I’ve been getting some interesting responses to my American Prospect essays
(1,2) on the future of progressive foreign policy. In a spirited rejoinder to my piece (amusingly titled "Against Democracy"), Spencer Ackerman of The New Republic criticizes my "fetishization of democracy.” Even
though I don’t think he intended this as a compliment, it does, I must say,
have a nice ring to it. (My fetishes aside, Ackerman's article is useful contribution to the debate, and I hope to respond to his points after I sufficiently digest them).
Heather, also yesterday, touched on what I think are
some critical questions regarding my suggested move toward a
“democracy-centric” foreign policy. Heather asks: “why has the democratization project been
mostly unsuccessful in the Middle East…?”
This assumes that there was, in fact, ever, a real
democratization project, not just in words but in deeds. The Bush administration’s
dramatic shift in pro-democracy rhetoric was never accompanied by sustained
policy changes on the ground. For a brief three or four month period in early
2005, Bush did, to his credit, put significant pressure on President Hosni
Mubarak of Egypt and a couple other repeat offenders. But, soon enough, the
realist temptation became too tempting even for the self-anointed
anti-Scrowcroft of our time. Well, then, why the reversal?
This brings us back to what I consider to be the fundamental
dilemma for American policymakers – they want democracy but fear its outcomes. For
too long, we’ve tried to avoid the question, get around it, or, worse, pretend
it doesn’t exist. Instead of supposing that there is some mythical, silent Arab
liberal majority that is just waiting to unleash its electoral potential, let’s
try to ground our idealism in a fact-based assessment of Arab politics. As I
point out in my article, Arab liberals have virtually no grassroots support in
the Middle East. And as for “pro-American Arab
liberals,” those don’t even exist. Mainstream Islamists, on the other hand, are
as powerful as ever (at least partly because the Bush administration’s
horrendous foreign policy has made gratuitous anti-Americanism such an easy
sell). So, yes, Islamist groups will come to power if there are free elections.
It’s going to happen whether we like or not. And it already has in Iraq, Turkey,
and the Palestinian territories (and is likely to happen in Morocco next parliamentary election).
What we need, then, is a coherent policy toward political
Islam.
We must begin to engage with mainstream, non-violent
Islamists (better to get to know them now before they come to power). I spent
this past summer meeting and interviewing a good chunk of the Egyptian Muslim
Brotherhood’s leadership. This is a topic for another time, but suffice it to
say that there is a (for now, low-intensity) internal struggle within
mainstream Islamism. For example, there are competing factions within the Muslim
Brotherhood: pragmatists and ideologues, reformers and conservatives,
moderates and hardliners. Unfortunately, in Egypt and Jordan (and particularly
in today’s hail-Nasrallah polarized environment), the ideologues grow stronger
(“Hawks” and “Hamasists” now dominate America Jordan’s Islamic Action Front. This
wasn’t the case two years ago). We must find ways to reverse this trend and to
draw the balance of power toward those “relative moderates” who are more
predisposed toward rapprochement with the US.
This requires some
creative policymaking (or is that an oxymoron?) by policymakers willing to
acknowledge the inevitable but necessary risks of a "democracy-centric
foreign policy."
Heather also asks: “What is the process by which democratic
change happens?”
We can be patient, and wait for democracy to take its course
and come on its own. If we take this route, then we might as well wait forever.
Patience is a virtue. Inaction is not.
Democracy cannot and will not come on its own in the Middle East. They said it would come in the early 1980s,
the mid-1980s, the early 1990s, so on an so forth. It never came. The
perpetually under-watered flowers of the “Arab spring” failed to blossom.
Instead, they died, at least partly because we, as Americans, did so little to
help them grow.
Or we can take action and start using our leverage to get
our Arab “friends” to get their act together (otherwise, why do they call it
leverage?).
We can be patient, and wait for democracy to take its course and come on its own. If we take this route, then we might as well wait forever. Patience is a virtue. Inaction is not.
Democracy cannot and will not come on its own in the Middle East...
This astonishes me Shadi. If you truly believe waiting for democracy to come on its own in the Middle East means "waiting forever", and that democracy "cannot and will not come on its own in the Middle East," it sure sounds like you are saying that democracy is in some sense not a natural fit in the region, and that it is a political sytem toward which there is no historical tendency or popular disposition whatsoever.
Now I don't know whether that is true or not. But if you believe that, then how on earth can you recommend making democracy promotion in the Middle East the very centerpiece of US foreign policy? What next? Should we promote olive cultivation of olives in Antarctica, and strive to bring Lutheranism to the Vatican?
Posted by: Dan Kervick | August 30, 2006 at 09:16 PM
Dan, there's no need to be astonished. We have to fix what we broke, right? We've supported Arab dictators quite consistently since the 1950s. All I'm saying is that we should withold such support by making foreign aid conditional (is that really asking too much?).
How do you expect democracy to flourish on its own when we're giving Mubarak, Abdullah, and the others billions of dollars a year. Of course, it won't. There is, according to numerous polls, widespread popular support for democracy (although not necessarily liberalism) in the Arab world. But what do you want them to do? These are brutal regimes that will stop at nothing to destroy their opponents. In the face of such represssion, Arabs need help - our help.
Posted by: Shadi Hamid | August 30, 2006 at 10:00 PM
Shadi- I too am amazed by your view that democacy could never come to the Middle East without outside intervention. Am I not mistaken that Iran actually did have a relatively democratic election in the 1950s? And that we helped to overthrow the democratically elected leader? I don't think so. And since Israel is a democracy in the Middle East are you saying that it is only Arabs/muslims who are incapable of generating democracy on their own?
I hope you take seriously Ackerman's much more substantive critiques, especially, that it is human rights which should be the focus, not democracy. I pointed this out in an email to you as well and an earlier piece I wrote demonstrates clearly the historical amnesia of those who think that democracy automatically=good.
http://www.voicesofreason.info/2006_02_05_archive.html
J.S.
Posted by: J.S. | August 30, 2006 at 10:16 PM
Shadi,
I guess I'm confused now. It sounds now to me like you do think democracy will come to the Middle East on its own: that it will happen on its own so long as we are not intervening in the region in such a way as to prevent it. So maybe this is just a semantic misunderstanding about the meaning of the expression "on its own."
Personally, I am eagerly awaiting the day when we learn how to run our cars and air conditioning on hydrogen or compost or dung, so we can withdraw support from Abdullah, Mubarak and the whole lot of them, bring our soldiers home, dismantle our bases, and leave the Middle East in peace to develop its own natural forms of government, on its own, without US tutelge or imposition.
Posted by: Dan Kervick | August 30, 2006 at 11:16 PM
The recent strengthening of hardline sentiment in the Arab world does not result from an absence of democracy but from recent events. The case for democracy addresses a deeper and longer-term problem.
Where you could make a real difference would be to think out (or discuss with your contacts) the practical question of how Arab states could begin the transition to more democratic forms of government. Could the post-1975 Spanish model work in places like Egypt and Jordan?
Posted by: David Billington | August 31, 2006 at 02:52 AM
Let's face it, the US prefers to deal with strong, non-democratic leaders in the oil states. It is easier to negotiate long term deals, and there is no risk of sudden expropriation as is now happening in Latin America.
Without the support of the west the oligopolies in Saudi Arabia, Syria, etc. would collapse. Not only are they dicatorships, but the misuse of the revenue by the wealthy means that a resentful populace has to be kept in check by brutal means.
Iran's revolution was against just such a regime, it used a combination of nationalism and appeals to traditional religion to gain support. The fact that the religious faction became dominant is what can happen when pent up resentment is unleashed. The shah suppressed all political dissent, so the only organization ready to take command was the religious hierarchy.
Nothing will change until we stop propping up the regional dictatorships. All this talk of "democracy" is just political pablum for US consumption.
It is about oil, it was always about oil, and will continue to be about oil.
Posted by: rdf | August 31, 2006 at 10:48 AM
"And as for 'pro-American Arab liberals,' those don’t even exist."
Actually, I can think of dozens of such kindred souls, ironically enough in Iraq. This has, to me, always been the supreme irony of the moveon.org and Michael Moore elements of the newer Left -- they don't seem to get that the sorts of Iraqis most disposed to their own brand of politics (the trade unionists, socialists, human rights advocates, feminists, et al) are those elements in Iraq, especially amongst the Kurds, who most championed the U.S. invasion.
They continue to flock to the nascent Iraqi military for idealistic reasons and could form the middle class basis of a civil society, if the war turns out well enough (which it might not).
"What we need, then, is a coherent policy toward political Islam."
Here, I think Shadi is being a tad bit coy because Shadi realizes that there's hardly a coherent body of thought inherent to "political Islam."
Now, I have many well-meaning friends in Iran and Iraq who will argue that the Qum revolution was necessary because only through a politicized Islam could Tehran transform into a fully modernized nation.
The problem, of course, is that the mullahs at some point realize that full modernizing means an end to their power, and they hardly become the ushering agent at that point toward change. Rather than the transformative, albeit transitory, agents, they become stalwart opponents to modernity.
If you were to sit down with Sistani in Najaf or Karbala, he likely would feign any vigorous interest in politics, and he might be honest. But he might also suggest, as my friends in Iran would say, identity theo-politics shall prove the only bridge to his country's peaceful co-existence with Iran and globalism.
Rather than find sort of accomodation with "political Islam" as some sort of platonic form, perhaps we should reach understandings with variously unique Islamist movements, picking and choosing amongst them.
This, of course, would prove poisonous to the very movements and leaders we "endorsed," at least as we have wielded our policy tools lately.
Want to delegitimize a "friend" of the U.S. in the Arab realm now? Say he's your "friend."
This, likely, won't change anytime soon. Perhaps not even for a generation or more, if Richard Clarke, Rand Beers, et al, are to be believed.
If the "progressives" can come up with some sort of policy menu different from fey Lamontism, then bully for you. I fear that even your best efforts will be compromised by the growing isolationism of your base.
But we'll see.
Posted by: SoldierInIraq | August 31, 2006 at 11:00 AM
rdf, if "the US prefers to deal with strong, non-democratic leaders in the oil states" then why did we take out Saddam and try to install a democracy in its place?
"It is easier to negotiate long term deals, and there is no risk of sudden expropriation as is now happening in Latin America." You evidently don't know the history of the State Owned Oil Companies in the Middle East, who are all based on expropriated private oil companies. And the US doesn't negotiate long term deals on oil or anything besides trade and arms sales. Everything else is done by the private sector.
Lastly, if you think "Without the support of the west the oligopolies in Saudi Arabia, Syria, etc. would collapse" you evidently don't know very much about the US, and Western generally, relationship with Syria--or how much oil they have.
Posted by: libertarian soldier | September 01, 2006 at 12:58 AM
'"And as for 'pro-American Arab liberals,' those don’t even exist."'
'Actually, I can think of dozens of such kindred souls, ironically enough in Iraq. . . . especially amongst the Kurds . . .'
Kurds aren't Arabs.
Posted by: David Tomlin | September 01, 2006 at 06:19 AM
You're right, Kurds aren't Arabs, although they're culturally influenced by Arabs or, as it happens, they live in Baghdad, which is one of Iraq's largest Kurdish cities simply because so many live there.
Are the Kurds in Baghdad, or Mosul, "Arab" or "Kurd" depends a lot on the time of the day you ask the question. Mostly, they're Kurdish, most often linguistically.
But not always even that.
I should have been a tad bit more careful with my wording nevertheless and said, 'A great many peoples in greater Iraq are quite liberal, and many of them live amongst the Kurds, although they're not solely Kurds. They include trade unionists, dissidents, journalists and others one would assume would appeal to similiarly minded souls in the West, but this is not always so.'
Posted by: SoldierInIRaq | September 01, 2006 at 10:32 AM
There are certain things in life related to smoking that simply cannot :)
parça kontör
parça kontör bayiliği
parça kontör bayilik
Posted by: kamil | December 19, 2008 at 12:45 PM
I am so happy to earn some angels gold. In fact at first sight I have fallen in love with angels online gold. So no matter how much I have spent to buy angels gold, I never regret. My life changes because of cheap angels online gold.
Posted by: cheap angels online gold | December 24, 2008 at 09:52 PM
I am so happy to get some Tales Of Pirates gold and the Tales Of Pirates money is given by my close friend who tells me that the cheap Tales Of Pirates gold is the basis to enter into the game.
Therefore, I should buy Tales Of Pirates Gold with the spare money.
Posted by: buy Tales Of Pirates Gold | January 06, 2009 at 08:47 PM
I hope i can get rf online gold in low price.
i buy rf money for you.
Posted by: rf gold | January 19, 2009 at 09:04 PM
Once I played 12sky, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have twelve sky Gold. He gave me some 12sky gold.
Posted by: 12sky gold | February 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM
Do you know the FFXI Gil, in here you can get the FFXI gold.
Posted by: FFXI gold | March 03, 2009 at 11:42 PM
you must borrow flyff gold from friends, or you buy flyff penya.
Posted by: buy flyff penya | March 20, 2009 at 12:38 AM
am so happy to earn some angels gold.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton handbag | April 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM
you must borrow flyff gold from friends, or you buy flyff penya.
Posted by: buy flyff penya | March 20, 2009 at 12:38 AM
Posted by: replica Bvlgari Bracelets | April 27, 2009 at 02:42 AM
I am so with you,rolex watch
luxury watch
Posted by: luxury watches | June 05, 2009 at 07:06 AM
Newspapers by China printing is very good quality and good prices.
Plastic products made by plastic injection molding services with low costs and supeior quality
Shoring scaffolding for construction is a very useful tool.
Posted by: injection moulding | June 17, 2009 at 03:47 AM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 26, 2010 at 09:50 PM
The FRANCK MULLER Watch Santa FRANCK MULLER Watch Monica-based
Posted by: bvlgari watches | February 26, 2010 at 09:14 PM
Good recommended website.
Posted by: some watches | March 06, 2010 at 03:47 AM
That's awesome! I can't wait to get into it.
Posted by: gucci watches | March 06, 2010 at 03:54 AM
GHD IV mini styler has a safety feature that gives you peace of mind, by turning itself off if it is left unattended for 30 minutes. The unique digital technology of GHD hair straightener means that the temperature is automatically controlled even quicker for even better styling.
Creating tight curls, flicks and waves as well as the perfect straight. The ideal styling tool for urban angels with short hair, men's hair and fringes.
price includes: ghd IV salon styler,ghd purple roll bag.
product features:
Auto sleep mode(A built in safety feature that gives you peace of mind by turning off if the ghd IV styler is left unallended for 30 minutes.)
Universal voltage(So that you can use your styler in any country without an adaptor.)
Advanced ceramic heaters(The ultimate heating technology for the ultimate shine and style creation.)
All our products are cheap,if you want to find cheap ghd,come here and that is right.
If you want to find GHD hair products,you can write GHD straightener,GHD hair straighteners,GHD straightners,GHD hair,straighteners GHD in google browse.
Posted by: ghd | April 15, 2010 at 03:16 AM
Chanel Handbags are woman’s dream come true.
Chanel, a fashion name that has become synonymous with femininity since 100 years, is on the must-have list of every fashion-conscious woman.? And we bring these must-have Chanel Handbags at never before discounts, just for you.
It is only when you come across an Chanel New Arrivals, do you realize the power of her words.? Chanel handbags are crafted not just to be trendy, but trend-setting.? Hardly has lived a celebrity who has not been seen carrying a Chanel handbag under her arm; such has the influence of Chanel handbags as a fashion statement.
Chanel handbags have been so popular in the elite classes of the society, that their pricing is usually prohibitive for everyone else.? Discount Chanel handbags are really difficult to come across, but today should be your lucky day.? We bring you a superb unbeatable range of Chanel Flap bags, all at fantastic discounts.? With us, you have an incredible chance to buy your favorite Chanel handbags at rock bottom prices!
Chanel Handbags have always been at the forefront of luxury and style.? The Chanel classic quilted leather handbags and its reinventions have ruled fashion since forever.? Chanel handbags have remained extremely popular as they continue to merge evolving modern trends with the class and simplicity of its original avatar.
An Chanel 2008 Collection and Chanel 2009 Collection single handedly enhances the look you are carrying.? The reason you would buy a Chanel handbag is own a bag that mingles with your charm and intensifies it with its inherent simplicity.? If you have owned an authentic Chanel handbag before, you know what we are talking about.? If you are one of the unlucky people who haven’t yet gotten a chance to own an Chanel Cambon, now is your chance to shop for an authentic Chanel handbag and discover its ability to transform your look completely.
Buy Chanel handbags with us, and get fabulous discounts which you will never get at your favorite store.? We offer cheap authentic Chanel handbags and they are all up for grabs!
Posted by: chanel handbags | April 15, 2010 at 09:41 PM
Mysterious black bezel and case, case materials for cement and steel production hasLouis Vuitton been the industry standard TEXIN belt do? 985U black rubber information, and the price and spraying mosaics, showing a high hardnessLouis Vuitton steel lesson material, with a special texture satin. Rubber surface show the appearance of fine lines beautifully, from the electro-corrosion to form the inner mold carved.
Posted by: Louis Vuitton | May 14, 2010 at 04:06 AM
If you like your Raymond Weil Replica big,bold,and durable,then the new GA100 line of G-Shocks will make your day.Available in white,yellow,and black,you get the "basic" G-Shock feature set in a new,larger case for a list price of only $99:Water resistant to 200m (660ft).Resin case,mineral crystal.Anti-magnetic case structure.Servo controlled hour and minute hands with 4-LCD digital displays.1/1000th of a second stop Panerai Replica Watches with unique "Speed" dial (tachometer).48 city world time,stop Cartier Replica Watches,countdown timer,five alarms.Casio module 5081 (PDF) with a 2 year battery life.LED dial illumination,automatic or manual with adjustable time duration.51mm across by 17mm thick,65g,22mm strap.(A bit larger than most G-Shocks,but quite light in weight.)Please read on for the rest of the review and pictures.Casio has been introducing bolder colors of late,and the X-Large series (as the GA100s are known) continues the trend.Look at the closeup here and notice that the hands and markers are actually purple! IWC Replica Watches not something that jumps out on the wrist,but you can see it up close.The white of the case and dial is bright and polished,yielding stormtrooper jokes from my friends.This is not a Omgea Replica Watches that goes unnoticed! The white does,however,look great on a tanned arm and is a very inexpensive way to make a statement.At $99,the GA-100 line is less expensive than many G-Shocks,and I'd be hard pressed to find any others for that price that included the more complex analog-digital functionality.Obviously missing are solar power and atomic timekeeping (radio setting),though for the price,I'm still impressed.Case construction is that of most G-Shocks: resin case,screwed stainless steel caseback,inset crosshatched buttons,integral raised bezel.The strap is an integrated,dual-tang thorn buckle,and is quite comfortable.One new feature on the GA-100s is the "speed" dial at 12 o'clock.You set a distance,then use the stop Breitling Replica Watches to measure times.Once you've done so,the dial indicates speed.Basically a tachometer,though digital and on a subdial instead of the bezel as normally seen.Might be useful for racing fans,coaches and the like.Also of note is the fact that the stop Breguet Replica Watches is unusual,measuring the ludicrously precise 1/1000th of a second up to 100 hours.Given human reflexes,I'm dubious as to how much of that precision is useful,but Jaeger LeCoultre Replica certainly quite cool and not commonly seen.On the wrist,the GA-100 is very comfortable.The light weight is spread across a larger area,reducing the already-light weight.The hands are easy to read at a glance,though the LCD panels are a bit more reflective than I'd like and take a bit more effort to read.Two overall comments: First,it's a G-Shock,meaning that functionally,it's impeccable.Bulletproof,inexpensive,functional,and reliable.Secondly,the size and bold colors will either appeal to your,or they won't,so make your decision based on whether you like it or not.At $99,it's an easy Gucci Replica Watchesh to recommend.Our thanks to Casio PR for the review unit.By Paul Hubbard; For updates on content,follow Concord Replica Watches Report on Twitter.
Posted by: watches | July 29, 2010 at 05:04 AM
nothing from this promises are done yet is this is democracy ?
Posted by: فيس بوك | October 03, 2010 at 04:36 PM
I love it,Excellent article.I am decide to put this into use one of these days.Thank you for sharing this.To Your Success!
Posted by: China Tent | October 11, 2010 at 08:41 AM
thanks for sharing chatmany people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch.zurnaPerhaps when you went to some place far away chattrou must borrow it from friends sohbetyou can get everything you want in this game
Posted by: laklak | December 29, 2010 at 06:31 PM
thanks for sharing Sohbet many people are pay more attention to one's swearing than before, especially a watch.Chat.
Perhaps when you went to some place far away Sohbet you must borrow it from friends you can get everything you want in this game Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at Chat
the surface of the watches viaload great any cool Exsohbet from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there Egitim Fourth, there were various signs of political conflict among shia. If they split 3 ways or 4 ways, the sunnis and the kurds could often be the Sohbet swing votes in the politics. If they felt they had political clout out of proportion to their numbers, they could settle in Sohbet and do politics and not feel oppressed.
Posted by: Egitim | January 13, 2011 at 04:53 AM
I am totally agree with your oppinion.this blog post is very encouraging to people who want to know these topics.
Posted by: China Inflatable | July 13, 2011 at 12:17 AM
This is a topic for another time, but suffice it to say that there is a (for now, low-intensity) internal struggle within mainstream Islamism.
Posted by: magic bullet | August 21, 2011 at 09:51 AM