Democracy Arsenal

« Saying it Does Not Make it So | Main | Straight-Talk Derailed »

May 15, 2008

Economist in 2002: John McCain "Laid the Groundwork" for George Bush's Post 9-11 Foreign Policy
Posted by Max Bergmann

In a shocking article from the Economist in March 2002, John McCain is described as having George Bush's foreign policy before George Bush had it. The article, by the Economist's Lexington columnist, is titled "George Bush: McCainiac - How the president has almost become the man he trounced in the primaries," confirms the progressive argument that John McCain's foreign policy is no different then George Bush's.

The article, written more six years ago, and meant as praise at the time, says "
It is almost as if the Arizona senator had won the election," saying that "Despite his defeat, he [MCCAIN] laid much of the groundwork for Mr Bush's post-September presidency." The article concludes that the great irony is that "Mr Bush has proved a better spokesman for McCainiac ideas than Mr McCain could ever have been."

The quotes are even better in context, below are snippets from the article and a great picture as well (you can read the whole thing here).

IF THE battle in 2000 to choose the Republican Party's presidential candidate now seems a world away, it is not just because September 11th changed the world. It is also because George Bush trounced John McCain so thoroughly that he seemed to bury everything the Arizona senator stood for.

Back then, the two men appeared to have nothing in common...

But the biggest differences were in foreign policy. The Arizona senator campaigned for a policy of “rogue-state rollback”— by which he meant preventing disruptive small-country dictators getting their hands on weapons of mass destruction, if necessary by arming the local opposition. Mr McCain was the only candidate on either side to promote this theme, and hardly anyone took him seriously. Mr Bush, in contrast, talked about managing great-power relationships and repairing the damage done to America's ties with China, Russia and Europe after, as he saw it, eight years of Clintonian inconsistency. Mr McCain spoke stirringly or scarily, according to how you see these things, about “national greatness”. Mr Bush called soothingly for greater humility in projecting American power abroad...

Yet, if you look at the ideas that currently animate Mr Bush's presidency, they are about as McCainiac as you can get without having spent five years as a Vietnamese prisoner-of-war... In his state-of-the-union speech in January, Mr Bush... delivered his famous warning on the “axis of evil”, rhetorically reformulating Mr McCain's “rogue-state rollback”.

Suddenly, “national greatness conservatism”—Mr McCain's amour fou—has become the passion of the White House too. Confronting threats from small dictatorships, not managing relations with big powers, has become the focus of the presidency. Mr Bush has defined his presidency in terms of success in the war against rogue states and terrorists. To make the comparison complete, Mr Bush has been telling anyone who will listen that he has been reading Edmund Morris's new book on Teddy Roosevelt, one of Mr McCain's often-quoted heroes.

It is almost as if the Arizona senator had won the election. How on earth did this happen? But he still does not see the broader horizon the way that Mr McCain sees it... Abroad, it meant changing corrupt regimes which threaten the West, and encouraging the spread of democracy.

...Whether by prescience or luck, he [MCCAIN] was the first to reach out for the policies that fit the new world wrought by September 11th. Despite his defeat, he laid much of the groundwork for Mr Bush's post-September presidency. But the credit to Mr Bush is probably greater. He has proved quicker to adapt his views than anyone expected, switching seamlessly from great-power maintenance to rooting out terrorists and showing his independence from the Republican establishment by pinching ideas from his rival.

This transformation contains an irony and a question. The irony is that, because the president dominates his party in a way the maverick Mr McCain could never have done, Mr Bush has proved a better spokesman for McCainiac ideas than Mr McCain could ever have been...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200e55227c2138833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Economist in 2002: John McCain "Laid the Groundwork" for George Bush's Post 9-11 Foreign Policy:

Comments

The US foreign policy and associated liberal use of military intervention for the past 50 years is the very cause of blow back such as Lebanon Barracks destruction and 911. The leader of the policy development bares the burden of the results. So what will happen to McCain now?

Americans need to do a real self analysis and ask why we only accept one viable point of perspective regarding foreign intervention?

We can make change happen only by recognizing that what we are doing is not working, not cost effective and counter productive.

Unfortunately, the current decade old GOP leadership has been primarily responsible for this myopic policy which was started by the Democratic party in the 1960’s.

Ron Paul represents a growing political movement. This movement is not content to sit and be told the same old platitudes. Observational monitoring make rational support of a party that has changed nothing in 20 years impossible.

It is the politics of Fear not rational thought that rules the GOP party. Ron Paul has brought in Millions to hear a GOP message and party asked them to leave. This is madness. The GOP lost three old party seats in 60 days!!!

The terrorists have no Navy -Army - Air Force or Missiles. We stood down the USSR with Twenty Thousand Nukes. The GOP Strategist reject the argument of the BlowBack of the Politics of Fear outright!

America is in very deep trouble economically and hard choices are coming.

Your medicine costs money the government is spending on smart bombs (500K apiece) to kill Hajjies with a 25 dollar AK-47.

This war is costing 1.5 trillion a year. We no longer have the money and as a direct result you have will see 5.00 gas very soon and a loaf of bread will cost more than the gallon of gas.

The GOP is not a conservative party any more. So where do we conservatives go now?

Welcome to our game world, my friend asks me to buy some habbo gold . I do not know how to use the habbo coins ; my friend tells me how to use. I will thank for my friends bringing me in this world. I am not regret to buy buy habbo gold . We all love game, if you want to play it, please cheap habbo credits and join us. Please do not hesitate to have game.

When you have second life linden, you will become strong. With cheap linden, you can upgrade and admire by others. You can use linden dollars to start the journey of the world. So, do not hesitate, let us move to buy lindens

Without thinking I buy some Metin2 gold . I use some Metin2 yang and want to find a good group.

I hope i can get Sho Online Mun in low price,
Yesterday i bought Sho Mun for my friend.

Besides, my friends usually give me some 2moon dil. I usually buy 2moons dil through Internet and advice from my friends.

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

This transformation contains an irony and a question. The irony is that, because the president dominates his party in a way the maverick Mr McCain could never have done
seslichat

e biodegradablechanel bags when you "stoop and scoop."
Dispose of animal waste according to the campground rules or bury it off-road.
Observe fire coguccinditions and always keep a full jug of water nearby.
Remove flammable brush near fire pits and keep campfires small.
Don't burn plastics and metalshermes.
Use non-toxic, phosphate-free, biodegradable cleaning supplies and sanitary additives.
Reduce the need louis vuitton for air-conditioning by parking in natural shade, opening windows, using awnings or portable sun shelters.
Wash air-conditionidesignerng filters when dirty, instead of buying new ones each time.
Reduce the need to turn on heat designer handbagsby parking in a sheltered spot, out of the north and west winds.

Mr McCain was the only candidate on either side to promote this theme and hardly anyone took him seriously. Mr Bush, talked about managing great-power relationships and repairing the damage done to America's ties with China.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use