Democracy Arsenal

« A new Cold War? | Main | The Burden of Proof »

January 11, 2007

National Security Temptations
Posted by Shadi Hamid

Some of you may recall Marc Grinberg's spirited run as a guest-blogger in November. Marc and I sparred quite a bit on questions of progressive strategy and the Dems' approach to foreign policy. These discussions (see here, here, and here) were productive, forcing us to reassess some of our original positions. Well, Marc and I decided to try to synthesize some of these ideas and come up with a more coherent argument. So we co-wrote a piece for TomPaine, published earlier this week, where we argue for a principled foreign policy approach that emphasizes sincerity over poll-tested notions of "strength," even if that means incurring political losses in the short-run. Here's an excerpt:

There are two national security temptations for Democrats in the new congress: a reflexively anti-Bush approach, and a reflexively "strong" approach—trying to out-tough the Republicans on security. Both must be rejected. Though based on political calculations, they are, in fact, bad politics. Neither is driven by an overarching set of principles, leaving Democrats looking like they stand for nothing.

According to supporters of the first approach, November's victory was a mandate for opposing the Bush agenda blow-for-blow. Thus, Democrats should respond with a strategy that is the antithesis of neo-conservatism — redeploying from Iraq, limiting American activism in the world and adopting a realist foreign policy outlook. But these Democrats have come to support a mishmash of policies that could hardly be described as liberal. A reflexively anti-Bush Democrat might oppose democracy promotion in the Middle East, arguing that that's what neoconservatives do. Others may claim that the internal politics of faraway nations should not be of concern to progressives —that we have enough problems at home to worry about. But it is precisely because we are progressives that we care about poverty and oppression abroad. As Martin Luther King, Jr. once noted, "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

The second temptation—to prove Democratic toughness on national security—is based on the interpretation that November's win was more a response to Republican failures than a vote of confidence in Democrats. The public still does not trust liberals to keep them safe, and so the Democratic Party must promote only what will be perceived as strong national security positions, taking on Republicans from the right, and avoiding soft issues such as civil liberties.

Like the first tendency, this leaves Democrats with something that is neither a comprehensive strategy, nor recognizably liberal. Fear-mongering nativism, such as that displayed by certain congressional campaigns that ran against amnesty for illegals, or by the many Democrats who made political hay out of the Dubai-ports deal, is not the legacy the party should be striving for. Neither is silence on the Bush Administration's use of torture. If progressives don't feel confident enough to vigorously oppose something as self-evidently illiberal as torture, then why do we want to lead?

Read the whole thing here.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200d8350baba769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference National Security Temptations:

Comments

Democrats are often labeled with the "feel good liberal" tag, but in this instance there is a tremendous need to support the world's poor. How about addressing national security through humanitarian means? Elminating global poverty is an effective tool for creating a safer and more secure homeland. According to the Borgen Project, helping these impoverished people to sustain themselves will eliminate the threat of "desperate people, in desperate situations."

Others may claim that the internal politics of faraway nations should not be of concern to progressives —that we have enough problems at home to worry about. But it is precisely because we are progressives that we care about poverty and oppression abroad. As Martin Luther King, Jr. once noted, "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."


In the first place, there are very few progressives who don't care about poverty and oppression abroad. That's a strawman. We just don't think the US should be using military force and covert operations to spread democracy.

Second, do you really want to be dragging Martin Luther King into this argument?


"A true revolution of values will lay hand on the world order and say of war, 'This way of settling differences is not just.' This business of burning human beings with napalm, of filling our nation's homes with orphans and widows.... cannot be reconciled with wisdom, justice, and love. A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.

-- MLK Jr., Rverside Church speech, April 1967


Are any of the posters here willing to cut the "defense" budget? Do any of you want to speak out against an attack on Iran? Or speak up for the 6 million stateless Palestinians who have no rights whatsoever?

No? Then please stop quoting MLK and talking about justice. It sounds insincere.

Cal, you say:

"We just don't think the US should be using military force and covert operations to spread democracy."

I agree.

You say: "Are any of the posters here willing to cut the "defense" budget? Do any of you want to speak out against an attack on Iran? Or speak up for the 6 million stateless Palestinians who have no rights whatsoever?"

I - and i think everyone else on this site - opposes a military strike against Iran. See my article on this at http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2006/05/09/the_path_to_war_with_iran.php.

As for your 2nd point, I think all of the DA bloggers believe in the importance and necessity of granting the Palestinians their own independent state.

Nice article. If you do any follow up articles on this particular topic, you might want to throw in a few positive examples of cases where individuals have gone with this policy and document what it cost them in the short term and how they benefitted in the long term.

Also, how many compromises to you think the Dems make to achieve unity on this overall strategy? As you've pointed out in the past, there seems to be disagreements on principle within the Democratic caucus.

So is this advice aimed more at individual members of Congress (and Presidential candidates, but for now I think we should be focusing on Congress) or is it primarily advice to the leadership? At this level of detail, you can still do both but if you get more detailed in the future you may need to get into the guts of building a Congressional agenda.

So is this advice aimed more at individual members of Congress (and Presidential candidates, but for now I think we should be focusing on Congress) or is it primarily advice to the leadership? At this level of detail, you can still do both but if you get more detailed in the future you may need to get into the guts of building a Congressional agenda.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

You are currently signed in as (nobody). Sign Out

Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!

If you have PANERAI Watches , I still have my idea to achieve.

Much better you grab, the more you appreciate, Superior you presently know, higher you forget. Considerably extra you ignore, the considerably less you presently know. So why make an do the job to understand.

thanks for sharing Sohbet many people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch. Chat .
Perhaps when you went to some place far away Chat you must borrow it from friends Sohbet you can get everything you want in this game
Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at the surface of the watches
Egitim from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there exsohbet

from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there non profit masters

Much better you grab, the more you appreciate, Superior you presently know, higher you forget. Considerably extra you ignore, the considerably less you presently know. So why make an do the job to understand.
Social Work Careers

Much better you grab, the more you appreciate, Superior you presently know, higher you forget. Considerably extra you ignore, the considerably less you presently know. So why make an do the job to understand. music education masters

Much better you grab, the more you appreciate, Superior you presently know, higher you forget. Considerably extra you ignore, the considerably less you presently know. So why make an do the job to understand. masters in education

My 2 year old son has been in the hospital for bilateral pleural chylous effusions since Jan 29, p/o Fontan in November of 2009. He has tried diet, diuretics, thoracic duct ligation and now pleurodesis on the right side. rn bsn

I want to be a part of this mags. I have idea to make a good design and to make a good layout for this mags. We need to make other people to feel interesting by see our mags cover, then they will buy it online degrees in criminal justice

I can’t seem to get this to work – it only imports the first account (the first line) regardless of how many I have listed – tried both manually entering the data and uploading a text file. Any help would be appreciated masters in homeland security

Thank you very much. I hope you will find more posts that you like

Others may claim that the internal politics of faraway nations should not be of concern to progressives —that we have enough problems at home to worry about. But it is precisely because we are progressives that we care about poverty and oppression abroad. As Martin Luther King, Jr. once noted, "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

Peace is now one of the most important problem in the world ...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.

Emeritus Contributors
Founder
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use