Democracy Arsenal

« Kinder/Gentler . . . One More Time | Main | What would it take to nip al-Qaeda in the bud? »

April 19, 2010

The Structural Hopelessness of US Policy Toward the Middle East
Posted by Shadi Hamid

Daniel Larison has made one of the strongest arguments I’ve seen for the structural hopelessness of US policy toward the Middle East. In response to my piece calling on Obama to focus more on democracy promotion, he writes

Were allied Arab states to become much more democratic, their governments would be obliged to pay more attention to the grievances Greg [Scoblete] mentions, and that would make the divergence of perceived interests between our governments difficult to paper over…Washington is not very used to having many allies that pursue independent foreign policies, and it does not respond well to allies that resist or criticize U.S. policies(...)

It might be possible for Washington to adjust to a world with many democratized Arab states that distance themselves from the United States in some ways, but more likely we would have to endure years of acrimonious domestic debate and recriminations over “who lost Oman.” Our politicians would try to outdo one another with promises to restore American “credibility” in the region, and the government would probably back the occasional coup against Islamist or populist Arab leaders.”

It is certainly possible that policymakers would be this myopic. One hopes we’re capable of some introspection – and, God forbid – change. I think that’s why we need to make the case, in very clear terms, that democracy promotion is, contrary to perceptions, in America's national security interest (I’ve made this argument here, here, and here). Continuing our unqualified support of dictators, on the other hand, is not, because it perpetuates what nearly everyone agrees is an untenable status quo - unless, that is, you’re willing to believe that autocracy can be made permanent.

That said, having, and propping, “stable” dictators in power is the path of least resistance, in part, because it's been our policy for so long. Change, particularly when it requires bureaucratic recalibration, is painful. It would require a strategic vision, along with a boldness, creativity, and imagination that have thus far been lacking from the Obama administration. It would also take a certain tolerance for risk; newly-elected governments, as Larison points out, would do things we'd disagree with. 

But I think Larison overstates the U.S. fear of states pursuing what he calls “independent foreign policies,” especially since there are already two Middle Eastern countries that actively and unapologetically do just that – Turkey and Qatar. They also happen to be close American allies. I’d be comfortable making the argument that, despite their hobnobbing with Iran and sympathy toward Hamas, both countries are more effective American allies than, say, Egypt and Jordan, precisely because their foreign policy conduct is perceived to be more independent and in line with popular Arab sentiment. Turkey and Qatar are credible actors where their Egyptian and Jordanian counterparts are not. In other words, it is possible to envision a new Middle East, one with democratically-elected governments which, because they enjoy popular consent, are more effective on the regional and international stage.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Structural Hopelessness of US Policy Toward the Middle East:


On this mater I would like to say revolutionaries need revolutions. Additionally, democracy is an evolutionary process, because of that terrorism won't be sated by elections.

There was a time, not that long ago, when, for the horological Christian Louboutin Boots at least, the words fashion and watch were mutually christian louboutin. However, attitudes have changed, consumers are more educated and if they are prepared to pay a few thousand euros for a bespoke suit with hand-stitched buttonholes and a canvas interlining and purchase a crocodile Christian Louboutin Pumps, then they are not going to be satisfied with a cynical piece of battery-powered brand extension. Gildo Zegna of the eponymous men's apparel brand, explains what prompted him to work on a watch with Gino Macaluso, proprietor of Girard Christian Louboutin Sandals.

In front of the entire world on a live webcast, Nike and ten time NBA All-Star and current MVP, Kobe Bryant unveiled the Nike Zoom Kobe IV.The shoe is Nike’s lightest basketball shoe ever weighing only 11.6 ounces, about 10% lighter than the Nike Hyperdunk.

As the game of basketball evolves, so too does the required equipment and footwear. For his fourth signature shoe with Nike, Kobe worked with Eric Avar, Nike’s Creative Director of Performance Footwear, to create a lowcut shoe even lighter than the revolutionary Nike Hyperdunk.

I was read this article It is useful for me.canvas interlining and purchase a crocodile Christian Louboutin Pump, then they are not going to be satisfie

There are many possible reasons for this. Serwer is smart to cite the politicization of terrorism, which so far has made it extremely difficult for administration to do some of the things it had promised. The GOP in particular seems perfectly happy to block the WH's efforts to close Guantanamo, despite the effect such a move would have on "stanch[ing] the flow of new recruits into a terrorist organization." Another thing to remember is that turning around the negative perceptions of the U.S. that can fuel terrorism rests on policy outcomes that take time to achieve. Withdrawal from Iraq is happening, but slowly. Progress toward Middle East peace has stalled. Resolving these challenges will go a long way toward undercutting the message of extremist groups like Al Qaeda, but it won't happen overnight.

Coach outlet store offer coach handbags and coach purses are sold at best price.

Our online-store rings are all very beautiful, and theylinks of london jewellery have attracted a lot of customers to order items from there. No matter which rings you choose to purchase, we guarantee that they will satisfy your needs as youlinks of london wish. If you don't believe us, try it and get convinced.

Maybe it’s just a joke for links of london you, but this is real story. You may not believe that such thing can happen, but it really happened.
Links of London can never slip out of links of london jewellery your eyes and mind whenever you want to buy jewelries, and till now it is also your best choice.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Sign-up to receive a weekly digest of the latest posts from Democracy Arsenal.
Powered by TypePad


The opinions voiced on Democracy Arsenal are those of the individual authors and do not represent the views of any other organization or institution with which any author may be affiliated.
Read Terms of Use