Democracy Arsenal

« Lipstick on a Pig | Main | Tear Down Which Wall? »

May 14, 2007

Avoiding Groundhog Day at the UN Human Rights Council
Posted by Suzanne Nossel

High on the list of things that have given the UN a bad name over the years is the spectacle of countries with abysmal human rights records issuing pious pronouncements on the subject from the comfort of international meeting halls.  This Alice-in-Wonderland phenomenon leads the world body's critics to conclude that a forum as diverse and universal as the UN is incapable of distinguishing right from wrong and should not be entrusted with either money or authority.

The UN's Commission on Human Rights stood for years as the most flagrant example of the foxes guarding the human rights henhouse.  A year ago, the UN took an important but incomplete step toward correcting that by disbanding the feckless Commission and replacing it with the Human Rights Council, a body aimed to correct the worst of the Commission's failings, if not restore the UN's position as a global force for human rights.  Unfortunately, with its second-ever elections coming up this week, the Council has thus far been a big disappointment.  When the UN membership goes to the polls on Wednesday, however, they will have a chance to signal - by keeping Belarus off the Council - that the new body is capable of more than just business as usual.

One of the key, and most hotly contested, elements distinguishing the Council from its disesteemed predecessor was to have been its composition.  Whereas the Commission was traditionally dominated by some of the world's worst human rights offenders (think Zimbabwe, Sudan, Cuba, Libya, etc.), the Council was supposed to be different.  The U.S., EU, the UN Secretary General and others wanted to bar nations with egregious human rights records from participating in the Council.  The idea was to prevent these states from shielding themselves from the Council's scrutiny, or simply trying turn the spotlight elsewhere. 

The membership criteria were hotly debated and, in the end, heavily watered down.  Part of the problem, in fairness, was that none of the proposed fixed formulas for membership - ratification of particular treaties or cooperation with human rights investigations - swept in the right countries while excluding the wrong ones.  Rather than, for example, banning nations under UN Security Council sanctions, the resolution that created the Human Rights Council simply said that membership "shall take into account candidates’ contribution to the promotion and protection of human rights.”  A proposed requirement that membership be by election of two-thirds of the UN membership - the idea being that violators would fail to muster broad enough support - was likewise scrapped in favor of a simple majority vote.

On the basis of these and other shortcomings in the drive to prevent the Council from going the way of the Commission, the US opted not to stand for membership when the Council was formed in 2006, and says it won't run again this year.  But some others still hold out the hope that the Council can be salvaged.  A look at this week's election hints at both the promise and the problems.

First off, its barely an election at all.  Of the UN's five regional blocs, three have proffered so-called "clean slates."  This means that a common slate of candidates has been agreed via horsetrading in the region, such that the rest of the UN membership has little choice but to ratify neighborhood's picks.  In a late-breaking exception, however, Bosnia announced on Friday that it would contest Slovenia and Belarus for the two available Eastern European seats, opening up the potential that Belarus - the worst human rights offender in the running - will in fact be kept off the Council.  Bosnia did so after human rights NGOs urged it to step forward and try to block Belarus' pernicious bid.  The other region with a contested slate is the Western Europe and Other Group where Denmark, Italy and the Netherlands are competing for two available seats.

The history of clean slates at the UN is inauspicious.  Traditionally the African Group, for example, has apportioned its seats on UN bodies by a strict geographic rotation.  Even when the results are perverse - Sudan becoming the region's candidate for a UN Security Council seat, for example - solidarity and protocol within the Group have often prevailed over considerations of what's best for the UN or those who depend on it.  Seeing this flawed methodology extended to the Human Rights Council does not bode well.

A second problem is the nominees themselves.  Belarus had the audacity to step forward despite one of the worst human rights records in the hemisphere.  The Human Rights Council has appointed a monitor for Belarus, but the government has refused for more than 2 years to even allow him entry into the country.  The monitor described theirs as "absolute refusal to cooperate" and reported that the country is moving rapidly toward dictatorship.

Non-governmental organizations have appraised the full slate of 14 candidates.  Many NGOs oppose Belarus and Egypt and find others - e.g. Angola - wanting.

Technically speaking, the UN General Assembly can and should vote down candidates that it judges to fall short of the standards expected for participation in the Council.  It takes the affirmative vote of fully half the GA members for a nominee to be seated.  But in practice, overturning the regional group's own choices happens rarely, and only when influential UN members are willing to expend significant political capital in typically bruising election fights (remember Venezuela v. Guatemala). 

The obvious and essential place for the UN membership to take a stand in favor of the Council being a genuine improvement over the Commission is by voting down Belarus.  A vote against Belarus is a vote for the credibility of the Council.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200d83514473553ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Avoiding Groundhog Day at the UN Human Rights Council:

Comments

High on the list of things that have given the UN a bad name over the years is the spectacle of countries with abysmal human rights records issuing pious pronouncements on the subject from the comfort of international meeting halls....On the basis of these and other shortcomings in the drive to prevent the Council from going the way of the Commission, the US opted not to stand for membership when the Council was formed in 2006, and says it won't run again this year.


Are we sure that moral indignation is the reason that the US isn't going to stand for membership? Bush's legal advisers have said that the President has the right to crush an innocent child's testicles as long as he says the magic words "national security." Maybe Bush & Co. didn't want the headache of trying to defend this position too openly.

I'm not saying our human rights record is anyway comparable to Belarus, but until we reaffirm our commitment to Habeus Corpus and the Geneva Conventions, we have no right to "issue pious pronouncements on the subject from the comfort of international meeting halls."

I am so happy to earn some angels gold. In fact at first sight I have fallen in love with angels online gold. So no matter how much I have spent to buy angels gold, I never regret. My life changes because of cheap angels online gold.

we don't think it is reasonable to spend hundreds thousands dollars to buy a decorating watch. you can use those money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit.
here you just need to spend 100-200 dollars to buy a replica rolex watches.
Louis Vuitton replica watches are made by the rating 1:1 according to the original watches, and you can't distinguish the original and the fake watches when you look at the surface of the watches.

we don't think it is reasonable to spend hundreds thousands dollars to buy a decorating watch. you can use those money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit.
here you just need to spend 100-200 dollars to buy a replica rolex watches.
Panerai replica watches are made by the rating 1:1 according to the original watches, and you can't distinguish the original and the fake watches when you look at the surface of the watches.

I am so happy to get some Tales Of Pirates gold and the Tales Of Pirates money is given by my close friend who tells me that the cheap Tales Of Pirates gold is the basis to enter into the game.

I hope i can get rf online gold in low price.
i buy rf money for you.

Once I played Rom Gold, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have Rom Gold. He gave me some Runes of Magic Gold.

you must borrow cheap shaiya gold from friends, or you can not go on this game without shaiya online gold.

you must borrow cheap shaiya gold from friends, or you can not go on this game without shaiya online gold.

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.

"The combination of Bryant and Artest at the wings….Danny Granger Guccl handbags got eight shots when we played in Indiana," O'Brien Fendi Bag said. "It's because it was like a tag team. They had Chanel Bag one guy or the other on him and they got under his chin." dfsssfdaaadftt

"Do I think there are some changes in people's Christian Louboutin online possibility? Yes, I said:" House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. "I think Christian Louboutin online store it is because it will be a different bill is in addition to the House of Representatives and the Senate. dfsssfdaaadftt

In a last-ditch manolo blahnik shoes attempt to craft a bipartisan health care reform bill, President Obama will release a Christian Louboutin shoes new proposal Wednesday that will include Republican ideas on tort reform and health manolo blahnik sale savings accounts, according to Democratic officials familiar with the plans. dfsssfdaaadftt

Good article, Each and every point is good enough.Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.

thanks for sharing Sohbet many people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch. Chat .
Perhaps when you went to some place far away Chat you must borrow it from friends Sohbet you can get everything you want in this game
Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at the surface of the watches
Egitim from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there exsohbet

Every NFL fan has a favorite player , Someone that they admire, look up to, and wish they could even be. That is exactly why Cheap Football Jerseys are perfect for the NFL football fan whether youth or adult. With current team colors of Midnight Green, Charcoal, Black, Silver and White, the professional football team known as the Philadelphia Eagles Jerseys have a popular jersey to share with fans.

The major problem I see is the things it altın çilek DOESN'T say: the role of the molivaUN, for instance, tütüne sonand how this is all going formula 21to be paid for.

Some are things orjin kremthat are already being doneorjin for instance, has been Supratall covered extensively by PNAC. altın çilek form setiBut that's to be expected in manxl such a broad recommendation.

I do not like war, I like healthy

you may desire to take into account the following item specifications:

Flour Mill Project

This is one of the good articles you can find in the net
explaining everything in detail regarding the topic.revivaly pembe maske I thank
you for taking your time sharing your thoughts and ideas to a
lot of readers out there.

Great article, It certainly is one of the more interesting I've read in the past few weeks.

I was actually looking for this resource a few weeks back. Thanks for sharing with us your wisdom.This will absolutely going to help me in my thinking.

have never read such a lovely article and I am coming back tomorrow to continue |
complex 41 yemek tarifi
manzaralar
Zayıflama

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In.

Guest Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use