Democracy Arsenal

« A New Standard for Success in Iraq | Main | If a tree falls... »

March 20, 2007

Curveball Revisited
Posted by Ilan Goldenberg

According to an article last week in the Washington Post, some of our best intelligence on the Iranian nuclear program is coming from the Mujaheddin-e Khalq (MEK), a militant group based in Iraq that is dedicated to overthrowing the Iranian government.  Pretty scary considering the disastrous intelligence that came from Ahmed Chalabi and the Iraqi National Congress (INC) in the run up to the Iraq War.

The MEK is a group of terrorists / freedom fighters / American allies that our government can’t seem to make up its mind about.  In 1997 they were added to the U.S. State Department’s list of foreign terrorist groups, but after the U.S. invasion in 2003 the Bush Administration granted them status of “protected persons” under the Geneva Convention.  Saddam saw the group as a useful ally in undermining the Iranian regime.  The Bush Administration seems to be using them for the same purposes.

Cutting deals sometimes with unsavory characters is an unfortunate reality in foreign policy.  The real problem here is that according to the article this group is providing key intelligence on Iran’s nuclear weapons program and its operations in Iraq.  Have we learned nothing from Chalabi, “Curveball” and the INC?  This group’s sole mission is to overthrow the Iranian government.  They have every incentive to cook up the intelligence and no reason to be straightforward with us.  Are we really going to go down this path again?

Still, all the claims in the article were made by the MEK and weren’t backed up by American intelligence or military sources.  So let’s hope against hope that it’s just shoddy reporting and not another case of the administration using questionable sources to build its case.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200d834eeb32253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Curveball Revisited:

Comments

Both former State Department official Martin Indyk and Jack Straw have admitted that the MEK were put on the FTO list only at the behest of the Iranian regime. They are not a terror organization but rather a legitimate movement that has been used by the west in their policy of appeasement of the Iranian regime. It is time that the people really take a look at the facts with respect to the MEK and not the rhetoric that has been spewed in the effort to appease the mullahs.

Shahab, are you saying that MEK has not done sabotage or assassination in iran or elsewhere?

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

On my Egypt Air flight yesterday to Cairo, I witnessed one of the more intriguing in-flight exchanges that I can remember. A bearded, well-dressed man sitting a few seats behind me began shouting at the flight attendant. He was complaining that the in-flight movie was inappropriate. What are these “offensive images?ugg boots clearance” he asked. These included a 15-minute stretch of the movie where at least one woman at any given time was wearing a bikini. In a couple of scenes at a club, members of opposite sexes were dancing in close proximity while, it appeared, consuming alcoholic beverages. “Are we really all Westernized now?” the man behind me asked, as if posing a question to those of us in the back of the plane.

The man’s arguments were rather interesting. He pointed out that if you took a poll of the passengers,ugg boots outlet most would agree the film was morally offensive. He asked the attendant, “if we ask the passengers what they think and they agree with me, then what will you do?” The attendant responded, “we don’t take public opinion (ra’i al ‘am) on the airplane.” The man was right: most passengers, and most Egyptians – the vast majority of whom don’t drink, go to clubs, or wear bikinis – would object to the film’s content. But at what point do they have the right to restrict minority expressions of unfaithfulness?

It was an odd, amusing exchange that justified the otherwise unpleasant experience of flying on EgyptAir.ugg boots clearance But it was a reminder of the fundamental lack of consensus in the Arab world over the boundaries and limits of the state. There are two groups – Islamists and secular elites – with worldviews which couldn’t be more different. They live parallel lives in parallel worlds, with parallel institutions. They rarely intersect.ugg boots clearance One group believes it has both history and the Egyptian people on its side. The other side, considerably smaller in number, likely has neither. It does, however, have the power.

This stalemate has paralyzed the Arab world for decades now.ugg boots outlet

Sunday’s elections will be just another version of this.ugg boots clearance The main players are the Muslim Brotherhood – populist, religious, and righteous – and the regime coalition which, with its president soon to pass, finds itself in an uncertain place. Both sides are strong in different ways – and weak in others. Neither seems to have anything resembling a coherent strategy for dealing with the impending transition that is soon to come.

ugg boots clearance

Thanks for the article. This keeps me informed about the topic.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use