Democracy Arsenal

« North Korea busted: Iraq hopeful? | Main | Hamdan and the Burden of Democratic Freedom »

June 29, 2006

Scrowcroft’s Ghost Continues to Haunt the Hallways of the State Department
Posted by Shadi Hamid

I remember the last time I was in Cairo in May 2005. There was, then, a sense that things were finally moving forward. Hope – that most rare of luxuries – was making a comeback (albeit a modest one). Today, the level of repression is getting pretty bad, as I wrote on Tuesday. And, of course, the State Department can be counted on for making things even worse.

No one in the press seemed to care much about the congressional debate on US aid to Egypt which took place earlier this month, so, for posterity’s sake, let me bring to your attention a few things which capture, quite convincingly I think, the veritable death of the Bush administration’s efforts to democratize the Middle East. If you really care about democracy, I suggest you take a deep breath before you read how our venerable officials at the State Department - perhaps under the spell of the Scrowcroftian spirit which continues to haunt the writhing hallways of the Harry S. Truman Building (and especially the 7th floor) – made a mockery of our country's founding ideals. What the heck is Condoleezza doing?

On June 9th, Congress debated Egypt’s aid package. Unfortunately (but not surprisingly), an amendment which would have reduced US aid to Egypt by $100 million was defeated in a close 225-198 vote. Well, I'm sure you're wondering where the Bush administration stood? This, according to a rather interesting article in al-Ahram Weekly, before congress voted: “The Bush administration has called on Congress to keep annual aid to Egypt of nearly $2 billion dollars intact for the next fiscal year, arguing that America's strategic interests will be harmed if aid to the Egyptian government is cut.”

Then you had one mess of a May 17th congressional hearing on the question of US aid to Egypt. Here, the position of the State Department representatives couldn't have been more clear. You had stalwart realists like Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs David Welch, who never for one second cared about Bush’s “vision” for “ending tyranny,” insisting, impassionedly it seems from the transcript, for the maintenance of the status quo:

Our strategic partnership with Egypt is a cornerstone of US policy in the region. We share a vision of a Middle East that is at peace and free of terror.

Who cares about ideals when you’ve got interests? (I guess he forgot that nothing causes terrorism like tyranny). Then, Michael Coulter, a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, pointed out that military aid to the Egyptian regime helps guarantee “a defense force capable of supporting US security.” I guess Coulter forgot to mention that Egypt also plays a valuable role in torturing the terrorism suspects that we ship over to them, as part of our extraordinary renditions program. Well, priorities are priorities.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c04d69e200d83465156f69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Scrowcroft’s Ghost Continues to Haunt the Hallways of the State Department:

» Rice aims to bolster Afghan leader from Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice vowed victory over a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan during a v [Read More]

» Ghost from Ghost
In order to effectively run Java on this limited device, much of the VMs activity is off loaded to a server. It is often ... [Read More]

Comments

I saw the name David Welch and my interest was peaked; wasn't he the US consul in Cairo until very recently? I didn't realize he'd gotten a title bump.

Aside from the torture, democracy itself has failed to take off in Egypt; Ayman Nour is still in jail and that's scared anyone else interested in opposition politics off into the bushes. This was a good post.

No one has yet explained to me why making Egyptian elections slightly less fraudulent or letting some Muslim Brotherhood types out of jail was the most important thing we had to discuss with a government that has for three years led the Arab League in opposing any effectual steps to end the genocide being conducted under the auspices of its fellow Arab government in Khartoum.

It never fails; when liberals crticize the Bush administration on things like this it's never for being impractical or unrealistic, and absolutely never for failing to recognize that there are some things on this earth worse than a lack of democracy. It always for being insincere and not idealistic enough.

Who cares about ideals when you’ve got interests?

Oh my God! Imagine...a country like the US pursuing its interests. What depravity is next? What would the founders think?!

Shadi, I've said it before, I'll say it again. Interests are to politics what location is to real estate. I can hardly wait until Egypt is a beacon of democracy able to project its will on neighboring countries. The best thing the Middle East can do for its governance is mirror the UAE model of independent, loosely confederated city states... يعني دول الدويلات.

However, no resources means no food, no production, and no independence from foreign influence. If the Arab states really want to pull out of the intellectual/political dark ages one of these countries needs to produce something other than jihadis and bootleg cds which it can then trade for resources...metal...food, anything really.

Countries like Iran and Syria are able to stay independent of American influence because they are self-sufficient. Food first, ideals later.

auto loans california. easy auto loans. government help with auto loans

If you are ready to cope up with this new changing society, you have to keep all sorts of luxury with you. Now a day's possessing a car is status symbol for everyone. You too have such thoughts but financial calamity can drag you from your passionate desire. Moreover if you are having bad credit history in the market then it will be very tedious to get loan amount through lenders. At this stage, no credit check auto loans will play a vital role and can easily put you on financial ease.. To find auto finance loan scalculator, auto loan poor credit visit http://www.advancedautoloan.com

Instant loans and Instant decision loans are the best means of getting fast cash. Instant loans can be availed by all kinds of borrowers like bad credit holders, borrowers who are tenant and cannot afford to provide any security against the loan amount. Instant Decision Loans have been categorized into secured and unsecured forms.All that you have to do is fill up an application online submit it. A borrower can get these loans instantly. if you want to get more information on Instant Approval Bad Credit Loans,Instant Approval Payday Loans log on http://www.instantapprovalloans.co.uk/

This financing carries with it an extremely high short term interest rate or fee percentage. They are typically not granted for more than $500. Many lenders that offer the payday loan require that the balance be paid through direct withdrawal from a borrower's bank account. This gives the lender more security in repayment especially when lending to those that have a bad history of credit repayment. Bad credit will not render a borrower ineligible for repayment as long as employment and bank information are confirmed.

The eyes of the American nation were fixed upon Hempstead, New York, on Wednesday, October 14th, 2008, for the third and final U.S. Presidential Debate. The Democratic candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, of Illinois, went into the debate with an eight point lead, and he was indeed content with it. The Republican candidate, Sen. John McCain brought it hard to his opponent, challenging his expertise, character, judgment and proposed policies. Obama’s position on the economic policies of the last eight years was far more critical than McCain’s, though he maintained that he is “not President Bush.” Both pledged that they would make cuts in the federal budget, McCain pledging to enact an “across the board spending freeze,” and take a hatchet to some programs whilst using a scalpel on others. Obama’s take was to “go through the federal budget page by page, line by line” in order to cut out those programs that are dysfunctional. Both of the candidates pledged to bring the change that America needs, but what does that mean? For instance, many politicians want to do away completely with the payday loans industry. Should they succeed, it will mean the end of the freedom to choose for the consumer, and the triumph of certain interest groups (the banks and credit unions, who have gotten themselves in enough trouble already) over the freedom of we, the American People.
Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back: 1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.com/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/

There are certain things in life related to smoking that simply cannot :)
parça kontör
parça kontör bayiliği
parça kontör bayilik

The comments to this entry are closed.

Emeritus Contributors
Subscribe
Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Email: 
Powered by TypePad

Disclaimer

The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use