Bush cuts funding for UN peacekeeping efforts in Africa
Posted by Max Bergmann
The President has rightly received credit on his trip to Africa for his administration’s efforts combating HIV/AIDS and Malaria in Africa. This clearly is a lone bright spot in an overall dismal foreign policy record. It also clearly undercuts Republican (and some Democratic) members of Congress that argue foreign assistance programs are useless and wasteful. The generally warm reception the President has received on the continent reflects the power of assistance programs to both do good and to enhance our national interests by gaining allies, improving our international image, and by helping to facilitate stability.
But at the same time the President is getting credit for these initiatives, he has totally dropped the ball on the security side of the equation.
Most shockingly, the President, at a time when U.S. forces are stretched thin, when conflicts in Africa are in danger of spreading instability, and when it has become almost universally agreed that it is in our clear national interests to prevent the emergence of new failed states and instability, his administration has decided to cut funding for UN peacekeeping efforts.
On the eve of President Bush's trip to Africa, his administration has decided to drastically cut money for United Nations peacekeeping missions in war-torn countries there. According to White House figures quietly released this week, more than $193 million for U.N. troops would be cut for missions in Liberia, Rwanda, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Cote d'Ivoire and elsewhere.
This is happening despite the fact that the UN is currently engaged in armed clashes in the Congo.
Most people don’t realize that the UN has the highest number of troops deployed abroad than anyone else besides the U.S. The UN has 90,000 peacekeeping troops deployed around the world in 17 different missions in some of the most dangerous hot spots, including Kosovo, Congo, East Timor, Haiti, and Lebanon. While the favorite conservative talking point is that UN missions are ineffective, because of the failure 15 years ago in Bosnia when the Dutch were held hostage by Serbian forces and unable to stop genocide. This argument is still made, despite RAND having shown that UN peacekeeping has been highly effective compared to U.S. efforts (pdf). UN forces however do fail, but this is often the result of either too few troops or too little money. And sometimes the peacekeeping forces are placed in a security environment where little could reasonably be expected. However, the fact is that, while our forces - since end of the Cold War - were constantly reinventing the wheel each time they engaged in peacekeeping operations, the UN instead, learned from each of its missions and in the process developed a high degree of knowledge and expertise.
Because our military is bogged down in Iraq and stretched to its limits in Afghanistan we face so many challenges around the world, our reliance on the United Nations to address trouble spots and to prevent them from worsening has only increased. Shorting the UN on peacekeeping funding is therefore akin to shooting ourselves in the foot.
And just as an aside, when John McCain had the opportunity to vote to approve a small increase in UN peacekeeping funding in 2005, he took the Bush line and opposed it.


Very nice review of an issue of direct concern to U.S. national security...but unfortunately something Americans really pay little attention to. Just a couple questions:
1) Why would an administration that launched a proxy war against Somalia want U.N. peacekeeping soldiers interfering?
2) Why would an administration that blocked international efforts to stop the 2006 Israeli invasion of Lebanon want to facilitate the possible expansion of U.N. peacekeepers on the Israeli-Lebanese border?
Peacekeeping soldiers really constrain a superpower's freedom of action. I mean, imagine where we'd be if one could somehow impose peacekeepers between the U.S. and Iran?
Posted by: William deB. Mills | February 21, 2008 at 02:10 PM
Respected sir,
This is Zubair Butt (ceo) System Development House International. Please help me my, after your reply i will tak to you
Thank you
Zubair Butt (CEO) complete
System Development House International
Address: House141e-Block-M-Marghzar Colony Multan Road Lahore, Pakistan
Ph: +928560099 +928533022
Mob:+9203004614685 & +9203454525818
Posted by: Zubair Butt | April 09, 2008 at 12:06 PM
Subject: Introducing of Foolproof Antiterrorism
Security System in world Security exhibition
Respected
This is Zubair Butt (ceo) System Development House International. I introduce a complete foolproof security system for antiterrorism(safe & sound humanity) detail in www.systendevelopmenthouse.com . In these days the hot issue is terrorism so I have the solution of this problem by my security system and I would like to show my system through exhibition. When you see the results of this system than you can say this is the best solution of terrorism. How can you people help me to introduce this system?
Best regards,
Zubair Butt (CEO)
System Development House International
Address: House141e-Block-M-Marghzar Colony Multan Road Lahore, Pakistan
Ph: +928560099 +928533022
Mob:+9203004614685 & +9203454525818
Posted by: Zubair Butt | April 09, 2008 at 12:11 PM
They supply cheapest rf cp for the player.
They have cheap rf gold. I usually
buy rf gold from them.
rf online goldThey have professional worker help you.
Posted by: rf money | December 24, 2008 at 10:11 PM
When you have shaiya gold, you will become strong. With shaiya money, you can upgrade and admire by others. You can use cheap shaiya gold to start the journey of the world. So, do not hesitate, let us move to buy shaiya gold
Posted by: cheap shaiya gold | January 07, 2009 at 02:41 AM
I hope i can get Tales Of Pirates gold in low price,
Yesterday i buy Tales Of Pirates Gold for my friend.
Posted by: dd | March 05, 2009 at 11:12 PM
Playing online games can make much Perfect World money. And you will be happy at the sametime. And you can use the cheap Perfect World Gold do what you want to do in the online game.
Posted by: cheap Perfect World Gold | March 19, 2009 at 09:20 PM
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account
Posted by: Designer Chloe Handbags | April 19, 2009 at 11:57 PM
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account
Posted by: Tiffany replica Cuff Links | April 28, 2009 at 11:03 PM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | May 25, 2009 at 01:38 AM
Respected Mambers
Subject: An invitation for the Sovereignty of Humanity
It is our great honor to write this message to you. The today’s world is surrounded by the threats of terrorism. Our dignity is snatched by these terrorists. What are we doing? What should we do?
This is the time for the revolution and our company “System Development House International” has invented a system which has the capability to fully control the terrorism and clean this world from all kinds of threats and terrorism. It is a device control system. We have different plans for the sovereignty of the humanity. Very soon we are arranging an international seminar for introducing and implementing our fool proof physical security system device. You are welcome to be the pioneer member of our system.
“Inventions are the gift of GOD”
There are two ways to live; the right way which leads to the peace and prosperity and the bad way which leads to the destruction. This is the right time to choose the right way. We are delivering our messages to all the countries in the world and the security companies as well to join Hand with us for the safety of this world. We are getting very positive responses.
We appeal to your country to make sure the presence of your representative in this seminar and give us the honor to host you. Your precious thoughts and ideas would be highly appreciated. If you have a better option, please let us know. You can also visit www.systemdevelopmenthouse.com
Venue in Dubai and date of the seminar would be decided soon after your response and feedback and let you know.
Regards,
Well wisher of humanity,
Zubair Butt,
C.E.O System Development House International,
Posted by: Zubair Butt | June 06, 2009 at 01:02 AM
I am Zubair Butt (C.E.O) System Development House International. I have received this page when I opened my website www.systemdevelopmenthouse.com . I just want to confirm that who is issuing these comments on my behalf. I have not sent any comments on this page. Who is responsible for this?
But today I am going to comment on this webpage.
I have sent this Invitation letter to others but who put these comments on this web page? I want explanation of this. Yes, I am going to introduce a foolproof security anti-terrorism system. But these are the people who are going to create hurdle in my work. I have no support by anyone even UNO. My seminar will take place on 12 September 2009 in Dubai. Details www.systemdevelopmenthouse.com .
Even the host of my website also creating hurdles for me. I do not know from whom he took orders to do that. All these people are culprit.
Who wants to see the demo of this system he can visit my website and fill the registration form.
Posted by: Zubair Butt | August 12, 2009 at 02:40 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 28, 2010 at 07:48 PM
Additionally,I would like to inform the UN and U.S. styles of nation-building are distinguishable, they are also interdependent. It is a rare operation in which both are not involved. Both UN and U.S. nation-building efforts presently stand at near historic highs. The United Nations currently has about 60,000 troops deployed in 17 countries. This is a modest expeditionary commitment in comparison with that of the United States, but it exceeds that of any other nation or combination of nations. Demand for UN-led peacekeeping operations nevertheless far exceeds the available supply, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. American armed forces, the world’s most powerful, also find themselves very badly overstretched by the demands of such missions.
Posted by: m3 card | March 23, 2010 at 03:22 AM
The generally warm reception the President has received on the continent reflects the power of assistance programs to both do good and to enhance our national interests by gaining allies, improving our international image, and by helping to facilitate stability.
Posted by: Appraiser | October 11, 2010 at 04:10 AM
Really enjoyed this post. You have a good point. I'm now reading on the other post on your blog. Definitely bookmark and comeback again. Thank you very much.
Posted by: Mykalai Kontilai | October 14, 2010 at 06:05 AM
The generally warm reception the President has received on the continent reflects the power of assistance programs to both do good and to enhance our national interests by gaining allies.
Posted by: wood shutters | October 21, 2010 at 05:26 AM
It’s a very tight budget year,” conceded Kristen Silverberg, assistant secretary of state for international organization affairs, acknowledging that neither she nor Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice thought the funding request made for “an ideal situation...thanks
Posted by: Nightly Business Report | October 25, 2010 at 02:45 AM
Peacekeeping soldiers really constrain a superpower's freedom of action. Imagine where we'd be if one could somehow impose peacekeepers between the U.S. and Iran.
Posted by: Internet Marketing Company | October 30, 2010 at 07:47 AM
The administration released its proposed peacekeeping cuts days before President Bush was scheduled to make what one paper termed his “victory lap” through the African continent.I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts.Thnaks
Posted by: Mykalai Kontilai | November 01, 2010 at 02:25 AM
Bush's budget in January allotted 160 million dollars for a peacekeeping in Darfur, leaving a shortfall of 724 million dollars for the Darfur mission.
Posted by: Peter Cassar | November 03, 2010 at 12:44 AM
A major issue facing the United Nations,the United States, and Congress concerning United Nations peacekeeping is the extent to which the United Nations has the capacity to restore or keep the peace in the changing world environment.
Posted by: Condo | November 10, 2010 at 03:30 AM
This is a modest expeditionary commitment in comparison with that of the United States, but it exceeds that of any other nation or combination of nations.Demand for UN-led peacekeeping operations nevertheless far exceeds the available supply, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.
Posted by: New Foreclosure Online | November 10, 2010 at 03:53 AM
It is a rare operation in which both are not involved.Both UN and U.S. nation-building efforts presently stand at near historic highs.The United Nations currently has about 60,000 troops deployed in 17 countries.
Posted by: Organic Baby Products | November 11, 2010 at 01:19 AM
The White House Office of Management and Budget gave the U.S. contributions to U.N. peacekeeping its highest-possible rating three stars judging the spending to be effective, achieving its stated goals Thanks, really nice article.
Posted by: Stephen Cassell | November 11, 2010 at 02:15 AM
The current hot issue is terrorism so I have the solution of this problem by my security system and I would like to show my system through exhibition.
Posted by: Home Protect Home Warranty | November 16, 2010 at 06:17 AM
Peacekeeping soldiers really constrain a superpower's freedom of action. I mean, imagine where they'd be if one could somehow impose peacekeepers between the U.S. and Iran?
Posted by: Total Protect Home Warranty | November 17, 2010 at 04:06 AM
It also clearly undercuts Republican members of Congress that argue foreign assistance programs are useless and wasteful..
Posted by: Gatehouse Academy Reviews | November 24, 2010 at 04:51 AM
President is getting credit for these initiatives, he has totally dropped the ball on the security side of the equation.
Posted by: Gatehouse Academy Reviews | November 25, 2010 at 03:27 AM
Bush's administration has decided to drastically cut money for United Nations peacekeeping missions in war-torn countries there.
Posted by: Toyota Parts | November 29, 2010 at 07:03 AM
As our military is bogged down in Iraq and stretched to its limits in Afghanistan we face so many challenges around the world.
Posted by: Peoria Toyota Parts | December 03, 2010 at 07:05 AM
This argument is still made, despite RAND having shown that UN peacekeeping has been highly effective compared to U.S. efforts...Thanks For sharing this post
Posted by: intmc | December 04, 2010 at 07:00 AM
Well that's true,This generally warm reception the President has received on the continent reflects the power of assistance programs to both do good and to enhance our national..Thanks for sharing with us...
Posted by: 2010 Mercury Mariner hybrid parts | January 10, 2011 at 03:55 AM
Really true, This argument is still made, despite Rand having shown that UN peacekeeping has been highly effective compared to U.S. efforts
Posted by: Cindy Margott | January 15, 2011 at 02:07 AM
Well This generally warm reception the President has received on the continent reflects the power of assistance programs to both do good and to enhance our national..Thanks for the information on blog.
Posted by: AcuraCL parts | January 15, 2011 at 06:56 AM
I think the administration released its proposed peacekeeping cuts days before President Bush was scheduled to make what one paper termed his victory through the African continent..
Posted by: SanDiegoDentists.org | January 29, 2011 at 06:44 AM
Most people don’t realize that the UN has the highest number of troops deployed abroad than anyone else besides the U.S.It also clearly undercuts Republican members of Congress that argue foreign assistance programs are useless and wasteful..
Posted by: Roberts Cottages 20 | March 30, 2011 at 04:45 PM
Really enjoyed this post. You have a good point. I'm now reading on the other post on your blog...It also clearly undercuts Republican members of Congress that argue foreign assistance programs are useless and wasteful..
Posted by: Appraiser | April 07, 2011 at 10:59 AM
Really different post..It is a rare operation in which both are not involved.Both UN and U.S. nation-building efforts presently stand at near historic highs.The United Nations currently has about 60,000 troops deployed in 17 countries.
Posted by: Bathroom | April 07, 2011 at 01:48 PM
As military is bogged down in Iraq and stretched to its limits in Afghanistan we face so many challenges around the world, our reliance on the United Nations to address trouble spots and to prevent them from worsening has only increased...Good one..thanks for it
Posted by: Walkin Bathtubs | April 08, 2011 at 06:53 AM