Democracy Arsenal

« The Era of Extortion Politics | Main | The Best and Worst Foreign Policy Presidents UPDATED »

August 03, 2011

On Rhetoric and Regime Change: This Is How I End Up Sucked In
Posted by Eric Martin


A recent piece by Micah Zenko highlights an aspect of the interplay between rhetoric and regime change that I want to offer a general comment on. First, the relevant excerpt:

On July 11, when asked about Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton answered: “From our perspective, he has lost legitimacy, he has failed to deliver on the promises he’s made,” adding that “we would like to see even more countries speaking out as forcefully as we have.”

Proponents of a low-cost regime change in Damascus seized upon Clinton’s use of the phrase “lost legitimacy” to press the case for the Obama administration to see through Assad’s removal. The Washington Post editorial board, in a piece titled “The U.S. has Gotten Tough with Syria; Now it Needs to Get Tougher,” noted that it was “good that the Obama administration has finally spoken that truth” but that “now it must act on its words.” [emphasis added]

As Blake Hounshell chronicles, in an article praising the Obama administration's more "cautious" approach, the calls for more forceful action have only grown louder since:

The latest example is Elliot Abrams, a former official in the administations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, who rips Washington's response to the uprising as "slow and unsteady" in Tuesday's Wall Street Journal. Danielle Pletka, in an overheated blog post Monday, argues that "finding ways to support the Syrian opposition, further isolate regime forces, cordon off Syria from the rest of the world, and begin the process of standing for freedom" in Syria is a "no brainer."

One of the problems with these entreaties is that, even if the Obama administration acted on them in earnest, they would still likely fall short of the desired goal - regime change.  As with the no-fly-zone imposed over Libya (a military operation that, thus far, exceeds what most are calling for in Syria), if these limited measures fail to bring about regime change, the Obama team would be confronted with the inevitable question: what next?

The options would be no more appealing than they are with respect to the stalled Libya campaign (boots on the ground? large scale arming of rebel factions?).  But that wouldn't silence the critics, or bring to a halt the impassioned pleas for greater US involvement, including the more robust use of military force.

This pattern of rhetorical escalation in response to the practical limitations of bringing about regime change from afar is a familiar dance, most deftly performed by those nclined to advocate for more and bigger US interventions abroad.  It can be mastered in five easy steps:

Step 1: How can the President not at least condemn [Regime X] publicly for its abhorrent actions?  A public condemnation is the very least the President can do.  It wouldn't cost much, but it would be an important show of our resolve and support for freedom!

Step 2 (with Regime X still in place): So what, the President condemned the regime publicly with some harsh words and called it "illegitimate."  Words are cheap and inconsequential.  We need sanctions and coordinated efforts to isolate the regime. That will do the trick!

Step 3 (with Regime X still in place): Sanctions? Regime isolation? Is that all the President is going to do in the face of Regime X's perfidy?  Those timid jabs will never work, and the President's dithering will make us look weak and lacking in resolve. Our enemies will be emboldened.  The President must use our military to deal a swift blow.  No one is advocating a prolonged occupation, just a decapitation maneuver, and then a rapid hand off to the indigenous forces for democratic change.

Step 4 (with Regime X toppled by our military):  Now that we've committed our military, and brought about regime change, we have a moral obligation to see the mission through to the end.  Besides, if we withdraw, chaos will erupt and our enemies will fill the vacuum.  We owe it to the locals, we can't afford to lose face, we can't show weakness and our credibility depends on staying until a relatively stable, friendly nation emerges from the rubble. 

Step 5 (repeat as needed): We've turned the corner, shifted the momentum and victory is within reach.  The next six months should prove decisive.


Step 6: I was critical of the handling of this military action from the beginning. I would have conducted the operation differently.  Regardless, no one ever said it would be quick or easy. But the difficulties encountered don't discredit the policy!*

(Photo credit: AP)

*As suggested/authored by Matt Duss and Micah Zenko


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference On Rhetoric and Regime Change: This Is How I End Up Sucked In:


Wow. This is crazy.By the way, this theme is very easy to read. Thank you.

Wow, you might say that the technology is very good! Photo, so beautiful, very clear, wish you good luck, create the future together! And I share my blog

Thank you for your article! I have been looking through your blog for a while, and now of course I like it. In fact, I have some questions, but your article. Do you think it will be sure I'm with you further to?Perhaps set up a chat via e-mail or even instant messangingapplication? If not, thank you, anyway, I will continue to read and comment

Careful when buying these shoes. They may look like they are built for winter weather, but most are only built for cold, NOT FOR WET. Whether it's snow, or slush, or rain - your feet will get wet and cold with most of their styles. Not exactly what you are looking for in winter foot ware.

Wow. This is crazy.By the way, this theme is very easy to read. Thank you.

If possible, as you become expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more details? It is highly helpful for me. Big thumb up for this blog post!

It's funny how we adopt words and adapt our lexicon to the times. This is a very useful slant on things.

Very comfortable and funky. I love wearing it with matching blouses or accessories, I got the raspberry colored ones which look very cute. They are very comfortable and good shoes for everyday.

The “roles and missions” review going on at Defense right now is set to address this

Really such an good blog,I like the stuff here in your blog,and it's worth reading again.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use