Iraq: instead of benchmarks to get out, benchmarks to stay in
Posted by Suzanne Nossel
Instead of benchmarks to get the US out of Iraq, how about benchmarks to determine whether we stay in?
Here's the logic: the Administration persistently maintains that we're making great progress in Iraq. The American people have grave and growing doubts. If, as the daily news would lead one to believe, Iraq is spiraling closer to civil war, then our presence is at best a finger in the dyke. We hold on as long as we can to delay collapse, but meanwhile lose lives and deplete our military, when its just a matter of time before we pull away and the country disintegrates (with, if Bush is lucky, a decent interval in-between).
To decide whether we're better off leaving now, or waiting until some unknown future point when Iraq can stand on its two feet, we need to verify the credibility of the Administration's claim that it is making progress. Condi Rice outlined the Administration's strategy for Iraq a few weeks ago as "clear, hold, build." So how about the Congress giving the Administration 10 weeks, until the end of January, 2006 to demonstrate the following:
- Getting the number of Iraqi military battalions capable of fighting independently of the US up from 1 to 5;
- Per Rice's strategy, identify up front 5 secure areas formerly occupied by insurgents and ensure that, safeguarded by Iraqi rather than US forces (but with American advisers if needed) they stay secure (i.e. no IEDs, no suicide attacks) over the coming 10 weeks;
- Secure commitments of 5000 additional (truly new) foreign troops to be deployed to Iraq in support of the US-led operation (note that the Koreans, within a day of Bush's meeting with Roh, have just announced they're pulling out a third of their troops).
The Government Accountability Office can certify whether these benchmarks are met.
You could argue that these requirements aren't rigorous enough but I would frankly be impressed if the Administration could accomplish all 3 by late January. Coupled with a successful election in December, it might help rebuild confidence in the mission.
If these benchmarks are met, would that not mean that we could start withdrawing US troops, rather than deciding to leave them in? Rest assured: if we ever start seeing solid evidence that Iraq is capable of securing itself and holding its own politically, there won't be a politician or a wonk in America who doesn't favor starting to pull out.
There's no disagreement between Republicans and Democrats when it comes to getting out if sufficient political and military progress can be made. We disagree about whether to stay in given the manifest absence of progress. So let's create some concrete benchmarks that allow us to evaluate whether "mission accomplished" is actually accomplishing anything at this point.


Keeping in mind the larger question -- whether there is or ever was any realistic prospect of achieving the administration's current war aim of a stable and democratic Iraq -- and the fact that congressional Republicans control until at least 2007 any requirements placed on the administration, I would like to suggest a slightly different version of your approach.
Rice, presumably speaking for the administration, said in the Senate testimony you linked to:
"We know what we must do. With our Iraqi allies, we are working to:
* Clear the toughest places – no sanctuaries to the enemy – and to disrupt foreign support for the insurgents.
* We are working to hold and steadily enlarge the secure areas, integrating political and economic outreach with our military operations.
* We are working to build truly national institutions by working with more capable provincial and local authorities. We are challenging them to embody a national compact – not tools of a particular sect or ethnic group. These Iraqi institutions must sustain security forces, bring rule of law, visibly deliver essential services, and offer the Iraqi people hope for a better economic future."
Rather than asking congressional Democrats to propose the benchmarks as you suggest, they could ask that the administration propose and the Congress adopt specific "metrics" to demonstrate during 2006 that these three steps in the administration’s strategy are being accomplished. Faint-hearted congressional Democrats could even insist on leaving out any withdrawal requirement and that all they are interested in is determining whether the administration’s strategy is working.
It is certainly probable that the administration would choose metrics that they believe can be accomplished in 2006, but at the very least it would introduce into the public debate the requirement to actually demonstrate progress rather than simply assert it and the President could no longer simply rely on the vague formulation of standing down when the Iraqis stand up.
For myself, I think our national interest and our soldiers are best served by those citizens and leaders courageous enough to call for beginning now to bring the troops home.
Posted by: Bob Gaines | November 19, 2005 at 01:53 PM
Rest assured: if we ever start seeing solid evidence that Iraq is capable of securing itself and holding its own politically, there won't be a politician or a wonk in America who doesn't favor starting to pull out.
I'm sure the administration would like to "start to pull out" but they're rather adverse to completing the process:
In talks with Rumsfeld, [Adel Abdul Mahdi, Iraq's vice president] said he had made clear he is "not averse" to a permanent base for U.S. troops in Iraq.
Eyes on the prize.
BTW Suzanne, what would you say to allowing the Iraqis a vote in this process? Given the ethnic divide in the country, I can see why this would be problematic, but I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.
Posted by: Cal | November 20, 2005 at 02:13 AM
"Averse" not "adverse." Oh for a preview option...
Posted by: Cal | November 20, 2005 at 02:15 AM
Why the requirement of 5,000 additional troops? It just sounds like political cover. It won't make a demonstrable effect, will it?
If we're just looking to find more friends and get more support, we should just let them know that we are looking for more support and then ask for the kinds of non-military support we need -- aid, political support, military trainers, police trainers, etc. -- so we can get out of there.
Posted by: Andy | November 20, 2005 at 06:15 PM
Maybe the problem is you're beleiving the "daily news"- perhaps you'd be better off listening to the word coming back from the troops actually there who see that they are winning a clear victory.
Your benchmarks are all very well, but they ignore the result of US forces pulling out. What's the point of that if it destroys the freedoms that the Iraqis are working towards now and throws the region into instability?
Posted by: Jay.Mac | November 21, 2005 at 06:04 AM
Good stuff, Suzanne. Rumsfeld's penchant for 'metrics' should make this proposition irresistible. I, like most detractors whose positions have been misrepresented by the administration, am not inclined to support 'cutting and running'... but I am inclined to support leaving if we can not show measurable progress. Thanks for this.
Posted by: no one in particular | November 21, 2005 at 03:29 PM
As I have pointed out in another post, the metrics<\a> already have general acceptance, and they are in fact being collected and disseminated to Congress.
If Democratic congressmen are uninformed, it can only be through their own incompetence.
Posted by: Jeff Younger | November 21, 2005 at 09:23 PM
[Sorry for the mangled link]
As I have pointed out in another post, the metrics already have general acceptance, and they are in fact being collected and disseminated to Congress.
If Democratic congressmen are uninformed, it can only be through their own incompetence.
Posted by: Jeff Younger | November 21, 2005 at 09:27 PM
Jeff Younger, I have to note that the most important metrics mentioned in that report are not available because the security situation etc doesn't let them be collected. That isn't encouraging.
But I do think it's encouraging that suicide bombers don't regularly infiltrate the iraqi military and police. While the data of how often they irregularly do is classified, still it indicates there is some sort of group self-preservation going on among those units.
Posted by: J Thomas | November 21, 2005 at 11:58 PM
- i've done a 180 concerning benchmarks regarding the iraq fiasco. 2 months ago i posted on this site exactly that: set metrics and when accomplished, get out. however, i think our chance to enforce reasonable metrics is not only past (the WH will use its own inexorable timeframe: 2006 mid terms), but i now question the basic, ‘everyone-knows’ assumptions that led me to argue staying in iraq to clean up george the younger’s mess. the December issue of The Atlantic, in addition to publishing another fine Fallows piece, also ran an article by Nir Rosen., who basically puts paid to almost every reason to stay in iraq.
know what? i tend to agree with his assertions…
Posted by: doc | November 22, 2005 at 10:20 AM
640-863
Posted by: AD | November 21, 2008 at 08:38 PM
I once have a lot of goonzu money in the game and i will go to buy goonzu gold to add my stock. I like the game very much and i like to earn the goonzu online gold with my friends together. I want to join the cheap goonzu gold and i can get a lot of equipment to arm myself. I like the game very much come on to join us!
Posted by: goonzu gold | December 24, 2008 at 08:44 PM
I hope i can get kamas in low price.
Ibuy dofus kamas for you.
dofus gold is present for you.
Do you like cheap kamas?
Posted by: dofus kamas | January 06, 2009 at 08:19 PM
When I have Archlord gold, I feel very pleased with life no one can understand you, but here you will find fun. When I have Archlord money, I experienced that feeling, that very warm feeling.
Posted by: Archlord gold | January 19, 2009 at 10:32 PM
In fact, the
runescape money is expensive. I usually find
cheap rs gold from the supplier.
Posted by: jina | March 03, 2009 at 08:30 PM
Once I played Anarchy, I did not know how to get strong, someone told me that you must have Anarchy credits. He gave me some Anarchy Online credits,
Posted by: Anarchy Online credits | March 20, 2009 at 02:47 AM
If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account,
Posted by: Louis Vuitton replica handbag | April 21, 2009 at 03:04 AM
THis is a good example of knitting rotary encoder in real industrial products.
THis is a good example of ultrasonic sensor
Or ultrasonic transmitter in real industrial products.
Posted by: aol | May 08, 2009 at 11:44 AM
CHEAP rs gold
MY lotro gold
CHEAPEST aion gold
Posted by: ghghg | July 03, 2009 at 10:59 PM
Thank you for your sharing.! seslichat seslisohbet
Posted by: muhtar | January 11, 2010 at 03:11 PM
Thank you for your sharing! I like i very much!
Posted by: cheap coach handbags | January 26, 2010 at 09:17 PM
Time is money, and many people pay their debts with it.Do you like the ugg boots?
Posted by: Ugg Classic Short | July 04, 2010 at 09:13 PM
cool electronic gadgets cool usb gadgets cool computer gadgets spy kids gadgets cell phone signal jammer Wireless Spy Gadgets Wireless Handheld Baby Monitor Walkie Talkie cool computer keyboard usb fans for laptops water glow led faucet light car air purifier ionizer Humanoid Light Control Lamp wooden alarm clock Portable Watch MP3 Player MP4 Digital Watch player wireless digital picture frame LED Digital Wrist Watch Portable Digital E-book Reader antique cigarette lighters LED Light Laser Pointer Digital Video Glasses Vertu Ascent Replica wrist watch mobile phone Cool Bluetooth Bracelet
Posted by: cool electronic gadgets | July 26, 2010 at 03:21 AM
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed resading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Posted by: Indonesian teak furniture: Indoor and teak garden | November 07, 2010 at 08:10 PM
As long as we can to get out benchmarks.
Posted by: seo-vancouver | December 13, 2010 at 03:33 AM
thanks for sharing Sohbet many people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch. Chat .
Perhaps when you went to some place far away Chat you must borrow it from friends Sohbet you can get everything you want in this game
Chat money to invest in other industry which will return you good profit. Sohbet when you look at the surface of the watches
Egitim from the city you live in and thought you knew nobody there exsohbet
Posted by: chat | December 17, 2010 at 02:27 PM
Fine information, many thanks to the author. It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and best of luck!
Posted by: neosporin lip treatment | December 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM
Fine information, many thanks to the author. It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and best of luck!
Posted by: green dress shirt | December 28, 2010 at 04:10 AM
Excellent post I must say.. Simple but yet interesting and engaging.. Keep up the good work!
Posted by: yellow dress shirt | December 28, 2010 at 10:06 AM
thanks for sharing chatmany people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before, especially a watch.zurnaPerhaps when you went to some place far away chattrou must borrow it from friends sohbetyou can get everything you want in this game
Posted by: laklak | December 29, 2010 at 06:09 PM
Fine information, many thanks to the author. It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and best of luck!
Posted by: tennis coach singapore | January 02, 2011 at 08:38 AM
Fine information, many thanks to the author. It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and best of luck!
Posted by: dating agency | January 05, 2011 at 08:00 PM
thanks for sharing ayna many people are pay more attention to one's wearing than before
Posted by: ayna | January 30, 2011 at 07:36 AM
Whether you include or not but this is really fun to read :) I agree all your statements are correct and simple but just because of back link people destroy whole purpose of commenting.
Posted by: chevrolet turbo | January 31, 2011 at 11:32 AM
vert good
Posted by: kaprisli | March 08, 2011 at 08:31 PM
good
Posted by: kaprisli | March 08, 2011 at 08:31 PM
ankara trabzon
Posted by: kaprisli | March 08, 2011 at 08:32 PM
güzel insan hoşçakal
Posted by: kaprisli | March 08, 2011 at 08:33 PM
It is puzzling to me now, but in general, the usefulness and importance is overwhelming. Very much thanks again and best of luck!
Posted by: casino en ligne | March 17, 2011 at 01:05 PM
en güzel porn videoları,
en muhteşem sex izleme sitesi
en kral porno izleme yeri
kaliteli pornoların bulunduğu tek mekan
yabancı sitelerden özenle seçilmiş muhteşem ötesi porn sitesi...
Posted by: rokettube | March 22, 2011 at 04:10 PM
I tried subscribing to kbcafe and it said there were no results. Not that I have the most popular blog in the world, but the other engines return plenty of current results.
Posted by: penny auction | March 26, 2011 at 06:22 AM
The particular runs in power you could see you can which means appealing together with purchase all the aberrant associate about adroitness that may experience an appropriate accurateness together with ancestors or possibly contacts. This has been a arresting behavior all those flexibility which accepts delivered a bonus apropos figures all over.
Posted by: Dallas Plumbing | April 27, 2011 at 02:28 PM
I think now we can all agree that the war on terror is over and we can move on in life terrorist are like a body with out the head.
Posted by: Anne Klein Watches | May 05, 2011 at 03:34 PM
I would like to say thanks for the time you took compiling this article. You’ve enlightening for me. I have forwarded this to a friend of mine.
Posted by: pandora australia | May 17, 2011 at 05:05 AM
I visited this page first time and found it Very Good Job of acknowledgment and a marvelous source of info.........Thanks Admin!
Posted by: Best Phone Lookup | June 06, 2011 at 08:19 AM
That's some great feedback based on real experience. I like the idea of concatenating the strings and will likely change Rmail to do the same.
Posted by: Atkins Diet | June 08, 2011 at 09:26 AM
great post keep up the good work
Posted by: Singapore Dating | September 05, 2011 at 09:39 AM
olmasa mektubun
Posted by: ankara nakliyat | October 13, 2011 at 11:34 AM
yazdıkların olmasa kim inanır senle ayrıldıgımıza
Posted by: ankara nakliyat | October 13, 2011 at 11:35 AM
kim inanır senle ayrıldıgımıza
Posted by: ankara nakliyat | October 13, 2011 at 11:37 AM
You know, as much as I hate #20, it made me realize something. I’ve never really understood the emotional reaction that other people have to memories of events like Pearl Harbor or the Vietnam war, because I wasn’t there and it didn’t affect me. Now I do. 911 is my Pearl Harbor. Thank you for making me think!
Posted by: Dublin restaurant deals | November 09, 2011 at 08:55 AM
Most of these are awesome… but why would you even post #20. Didn’t we learn something from the fake
Posted by: public background check | November 23, 2011 at 02:16 AM