Afghanistan Withdawal Timeline Watch - UPDATED
Posted by Michael Cohen
So remember when President Obama said we could have 30,000 American troops in Afghanistan by the by "the first part of 2010 -- the fastest pace possible -- so that they can target the insurgency and secure key population centers." Well not so fast:
The reinforcements begin arriving next week, and the bulk of the troops are scheduled to be in Afghanistan by the end of summer. But it will probably be nine to 11 months before all the troops are in place, Lt. Gen. David Rodriguez said. Military officials had been hinting in recent weeks that the escalation might take slightly longer than the summer goal, suggesting the administration's announcement of such a rapid escalation might not be entirely firm.
FWIW, late summer is not the first part of 2010, but I quibble. I think we can expect a lot more of these types of stories - you know the ones where the hopes of policymakers comes face-to-face with the difficult logistical and political realities of trying to wage a counter-insurgency in Afghanistan. Now granted it is possible that the US can get 30,000 troops into Afghanistan by the summer, but combine this news with the furious backtracking done by Administration officials in the days after the President's speech about that June 2011 withdrawal timeline and I think we have a pretty clear sense of what direction this policy is going . . . or perhaps I should say which direction American troops won't be heading any time soon: home.
UPDATE:
And now this follow-up from David Ignatius:
I asked Lt Gen. David Rodriquez, the No. 2 US commander here, in a briefing tonight how long the deployment of the extra 30,000 would take. He answered that "it will happen between nine and eleven months," starting in January 2010. Which means that some troops might not arrive until November 2010.
The next month after that, December 2010, is when Obama plans to assess how well the troops are doing -- so he can decide how many to pull out when the withdrawal begins in July 2011. That doesn't give him much time to make good decisions.
Am I the only person who worries that "fuzzy math" is being used here?
Actually David, you're not the only person. And this little factoid in Ignatius's post makes me a wonder a bit more about how the President, with a straight face, said that US troops would be in Afghanistan by the first part of 2010:
U.S. McChrystal's original finishing point for adding 40,000 troop was March 2011. Now it has been "rushed" to November 2010 for 30,000 troops.
If November 2010 is rushed, why was the president talking about the first part of 2010?
At the time there were several elements of the president's speech at West Point that struck me as not completely accurate - the conflation of Pakistan Taliban with Afghan Taliban was perhaps the most obvious example, but there was also the threat inflation in respect to al Qaeda and the misleading notion that Af/Pak is the "epicenter of the violent extremism practiced by al-Qaida" when in fact Afghanistan has lacked an al-Qaida presence since 2002. But now we see that Obama may have been exaggerating how quickly the military could get US troops into the country - a not insignificant fact considering that in the speech he also announced an 18-month timeline for beginning to turn over security responsibility to the Afghan government.