Democracy Arsenal

« John McCain’s “100 Years” putting the controversy to rest | Main | Beyond Embarrassing »

April 30, 2008

Global terror increasing, says US state department
Posted by Adam Blickstein

Five years since mission accomplished in Iraq and instances of terrorism across the globe, according to the State Department, grew once again last year. While Iraq constituted 60 percent of terror-related fatalities globally last year (in 2006, before the surge, that number was 52 percent), and seemingly 99 percent of America's focus in the region, the report also contained yet another description of where the greatest threat actually exists:

"[al Qaeda] has reconstituted some of its pre-9/11 operational capabilities through the exploitation of Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas, replacement of captured or killed operational lieutenants, and the restoration of some central control by its top leadership, in particular Ayman al-Zawahiri," it says.

So while we continue to referee internecine violence in Iraq with 150,000 troops, al Qaeda reconstitutes itself along the Afghanistan/Pakistan frontier. Why, then, do we only have 27,000 troops in Afghanistan? Why do we spend nearly $100 billion less annually in Afghanistan than we do in Iraq? Why do we still lack a coherent strategy for dealing with Pakistan's tribal regions? And why does seemingly every report coming out from this Administration contain ominous warnings of a reconstituted al Qaeda, and yet the White House is doing nothing about it?

These questions are too important to remain unanswered. Perhaps the President's nominee for CENTCOM Commander might eventually provide some clarity...

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200e5521d2be08834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Global terror increasing, says US state department:

Comments

The US spends less effort in Iraq than in Afghanistan because Iraq has the second or third largest oil reserves in the world, and a large water supply. That's what the recent Basra operations were about, trying to secure this oil-rich region. Afghanistan only has the world's largest supply of opium poppies.

Regarding Iraq, the US (unfortunately) is doing more than refereeing internecine violence. The US for five years now has been imposing a brutal military occupation upon the Iraqi people which has led to a significant resistance movement. This is state terrorism, which of course isn't really terrorism according to the US State Dept., just as US torture isn't really torture. Even after five years of occupation this resistance shows little sign of abating. General Petraeus has recently said that the situation in Iraq is fragile and reversible, and last month the US suffered more casualties than any month since September last.

The US lacks a coherent strategy for dealing with Pakistan's tribal regions because they are Pakistan's tribal regions, and Pakistan has been going through a bit of political turmoil recently. Just a bit. Recenly Pakistan has been using diplomacy (what a concept!) to lessen their terrorist threat.

In any case, whatever terrorism threat to the US there is, which is actually statistically miniscule, is better countered by intelligence and police units than by military units, which just go in and bust everything up and kill a lot of innocent people, thereby creating more animosity toward the USA and a higher (though still tiny) threat of terrorism.

It is not the duty of the CENTCOM commander to determine US foreign policy. That is a congressional responsibility, which of course they are shirking for the most part leaving foreign policy up to brains over there in the cowboy boots. It would probably be wise not to depend upon any general for a coherent strategy on anything. Harry Truman had a relevant thought on this: "It's the fellows that go to West Point and are trained to think they're gods in uniform that I plan to take apart."

Hold on, I'm all for pulling troops our of Iraq but don't set up the argument so that those same troops get sent into Afghanistan. Our troops need to be pulled out of combat zones right now. They're battle fatigued. Giving up the Iraq quagmire for a quagmire in Afghanistan is not an answer.

t is not the duty of the CENTCOM commander to determine US foreign policy. That is a congressional responsibility, which of course they are shirking for the most part leaving foreign policy up to brains over there in the cowboy boots. It would probably be wise not to depend upon any general for a coherent strategy on anything. iş ilanları
Harry Truman had a relevant thought on this: "It's the fellows that go to West Point and are trained to think they're gods in uniform that I plan to take apart."

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

You are currently signed in as (nobody). Sign Out

I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

sonra bedava chat
burasıda var bedava sohbet

Never frown ,when you are sad ,because you never know who is falling in love with your smile

很难有发展前途做人体艺术美,看的眼光不同,人也不同
务的受人体艺术是确是很难
人体艺术这项工作了女so you him
其实有空还不如去看看人体艺术有意思,再不然也可以去浏览下有不错的人体艺术指导,难道看到的古惑仔全集系列要去
short haircutssms jokesshort hairstylessdog groomerswhy

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use