Democracy Arsenal

« An Urgent Letter from Egypt | Main | G-8: Not Just One Queasy Stomach »

June 08, 2007

Legitimacy Synonymous With Democracy?
Posted by David Shorr

One of the latest papers in the Stanley Foundation's Bridging the Foreign Policy Divide project is a piece by Ivo Daalder and Robert Kagan on America and the Use of Force: Sources of Legitimacy. I agree with much in the paper (disclosure: I"m a co-editor), but when they argue that only democratically elected governments can lend legitimacy at the international level, I see a real problem.

The authors take the emphasis on regime character to its logical extreme: undemocratic governments are members of the international community at our sufferance. Now I'm no neo-realist, but to me, this dismissal of the Westphalian order is liberal internationalism run amok. And as we try to revise the concept of sovereignty to hold leaders accountable for how they treat their own people, I actually see the Daalder-Kagan position as a threat to the emerging -- and important -- Responsibility to Protect norm. It's the difference between viewing the Community (Concert) of Democracies as a long-term project, which is a fine thing, or seeing it as a soon-as-we-can-slap-something-together replacement for the UN, which is not such a good idea.

First, here are the relevant passages of the paper:

...real sovereignty, like real legitimacy, resides with the people rather than with the states. That is why the decision of states to intervene in the affairs in another state can be legitimate only if it is rendered by the people’s democratically chosen representatives rather than the personal whims of autocrats or oligarchs.

and

Would anyone seriously argue that an action supported by authoritarian regimes would, by garnering more votes, be legitimate in a way that an action supported by the world’s democracies would not?

Well, yes actually, I would. Being a model citizen in the international community is not an all-or-nothing proposition. If authoritarian regimes stand behind nuclear nonproliferation norms, that lends the added legitimacy that any broad and diverse political coalition does. Democratic empowerment of people is a core UN ideal, and democracies certainly carry the highest degree of moral authority. But more basic membership in the international community depends on more basic norms.

Which brings me to the Responsibility to Protect. In order for this emerging norm to gain international support -- and normative force -- it must be set apart from some of the other debates over sovereignty and non-interference. Humanitarian intervention must be reserved for the most severe abusees to avoid any impression that it might be mobilized in response to a broad range of human rights violations. The threshold for legitimate use of force must remain high: i.e. mass violence, ethnic cleansing, systematic and severe repression (sometimes called acute rathern than chronic vilations). Regardless of whether such clarity would win over hard-core sovereigntist countries, it could only help tilt the weight of the arguments in the associated debate. What doesn't help is to deny any legitimacy to non-democracies and discount their support.

As to the Concert of Democracies, Daalder and James Lindsay wrote a quite practical proposal in The American Interest last winter. The position Ivo and Bob Kagan take here pretty much pulls the rug out from under the UN.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200df352097de8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Legitimacy Synonymous With Democracy?:

Comments

Is it just me, or has Ivo Daalder grown more strident and radical in recent months? I used to think of him as a sort of milquetoast internationalist with more or less conventional neoliberal views, and a few neocon friendships. Lately he seems to have moved more decisively toward the dark side.

Re: The American Interest

It was the UN's fault that the US had to invade Iraq:

"The UN Security Council proved unable to achieve a consensus on how to address Iraq’s failure to comply with its many resolutions, leaving it sidelined when the United States, the United Kingdom and a few other countries decided to take matters into their own hands."

And the US had to use NATO for the Afghanistan killing fields:

"Washington has repeatedly turned to NATO as its primary vehicle for effective multilateral action. . . . robust peacekeeping forces were needed to stabilize post-Taliban Afghanistan." Stabilize?

The answer is a Concert of Democracies. Who will play in this band? Not the US, apparently, because of the strict entry requirements:

"Who should be able to join the Concert of Democracies? One obvious criterion for membership is regular, free and fair elections."

That lets us out. Whew.

It gets weirder.

"Can a Concert of Democracies succeed if it excludes large countries such as China and Russia? Of course it can. Many successful international organizations do not count China or Russia as members. Neither country belongs to NATO, the European Union or the OECD. China doesn’t belong to the G-8, and Russia stands (at least for now) outside the WTO. Yet no one argues that these institutions are ineffective because of these exclusions."

When someone says "no one argues" something I wonder what kind of democracy they envision. China and Russia do belong to the Shanghai Alliance, and 125 other countries belong to the Non-aligned Movement, but, hey, we love NATO, right? Just call us Euro-centric, even though world power is clearly shifting to Asia. No one argues otherwise.

What would the Concert actually do?

"military deployments . . providing the vast bulk of both official and private development resources and expertise . . " sounds like the US agenda, all right. "the American Interest" for sure.

It's time to enlist members. We won't allow Brazil, Germany, India and Japan onto the UN Security Council, so they're Concert candidates.

And why are we doing this? " . . .September 11 . . ."
That's it!!

Either Sudan and Germany are more or less equal or they are not. The position that a non democratic regime is not the equal of a democratic regime is both not an aspect of international law and a truism. India, the largest democracy in the world, does have a more legitimate regime than Egypt. This does not mean Egypt's regime is illegal or that it's legal to come in by force and change it but neither should it mean that all nations are treated equally all the time.

Non democratic actors should not be allowed all the privileges of democratic nations. They should not be allowed to chair international human rights organizations. It should be understood by all that non democratic regimes do not represent the people from that nation but rather keep them enslaved. The worlds democracies should not encourage slavery and where possible should oppose it even if only by example.

One flaw of the UN is that non democratic regimes have equal voice to democracies in violation of the UN Charter. The 2nd line of the Preamble mentions the "equal rights of men and women". Article 1 of Chapter states that the purpose of the UN, in part, is promote friendly relations based on the "equal rights and self determination of peoples". What the UN has become violates the legal framework under which it operates.

And who's going to judge this 'democra-cicity'? Why, the US, of course, the land where:
*The president is ordained by the Supreme Court in violation of the Constitution.
*The electoral college determines that a voter in Nevada has about three times the weight of a voter in California.
*The Congress regularly enjoys a 99% return rate as a result of gerrymandering.
*A change in congressional power results in an opposite turn in the largest issue (Iraq).
*Congress has been bought and paid for by moneyed interests.
*Third parties are virtually shut out of contention by restrictive laws in the states governing ballot access, by exclusion from presidential debates managed by the two major parties and by lack of media access.
*Only half the eligible voters try to vote; the other half has given up on the system--their views are not represented.
*There is widespread election fraud, with minorities being disenfranchised.
*An imperialistic foreign policy demands that other democratic world leaders adopt policies not popular in their countries.
*The president routinely violates the laws.
*The government has a policy of favoring corporations over the general welfare of the people, in violation of the Constitution.

I just returned from a visit to the Republic of Ireland where a national election was going on. They have a complicated scheme of proportional representation and had twelve candidates running. Some of the pub talk, when they learned that I am an American (not difficult to discern) included jokes about American elections. They know what's going on and they probably find the US promotion of democracy abroad amusing. I know I do.

Interesting. I think the long-term emphasis on any Concert of Democracies proposal is right. The U.N. is still necessary and trying to completely exclude autocracies from the discussion would undermine the attempt to build a responsibility to protect.

tciopmvjs apteonmuc xongr ckxdqne lbewg zokehavsi bckn

My friends and I like to buy kal geons, because the kal gold is very useful to upgrade equipment. Only your equipment becomes better, then you can win this game. In kal online geons, you can buy everything you want in this game. Yesterday is my birthday, so my friends bought me some kal online gold as gifts. I am so happy.

we don't think it is reasonable to spend hundreds thousands dollars to buy a decorating watch. you can use those money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit.
here you just need to spend 100-200 dollars to buy a replica rolex watches.
Rado replica watches are made by the rating 1:1 according to the original watches, and you can't distinguish the original and the fake watches when you look at the surface of the watches.

then he let his friends all have some runescape money

I hope i can get sro gold in low price.
i buy silkroad online gold for you.

Once I played seal, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have seal cegel. He gave me some sealonline cegel.

I will go to library with he 12 sky gold, and the other time, I will buy twelve sky Gold.

Do you like playing the game where you need to use shaiya gold, when you do not have shaiya money,

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

GHD IV mini styler has a safety feature that gives you peace of mind, by turning itself off if it is left unattended for 30 minutes. The unique digital technology of GHD hair straightener means that the temperature is automatically controlled even quicker for even better styling.

Creating tight curls, flicks and waves as well as the perfect straight. The ideal styling tool for urban angels with short hair, men's hair and fringes.

price includes: ghd IV salon styler,ghd purple roll bag.

product features:
Auto sleep mode(A built in safety feature that gives you peace of mind by turning off if the ghd IV styler is left unallended for 30 minutes.)
Universal voltage(So that you can use your styler in any country without an adaptor.)
Advanced ceramic heaters(The ultimate heating technology for the ultimate shine and style creation.)
All our products are cheap,if you want to find cheap ghd,come here and that is right.

If you want to find GHD hair products,you can write GHD straightener,GHD hair straighteners,GHD straightners,GHD hair,straighteners GHD in google browse.

Chanel Handbags are woman’s dream come true.

Chanel, a fashion name that has become synonymous with femininity since 100 years, is on the must-have list of every fashion-conscious woman.? And we bring these must-have Chanel Handbags at never before discounts, just for you.

It is only when you come across an Chanel New Arrivals, do you realize the power of her words.? Chanel handbags are crafted not just to be trendy, but trend-setting.? Hardly has lived a celebrity who has not been seen carrying a Chanel handbag under her arm; such has the influence of Chanel handbags as a fashion statement.

Chanel handbags have been so popular in the elite classes of the society, that their pricing is usually prohibitive for everyone else.? Discount Chanel handbags are really difficult to come across, but today should be your lucky day.? We bring you a superb unbeatable range of Chanel Flap bags, all at fantastic discounts.? With us, you have an incredible chance to buy your favorite Chanel handbags at rock bottom prices!

Chanel Handbags have always been at the forefront of luxury and style.? The Chanel classic quilted leather handbags and its reinventions have ruled fashion since forever.? Chanel handbags have remained extremely popular as they continue to merge evolving modern trends with the class and simplicity of its original avatar.

An Chanel 2008 Collection and Chanel 2009 Collection single handedly enhances the look you are carrying.? The reason you would buy a Chanel handbag is own a bag that mingles with your charm and intensifies it with its inherent simplicity.? If you have owned an authentic Chanel handbag before, you know what we are talking about.? If you are one of the unlucky people who haven’t yet gotten a chance to own an Chanel Cambon, now is your chance to shop for an authentic Chanel handbag and discover its ability to transform your look completely.

Buy Chanel handbags with us, and get fabulous discounts which you will never get at your favorite store.? We offer cheap authentic Chanel handbags and they are all up for grabs!

Mysterious black bezel and case, case materials for cement and steel production hasLouis Vuitton been the industry standard TEXIN belt do? 985U black rubber information, and the price and spraying mosaics, showing a high hardnessLouis Vuitton steel lesson material, with a special texture satin. Rubber surface show the appearance of fine lines beautifully, from the electro-corrosion to form the inner mold carved.

The artist may have passed away more than!

Should also be a need!

Produced pioneering spirit is very difficult.

thanks for sharing Sohbet many people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch. Chat .
Perhaps when you went to some place far away Chat you must borrow it from friends Sohbet you can get everything you want in this game
Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at the surface of the watches
Egitim from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there exsohbet

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use