Nobody Wants to Work for George Bush Posted by Moira Whelan

There’s good news and bad news about Philip Shenon’s article about recess appointments and vacancies in the Bush Administration.

The bad news is that of course, the government can’t function the way it should without top appointees at the helm. The good news is that because these positions are not filled, fewer mechanisms of government are acting according to a radical right-wing agenda. One might also infer that there just aren’t enough right-wing people out there willing to drink the Kool-Aid of the Bush Administration, which is reassuring to me as an American.

The Bushies aren’t trying a sneak attack with recess appointments, rather, things really are That Bad for them.Brian Beutler gets at this and I agree with him.

The transition in 2009 will no doubt be made worse by the fact that civil servants and political appointees are fleeing the Bush Administration. So bad, in fact, that the Department of Homeland Security has issued a contract to address the challenge.

Comments

[Zathras]

The increasing dominance of the permanent campaign over the business of government has led American administrations to centralize more and more decision-making authority in the White House, the better to maintain message discipline. The current Bush administration has greatly accelerated that trend, but did not create it.

Cabinet and sub-Cabinet positions with less real authority are bound to be less attractive to able people no matter who the President is. In Bush's case the problem is magnified by his unpopularity, unprecedented for a President since the Watergate era and a concern for ambitious people wary of being burdened in the future by their association with him. A more prosaic concern is the considerable sacrifice of income many potential appointees would have to make to accept a government post, particularly potential appointees to departments like Justice, or those with a business background.

This is no more than a minor irritation to Bush personally. The orderly functioning of the government has never much concerned him, and obviously that makes working for his administration even less attractive a prospect than it would be otherwise.

[John Isaacson]

There is no doubt that the Bush Administration is slow to fill both confirmed appointments and day-to-day non-confirmed political appointments. Historically - this shortage of appointments occurs later is a lame duck administration - people don't want to leave another permanent job for a few months in a closing administration - and in this case more than others - it is tough to get people to serve an unpopular President.

It is also true that the party in control of the Senate is slow to approve appointments which have permanent terms - perhaps 5-12 years long and install the other party in for the long pull when there is a chance they might own the White House in January 2009 and can fill those jobs with their own people.

In practice - day-to-day business functions do continue routinely because the civil service looks after important business when the politicos are not there - but of course - new policy is tough to come by when nobody represents the President.

The good news is that people interested in 2009 transition jobs are lining up across the country and getting their political hookups in place - and that is true in both parties and along side all the leading candidates. Because of the long time between January 2008 and the election is a long time - and many positions will be lined up well in advance of the election. In short - the transition ought to be quicker this time around with the long campaign in view.

A personal view is that the White House really doesn't care much anymore about political positions - Karl Rove's department is a good indicator of the sort of political "I don't give a damn" attitude at the White House.

John Isaacson
Director
Presidential-Appointments.org

[Zathras]

That is a theory, and presuming that the President elected in 2008 is a Democrat graced with increased Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress it certainly could work out that way.

Unless I'm mistaken, though, the elder Bush took longer to fill all his administration's Cabinet, sub-Cabinet and agency head positions than Reagan did. Clinton took longer than the elder Bush, and the current President Bush took longer than Clinton. Apart from the fact that the campaign is all-consuming for those engaged in it -- the campaign, not work in government, is the main event for many of these people -- other factors have combined recently to make staffing an incoming administration progressively more time-consuming.

[wow power leveling]

wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft power leveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
World Of Warcraft powerleveling
wow power level
wow power level
wow power level
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow powerleveling
codeheart article
Warcraft Gold
World of Warcraft Gold
cheap wow gold

[how to play video poker]

Did I mention that on Sunday I cut my hair short and colored it fire engine red?
The bottle may have said "Red Birch" but the reality is Sharon Osborne, color that does not live in nature, sharp, spikey RED.
Years ago, before I started feeling adult and responsible, I had red hair, and then after a while I got into the natural look and being low key (this can be hard, as you know if you know me).
This evolution required less unique hair, well-tailored black clothes, and the constant practice of active listening(not always successful.)
Didn't do me much good, did it?
Joking aside (if it is possible to do that when your hair edges toward whore red), my new look feels good for right now.

[oops]

There is no doubt that the Bush Administration is slow to fill both confirmed appointments and day-to-day non-confirmed political appointments. Historically - this shortage of appointments occurs later is a lame duck administration - people don't want to leave another permanent job for a few months in a closing administration - and in this case more than others - it is tough to get people to serve an unpopular President.
how to play video poker
It is also true that the party in control of the Senate is slow to approve appointments which have permanent terms - perhaps 5-12 years long and install the other party in for the long pull when there is a chance they might own the White House in January 2009 and can fill those jobs with their own people.