCain Talk to Larijani? Posted by Adam Blickstein

Big news out of Iran today. Ali Larijani, Iran's  former head of nuclear negotiations and rival to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, became the Iranian parliament's new speaker today by a narrow an extremely wide margin. Larijani differs greatly from Ahmadinejad in demeanor, temperament, and some substance, favoring a more diplomatic approach on a host of external issues, including Iran's nuclear program in which he has favored a more inclusive approach:

Enmity between Larijani and Ahmadinejad runs deep. Larijani ran and lost against Ahmadinejad for the presidency in 2005. As Iran's nuclear negotiator he chafed against Ahmadinejad's belligerent international tone, which he complained undermined his talks with European leaders and international arms inspectors.

...European diplomats who have dealt with Larijani on the nuclear issue and other matters said he was far better informed and more flexible than Ahmadinejad's loyalists. He also appears to have Khamenei's ear. When Larijani quit as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator late last year over disagreements with Ahmadinejad, Khamenei's office intervened to have him stay on for a transition period.

As the article suggests, this portends a Spring 2009 showdown between the hardliners headed by Ahmadinejad and the realist/pragmatist wing lead by Larijani, who may have perhaps a tacit blessing, at the very least, from Ayatollah Khamenei, whom with Larijani is said to be a close follower.

Now Larijani is not an actor who would bring serious and needed reform domestically to Iran (while he was head of Iranian Radio & TV, he implemented cultural filters on foreign programming while also expanding Islamic broadcasting), but on the issue most salient to America's interests, Iran's nuclear program, he could represent a departure from Ahmidinejad's bellicosity. Though it's still extremely early (Larijani has already threatened to "review cooperation" with the IAEA after the UN body expressed concern over hidden information), Larijani's accession has the potential to create a new avenue for diplomacy, or at the very least, a greater likelihood of more high-level, back channel discussions.

With some Republican Presidential candidates wrongly asserting that Iran's President, not Ayatollah Khamenei, is the country's true political leader, would John McCain open the door towards diplomacy with Iran if a more conciliatory politician becomes President there? Or would a President McCain maintain his doctrinaire stance even if the political situation in Iran shifted, even if only in rhetoric and temperament?

 

Comments

[peace]

I personally believe that McCain would not talk to even a moderate Iranian leader, because during the nineties when moderate Iranians dominated the government, neocons and the foreign policy establishment, still took a hardline against Iran.

[Appalled Moderate]

The Iranian system is unusually opaque -- it isn't clear who you should talk to, and whether said person really has much power or not. I think the sort of forum shopping discussed in this post, however, approaches risible. Just because one guy might be reasonable does not mean the unreasonable can't and won't overrule him.

In any event, the Democratic arguments on this subject have been increasingly silly. It's as if a foreign politician pledged he would talk to the US leadership -- the opposition said "You mean Bush?" -- and the politician answered "No, Cheney, you stupid twit!" In this case, this little blog post would be a suggestion that, perhaps, the real guy to talk to is the Secretary of Defense, cause he seems to have some power, and is a rational kind of guy.

[Tiffany replica Earings]

In any event, the Democratic arguments on this subject have been increasingly silly. It's as if a foreign politician pledged he would talk to the US leadership -- the opposition said "You mean Bush?" -- and the politician answered "No, Cheney, you stupid twit!" In this case, this little blog post would be a suggestion that, perhaps, the real guy to talk to is the Secretary of Defense, cause he seems to have some power, and is a rational kind of guy.

[Links of London replica Jewelry]

In any event, the Democratic arguments on this subject have been increasingly silly. It's as if a foreign politician pledged he would talk to the US leadership -- the opposition said "You mean Bush?" -- and the politician answered "No, Cheney, you stupid twit!" In this case, this little blog post would be a suggestion that, perhaps, the real guy to talk to is the Secretary of Defense, cause he seems to have some power, and is a rational kind of guy

[michael jordan shoes]

Cheap Jordan shoes and Gucci shoes are on sale

[buy r4 ds]

This is very well written post.I would like to share in 2007 Larijani was removed from his post as Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, in a move seen as an expression of the Supreme Leader's preference for Ahmadinejad's more confrontational approach.

[cheap coach handbags]

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

[sesli sohbet]

The Iranian system is unusually opaque -- it isn't clear who you should talk to, and whether said person really has much power or not. I think the sort of forum shopping discussed in this post, however, approaches risible. Just because one guy might be reasonable does not mean the unreasonable can't and won't overrule him.seslichat

[led miner cap lamp]

Specialize in manufacture explosion proof light, including: explosion proof floodlight, led flashlight, spot lamp, led mining light, led searching light with rechargeable battery in China.

[coach bags outlet]

More than four decades ago, did anyone here notice when Sayyid Qutb was executed? No, but we notice today. And it is now too late.

[jordan cheap shoes]

tes, and seven thousand kilometers in the last half a months journey, Gucci belt bag on sale he only Gucci online spent less Gucci backpack sale than $ 50 toll.

Gucci backpack for cheap first choice Gucci shoulder bag route, Michael said,...

[xixihaha]

It is time to buy a homecoming dress for youself.Do you want to be the homecoming queen?If your answer is 'YES'.You'd better search for your homecoming dress as soon as possible.Bright colors are so in this year.Remember, this isn't a prom or graduation ceremony. Homecoming is about fun! Dresses can still look formal, but this year you should be jazzing up your look with bright or even neon colors. Hot pink, electric blue; show your wild side and don't forget to color-match your makeup and accessories.Short skirts are a must. . If you're going to be dancing away the night then you don't want a long skirt tripping you up at every turn! Homecoming is a great chance to be a bit less formal, so ditch the long gown and go short!A-Line or ball gown style is ideal. Every year girls are wondering what the best style is for some serious partying at homecoming! Well in 2011 we're saying that you need to choose A-Line or ball gown style gowns as these are going to be really comfortable for dancing as well as being flattering for almost ANY body shape!Choose iridescent taffeta. 2011 is the year of iridescent taffeta. Here comes the best part though, following 2011's trends and still getting the dresses cheaply!

And now let me tell you where can buy these dressses:

Dress store/This is one site which belong to our company..we are provide a lot of new style homecoming dresses. And we will update the products every month.

Gsdresses/It is belong to our company,too.we will update the products every month and send you conpon non-periodical.

Mldress/We not only provide customize homcoming dresses but also send the new product list to you. If you are lucky,you may get the conpon non-periodical.

Don't be shillyshally,To get your new homecoming dresses as soon as possible.

[canada goose jakke]

All I can say is ... please write more. My God, I feel like I read an article, do not read the video ... It is so clear. My idea is, why waste your blog article writing skills, you can create a book? Think about it. You see what you do, very good. Word!