How Can A Progressive Talk To An Islamist
Posted by Ali Eteraz
It is inevitable that the tyrants (and oligarchs) in the Muslim world -- Musharraf, Mubarak, the Hashemites, the Ayatollahs, Zine el Abidine of Tunisia -- will be toppled. In some places, the vacuum will be filled with another tyrant. Yet we have finally realized that the short-term and superficial stability that a tyrant provides is "chump-change" in the face of the dictators' horrifying human rights records, and of their ability to create a vast class of militant Muslim revolutionaries (who then rage against us).
In other words, progressives have realized that the kind of people that should fill that vacuum ought to be people who a) value democracy b) value constitutionalism and c) value human rights. This is where you guys at Democracy Arsenal have been so important -- because you have been able to sell this simple idea. If there is one way to distinguish a Conservative from a Progressive in terms of foreign policy today it is this: a Conservative (Neo-Con) is willing to leave power in the hands of a Muslim tyrant while a Progressive thinks that is patently idiotic (but may not have any idea of what he or she wants instead).
The problem arises that it in large parts of the Muslim world (excluding Turkey), those who have the power to affirm propositions a, b, and c, tend not to look like us, act like us, or share our "liberal" values. If anything, with their social conservatism, they remind us of "backwater" hill-billies. With their protectionist economic policies, they remind us of the worst of the old school isolationists we guffaw over. With their stubborn adherence to their religion, and their use of religion as an identity, they remind us of the Christianists we here are trying to boot out of office. They aren't really down with gays, down with drinking, tolerant of Brittney, willing to turn a blind eye to swinger's clubs, nor encouraging of stripperobics, or what we like in our art. Ever since 1979, when these Islamists first showed their face, Progressives have had no idea how to deal with such people, and as a consequence, the Conservatives, by alternatively evoking them as fearful (Iran) and using them as mercenaries (Taliban) have been able to define foreign policy with respect to the Muslim world.
What Progressives need -- now more than ever -- is leverage with the democratic Islamists. But how in the world does a Progressive get leverage over people who are so conservative?
We can't send them tapes of Velvet Underground. We can't show them good American porn. We can't offer them a Christianized liberation theology. They don't know who Coltrane or Miles Davis are (nor care). The method of culture-war that we used to stoke the Soviet Bloc underground-democrats doesn't work with people so (freaking) conservative.
So then how are we going to get leverage? How to speak to them if they are just going to dismiss as a bunch of atheist hedonists?
The answer has two parts: i) social work, ii) money.
i) Social Work is easy. The Progressive ace in the hole has always been its populist impulse, its affiliation with the downtrodden, and its receptiveness to the actual material needs of people. We can talk to the conservative (but democratic and constitutionalist) Islamists by showing them the goodness of our actions.
ii) Money is hard. There are two major impediments to Progressives being able to use money to their advantage. First, we simply don't have that much money. Second, those of us who do have money have no interest in sending it to the Muslim world because no one wants to become subject to the latest version of P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Have you ever noticed how much money we give to African civil groups and how little to Muslim civil groups? It isn't because we like poor Africans more than we like poor Muslims. It's because we aren't going to get interrogated or inquisitioned. Gates and Soros pump money everywhere -- Africa, Latin America, India, China -- but not into civil service groups in the Muslim world. Today's Progresives have to fix that.
How, pray tell, am I expected to go to Pakistan and say to the democratic Islamists that people in America support them if these people have never received a single dollar of American "approval." Progressives have to look into the financial transfer laws currently in place and tweak them (a list of approved Islamists might be a start). Post 9/11, the assumption has been that all Islamists are terrorists. This is, like, so not true. Progressive insiders need to create a new list of 'approved' groups. If there is a legislative cause that Progressives insiders need to take up with the forthcoming Democratic house, it is this.


This is exactly WHY we democrats are not running the House or Senate right now. Not because we have different ideas about dealing with what in this article is offensively termed 'Islamist' but because we don't have a (freaking) clue about Muslim culture. There seems to be a prevailing idea that Muslim society a) needs to change or have some kind of a reformation and b) they should be more like us. In fact, they did have a reformation just around the time we did and, in fact in response to it. It just wasn't the kind of reformation we assume they should have had. Instead of continuing with the open and free thinking society that was then prevalent in the Muslim world, 'western' expansion and oppression of Muslims guided their reformation in the opposite direction. Muslims sought solace in God and in more traditional, maybe even fundamentalist ways (see Karen Armstrong, Battle For God). All thanks to us in great part.
Now why exactly should we be so vein and conceited to expect others to change to be more like us? Isn't that the same as assuming our own infallibility? Instead of expecting them to change or listen to Louis Armstrong or even accept our money (a particularly specious device) why don't we make an attempt to actually understand their culture and their terms of reference, their reasonings etc. and then and only then create policies to deal with ongoing problems? That kind of approach is not only better than what is being offered by the Republicans at the moment, it is also a way to marginalize those extremists that this article mingles unsurrepticiously with the average Muslim on the street.
We need a change of approach, not some Anne Coulteresque dictum of 'us versus them' that is just a typical unthinking "I'm a liberal and proud" diatribe that merely encourages the Reps versus Dems discourse that typifies the vilification of the 'other' culture of the US. This is exactly why we are in this position - because we are not offering any culturally relative ideas to the (freaking) conservative stance of Us and Them.
Grow up Democrats and start listening to your conscience and think culturally. Face up to the fact that we cannot and should not change a culture, much less recreate it in our own image. Culture should change through its own momentum, not with our help and certainly not through our monetary incentives that only make other cultures see the US as relying on cash rather than ideas and certainly don't promote respect for other states. Let's rethink!
Posted by: Tim | November 02, 2006 at 04:17 PM
If there is one way to distinguish a Republican from a Democrat in terms of foreign policy today it is this: a Republican is willing to leave power in the hands of a Muslim tyrant while a Democrat thinks that is patently idiotic
Huh? You seem to have that backwards. Bush is the one pushing democracy, Dems are saying that's idiotic (like the commenter above, who seems to think Muslims aren't really interested in freedom and democracy).
Posted by: TallDave | November 02, 2006 at 04:48 PM
Post 9/11, the assumption has been that all Islamists are terrorists.
That seems overly tendentious. The problem is not that Islamic groups are unfairly stigmatized as terrorist supporters, the problem too many Islamic "civil" groups are in fact also supporting terrorism. Hamas, Hizbollah, etc. do provide massive social services, but also undeniably carry out terrorist acts.
Posted by: TallDave | November 02, 2006 at 05:08 PM
TallDave,
Bush is not pushing democracy. He's rolled back on the idea. Even AEI has turned against him b/c of his turn-around.
http://www.aei.org/publication24467
Posted by: eteraz | November 02, 2006 at 05:11 PM
Ali: "They aren't really down with gays, down with drinking, tolerant of Brittney, willing to turn a blind eye to swinger's clubs, nor encouraging of stripperobics, or what we like in our art."
Are these, in your mind, the crucial components of American liberalism?
Posted by: Shadi Hamid | November 02, 2006 at 05:57 PM
Just an FYI - if you're going to be sending money abroad, make sure the group isn't affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Via the Strategy Center:
http://www.strategycenter.net/research/pubID.102/pub_detail.aspThe
:::
Little Explored Offshore Empire of the International Muslim Brotherhood
Almost from the inception of the modern Islamic banking structure (early 1980s), the international Muslim Brotherhood set up a parallel and far-flung offshore structure that has become an integral part of its ability to hide and move money around the world. This network is little understood and has, so far, garnered little attention from the intelligence and law enforcement communities tracking terrorist financial structures.
The fundamental premise of the Brotherhood in setting up this structure was that it is necessary to build a clandestine structure that was hidden from non-Muslims and even Muslims who do not share the Brotherhood’s fundamental objective of recreating the Islamic caliphate and spreading Islam, by force and persuasion, across the globe...
...There has been some understanding of the Brotherhood’s relationship to Islamist groups, and of those ties even in the United States. In 2003 Richard Clarke said “the issue of terrorist financing in the United States is a fundamental example of the shared infrastructure levered by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and al Qaeda, all of which enjoy a significant degree of cooperation and coordination within our borders. The common link here is the extremist Muslim Brotherhood—all these organizations are descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood.”[5] However, this understanding has not taken root in the intelligence, law enforcement and policy communities, nor has the financial network of the Brotherhood come under intense scrutiny.
Public records show the Brotherhood’s financial network of holding companies, subsidiaries, shell banks and real financial institutions stretches to Panama, Liberia, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Switzerland, Cyprus, Nigeria, Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay and beyond. Many of the entities are in the names of individuals who, like Nada, Nasreddin, al-Qaradawi and Himmat, have publicly identified themselves as Brotherhood leaders
::::
Posted by: maryatexitzero | November 02, 2006 at 06:24 PM
<
Are these, in your mind, the crucial components of American liberalism?>>
Shadi,
In the eye of the average American, these are the things what it boils down to.
To me, its not important if an Islamist over there is sitting around and quoting Locke. That doesn't say as much to me as when I see him bumpin and grindin to I'm a Slave For You.
Posted by: eteraz | November 02, 2006 at 06:38 PM
With their stubborn adherence to their religion, and their use of religion as an identity, they remind us of the Christianists we here are trying to boot out of office.
Wow... use of religion as an identity. What a bizarre concept! You mean there are some people whose deepest metaphysical and moral views actually form a major component of their identities? The barbarians! These guys need some hookers and Jim Beam right away.
Once we're done with the Mormons, whom do you think we should transform next? The Amish? The Mormons?
Posted by: Dan Kervick | November 02, 2006 at 10:47 PM
That last paragraph should have read:
Once we're done with the Muslims, whom do you think we should transform next? The Amish? The Mormons?
Posted by: Dan Kervick | November 03, 2006 at 07:24 AM
Ali isn't talking about changing a culture. What is important isn't taking religion out of a culture but bringing tolerance to all societies. One experience that will always stay with me was when I was teaching in Istanbul.I was teaching two girls who chose to wear the hijab. One day after class we got on the subject of music. To my utter surprise one of the girl's favorite bands was Bon Jovi. I just remember thinking that religion, or country...or even the hijab (which ali had a great post on the other day) doesn't define someone. Now obviously Turkey isn't the most conservative muslim country (the opposite actually), but this scenario plays out everywhere. A christian in Montana might despise alchol and a gay Lebannese man might want to go to clubs and have many sexual partners. What is needed is tolerance of each of our own individua preferences within society. That is not changing a culture, just respecting the diversity of it.
Also...as for money... i think a great model for the money part of the equation is Muhammad Yunus and his micro-loan program in Bangledesh. Micro-loans would have a much more personal effect on the recipient and would be more empowering. Just my thoughts.....
Posted by: matthew | November 03, 2006 at 08:43 AM
Ali, Bush has gone to huge lengths to transform Iraq and Afghanistan into democracies, despite prediction from Juan Cole and Noam Chomsky that he would take the simpler path of installing a friendly autocrat. The main thrust of neoconservatism is creating liberal, democratic societies.
The Amish and Quakers don't pratice honor killings, stoning homosexuals, chastity beatings, etc., so they aren't really at odds with civil liberties. Expressing disapproval is one thing; punitive illiberal actions taken to enforce disapproval are another. Nearly all Christian sects have now resigned themselves to living more or less within the civil structure (this was not always the case, of course). Muslim cultures are mostly new to democracy and liberalism and are still struggling with that conflict.
Posted by: TallDave | November 03, 2006 at 11:56 AM
Why not take Bush at his word for once. After all, he is a man of his word.
He says himself, he doesn't seek to *transform* Muslims, simply to liberate them. The desire to be free and control ones' affairs common to all Mankind. Democracy is simply an expression of this. It belongs to no particular culture. This is Bush's philosophy, why not listen to him once in a while!
And liberals, if you really believe in democracy and oppose tyranny, here is your champion. Support him and his party and oppose those who who would abandon newly won democratic allies to the tyranny of the terrorists.
Posted by: Kip Watson | November 03, 2006 at 05:54 PM
Why not take Bush at his word for once.
Fool me twice....
It would be ridiculous for anybody to believe Bush about anything at this point, unless it's been independently verified by multiple trustworthy sources.
Posted by: J Thomas | November 03, 2006 at 06:31 PM
Ali Eteraz seems to be taking the cliche, "money talks," a bit too literally. The key to engaging the Islamists is not to talk at them by patronizing them with money or social work; it's to be willing to sit down with them and listening to what they have to say. This is what Conflicts Forum - under Alastair Crooke and Mark Perry's direction - is actually doing. It's a rather simple but quite radical approach.
Posted by: Paul Woodward | November 03, 2006 at 06:50 PM
Who else is opposing tyranny and bringing freedom to the oppressed?
[scans horizon]
Anyone? Anywhere?
Posted by: Kip Watson | November 03, 2006 at 06:58 PM
I am! I'm campaigning against the GOP!
Posted by: J Thomas | November 03, 2006 at 08:04 PM
Who's serious? Who's unserious?
Who cares? Who's just posturing?
Who has vision? Who can't see past their own electoral advantage?
Your little joke answers so eloquently...
Posted by: Kip Watson | November 03, 2006 at 08:30 PM
Kip, I'm not joking.
You got to shoot your own dog.
Fight for freedom and against tyranny in your own country first. When we re-establish democracy in the USA then maybe we can start thinking about helping out the rest of the world.
When the GOP is nothing but a horrible memory then we can look at utopian schemes for the whole world. But until then it's hopeless.
Look -- if you can't work for democracy in foreign countries without airstrikes, then you can't work for democracy at all.
Destroying the GOP isn't a matter of electoral advantage. It's a matter of destroying a major danger to the whole world. it's absurd to allow George Bush access to nuclear weapons.
Posted by: J Thomas | November 04, 2006 at 09:47 AM
To give a certain secular group of Islamic the okay for not being the terrorists, what you have done is give the militant Muslim revolutionaries an avenue of foundation to disguise, blend, mingle with these innocents and kalomazoo
a plane glides into the...
they will not believe that Christians can live in this world free or any other religion, they are the only one and they say to give the enemy one chance to convert then kill. In fact they are promoting genocide this is what they believe they will not change not even the good ones.
how can they without obeying their written word. They will also still carry out contracts for the capture and public murders of the Danish Cartoonists. With out the Pope publicly apologizing for his spoken words of history the truth of them and he does know of them, they would still be raping killing, nuns, destroying christen churches rioting, protesting in extreme violence, how many times will you forgive their trespasses before your family or friends or acquaintances publicly executed, beheaded on TV for all the world to see?
Posted by: james moerike | December 02, 2006 at 02:33 AM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts runescape lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro goldrunescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit
Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold
Posted by: runescape money | November 25, 2007 at 01:06 AM
runescape money runescape gold runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape gold runescape money runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money lotro gold buy lotro gold Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold dofus kamas buy dofus kamas 血管瘤 肝血管瘤 音乐剧 北京富码电视 富码电视 富码电视台 7天酒店 7天连锁酒店 7天连锁 自清洗过滤器 过滤器 压力开关 压力传感器 流量开关 流量计 液位计 液位开关 温湿度记录仪 风速仪 可燃气体检测仪 wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling
runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling 棕榈树
eve isk
eve online isk
eve isk
eve online isk
Posted by: runescape money | December 02, 2007 at 07:51 PM
thanks for your article
Posted by: runescape gold | October 07, 2008 at 01:05 AM
There are certain things in life related to smoking that simply cannot :)
parça kontör
parça kontör bayiliği
parça kontör bayilik
Posted by: kamil | December 19, 2008 at 12:38 PM
FF11 is very famous now. My friends like to play it and buy FFXI Gil. If you have money to buy FFXI gold, you will find it is very useful. Earning Final Fantasy XI gold is not so hard. Try your best and then you can get it. I buy FFXI Gil, just because I like it.
Posted by: cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold | December 24, 2008 at 11:53 PM
he usually buy priston tale Gold to start his game
Posted by: cheap priston tale Gold | January 06, 2009 at 10:06 PM
I hope i can get GuildWars Gold in low price.
i buy Guild Wars Gold for you.
Posted by: gw gold | January 19, 2009 at 10:16 PM
Once I played silkroad, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have silkroad gold. He gave me some sro gold.
Posted by: sro gold | February 14, 2009 at 04:36 AM
they are like me and tell me anything about them twelve sky Gold. I know 12sky gold.
Posted by: 12sky gold | March 04, 2009 at 01:38 AM
Do you like playing the game where you need to use wonderland Gold, when you do not have wonderland online Gold,
Posted by: wonderland Gold | March 20, 2009 at 01:42 AM
For those who have not used a 24-hour hand,it makes one full revolution of the dial over 24 hours which means that 12 pm is at 6 clock on the dial.This features allows you to track two timezones: one using the standard time hands,and the other using the GMT hand and the 24hr bezel.The bezel has a grippy coin edge and a light but clicky turn.The included bracelet is nice and light.Replica Casio Watches features solid end links (spring bars),and the outer links of the bracelet are screwed together.The clasp has a fold-over design with a signed safety.The bracelet is a perfect fit for the Replica Wittnauer Watches and integrates beautifully with the lugs.I will mention that the PVD on the bracelet is very light and after some considerable time on my wrists,there is noticeable wear.If PDV wear bothers you,go with the brushed/polished model instead (brushed on top and polished on the sides of the case).This is a Replica Vacheron Constantin that is up for just about any task and does so with little fuss or explanation.I wore it on a twelve day trip to San Francisco and Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches kept up perfectly.The Replica Zodiac Watches is light enough to be worn without consideration,classy enough to be worn with any attire,and with the GMT complication,it is a traveler's best friend.It's amazingly accurate; many days,it showed no deviance at all,and after a month,it is usually within +/-4 seconds.The G-1 starts at $549,which is an amazing price for a watch of this quality.Many other Replica Tommy Hilfiger Watches that feature this movement retail for hundreds to thousands more,and the G-1 is without a doubt the best design from OCEAN7 that we have reviewed to date.The model as reviewed is $599,and the buyer can choose from a series of bezel colors to suit either finish.OCEAN7 Watch Company have outdone themselves on the new G-1 GMT *** a very cool watch that doesn't sacrifice quality,features,looks,or everyday practicality; For updates on content,follow Watch Report on Twitter.
Posted by: watches | July 29, 2010 at 11:19 PM
Thanks for the post. This keeps me informed about the topic. By the way, if you have time, please give me a few seconds by visiting my website at citronella bark collar citronella anti bark collar
Posted by: No bark dog collar | March 05, 2011 at 10:23 AM
I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post's to be just what I'm looking for. can you offer guest writers to write content for you?
Posted by: Discount bathroom cabinets | March 05, 2011 at 11:47 AM
Thanks on your marvelous posting! I really enjoyed reading it, you could be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and will eventually come back later on. I want to encourage you to continue your great posts, have a nice afternoon!
Posted by: venapro hemorrhoids treatment | March 05, 2011 at 11:49 AM
So then how are we going to get leverage? How to speak to them if they are just going to dismiss as a bunch of atheist hedonists?
Posted by: magic bullet | July 29, 2011 at 09:08 AM